Upload
Login or register
x

Comments(309):

Leave a comment Refresh Comments Show GIFs
12345>
[ 309 comments ]
Top Rated Controversial Best Lowest Rated Newest
Anonymous comments allowed.
171 comments displayed.
Reply
+537
User avatar #23 - mrwillje (10/10/2015) [-]
how the **** could you even sell antimatter
Reply
+3
User avatar #256 to #23 - platinumaltaria (10/11/2015) [-]
If you could have contained antimatter, you would be ******* rich as **** . Literally world governments would want a slice of that anti.
Reply
0
User avatar #282 to #256 - cognosceteipsum ONLINE (10/11/2015) [-]
That's impossible though, because how would you contain antimatter in matter?
Reply
-1
User avatar #283 to #282 - platinumaltaria (10/11/2015) [-]
You could contain it within an electromagnetic field.
Reply
0
User avatar #284 to #283 - cognosceteipsum ONLINE (10/11/2015) [-]
Electromagnetism is atoms, aka matter.
Reply
+3
User avatar #287 to #284 - platinumaltaria (10/11/2015) [-]
Antimatter is, in fact, affected by the fundamental forces, but inversely.
Reply
+1
User avatar #291 to #287 - cognosceteipsum ONLINE (10/11/2015) [-]
Source for that? Sounds like pseudoscience
Reply
-1
User avatar #295 to #291 - platinumaltaria (10/11/2015) [-]
Antimatter is merely matter with inverse physical properties, like charge etc. It is composed of anti-particles (antiquarks, positrons etc.) and thusly is affected by the strong, weak, electromagnetic and gravitational forces. However, since charge is inverted you would require an inverse field.
Reply
0
User avatar #288 to #284 - derangedberger (10/11/2015) [-]
No, it's not
Reply
+1
User avatar #290 to #288 - cognosceteipsum ONLINE (10/11/2015) [-]
Electromagnetism is a property of atom. Dark matter for example has no electromagnetic radiation and works in a different way.
Reply
+1
User avatar #292 to #290 - derangedberger (10/11/2015) [-]
Electromagnetism is a force carried by photons, photons are not matter/atoms
Reply
0
User avatar #293 to #292 - cognosceteipsum ONLINE (10/11/2015) [-]
That's what I said. Electromagnetism is a property that atoms have, atoms emit light because of photons but the photons are only emitted by regular matter and atoms I'm pretty sure.
Reply
0
User avatar #286 to #284 - cognosceteipsum ONLINE (10/11/2015) [-]
Bluenebula can you help out?
Reply
+2
#294 to #286 - bluenebula (10/11/2015) [-]
You can't actually sell anti-matter. It costs that much to make it is what the content is saying. I don't know exactly how accurate that is, but it's pretty ******* expensive.

Antimatter can and does exist naturally in out universe today, we think. The idea is that during the big bang, there were both matter and anti-matter being dished out left and right. They collided, made energy, and eventually one won out. That being the matter we see today. There MAY still be super small pockets of anti-matter out there that still have not collided with our normal matter, but it's hard to prove.

Containing anti-matter? oh ******* boy, there's a Nobel Prize winning question. Anti-Hydrogen moves near the speed of light when it's created, and is super-heated to stupid high levels because of the creation processes. It's not something you can catch with a butterfly net.

I'll try to sum this up simply. Anti-matter was thoguht to be a negative proton and a neutron nucleus, with a positively charged electron. Turns out, it's a negatively charged proton and a neutron nucleus, with a positive proton. So the way we slow these anti-atoms down is by sending them through a bunch of normal negatively charged electrons. The way we trap it is by sending it into a vacuum container full of positrons, where it becomes a low charged anti-atom. Now that it has a charge, large magnets can then be used to keep the anti-hydrogen in place. Simply storing anti-matter costs a lot of money. Even then, I think the longest anti-matter has ever been stored was 15 minutes, back in 2011. So if you want your very own tube of anti-matter, use express shipping.
Reply
0
User avatar #307 to #294 - SaintSlayer (10/16/2015) [-]
That was beautifully written
Reply
0
User avatar #296 to #294 - cognosceteipsum ONLINE (10/11/2015) [-]
Well then... My understanding of antimatter was that it would be impossible to store considering it should release huge amounts of energy within contact of matter. So naturally, I thought storing antimatter within anything else than antimatter would be impossible, know what I'm saying?
Platinumaltaria I guess you're right in this.
Reply
0
User avatar #297 to #296 - bluenebula (10/11/2015) [-]
It is stored in regular matter. The tube is a vacuum filled with positrons that give the anti-hydrogen a charge. There are massive magnets set in place to detract the anti-hydrogen. So imagine a steel ball levitating due to the forces of the magnets pushing it away. Same idea.
Reply
0
User avatar #298 to #297 - cognosceteipsum ONLINE (10/11/2015) [-]
Eh, it's not for nothing that I go to social science classes instead of ******* .. Real science. Closest I get to hard sciences is geography and math. Which is funny, because my dad has a PhD in physics. Thanks for the explanation though
Reply
+4
#250 to #23 - areyouseriouss (10/11/2015) [-]
i think thats the cost of creating it.
Reply
+88
User avatar #202 to #23 - beatmasterz (10/11/2015) [-]
What does it matter?
Reply
+24
#220 to #211 - anon (10/11/2015) [-]
oh hey it's the one i edited, neat

