Home Original Content Funny Pictures Funny GIFs YouTube Funny Text Funny Movies Channels Search

hide menu
What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
User avatar #66 - peacockockock (07/13/2014) [-]
All ya'll ****** against piracy are hypocrites, like seriously. By that logic all agriculture should be illegal.
If your neighbor gives you tomato seeds from his garden so you can plant you're own tomatoes, then should Home Depot arrest you piracy?
User avatar #108 to #66 - misticalz (07/13/2014) [-]
Actually
if your not in the Monstanto group
and one of their GMO seeds grows in you're crop
and they find it
they sue you
User avatar #153 to #108 - peacockockock (07/13/2014) [-]
Okay, your splitting hairs. It can be used for anything with a natural cycle with this type of relevance. Dogs, cats, weed, or intense bodyloveing leopards.
#87 to #66 - ohemgeezus (07/13/2014) [-]
That makes no sense, holy digestive end product you pro-piracyfags are so god damn stupid.   
If the neighbor bought the seeds then they're his BY RIGHT to do whatever he wants, he could shove them up his ass with and no one can do anything if he BOUGHT THEM. Pirates don't buy anything by illegally copying stuff.   
   
Give me you're red toes retards, you know I'm right.
That makes no sense, holy digestive end product you pro-piracyfags are so god damn stupid.
If the neighbor bought the seeds then they're his BY RIGHT to do whatever he wants, he could shove them up his ass with and no one can do anything if he BOUGHT THEM. Pirates don't buy anything by illegally copying stuff.

Give me you're red toes retards, you know I'm right.
User avatar #148 to #87 - peacockockock (07/13/2014) [-]
your missing the point, someone bought that product. If he gives it out for free, why the intense bodylove is that my problem? By you're logic its my neighbors right to give them to me.
Lets imagine that its a netflix account for example, someone is obviously paying for the subscription. If he lets his friend use it on their computer netflix still gets paid.
What you seem to be forgetting is that these companies are still making millions upon millions of dollars because of dumbintense bodyloves like you.
Do you really pay for every song or every movie you watch? If you had a friend that could sneak you in to a free movie at the theatre, would you really be a white knight and report you're friend?
Case closed newfag
#154 to #148 - ohemgeezus (07/13/2014) [-]
It is the neighbors right to give stuff to you if he bought it you autistic retard, it's not his right to buy a game, illegally copy it, and distribute it.
I wouldn't have any purpose to sneaking into a movie because I'm not an edgy 15 year old trying to, "fight the man" like you'reself.
Retards like you are what's wrong with the world.
Case not closed because you're examples and arguments are complete pants-on-head retarded.
User avatar #155 to #154 - peacockockock (07/13/2014) [-]
Then please elaborate on the difference? He intense bodyloveing bought, someone bought it. Otherwise how can you share the file? You seem to be arguing about something you don't understand. There has to be a source
If all you can come up are autism jokes then I'm kinda disappointed. Go back to tumblr
#157 to #155 - ohemgeezus (07/13/2014) [-]
>disappointed with autism jokes
>calls me a newfag
Does it actually hurt to think, because your so damn stupid. go back to 9.gag with you're fellow "anermouse" friends.
User avatar #161 to #157 - peacockockock (07/13/2014) [-]
Lol you still haven't answered my question dipdigestive end product. Keep trying you actually might offend me this time.
And greentext doesn't obviously work of FJ, stop trying to suck 9gag's dick
#163 to #161 - ohemgeezus (07/13/2014) [-]
There's no point in answering you're question, because I'm not debating whether the content is right or not, I'm saying you're comparison is completely retarded, you dumbass.

