Upload
Login or register
x

Friendly animal right activists

 
Friendly animal right activists. Arent these americans just so tolerant and open minded?. love science They have no intention of stopping. Japan Will Continue T

Arent these americans just so tolerant and open minded?

******** love science
They have no intention of stopping.
Japan Will Continue To Slaughter Whales, Despite
International Ban
We were warned, and now the time has come: Japan is setting sail forthe
resuming their condemned whaling activities after a hiatus...
H Robert
cilia swam the 33 min
cilia swam tha 35 min
Scott Feeback Drop another bomb on them problem solved
cilia were dba 35 min
Benjamin Pewter Time to drop another bomb... to soon?
cilia swam dba 35 min
E Ross Blueshell who has the nukes.
I cilia swam dba 33 min
Clk Gaymen C. Dela Cruz Drop a nuke andthey will stop (ii)
an cilia swam the 33 min
Steve Bowles Maybe we tell them to stop, or else we pull out all
Terry whenthey ...
cilia swam the 40 min
Nicolas Dickheads . Where ya at nuke it
Gills swam thl 39 min
Patrick Webley Send starship and that last time they really
Msp. pissed us offre
Gills swam the 39 min
Dat Ly ******* cunts, deserve few more nukes. Country where all the
********* begin.
cilia swam the as min
I Trevor Ewan We might needto drop another bomb orowo.
cilia swam the as min
Nigel Lavallee bomb?
cilia swam tha 53. min
Caleb Lupo I' always Japanese are bad people.
cilia swam thl 54 min
Kosmin Pom ******* chinks...
cilia swam the .5.. 5. min
lam : some Japan want to be slaughterers guess, they wont stop until
F??, theres nothing left! Bad and cruel people...
l. l, lloll Martyn Finch Slit eyed cunts
15,, cilia swam thl .5.. 5. min
B. Keith Salvage's Suddenley dont feel bad about the end
cilia swam the .5.. 5. min
...
+763
Views: 32131
Favorited: 39
Submitted: 12/01/2015
Share On Facebook
submit to reddit +Favorite Subscribe to enlightednatzie

Comments(260):

Leave a comment Refresh Comments Show GIFs
12345>
[ 260 comments ]
Top Rated Controversial Best Lowest Rated Newest
Anonymous comments allowed.
147 comments displayed.
Reply
+523
#6 - sneakyseahorse (12/01/2015) [-]
Those bastards have had it too good for too long.
Reply
0
#217 to #6 - kingxcvii (12/02/2015) [-]
Can I get a sauce?

Because when I was young I used to play a game called nuke the whales on roblox.(Yes I do know roblox is **** just let me live and be happy mang)
Reply
-31
#122 to #6 - brothan (12/02/2015) [-]
Shouldn't it be nuke the Whalers.
Reply
+110
User avatar #131 to #122 - Javapenguin (12/02/2015) [-]
You see ivan

when nuke whales

japan no longer whaling
becuas no more whale
Reply
-7
#145 to #6 - sedativechunk (12/02/2015) [-]
I guess you can say that's the start of "Whaleout" video game series.
Reply
+5
#165 to #145 - anon (12/02/2015) [-]
kill yourself
Reply
-23
#124 to #60 - anon (12/02/2015) [-]
Reply
+106
User avatar #16 - thanduril (12/01/2015) [-]
I like how Japan is always blamed for whaling, nobody looks at us in Norway
Reply
+6
User avatar #54 to #16 - Norway (12/01/2015) [-]
**** off
Reply
+4
User avatar #156 to #16 - jonball (12/02/2015) [-]
They do, have even been cases where people have been sinking our ships in protest.
Reply
-4
#174 to #156 - tarabostes ONLINE (12/02/2015) [-]
Oh I'd sink your ship
Reply
0
#247 to #204 - tarabostes ONLINE (12/02/2015) [-]
2KAWAII4ME
Reply
0
User avatar #228 to #156 - admiralen ONLINE (12/02/2015) [-]
Sounds logical, "WE WILL MAKE YOU ACCEPT OUR PEACEFUL WAYS WHALERS! WITH VIOLENCE!"
Reply
0
User avatar #212 to #156 - orangelightning (12/02/2015) [-]
Yeah people are throwing a fit over faroe islands whaling aswell
Reply
+5
User avatar #69 to #16 - YippieKiYay (12/02/2015) [-]
As far as I'm aware, Norway isn't legally bound by the IWC's moratorium on commercial whaling because they objected to it; whereas Japan didn't. So Japan can only legally do it for 'scientific research' - but why they'd need to kill them for research is questionable... Meanwhile, they can conveniently then sell the whale meat domestically as a by-product...
Reply
+5
#188 to #16 - chrispthesebbe (12/02/2015) [-]
Norway hunts minke whale. Which has an estimated population in norway around 70k. And norway kills between 1k-1.5k whales each year. It is considered least concerned. ( en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Minke_whale ) Thats why
Reply
0
User avatar #236 to #188 - thanduril (12/02/2015) [-]
I'm not saying we are the badguys, I enjoy whalemeat, had it less than a week ago :p
Reply
0
User avatar #216 to #188 - YippieKiYay (12/02/2015) [-]
Japan is also predominantly targeting minke whales - the two countries are just bound by different laws
Reply
+6
User avatar #168 to #16 - hetzerdk (12/02/2015) [-]
Norwegian Navy Attacks Sea Shepherd Because you still got balls. I hope more people where like the captain on the norwegian ship. Protecting the local people from assholes.
Reply
+2
#203 to #168 - teltjeger (12/02/2015) [-]
If I remember correctly from reading about the incident Sea Shepherd didn't comply with the coast guards request to inspect them(or something like that). Something that is kinda silly as the coast guard is pretty much police of the seas.