going anon because this will without a doubt be downvoted into oblivion for no reason
Reply
+3
User avatar #243 to #211 - mettallica (10/11/2015) [-]
Don't waste your money. It's just a picture of a hew rubbing his hands.
Reply
0
User avatar #244 to #243 - mettallica (10/11/2015) [-]
Jew*
Reply
+166
#51 to #23 - hillbillypowpow (10/11/2015) [-]
carefully
Reply
+21
User avatar #110 to #51 - whimsicalmagnus (10/11/2015) [-]
**** you, thats the answer my dad always gives to **** like this damn dad jokes, and the worse part? they always make me laugh so screw you for making me laugh
-5
#138 to #110 - homestuckxplain has deleted their comment [-]
Reply
+81
#87 to #23 - ohemgeezus (10/11/2015) [-]
Click to show spoiler
craigslist? ebay?
Reply
+12
User avatar #178 to #87 - ilikechoclatemilk ONLINE (10/11/2015) [-]
A bank does this where i live. They send these letters monthly, in English, and they basically say "you owe x amount of money" (English is not the language in my country). They did this to a friend's grandmoher, she didn't know what the letters were about, and by the time she showed them to someone and asked what the letter was about, the 2.5 euros p/m had piled up and now she owes the bank 60 euros, out of nowhere.

The ********* thing is that they started this "service" without letting people know there is a charge for it, without their permission or consent, and they made lots of money from this. I imagine especially from old people.

**** bankers.
Reply
+5
User avatar #185 to #131 - tacticalhog (10/11/2015) [-]
christ thanks for posting that, made my night
Reply
0
#252 to #185 - skelebones (10/11/2015) [-]
no prob. i wonder if anyone actually bought that bomber?
Reply
0
#285 to #131 - anon (10/11/2015) [-]
**anonymous used "*roll picture*"**
**anonymous rolled image**HOLY ******* **** RUSSIA ACTUALLY DID
www.ibtimes.co.uk/soviet-tu-95-bomber-aircraft-sale-ebay-1439453
too bad they pulled the listing a week later tho... that woulda been a fun buy
Reply
+609
User avatar #28 to #23 - demandsgayversion (10/10/2015) [-]
Obviously by trading it for antidollars.
Reply
+130
#101 to #28 - asdqwezzx ONLINE (10/11/2015) [-]
You missed a pun opportunity.
Reply
+17
User avatar #55 to #28 - corsairjoshua (10/11/2015) [-]
3 hours and 195 thumbs? You're in for the ride of your life, bucko
Reply
+44
User avatar #61 to #55 - demandsgayversion (10/11/2015) [-]
So you're getting in on it early to get some associative thumbs? And to think people say trickle-down thumbanomics isn't real.
Reply
+48
#77 to #61 - wrpen (10/11/2015) [-]
It's the basic thumbanomics.
Reply
+10
#105 to #77 - allthesenamessuck (10/11/2015) [-]
That's gotta be the most underrated joke I've ever seen
Reply
0
#260 to #105 - anon (10/11/2015) [-]
Something something something huehuehue something antisomething gib thumbs pls
Reply
+1
User avatar #64 to #55 - maxismahname (10/11/2015) [-]
195 8 minutes ago
207 now. That's 12 thumbs in 8 minutes.
The content will still be up for about 14 hours
12 thumbs in 8 minutes is 1.5 thumbs a minute.
1.5 x 60 is 96
96 thumbs an hour, means that in a perfect world, this comment is going to end up with about 1500 thumbs.
Realistically though, it'll probably be more around a 1000, but that's still damn good
Reply
+1
User avatar #65 to #64 - maxismahname (10/11/2015) [-]
Actually it rose by 13 in the 5 minutes it took me to write that, so I'm starting to believe it might actually reach 1500+
Reply
+1
User avatar #88 to #65 - ohemgeezus (10/11/2015) [-]
no it wont
Reply
0
User avatar #90 to #88 - maxismahname (10/11/2015) [-]
100 thumbs in an hour, it's definitely possible
Reply
0
User avatar #94 to #90 - ilovehitler (10/11/2015) [-]
It'll probably reach, at max, like 400-500.
Reply
0
User avatar #92 to #90 - ohemgeezus (10/11/2015) [-]
it's 4 hrs old and not even 300 thumbs yet, that's not 100 per hr. The top comment right now is has 500+ and is only halfway dead. comments rarely get 1k thumbs, lets alone 1500
Reply
0
User avatar #95 to #92 - maxismahname (10/11/2015) [-]
I got the 100/hr figure from the past hour. When I made my original comment, it was at 208, now it's at 297. That's pretty darn close to 100. This debate will be solved when the content ends. I predict it will be between 1000-1500 thumbs
Reply
0
User avatar #99 to #95 - ohemgeezus (10/11/2015) [-]
your prediction is as wrong as your math seeing how, if you look at this comment you'll see for yourself. 4/300 isn't 100. thumbs usually top off at 600-800. notice how the top content is at 1500, that's standard for top content, comments rarely ever get anywhere near that, and those that do are actually hilarious.
Reply
0
User avatar #299 to #99 - maxismahname (10/11/2015) [-]
Fine, you win, gg no re
Reply
0
User avatar #102 to #99 - maxismahname (10/11/2015) [-]
We'll see
Reply
0
User avatar #114 to #102 - demandsgayversion (10/11/2015) [-]
>>#99 I've gotten a 1,000 comment before, so it's not impossible.
Reply
0
User avatar #186 to #114 - deadmice (10/11/2015) [-]
Just showing up here to show off my nearly 2k comment

