Upload
Login or register
Anonymous comments allowed.
#7 - davidispissed
Reply +8
(11/14/2013) [-]
i think something's wrong with your firefox. Close some of your porn tabs.
#102 to #7 - dyllygaf
Reply 0
(11/14/2013) [-]
My firefox barely uses any CPU and I have a ********** laptop
#105 to #102 - davidispissed
Reply +1
(11/14/2013) [-]
then you aren't using it right lol.
#108 to #105 - dyllygaf
Reply 0
(11/14/2013) [-]
Haha How should I be using it then? I feel that's an appropriate amount of CPU usage for just browsing fj right now, don't you?
#114 to #108 - davidispissed
Reply 0
(11/14/2013) [-]
are you a one-tabber?
#116 to #114 - dyllygaf
Reply 0
(11/14/2013) [-]
Yep, that's all I need
#86 to #7 - tkuja
Reply +2
(11/14/2013) [-]
lol no
#171 to #86 - siemen
Reply 0
(11/14/2013) [-]
I completely agree.
a few months old, sorry, had to close them when the browser started using 6 GB ram every day.
#172 to #171 - tkuja
Reply 0
(11/14/2013) [-]
christ you mustve had year old tabs
#173 to #172 - siemen
Reply 0
(11/14/2013) [-]
Not really, was merely a test to see how often I open new tabs.
I just stopped closing tabs, and it took me around 3 weeks to get 3k tabs.

I did however once have a 4 year old tab on my old computer.
#178 to #173 - tkuja
Reply 0
(11/15/2013) [-]
did it disintegrate into dust when you opened it

out of interest, what was it
#179 to #178 - siemen
Reply 0
(11/15/2013) [-]
I dont fully remember what the tab was about, but I think it was a wikipedia article about something. Kinda recall it being something science related, not completely sure.

iirc, it was in a browser I very rarely used, causing me to not have any need to delete the tabs I had there.

#52 to #7 - daviid ONLINE
Reply 0
(11/14/2013) [-]
hey david
#64 to #52 - davidispissed
Reply +1
(11/14/2013) [-]
hey
#65 to #64 - daviid ONLINE
Reply 0
(11/14/2013) [-]
you have a beautiful name <3
#66 to #65 - davidispissed
Reply +1
(11/14/2013) [-]
thanks. so do you
#71 to #66 - daviid ONLINE
Reply 0
(11/14/2013) [-]
please stop being so angry,

chill bro, its going to get better
#72 to #71 - davidispissed
Reply +1
(11/14/2013) [-]
but that's my shtick
#35 to #7 - anon
Reply 0
(11/14/2013) [-]
Well Gee someone's using Linux.

Finally, I am not alone in this world.
#37 to #35 - davidispissed
Reply +1
(11/14/2013) [-]
Greeings fellow penguin.
#30 to #7 - EventHorizon
Reply +2
(11/14/2013) [-]
Hello David.
#36 to #30 - davidispissed
Reply +1
(11/14/2013) [-]
hiya
#18 to #7 - fragman
Reply +1
(11/14/2013) [-]
10%?
sorry but to me that's crazy high for a browser...
#25 to #18 - davidispissed
Reply +1
(11/14/2013) [-]
it's an older computer with a 980MHz P3 CPU. So there isn't much room for much.
#27 to #25 - fragman
Reply +1
(11/14/2013) [-]
ok, FF is excused.
#8 to #7 - nyz [OP]
Reply +18
(11/14/2013) [-]
Whenever I work with lots of tabs open, Firefox may start using a lot of CPU. But as soon as I check the Task Manager, it slooowly starts giving back the memory. Like the cat in this gif slowly closes the drawer. I thought some people might relate to this.
#9 to #8 - davidispissed
Reply +6
(11/14/2013) [-]
oooooh. now i see. do you deal with a lot of flash intensive sites?
#10 to #9 - nyz [OP]
Reply +57
(11/14/2013) [-]
I watch lots of porn, yes.
#11 to #10 - davidispissed
Reply +3
(11/14/2013) [-]
yeah, you should use Midori for that if you are finding too much CPU usage.

You need to login to view this link

its a bit more lightweight, so it uses fewer resources as it buffers.
#12 to #11 - nyz [OP]
Reply +3
(11/14/2013) [-]
I will definitely check it out, thanks.
#60 to #12 - anon
Reply 0
(11/14/2013) [-]
or just use chrome....

firefox is trying to copy chrome anyhow (the new features, the look, everything, but still worse in performance than chrome)
#109 to #60 - nogphille
Reply 0
(11/14/2013) [-]
chrome is never the answer.
#123 to #109 - anon
Reply 0
(11/14/2013) [-]
chrome is always the answer
#126 to #123 - nogphille
Reply 0
(11/14/2013) [-]
if you really enjoy the chrome engine, use ironware's browser.

at the least it doesn't run everything through the google servers.
#133 to #126 - anon
Reply 0
(11/14/2013) [-]
why is it exactly bad if it runs on google servers?

paranoid much? i myself like how i can sync my phone and tablet and pc without doing anything. love how it knows what i want with just typing 1st letter.

chrome is much safer thanks to running everything thru google servers...

they don't actually spy on every single user...


i like chrome because: safer than firefox, faster than firefox, looks clean like i said... faster and safer than other big browser
#146 to #133 - nogphille
Reply 0
(11/14/2013) [-]
good, i'm happy that you enjoy all that functionality.

i'm against the NSA tapping wires and reading your emails for the same reason.
privacy.

it's my data and i don't like it being sent anywhere i don't want it to.

i highly doubt google's using data on individual users, but uses the data to improve their adcrap.. still doesn't mean i have to give away my data.

and yeah.. more secure? if you don't want people to touch your data, then you shouldn't be handing it out in the first place.

it's faster. let's stop there.
#164 to #146 - anon
Reply 0
(11/14/2013) [-]
use adblocker, no personalized adcrap (which you can also turn off in google if you don't like that being sent anonymously)

more secure against viruses and malwares and pishing sites and so on.

the only real data it stores (heavily encypted) is on a cloud to sync your data thru different computers or platforms. so now dropbox is bad too?
#132 to #126 - nogphille
Reply 0
(11/14/2013) [-]
slight mistake in the software name..

www.srware.net/en/software_srware_iron.php
#135 to #132 - anon
Reply 0
(11/14/2013) [-]
also if i want to use anything else than chrome than i'd use the dragon (even more improved security)

the engine is not actually "chrome" but it's not that big of a surprise from someone like you
#149 to #135 - nogphille
Reply 0
(11/14/2013) [-]
the chrome engine is called chromium.
#13 to #12 - davidispissed
Reply +2
(11/14/2013) [-]
anytime