So it's pretty much like complaining when a cop deploys stingers during a car chase.
Reply
+99
#19 to #16 - bismarcksback (12/01/2015) [-]
Dude stfu.Do you want them to notice?
Reply
+2
#53 to #19 - kewolsky (12/01/2015) [-]
Whale wars went to Norway once, the Japs noticed and started their whaling season early and had a good run.
Reply
0
User avatar #20 to #19 - thanduril (12/01/2015) [-]
I guess not, just didn't want to leave them in the *******
Reply
+52
User avatar #10 - watermeloncyborgs (12/01/2015) [-]
Oh no! 1% of the Japanese population is murdering whales?
Let's nuke 25% of them.
Reply
+4
User avatar #162 to #10 - haroldsaxon ONLINE (12/02/2015) [-]
There's no guarantee we get all in the 1%. We should nuke at least 101%
Reply
+30
#22 to #10 - anon (12/01/2015) [-]
Correction: Let's nuke 100% of them
Reply
+10
User avatar #82 to #22 - captchakid (12/02/2015) [-]
Well I mean, if you get rid of 100% of the possible problems, you're left with 0% whaling.
Reply
+20
User avatar #91 to #82 - tenaciouslee ONLINE (12/02/2015) [-]
Yeah!

Then we get to kill the whales!
Reply
+9
User avatar #92 to #91 - captchakid (12/02/2015) [-]
gotta fill that quota.
Reply
+31
User avatar #56 - FrankReal (12/01/2015) [-]
>French flag avatar
>Wants to nuke japan

Oh the ironing
Reply
+1
#77 to #56 - anon (12/02/2015) [-]
They're only terrorists when it's for a cause we don't agree with, right?
Reply
0
#81 to #77 - anon (12/02/2015) [-]
no if its two nations its war, a terrorist is a person whom uses violence to change a governments legislature without a nation backing them

its a matter of organization.
Reply
+1
User avatar #215 to #81 - quantumranger (12/02/2015) [-]
I thought a terrorist was just someone who used terror and mayhem to push their beliefs. Not necessarily changing legislature.
Reply
+3
#106 to #56 - overture (12/02/2015) [-]
the ******* ironing
Reply
+19
#15 - lirfy (12/01/2015) [-]
it's because those are in high demand
Reply
0
User avatar #150 to #15 - jagerhaus (12/02/2015) [-]
so ******* hyped for the new one
Reply
+1
User avatar #31 to #15 - vladhellsing ONLINE (12/01/2015) [-]
Careful, it's volatile!
Reply
+144
#2 - anon (12/01/2015) [-]
Because allowing illegal hunting of whales is sooo tolerant and accepting.
Reply
+10
User avatar #3 to #2 - sickreality (12/01/2015) [-]
i guess us round eyed pale skins don't get the fun of hunting down giant beautiful endangered water gods with your fellow yellow slit see'er... i mean, asians must see in horizontal recordings only...
Reply
+74
#8 to #3 - chukupowpow ONLINE (12/01/2015) [-]
Round eyed person killing innocent animals. Sounds familiar.
Reply
+4
User avatar #9 to #8 - sickreality (12/01/2015) [-]
this is of no concern of your chukupowpow! hasn't your kind done enough!?!
Reply
+20
User avatar #30 to #8 - lean (12/01/2015) [-]
Do you get chafe marks from hugging all those trees?