/He+takes+it+rather+well/funny-pictures/5446424/5#5
Reply
0
User avatar #258 to #186 - demandsgayversion (10/11/2015) [-]
I remember that one, that's pretty great
Reply
-1
#302 to #64 - anon (10/11/2015) [-]
>>#114, >>#88, only 608
Reply
0
User avatar #32 to #28 - hirollin (10/11/2015) [-]
you deserve more thumbs.
Reply
+121
#63 to #23 - pennydragon (10/11/2015) [-]
You can create tiny tiny amounts of anti-matter with a special laser and equipment. Then you can store charged anti-matter in a specialized device with an electric or magnetic field.

Then you put it on Craigslist or something, I dunno.
Reply
0
User avatar #221 to #63 - mrwillje (10/11/2015) [-]
Of course it would be in an electric field, i didnt think of that
Reply
0
#159 to #63 - skebaba ONLINE (10/11/2015) [-]
How much matter can such an amount of anti-matter annihilate?
Reply
+25
User avatar #164 to #159 - goobyman (10/11/2015) [-]
1 gram of antimatter will annihilate 1 gram of matter
duh
Reply
0
User avatar #176 to #164 - siemenz (10/11/2015) [-]
How much energy would be released in annihilation of 1 gram of matter and 1 gram of antimatter?
Reply
+5
User avatar #179 to #176 - goobyman (10/11/2015) [-]
the reaction between matter and its corresponding anti-matter particles is 100% efficient, converting all of the mass into energy.
just multiply the total mass (particles plus their anti-particles) in kilograms by the speed of light squared (9 x 10^16) and you will get the result in joules.
90,000,000,000,000,000
90 Quadrillion Joules of energy.
Reply
+8
#188 to #179 - bmnhu ONLINE (10/11/2015) [-]
Thats for 1kg (so 0.5kg matter + 0.5kg anti-matter). (9x10^16)


For 1gram matter + 1gram antimatter, the energy = 1.8x10^14 J
Thats equal to 0.042Megatons (TNT equivalent), which is approx. 2x Fat Man bomb dropped on Nagasaki.

