Feminism's Effect. . Bobby Sherri's, a Lockheed employee in Kuwait from North Carolina, was captured by Iraqis and spent nearly five months as an Iraqi hostage. FEMINISM Patriarchy
Upload
Login or register
✖

Feminism's Effect

Bobby Sherri's, a Lockheed employee in Kuwait from North
Carolina, was captured by Iraqis and spent nearly five months
as an Iraqi hostage. He was arrested the night after his release
for not paying in child support while he was a hostage.
In United States law, the Bradley Amendment requires state
courts to prohibit retroactive reduction of child support
obligations. Specifically, it:
automatically triggers a lien whenever child
support becomes .
overrides any state' s statute of limitations.
r disallows any judicial discretion, even from bankruptcy
judges.
requires that the payment amounts be maintained without
regard for the physical capability
The Bradley Amendment forbids any reduction or retroactive
reduction for any reason, whether a captive of war or in a
coma, inability to pay is no excuse.
...
+425
Views: 19924 Submitted: 10/19/2014

Comments(102):

Leave a comment Refresh Comments Show GIFs
123>
[ 102 comments ]
Top Rated Controversial Best Lowest Rated Newest
Anonymous comments allowed.
43 comments displayed.
#5 - databutt
Reply +103
(10/19/2014) [-]
This isn't feminism, it is a broken ******* legal system. Big difference. Easily confused.

>before someone fags in with "femnism influenced teh legal system"

No it didn't, the system was already all kinds of ****** up. Judges are not allowed to exercise common sense in America. People should be pissed about this (so long as these individual stories are not utter ********) but be pissed at the right thing.
#50 to #5 - skorve
Reply 0
(10/20/2014) [-]
It's probably both. If those women had just not filed charges - like, why the **** would you want someone thrown in prison because it took them a few seconds too long to pull out? - then there wouldn't be a problem. But they DID file charges, and then the ****** up system did its thing.
#65 to #5 - wimwam
Reply 0
(10/20/2014) [-]
If this were the case, you would see just as many unjust cases of women being jailed for stupid accusations
#39 to #5 - usafperson
Reply +6
(10/19/2014) [-]
No, feminism isn't why the legal system is ****** up. YES, feminism is a big reason why the legal system is ****** up in this specific manor.
#11 to #5 - sadpandafacezero
Reply +19
(10/19/2014) [-]
It's a broken legal system due to extreme feminists pushing them. It's a failure by the government and by the people.

You're 100% correct about judges not being able to exercise common sense in America.
It's absolute ********.

Another ******** thing is minimum prison sentencing. Did you hear about the father in Florida who's daughter's boyfriend was attacking the family, and he pulled out a gun and fired a warning shot (into the wall, mind you), and got (IIRC) 15-20 years in jail, even though he didn't harm the (legally adult) guy, and the guy admitted to not being harmed and harming the family.

I could go on for days about the ******** system.

Illegal ticket quotas, that case of the kid that was in jail for 3 years for a crime he very obviously (there was no proof he did anything other than one guy who claimed he had stolen his backpack, and the guy kept changing his story) in New York, into a jail where the guards often starved them, and abused them. Plus, he was in solitary confinement. A 16 year old was in solitary confinement for 3 years because a guy said he had stolen his backpack.

Cops raiding houses and assaulting the innocent people inside, and then fining the people and sending them to jail/prison because the people allegedly "assaulted" them.

It's a horribly ****** up system, in every way.

"Juries can't be biased because they're your peers" *******, have you even heard of groupthink? A group of a bunch of minorities are obviously gonna convict a white guy who killed a minority. And, vice-versa, a group of Southerners (who may not be racist, but still influenced by racism) may not convict a white guy that killed a minority.

It's ridiculous that stuff like this can happen, and the government/police simply don't care, because it benefits them.
#13 to #11 - anon
Reply 0
(10/19/2014) [-]
I'd actually argue it's a lack of compassion. The're some people out there who think that compassion and mercy are either bad, or hurtful to a legal system, then those who are just apathetic.
We need to be reminded fo the words of Excaliber(first heard by Linkara in my life). "compassion is not weakness, violence if not strength, and revenge is the most worthless of endecours.
#24 - anorselegend
Reply +44
(10/19/2014) [-]
I agree with databutt, this is just an EXTREMELY broken legal system. Still makes me rage like a ************ when I read it.
#25 to #24 - goodhomer ONLINE
Reply +11
(10/19/2014) [-]
It's not broken, it is working exactly as they want it to.

Look up Elizabeth Sheehy, she is a lawyer in Canada who has been for some time trying to make the murder of Men by Women legal.
#26 to #25 - anorselegend
Reply +3
(10/19/2014) [-]
Well that's not technically the American legal system, and I do agree that extreme feminists do have a terrible affect on our legal system.