Fact: hunters provide more funding to conservation groups and wildlife management than all other sources combined.

Fact: Zimbabwe earns about $200,000,000 annually on exotic hunting

Fact: Exotic and protected species that are hunted are used in their entirety by local populations. These hunts mean good meat and meals for people who are often going hungry.

Fact: Hunters are the greatest environmentalists in the world, sponsoring more national parks and saving more endangered species than any other conservation group. Many conservation groups are in fact funded by hunters and hunting,including the US game and Fish department.

Without hunting and its close association with conservationism the ecology all over the world would be extremely ****** up. They have undeniably solved more problems than they have caused from over hunting 100 years ago.
Reply
+6
User avatar #136 to #30 - unikornking (12/02/2015) [-]
Are giraffes and the like hunted often in places like this? I've remained neutral to stuff like this, but typically it's exotic predators, I can't imagine anyone wanting to hunt a giraffe. Actually, I can't imagine that being much of a hunt at all, are giraffes even scared of humans?
Reply
+2
User avatar #232 to #136 - lean (12/02/2015) [-]
There is an agency that attempts to monitor all legal exotic hunts that I can't recall the name of at the moment.... It isn't the African Wildlife Foundation, it's a different one.
The majority of hunts occur in zimbabwe and south africa, where they have the greatest wildlife management as well as designated state parks. (because there are more game species in these places due to conservation, weird)
I believe the stats are something like 15,000 guided hunts per year resulting in around 70% efficiency. USA is the #1 country where hunters come from, followed by canada, UK, and scandinavian countries. Total revenue generated for the continent is estimated to be over 1.2 billion per year.

Obviously the hunters could choose to hunt in legally grey countries for exotic game, but there is less game, less stability, and in a world where you are put on public trial like the Dentist from MN who legally shot Cecil (Zimbabwe did not press charges and in a statement said he complied with all laws) it's better to be safe than sorry. Most ethical hunters choose locations where their game is shared with the villagers nearby and the governments are strong enough to use the revenue for conservation.

Poachers are everywhere of course, but the posts like the one above are hunters who had the opportunity to harvest a once in a lifetime animal.

As far as giraffes, they are wild prey animals. They are as skittish as deer, albeit substantially larger. Most of these places are not petting zoo type farms, but wild and hazardous country. To put it in perspective white tail deer kill more people per year than bears in North America. A giraffe could easily kill a human. People have it in their head that so many of these exotic game animals are gigantic majestic pets. I challenge any of them to try and pet one, even in a zoo.

The many save the animals activist groups will tell you that in the last 30 years the African giraffe population has been cut in half. What they neglect to say is that the majority of this is due to human development destroying habitat, not overhunting. In the same amount of time, zimbabwe and South Africa have tripled their populations of giraffe, because they practice active conservation.

I personally wouldn't shoot one, because importation is almost impossible without tens of thousands of dollars, and I can't imagine they are good eating, but I won't judge anyone who legally takes one.

www.snopes.com/photos/hunting/deadgiraffe.asp
Reply
+1
User avatar #34 to #30 - mrwalkerfour (12/01/2015) [-]
citation?
Reply
+15
#39 to #34 - lean (12/01/2015) [-]
There is always one of you isn't there? Does google not work there?

#1- visual.ly/how-wildlife-thriving-because-guns-hunting

#2- mg.co.za/article/2012-10-30-molewa-hunting-brings-much-to-south-africas-economy

#3- gothunts.com/see-what-happens-to-an-elephant-after-elephant-hunting/

#4- Numerous. From Essays in world history, Mallenby pg. 189 specifically details the avid hunting and fishing of Ferdinand Vandeveer Hayden, The man responsible for mapping and persuading US congress to dedicate Yellowstone national park to the future generations for the benefit and enjoyment of the people, prompting a worldwide trend of national parks. He also started the USGS, his first sponsored trip was geologically mapping yellowstone area.

www.startribune.com/150-years-of-minnesota-deer-hunting/107011473/

www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/00207233.2015.1019296?journalCode=genv20