Although "in the case of proton–antiproton annihilation, approximately 50% of the released energy will escape in the form of neutrinos, which are almost undetectable" so its probably half that.
Reply
-1
User avatar #189 to #188 - goobyman (10/11/2015) [-]
>>#181
i specificed it to be 0.002kg (1gram + 1gram duh). you still multiply by 9x10^16
Reply
+2
#190 to #189 - bmnhu ONLINE (10/11/2015) [-]
Do your math again.

www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=0.002kg+*+c%5E2

www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=90+Quadrillion+Joules

Read section "Comparisons as energy"
Reply
0
#194 to #190 - goobyman (10/11/2015) [-]
dunno why the **** my calculator ***** up so badly, but yeah you're right 0.002kg*c^2 = 1.79751036 × 10^14 joules or 180,000,000,000,000 or 180 Trillion Joules... what the **** , calculator? what am i doing wrong?
Reply
+4
#197 to #194 - bmnhu ONLINE (10/11/2015) [-]
I get the same answer as you did on windows calculator.
Also, without brackets I get a different answer, which is also wrong and makes no sense..

I guess... we shouldnt use windows calc for big numbers.
Reply
0
User avatar #184 to #179 - siemenz (10/11/2015) [-]
With the price of 12 USD cents per kWh of electricity that would mean if this energy was somehow harnessed and transformed without loss into electricity, this would make 2 grams of annihilated matter worth 3 000 000 000 dollars.

That leaves us with a huge deficit. That means we won't see annihilation power plants any time soon.
**** .
Reply
+1
User avatar #187 to #184 - goobyman (10/11/2015) [-]
mind you, you can't really store it for any reasonable amount of time so it's worthless. However, if you do a slow controlled reaction, possibly.
Reply
+1
User avatar #192 to #187 - siemenz (10/11/2015) [-]
However, should it be used as a weapon, 2 grams of annihilated matter would unleash 21,510516252390057361376673040153 Megatons of energy.
For comparison the Tsar Bomba, the most powerful atomic bomb ever detonated had 50 Megatons.

So that's good. Humanity once again has more effective means to kill each other

By the way, yes I read the "Angels and Demons" by Dan Brown. I was just curious about this exact ammount of antimatter.
Reply
0
User avatar #212 to #192 - DisgruntledTomato (10/11/2015) [-]
Attach an antimatter bomb onto a scramjet, fly it into whatever you want to **** up.