Greentext doesn't work? How'd you figure that out, champ? The basis on greentext does, which is to draw attention to certain words or phrases, newfag. Thank you for further proving my point that your actually mentally disabled.
User avatar #169 to #163 - peacockockock (07/13/2014) [-]
Careful, I wouldn't want you to come up with an original comeback.
So as I was saying about my point.
case closed
Go be cool somewhere else, it's clearly working out for you. I bet all the boys love you.
#170 to #169 - ohemgeezus (07/13/2014) [-]
lol, as if you're comebacks are super smart and original(that's sarcasm if you didn't notice).
Nice job trying to cut out of the convo because you can't prove me wrong, go back to sitting on you're uncles lap.
User avatar #176 to #170 - peacockockock (07/13/2014) [-]
I don't have to prove how cool I am to you, it wouldn't matter anyway. It's not like I could prove it in the first place.
If you think I have autism, congratulations.
If you think I have an uncle, you must be a psychic.
Why do I care? I don't have to prove myself right, I just have to prove you wrong.
Which is becoming easier to do the more you type.
Keep digging you'reself into that hole chief, you might reach China.
#178 to #176 - ohemgeezus (07/13/2014) [-]
My goodness your starting to make me laugh. You have yet to prove me wrong, yet you seem to think you are. This is starting to get boring because all your doing is contradicting you'reself which is amazing.
User avatar #186 to #178 - peacockockock (07/13/2014) [-]
Prove you wrong on what? You have yet been able to prove me wrong on my first point.
You say my analogy is digestive end product? I'm still waiting.
All you seem to be able to do is question my intelligence on a intense bodyloveing tangent. your a one trick pony.
Try harder.
#187 to #186 - ohemgeezus (07/13/2014) [-]
I proved you're analogy wrong in the first two comments, champ, then you turned it into the debate of many other threads here.
User avatar #193 to #187 - peacockockock (07/13/2014) [-]
By claiming it's illegal? I directly used your words against you.
In the sense of "bought" as you are talking about. If my neighbor shoves them up his ass then he is more then welcome to do so. If he wants to give them away, he is more than welcome to do so. It's his RIGHT to make that happen. Theres a reason they call it seeding in the first place. If I take it from a friend or "neighbor" instead of another person on the internet that suddenly makes it not okay? Do you see the hypocrisy?
How about this, drop you're Barbie dolls for a second and go use you're crayons to write this all down. It might do you some good.
#198 to #193 - ohemgeezus (07/13/2014) [-]
Alrighty, I'll put down my Barbie dolls and how about you actually pick up a book and get educated because your obviously a bit confused on basic logic by comparing illegally downloading games and giving a tomato seed to a neighbor.
User avatar #209 to #198 - peacockockock (07/13/2014) [-]
I'm not saying that its not a digestive end productty analogy, granted, theres a lot more to torrenting than that. No argument there. The point remains the same, its rather hypocritical. your splitting hairs over the fact that I used a plant. Put any type of comparison on it you like. It doesn't change the fact that if someone gives it away for free when they bought it, there shouldn't be negative repercussions to a guy who decides to connect people who want/have it. If third party systems like that should now suddenly be illegal, fine. But you can't draw the line there. Companies like SmartCircle should be reprimanded as well on the same law. The fact that this one type of third party is now suddenly the exception to throw these guys in jail is bulldigestive end product. As a matter of fact these guys actually help support smaller businesses. They ask for donations to support indie software. They care about the little guy that is trying to make it big. Do you know anything about Anakata and Brokep? Have you been on their websites? Have you seen what they are trying to accomplish?
or do you just sit back and become an metaphorical "armchair anthropologist?"
Riddle me that.
You can't argue against something if can't argue for it. Otherwise you really don't know who or what you're enemy is.
#89 to #87 - fitta (07/13/2014) [-]
omg is it fun to read digestive end product like this with the word filters
omg is it fun to read digestive end product like this with the word filters
#90 to #89 - ohemgeezus (07/13/2014) [-]
The new filters suck when trying to have a debate/argument, especially for me because I like to use the f word a lot. intense bodyloveing
User avatar #91 to #90 - fitta (07/13/2014) [-]
intense bodylove my thumb you fag
testing