I mean the list goes on forever. Without the management funded by hunters the populations wither and die. Game species on the whole fare better than non game species all over the habitable world.
Reply
+14
User avatar #43 to #39 - mrwalkerfour (12/01/2015) [-]
calm down dickhead im just asking for evidence so i can source it when i make the same arguement.
Reply
-8
User avatar #112 to #43 - satansferret (12/02/2015) [-]
Then find it faggot.
Reply
0
#161 to #8 - amuzen ONLINE (12/02/2015) [-]
I'm suddenly super curious as to how giraffe tastes. I want to eat a giraffe now. You're responsible for this.
Reply
-3
User avatar #99 to #8 - mrsexmuffins (12/02/2015) [-]
Except that's legal hunting
Reply
0
User avatar #259 to #99 - mrsexmuffins (12/03/2015) [-]
I'm getting thumbed down but no one is denying it. Problem?
Reply
-5
User avatar #23 to #8 - xcrossdoge (12/01/2015) [-]
Giraffes arent endangered, though
Reply
+17
#26 to #23 - affects (12/01/2015) [-]
Neither are the wales they are hunting.
They mostly hunt minke whales.
There are currently over 800.000 minke whales, and they kill no more than 400 a year.
Reply
+6
User avatar #27 to #26 - xcrossdoge (12/01/2015) [-]
Hm, you're right. But they're still protected under some International whaling acto to maintain the whale population, however Japan continues to hunt whales claiming they're for "Scientific Research", despite whale meat beaing available throughtout Japan. That's what the uproar is about: Japan is using a loophole in international law to keep whaling, despite it's ban.
ALSO: i should have probably checked my facts b4 claiming they were endangered
Reply
+1
#28 to #27 - affects (12/01/2015) [-]
I still agree with you, the killing of whales is inhumane and should stop.
Reply
+2
User avatar #37 to #28 - drpenguinz (12/01/2015) [-]
hunting not endangered whales is as cruel as killing any other kind of animal.
why is killing a cow/pig less cruel than killing a whale?
Reply
+5
User avatar #55 to #37 - cakefaceify (12/01/2015) [-]
Argument is that a lot of whale and dolphin species are self-aware. Brings in the moral dilemma of killing living beings that have a consciousness, just like we do.
Reply
+4
User avatar #75 to #55 - bobtombobbob (12/02/2015) [-]
So are pigs camels and goats.
But people still eat them
Reply
+3
User avatar #83 to #75 - cakefaceify (12/02/2015) [-]
Not necessarily. All mammals are not self-aware. For land mammals it's widely believed to be limited mainly to a select few primates. Research has only really extensively been done on primates/dolphins that sort of thing though
Reply
0
User avatar #237 to #83 - drpenguinz (12/02/2015) [-]
what do we interpret as self aware?
just because some animal doesnt understand a mirror, that doesnt mean its less cruel to kill it. it realizes it doesnt want to die and its in pain when held in **** conditions. thats how nature do.
Reply
0
User avatar #258 to #237 - cakefaceify (12/03/2015) [-]
Of course, but it's not always so black and white. An ant for example, while very much alive, is basically a biological robot. Signals fire off and it does it's programmed thing, it's pretty safe to say they don't suffer in the same way a cat would or a dolphin or a bird or a human. Difficult to know where to draw the line, but if we can't figure that out we can at least cut down on our indiscriminate slaughter of species especially those we figure to be intelligent.
Reply
0
User avatar #261 to #258 - drpenguinz (12/03/2015) [-]
yeah, ok, compared with bugs there is a difference. but thats an extreme comparison. the intelligence of the animals we compared before are about the same scale. a whale is not significantly smarter/dumber than a pig. and often its not even about that.
i mean...people would never kill their pets for example, even if it is "just a mouse/hamster" or some sort of spider. yeah, you have a connection to your pet, but how does your hamster deserve life more than "just some whale". intelligence is what we argue with, but its not actually the reason. we are just not used to whales being eaten over here in the western world. if you grew up eating whale meat you wouldnt care either.
Reply
0
User avatar #210 to #83 - orangelightning (12/02/2015) [-]
Pigs are way smarter than dogs tho and one of the tests they do to check self awareness is if an animal can recognize it self in a mirror and pigs can do just that while dogs can't even do that (at first anyway).
Reply
-1
User avatar #230 to #75 - heartlessrobot (12/02/2015) [-]
Pigs might be kinda smart but they're still dumb as **** .
So are camels, they're dumber than horses, don't know about goats though.
Reply
+2
#38 to #37 - affects (12/01/2015) [-]
They way in which they are killed is completely different.
A whale suffers for a long time after it is harpooned, a cow/pig doesn't suffer most of the time.
Reply
+1
#96 to #38 - anon (12/02/2015) [-]
Wrong. Do a little research on how pigs are kept. In tiny boxes from the moment they're born, force-fed until by the time they're grown they can't walk under their own weight because their legs have broken and they've never been out of their several-sizes-too-small box.