However, when a man is arrested after he has been released from being a hostage for not paying child support, or a man is arrested and still imprisoned despite the accuser saying she was forced by a parent, that isn't so much feminism as it is the legal system allowing laws to be put in place that break is more.

The Bradley Amendment was created because there was a disparity between the power of the payee and receiver, because some payees would have large amounts of child support debt inability to pay the child support , and then go to another state and have the debt wiped by a sympathetic judge, so the one receiving would never get the money.
#28 to #26 - goodhomer ONLINE
Reply 0
(10/19/2014) [-]
Debtors prisons are supposed to be illegal. It is not supposed to be possible to go to jail for owing money, that is why they don't charge you with that. What they do is make it is that the support is a court order and then charge you with defying the court.

Anyway, the point is that it was not a patriarchal society that one day decided that screwing over the largest earning worker class (low income men) it was based on the idea that women are entitled to a man's money.

Where do you think such an idea would come from?

I would also like to point out that the largest number of 'deadbeat' parents are Female, not male, yet no one even seems to care about going after women or throwing them, illegally, in jail for not paying their debts.
#30 to #28 - anorselegend
Reply 0
(10/19/2014) [-]
It's not to arrest men, it was implemented to prevent any kind of override to the debt. A man cannot be arrested for it, which is why the Bobby Sherrill case is controversial, but it does not all the debt to ever be expunged, even through a claim of bankruptcy. It can only be forgiven or expunged by the receiver, unless it is a case of state welfare, in which case it can be forgiven the the state.

While true, if a man and a woman become married and have children and get divorced, whomever has custody of the children should receive child support, whether it is the father or the mother. The battle should not be "why should I pay that bitch/bastard my hard earned money" but rather, "I need to help my children survive and get an education.".

And I take rather large offence to the 'dead beat mother' statement. My mother was married for a long time, but even during the period she was married, she raised my brother and me by herself, she paid for all our medical bills, even brithday/christmas/anniversary presents for my father and herself with her own money. Then when they were divorced, he was even less of a help. I'd rather not get into details as it gets a bit too personal.
#83 to #25 - desacabose ONLINE
Reply +1
(10/20/2014) [-]
#27 to #25 - anorselegend
Reply +1
(10/19/2014) [-]
TL;DR, I do agree with you, but also think that some of these are just examples of a broken legal system.
#31 - anon
Reply 0
(10/19/2014) [-]
Women don't realize how dangerously close they are to actually getting the oppression, rape, abuse, and domestic violence they claim they are getting now. They think this is a game, but in 24 hours men could undo 60 years of misandry. They only exist because we allow them to. They only have the power they have been given by men, which is to say, they have no power at all. Power granted by authority isn't real because that authority can take that power and give it to someone else. If I was in one of these situations I would have no problem using violence. It would be the adult-to-adult version of "I'm going to give you something to cry about." One of these days these bitches are going to push too far, and then Zoe, Anita, and the rest will be handing from trees.
#32 to #31 - YoursTruley
Reply +22
(10/19/2014) [-]
unlikely because there will be men more desperate than you who will save them and protect them for scraps of tit . And what is worse is they are the majority
#36 to #32 - jimmynutz
Reply +9
(10/19/2014) [-]
"scraps of tit"
#35 to #32 - anon
Reply 0
(10/19/2014) [-]
I'm stealing "scraps of tit."
#34 to #32 - anon
Reply 0
(10/19/2014) [-]
I fear you are right. I keep spreading the red pill message to whoever will listen though. Maybe one day these thirsty fags will wake up.
#51 - chaosascendingx
Reply +7
(10/20/2014) [-]
this is why i want a nice bf
#52 to #51 - anon
Reply 0
(10/20/2014) [-]
So you don't have to falsely accuse him of rape?
#53 to #52 - chaosascendingx
Reply +20
(10/20/2014) [-]
i'm a guy
#54 to #53 - anon
Reply 0
(10/20/2014) [-]
My bad. I wish your great success with wieners.
#58 - leojxxitenah
Reply +16
(10/20/2014) [-]
Comment Picture
#48 - daIRONman
Reply -1
(10/20/2014) [-]
Feminism didn't convict these people, juries did. The solution isn't to bitch about feminism or the legal system, but to attempt public education about the inequalities in rape trials. Blame the American people, because they are, and have always been, the final say in who goes to prison.
#57 to #48 - anon
Reply 0
(10/20/2014) [-]
That's pretty naive. Feminist politicians have written these laws. They create the stupid zero tolerance policies and mandatory minimums that take discretion out of the hands of prosecutors and judges. However, it is fair to say that people in general aren't educated enough about things such as jury nullification, but even that possible remedy is prosecuted in some jurisdictions. In fact, the education of the public that you think is the answer is prosecuted widely! Go to your local courthouse and try to pass out pamphlets to that day's jury pool about their constitutional right of nullification and there is a very good chance that you will end up in handcuffs as so many have before you. Question: Do you think male defendants, the ignorant public, or feminist/misandrist politicians and prosecutors are behind the criminalization of the mere education of the public?
#60 to #48 - goodhomer ONLINE
Reply +16
(10/20/2014) [-]
Racism didn't convict any of these *******, Juries did. The solution isn't bitch about Racism or Jim Crow Laws, but to attempt public education about the inequalities in segregation trials. Blame the American people, because they are, and have always been, the final say in who goes to prison.
#72 to #60 - reginleif
Reply 0
(10/20/2014) [-]
Well that's partially right...... juries do bear SOME responsibility for sending people away on unjust laws.