User avatar #92 to #91 - fitta (07/13/2014) [-]
thumb and fag not filtered? disappointed
#76 to #66 - rebornpooper (07/13/2014) [-]
Home Depot doesn't own the rights to tomato plants.
User avatar #149 to #76 - peacockockock (07/13/2014) [-]
you seem to be splitting hairs here.
User avatar #208 to #149 - rebornpooper (07/13/2014) [-]
You seem to be making false analogies.
User avatar #211 to #208 - peacockockock (07/14/2014) [-]
your still missing the point. Its not about Home Depot. It's not about the tomatoes. Its the principle behind it. Don't get caught up on the wrong part.
User avatar #212 to #211 - rebornpooper (07/14/2014) [-]
Oh, right, the "principle", because taking an abstract, electrical, print, etc type of concept for personal gain without the guarantee that the mind that created the concept will receive payment for his or her work is the same thing as a biological creation of nature reproducing, both without creation of said biological object being responsible by the retailer or further maintenance from said retailer...
Wait a minute!
User avatar #215 to #212 - peacockockock (07/14/2014) [-]
So by that logic (implying for the sake of argument there is a god) does that give "The Almighty" the right strike you down with lightning for a friend to give you tomato seeds?
The original maker already got paid. The corporations like Apple or Microsoft already gave out intense bodylovetons of money to the original designer. The producers for songs already paid out the musicians. The thing you are stealing from at this point is now the company like Warner Brothers or Ubisoft. Companies that still continue to make a grip of money because individuals don't know how to steal correctly. When megaupload shut down and the guy was sentenced to like 50 years in prison, (Don't know for sure on the amount of time he supposed to be in jail) there were dozens of musicians and celebrities that popped up and asked for the site to be put back up. These are the same guys you are "stealing" from. Kind of ironic isn't it?
Anakata and Brokep supported small indie software. They weren't out to intense bodylove over the guy trying to make ends meet.
#221 to #215 - rebornpooper (07/14/2014) [-]
If God were real, he works by Creative Commons.
Yes, the "original creator" gets paid by the likes of Warner Brothers, but where does the money for Warner or Ubisoft come from? The productive means for the media are employees to a larger business. What your proposing is akin to robbing a factory outlet store (the employees have had their compensation, replacement product exists, the "consumer" has the item without needing to pay the store, the market has one less consumer for each act).
AAA gaming can cost millions of dollars to develop in, and there are very few people who are willing to give a full AAA package for free.
Megaupload was asked to be brought back online because all it is is a file hosting site, which, if taken down, hurts free and legit data sharing for individual use.
thepiratebay supported free data at the expense of large scale software marketing. They didn't give a rat's ass about what was uploaded unless they could use it for some sort of victim complex ("Dah big bad corpurations h8 us DD"), letting the preteens and young adults of the world, and everything in between get whatever the hell they want for a margin of fame.

To return to the original point, though, your a hypocrite "as well" for not making you're Funnyjunk account publicly accessible to all users with access to the site.
User avatar #230 to #221 - peacockockock (07/14/2014) [-]
I never said I wasn't a hypocrite, I'm not better than the rest. However I can live with my hypocrisy.
Secondly, thank you for the insight on the difference between megaupload and TPB. Genuinely. I didn't know there was a difference between the two.
Am I wrong for believing that these companies are intense bodyloveing us over to begin with on the prices of these products in the first place? I mean think about it, granted they cost millions of dollars to produce such a magnificent piece of work. On the ratio of how much these companies are making in first place on that game? It's chump change. Rockstar wouldn't be hurting if they lost $50 million on GTA V. And thats pushing it, I don't think there are that many torrenters out there in the first place. I mean compared to the magnitude of people that bought the game. Is microsoft going to be in pain if 100k people torrent microsoft office for free? Is Ubisoft going to genuinely see a significant drop in stock solely because of what these guys did? Doubtful.
User avatar #99 to #76 - sparkyoneonetwo (07/13/2014) [-]
Home depot doesn't even own there tomato plants at lest not at the one I work at.
 Friends (0)