Pigs suffer their whole lives. Whales die in a couple hours.
Reply
0
#123 to #96 - anon (12/02/2015) [-]
yeah but pigs are food brah, nothing more
Reply
+1
User avatar #211 to #123 - orangelightning (12/02/2015) [-]
And so are whales to the japs so where does that leave us?
Reply
0
User avatar #231 to #211 - heartlessrobot (12/02/2015) [-]
Most Japs don't eat whales. In fact, more japs hunt whales than eat them.
Reply
+1
User avatar #40 to #38 - drpenguinz (12/01/2015) [-]
thats how nature works tho
every animal suffers when killed in nature
and a whale still feeds way more people than a pig
and...
a pig lives his whole life in the same place, eating the same **** everyday, just waiting to get killed, there is nothing nice about their lifes. its not valuable at all.
a whale is free until it gets killed.
and thats why i really dont think killing a whale is more cruel.
Reply
+1
#47 to #40 - anon (12/01/2015) [-]
Not every animal. Most animals are killed with a bite to the throat or some equivalent that stops bodily function and kills them quickly. A harpoon causes a lot more suffering
Reply
+3
User avatar #68 to #47 - drpenguinz (12/02/2015) [-]
every large animal is killed slow and painful if there is a hunter to kill it
see buffalos getting killed by lions
they often take several minutes, start biting their dicks off and stuff to get them down. im not lying, there are enough videos on youtube
nature is ****** disgusting
yeah...if a puma kills some bird or something, that will be fast and painless.
Reply
0
User avatar #36 to #27 - Shramin (12/01/2015) [-]
Whale is delicious, I understand completely why they would keep hunting it if its in their culture.
Reply
+1
User avatar #41 to #26 - crypticmerle (12/01/2015) [-]
I don't have an issue with hunting as long as it's permitted. I wouldn't have a problem for it if it weren't for the fact that they were breaking a law to do it. I don't care if they aren't endangered. They are basically saying - we know we've been told not to, but we're exempt cause **** you.
People aren't endangered, but it's still illegal to shoot a ******** who has done things in their life to deserve it. Does that mean we just go shoot them anyway cause the world won't miss them if we pick out a few of the bad ones? Hell that would be good for the human population actually.

If they lift the ban, then there's nothing we can do and they can go about their business. If they were at least told they could kill only those whales you mentioned that they "mostly kill" and left the other ones alone, then fine. But they don't. And I have a problem with people who think that they are above a law or an agreement without consequences.
Reply
+10
User avatar #25 to #2 - ledd (12/01/2015) [-]
Now that they banned it, it is illegal.
You really think a government is going to say "lol k" when some outsiders tell them to stop? It's their business, they wont give up with some ban. I'm not justifying them doing it, Im justifying them not giving a ****
Reply
0
User avatar #229 to #25 - heartlessrobot (12/02/2015) [-]
Well, we wouldn't have to nuke them. Look at the US Navy. Largest, most powerful navy in the world, sitting there, doing nothing. 1 ship could sink every Jap whaling ship they sent out.
Reply
+12
User avatar #44 to #2 - paddypancake (12/01/2015) [-]
Sure it isn't a nice thing to kill whales but just think about what these sort of people the ones who are asking for mass murder in retaliation for animal killing would do if they were in power. I personally prefer having whale killers in power rather than narrow minded maniacs.
Reply
+27
User avatar #59 - jiichei (12/02/2015) [-]
haven't you heard? two wrongs make a right!