If a man say..... were to be tried in my state for unlawful gun possession (type not disqualification), and had no other crimes then I'd set his ass free and tell the judge why I'm doing it.

That being said a lot of these abuses are in family courts, which don't have juries.
#75 to #72 - anon
Reply 0
(10/20/2014) [-]
Read post 57 two down. It's not so simple.
#76 to #75 - reginleif
Reply +1
(10/20/2014) [-]
You're right, jury nullification is ******* hard to spread nowadays with judges screening hard for Informed Jurists.... but it's not even legal info man.

It's an unjust law, whether it was my right or not and before I was even aware of the term "nullification" I knew I wouldn't condemn people on unfair laws. I expect a level of common sense from US citizens.
#84 to #76 - anon
Reply 0
(10/20/2014) [-]
Good point.
#66 to #60 - anon
Reply 0
(10/20/2014) [-]
#70 - darthmaulman
Reply +13
(10/20/2014) [-]
Notice how none of the women perpetrators are named but the male victims are... Feminism in action.
#49 - ninjapieguy
Reply +11
(10/20/2014) [-]
#59 - helenwheels
Reply -31
(10/20/2014) [-]
99% of these are either
A: ********
B: exaggerated
or C: Have nothing to do with feminism.
#67 to #59 - anon
Reply 0
(10/20/2014) [-]
That's pretty naive. Feminist politicians have written these laws. They create the stupid zero tolerance policies and mandatory minimums that take discretion out of the hands of prosecutors and judges. However, it is fair to say that people in general aren't educated enough about things such as jury nullification, but even that possible remedy is prosecuted in some jurisdictions. In fact, the education of the public about nullification is prosecuted widely! Go to your local courthouse and try to pass out pamphlets to that day's jury pool about their constitutional right of nullification, and there is a very good chance that you will end up in handcuffs, as so many others have. Question: Do you think male defendants, the ignorant public, or feminist/misandrist politicians and prosecutors are behind the criminalization of the mere education of the public?
#85 to #59 - dangercliff
Reply 0
(10/20/2014) [-]
firstly - the maximum <100% percentage of a group of seven things is 85.71%
secondly - these are all unopinionated stories, leaving no room for exaggeration, and all of them have something to do with feminism (see the labels on each image), leaving "********" as the only possible classification for discrediting the post.
thirdly - even if only one is true, as implied by "99%," there remains a serious need for TRANSPARENCY and REEVALUATION OF DEMOGRAPHIC RIGHTS.
Since these stories contain names, and can be looked up easily using google and other search engines, I'm sure you'll be able to separate the fact from fiction if you want slip into a more accurate percentage OP
tl;dr Boy, everyone is stupid except you.
#86 to #59 - mrhaihoang
Reply 0
(10/20/2014) [-]
I was glad for a second thinking you could be right
#61 to #59 - noin [OP]
Reply +9
(10/20/2014) [-]
If you believe that these things have nothing to do with feminism, you haven't been paying attention.
#93 to #61 - helenwheels
Reply -2
(10/20/2014) [-]
Oh then excuse me, exaggerated ******** then. M y mistake.
#96 to #93 - noin [OP]
Reply 0
(10/20/2014) [-]
Wake us up if you ever decide to go look at how things are.
#94 to #93 - anon
Reply 0
(10/20/2014) [-]
F*ck off to Tumblr, cunt.
#95 to #94 - helenwheels
Reply -1
(10/20/2014) [-]
You have it all wrong.
I simply don't believe every single thing I read that pertains to a certain ideology because I swear my parents like my sister better than me.
#17 - chixla
Reply +8
(10/19/2014) [-]
"Spontaneous and opportunistic rape"
so surprise butt seks
123>
[ 102 comments ]
Leave a comment