and before anyone takes me seriosly, I was being sarcastic. and before anyone comments duh it was pretty obvious, lately I've seen more and more serious, humourless people on fj who lack the ability to detect a joke. yeah I pretty much super killed my joke, my body is ready for the red thumbs.
Reply
0
#175 to #59 - tarabostes ONLINE (12/02/2015) [-]
And a right makes two wrongs?
Reply
0
User avatar #224 to #59 - plazmaflare (12/02/2015) [-]
And three rights make a left, so 6 wrongs make a left.
Reply
0
User avatar #72 to #59 - plataeiou (12/02/2015) [-]
Wak the fu is wrong with people these days?
Reply
+3
User avatar #62 to #59 - hairycheeseball (12/02/2015) [-]
Wow you are covering all your bases there, its kind of sad you kinda have too. I personally thought it was funny so at least you get a green thumb from me.
Reply
0
User avatar #63 to #62 - jiichei (12/02/2015) [-]
thank you hairycheeseball. nice name btw!
Reply
+1
User avatar #65 to #63 - hairycheeseball (12/02/2015) [-]
No problem. I would like to say I spent a lot of time and effort into my name, but I didn't.
Reply
+11
#14 - ohhh ONLINE (12/01/2015) [-]
What's that? A large place full of millions of people kids men and women, and like some 0.01% are killing sea life we like? Well time to straight up ******* kill them all.
Reply
-4
User avatar #32 to #14 - vladhellsing ONLINE (12/01/2015) [-]
Why do people like whales anyway? What have they ever done for us? Dolphins are understandable since they're cute and rescue people from sharks & drowning and stuff, but when was the last time anybody shook hands with a whale? You have to go pretty far out to see to actually find one and when you do find one you can't exactly shake hands with it.

I don't hate whales or agree with killing them into extinction, but people seem to get genuinely butthurt over creatures they know nothing about.
Reply
+3
User avatar #46 to #32 - spearpwi (12/01/2015) [-]
Whales keep krill population down by eating about 40 tons (40million krill) a day. They play a massive role in keeping the balance of the food chain intact. If krill population was to explode, it would then serve to cause the producer in that food chain to eventually run out, resulting in a lowering of population of that food chain over the next few decades which could potentially be disastrous.
Reply
+4
User avatar #71 to #14 - seikestrom (12/02/2015) [-]
www.youtube.com/watch?v=cS0jTbzd8Q8 here is the source for the video if anyone wants it.
Reply
+9
#166 - totallytito ONLINE (12/02/2015) [-]
Alright... so they're insulting the massacre of innocent animals, by wishing the massacre of innocent people(again).
Reply
+9
#133 - AnomynousUser (12/02/2015) [-]
Let's be honest here. Those probably aren't Americans and we all know who they really are.
Reply
0
User avatar #137 to #133 - gabeinated ONLINE (12/02/2015) [-]
What are you talking about? Korea has nothring against da Japan, nooooo no no no not-ting at arr. We are on friendry terms. Friendry! So friendry, we are wirring to give dem free nukes which we wir drop from our friendry derivery pranes.
Reply
+64
#5 - anon (12/01/2015) [-]
Muslims kill a bunch of people in Paris.
ISLAM IS A RELIGION OF PEACE. THEY DINDU NUFFIN.

Japan hunts whales.
JAPANESE ARE SICK AND TERRIBLE. NUKE THEM ALL.

This is the future you chose.
Reply
+1
User avatar #159 to #5 - jonball (12/02/2015) [-]
Surely that would come from the same group of people...
Reply
+14
User avatar #97 to #5 - taniv (12/02/2015) [-]
Have you been on this site in the past few weeks? Or been listening to American media? The response to those attacks has been insanely violent. A mosque got burned down in Canada, ******* Canada, and the guy didn't even apologize. More Sikhs have been victim to Islamophobia in Canada than there have been Canadian victims of Islamic terror.

I mean I'm all for ******** on the left wing for their blatant ignorance and ISIS is definitely a worse issue than Japanese whaling, but let's not forget that tons of Americans are advocating to "nuke the ********* ", and don't seem to care about the innocent lives that are actually lost daily in those regions. Islamic peoples have suffered violent attacks, even people who aren't Muslim but happened to have brown skin, and even if you by some twisted way think that's justified, we can't really say that there hasn't been an angry response.

Listen to at least Bill Maher or Sam Harris; politically left-wing people who denounce Islam and the other Abrahamic religions for promoting violence
Reply
+7
User avatar #144 - brbgoldfishonfire (12/02/2015) [-]
I don't understand the people that think it's bad to hurt animals, but hurting another person is totally fine.
Reply
0
User avatar #146 to #144 - Milvath (12/02/2015) [-]
because we know we're terrible animals
Reply
0
User avatar #148 to #146 - FightClub (12/02/2015) [-]
humans are the crawdads of the sea
Reply
0
User avatar #152 to #144 - miia ONLINE (12/02/2015) [-]
because people are dicks and there are 7 ******* billion of them
Reply
+1
User avatar #153 to #144 - sugoi (12/02/2015) [-]
because only cute/attractive things are worth protecting
Reply
+1
#176 to #153 - tarabostes ONLINE (12/02/2015) [-]
Like you
Reply
+1
#246 to #199 - tarabostes ONLINE (12/02/2015) [-]
Me? Stop?
Reply
+2
User avatar #157 to #144 - machiavellianhumor ONLINE (12/02/2015) [-]
innocence vs stupid morality. animals are better than humans. animals just seek to survive. humans seek to gain
Reply
+6
User avatar #167 - AZSYANKEE (12/02/2015) [-]
As an American I feel it is my duty to apologize for some peoples Hypocritical beliefs. Not all Americans are assholes to the rest of the World like these cunts are.
Reply
+6
#164 - hypocritical (12/02/2015) [-]
Japan hunts whales
Canada hunts seals
Germany hunts Jews
It's a living
Reply
+6
#135 - brobafett (12/02/2015) [-]
>Faggots trying to be edgy "BAAAAW We need to nuke the nips again! BAAAW Poor whales and sea rapists!"


Reply
+12
#18 - physicsdude (12/01/2015) [-]
"Let china have their way with Japan" If memory serves me right that's not how it has gone down so far.
Reply
+6
#24 to #18 - sheepnut (12/01/2015) [-]
Yeah well Japan has no standing military power other than the US and if we wanted to let it happen, we could literally just hand Japan over to China like a present.
Reply
+1
User avatar #48 to #24 - anonemous (12/01/2015) [-]
that's not true, regular and reserve forces are over 300,000 personnel... en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Japan_Self-Defense_Forces
Reply
+3
User avatar #95 to #48 - thatoneiranianguy ONLINE (12/02/2015) [-]
300,000...I bet China is so scared.
Reply
+4
#138 to #95 - kurbeh (12/02/2015) [-]
China could use 300.000 people as living ammunition and not give a **** .
Reply
0
User avatar #187 to #138 - willindor (12/02/2015) [-]
Their military can make a bridge to Japan out of soldiers and squash everyone in Japan to death with bodies and they still would have more than half of their manpower left
Reply
+5
User avatar #64 - draeman (12/02/2015) [-]
whaling in japan can literally be traced to 10,000 B.C.
Something that ingrained into a culture is going to be pretty ******* hard to stop- especially when some foreigners (which is something Japanese people are historically known to dislike) tell them to stop.
Reply
0
User avatar #227 to #64 - heartlessrobot (12/02/2015) [-]
Yeah but nobody consumes any part of a whale anymore.
It's pointless and a money sink.
Reply
0
#80 to #64 - anon (12/02/2015) [-]
yep, japan is not a country of intelligent individual human beings its a massive retard that uses modern ships to kill whales.

IS it really that ******* hard to comply with not killing a animal for no real good reason?
Reply
+4
User avatar #85 to #80 - draeman (12/02/2015) [-]
I'm not saying Japan is stupid as a collective group- I'm Japanese myself.
What I'm saying is when something has been ingrained for so long into a culture, it's kind of hard to stop it immediately.
And there is good reason. It's their main food source- and has been for quite a while. "This history is an important part of why the Japanese continue to hunt whales. Attempts to stop the nation's whaling are perceived by many as a threat to Japanese culture. According to its defenders, eating whale meat is an old and impenetrable Japanese tradition. "No one has the right to criticize the food culture of another people," said Matayuki Komatsu of Japan's Fisheries Agency."
www.animalplanet.com/tv-shows/whale-wars/about-whaling/why-japanese-hunt-whales/
I'm not saying they're not being ignorant ; it is however ignorant to assume it's a matter of compliance
Reply
+1
User avatar #110 to #85 - zenler (12/02/2015) [-]
but if its going to harm the environment like >>#46 is saying, should it continue ?
Reply
0
User avatar #114 to #110 - draeman (12/02/2015) [-]
No it shouldn't
I'm not saying it should tho
Reply
0
User avatar #120 to #114 - zenler (12/02/2015) [-]
ahk cool

Reply
+3
#186 - hereforthelinks (12/02/2015) [-]
In an interview, the prime minister of Japan responded
Reply
+3
#127 - darknesincontrol (12/02/2015) [-]
Where are you Aquaman? Save the whales!
Reply
+3
User avatar #89 - zaggystirdust ONLINE (12/02/2015) [-]
>Person with the "Pray for Paris filter talking about setting off a bomb in another country.

Social media really has turned tragedies into trends.
Reply
0
#179 to #89 - tarabostes ONLINE (12/02/2015) [-]
Click to show spoiler
Exactly what I was thinking! You're so cute and smaaaaart zaggyyyyyyyyy! If only you didn't watch that ****** show...
Reply
+1
User avatar #194 to #179 - zaggystirdust ONLINE (12/02/2015) [-]
It's a curse, I'm forced to watch it. Send help, I can't stand this poorly drawn leftist agenda show.
Reply
+1
#245 to #194 - tarabostes ONLINE (12/02/2015) [-]
Click to show spoiler
Oh I got some help , watch an ACTUAL good show
Reply
+1
User avatar #248 to #245 - zaggystirdust ONLINE (12/02/2015) [-]
>liking Vietnamese moving pictures

Sorry I don't have **** vision
Reply
+1
#249 to #248 - tarabostes ONLINE (12/02/2015) [-]
Manga isn't a moving picture you ******* retard



Sorry I don't speak Down Syndrome
Reply
+1
#250 to #249 - zaggystirdust ONLINE (12/02/2015) [-]
"Watch an actual good show"
"I wasn't talking about moving pictures I was talking about manga."

You keep the meds in the cabinet right? I'll get them for you. Just sit there and don't hurt yourself.
Reply
0
#251 to #250 - tarabostes ONLINE (12/02/2015) [-]
If you flip the pages really fast , it looks like a show.
Also I used the manga image of Once Punch Man because it looked better.
Anime has only 9 episdoes anyways , you cheeky little cunt
btw What made you want to see a gay , ****** show for kids?
Reply
+1
#252 to #251 - zaggystirdust ONLINE (12/02/2015) [-]
Yeah but I'm not that big on manga.
The only manga I'm reading is for Diamond is Unbreakable.
I watched it when it only had 5 episodes. Loved the art style because it reminded me of Kirby. After a few episodes I was like "man, I wish more people liked this show!" Then Jailbreak came out after a month I was like "I change my mind. Get rid of them." The fandom hd gotten worse since then now that tumblr saw a lesbian scene and was all "muh representation" instead of liking it for the show itself. And recently it's kind of ruined the show for me a bit because I feel as though it's lost its innosense now that people are using it to promote their views. So I hate the **** out of this fandom. But hey, at least it's not like Undertale's fandom.
Reply
0
#253 to #252 - tarabostes ONLINE (12/02/2015) [-]
You tramp
There will be anime you impatient slut
In order of cringyness : Sonic fandom >MLP Fandom> SU fandom > FNAF fandom > Waifu weeb anime fandom (pic related)
I just don't know where to place Undertale here , it has a retro style , MEMES and people in the fandom are obsessed and push it into everything . (I have also seen a fat, crazy bitch draw the sans skeleton **** her and r34 of goatmom and other characters... What the **** ...)
Reply
+1
#255 to #253 - zaggystirdust ONLINE (12/02/2015) [-]
I got into before the anime was announced. I'd stop but it's just too good.
The sonic fandom will always be at the bottom no matter what. It's a shame too since I was a huge fan as a kid. Also I hate that I know what you're talking about with the rule 34.
Also what's so bad about the FNaF fandom? I know it's demographic is usually autistic minecraft kids, but beyond that I didn't even know there was a fandom.
Reply
0
#256 to #255 - tarabostes ONLINE (12/02/2015) [-]
GIF
KOICHI STEALS?
Can I touch your hard nipples?
Oh God the r34 is horrible Two words: Deviant art ; INFLATION
Reply
+1
User avatar #257 to #256 - zaggystirdust ONLINE (12/02/2015) [-]
No, just prod my butthole lightly.
So basically sonic fandom 2.0?
Reply
0
#260 to #257 - tarabostes ONLINE (12/03/2015) [-]
Of course , then I work up to your pusi then to your sweet nips.... THEN I SHALL **** YOU LIKE A MACHINEGUN! [/spoiler
[spoiler] Yep
Reply
0
User avatar #254 to #253 - tarabostes ONLINE (12/02/2015) [-]
**** I forgot SUPERWHOLOCK
but i'm not sure abot that either.....
Reply
0
User avatar #226 to #89 - heartlessrobot (12/02/2015) [-]
Yeah but those Frenchies did nothing wrong.
The nips are killing harmless animals for ***** and giggles.
12345>
[ 260 comments ]
Leave a comment
<
>
 Friends (0)