Reply
0
User avatar #240 to #212 - malachitecobra (10/11/2015) [-]
>attaches antimatter bomb to jet
>bombs russia
>whole world explodes
fugg : D
Reply
0
User avatar #181 to #179 - goobyman (10/11/2015) [-]
clarification: we have 0.002kg of matter converted into energy, *(9x10^16) = 90 quadrillion joules of energy
Reply
0
#213 to #176 - myjunk (10/11/2015) [-]
That's assuming they are the same element.
Could Anti-Iron be annihilated by Nitrogen for example?
Reply
0
User avatar #264 to #213 - Devourer (10/11/2015) [-]
Yes, it can, since antimatter consists of positrons instead of electrons etc, so the exact opposites of regular atoms. The building blocks of these atoms will react with each other, not the atoms themselves. So it doesn't matter what kind of atom it is, whether anti-hydrogen of anti-uranium, both react the same with regular-anything.
Reply
+262
#1 - anon (10/10/2015) [-]
Damn...you need a new drug dealer. I pay only 28k a gram for tritium.
Reply
+35
User avatar #2 to #1 - redocean [OP](10/10/2015) [-]
Your **** is stepped on as hell though... My tritium guy delivers too.
Reply
+38
#7 to #1 - anon (10/10/2015) [-]
Donchu hate when you forget a batch for 12.33 years and half of it goes ******* Helium. br /> br /> Bring back gundam Deuterium, I say.
Reply
+9
#58 to #7 - shiphotel ONLINE (10/11/2015) [-]
I'm too dumb to get these jokes but I laughed anyway
Reply
+2
User avatar #139 to #58 - wrpen (10/11/2015) [-]
Half lives, ***** . Basically, a radioactive material releases "alpha particles", helium that's just been fused together from two protons and two neutrons from the original atom, which is why it's radioactive in the first place. A half life is the amount of time it takes for half of the material to turn into helium, which in Tritium is around 12 years and 4 months.
Reply
0
User avatar #246 to #7 - wtfduud (10/11/2015) [-]
I'm out of the loop, what does br /> mean?
Reply
+89
User avatar #43 - bucketofhurt (10/11/2015) [-]
And then there's god damn printer ink.....
Reply
+105
#4 - sinery (10/10/2015) [-]
>Antimatter 62.5 trillion per gram
How the **** does that work?
Reply
+37
User avatar #6 to #4 - cupcakescankill (10/10/2015) [-]
Really it's only speculated since now it's only possible to very expensively produce a few atoms of antihydrogen.
Reply
+2
#53 to #6 - steezburger (10/11/2015) [-]
I believe that the $62.5 T/g is the cost of making a few atoms scaled up to one gram. Since it is made using a particle accelerator Don't quote me on this its expensive AF. Maybe once they figure out a better method of production economy of scale will decrease the price tremendously, kind of like pharmaceuticals where 'it takes $1 billion to make the first pill and $10 for the second'.
Reply
0
#210 to #53 - myjunk (10/11/2015) [-]
Even if you manage to cut down production prices and amortize the machinery, you might still need some rare and pure resources but more importantly, very elaborate storage and transportation vessels.
Since the antimatter will be annihilated when it gets in contact with any matter it has to be stored in a vacuum and keept away from the walls by a magnetic field.
That would usually prohibit any shipping and you would prodce it right where you need it.
Reply
+36
#12 to #4 - kugis (10/10/2015) [-]
It's not that expensive. The problem is that the only way to create antimatter is via pair production which yields equal amounts of matter and antimatter which usually means the products annihilate before you can do anything with them.
Reply
+4
#111 to #12 - anon (10/11/2015) [-]
If I understand you correctly...anitmatter seem to be the best way to decompose garbage and toxic waste.
Why aren't we funding this!?
Reply
+19
#135 to #111 - anon (10/11/2015) [-]
w-we are
Reply
0
User avatar #160 to #135 - soldiertwo (10/11/2015) [-]
but its too expensive on bigger scale, right?
Reply
0
User avatar #227 to #111 - shinycharizard (10/11/2015) [-]
Because charge parity and pair production go hand in hand. It's the reason why blasting antimatter at matter in vast amounts isn't a good idea.
Reply
+2
User avatar #89 to #12 - hellbentcrusade (10/11/2015) [-]
Is the positron the antimatter? I just thought it was an oppositely charged particle. I am not science man. I only learned of pair production from learning fission for my job.
Reply
+3
User avatar #141 to #89 - reretzu (10/11/2015) [-]
The positron is antimatter, it is an oppositely charged particle as well, but that's pretty much what antimatter is.
Reply
0
User avatar #300 to #141 - hellbentcrusade (10/11/2015) [-]
Weird. Thanks
Reply
+2
User avatar #123 to #89 - mgarrigan (10/11/2015) [-]
am not a science man
learning fission for my job
i am confus
Reply
+1
User avatar #301 to #123 - hellbentcrusade (10/11/2015) [-]
I work in the nuclear field. I have learned about matter but I haven't gotten into all the deep stuff.
Reply
0
User avatar #303 to #301 - mgarrigan (10/11/2015) [-]
sounds interesting. do you enjoy it?
Reply
0
User avatar #304 to #303 - hellbentcrusade (10/12/2015) [-]
I'm in the navy so no. Coupling all of the normal nuclear restraints with the navy restraints makes a not fun job a headache. It's a good set up for the rest of your life and you're not an infantryman so it's better than most military work.
Reply
0
User avatar #27 to #12 - sinery (10/10/2015) [-]
Was more thinking about you know
value = dollars / grams
Antimatter and grams in an equation.
Reply
+51
#37 - commanderbunbun ONLINE (10/11/2015) [-]
actually, the de beers diamond corporations has a monopoly on diamond mining, and they create artificial scarcity of diamonds.

so that exotic rock you got your girlfriend is just as common as a blue eyes white dragon.
Reply
0
User avatar #310 to #37 - capps (11/04/2015) [-]
Well I mean, as long as they keep their monopoly that diamond is gonna keep it's value tho?
Reply
+1
User avatar #68 to #37 - maxismahname (10/11/2015) [-]
Your Yugioh reference kinda contradicts your argument
Reply
+1
User avatar #148 to #37 - enlightednatzie (10/11/2015) [-]
Not to brag but i have over 300 yo gi oh cards and one blue eyes white dragon.
Reply
+35
User avatar #40 to #37 - schwerdaddy (10/11/2015) [-]
There are only 4 in the world?
Reply
+21
#81 to #40 - xseargeantxpainx (10/11/2015) [-]
Well three now technically.
Reply
+8
User avatar #96 to #81 - imdan (10/11/2015) [-]
I liked Kaiba, but when I saw that first episode, I got so ******* pissed off. Why would you destroy one of the greatest ******* cards ever? You could have had a four headed blue eye's white dragon, you **** .
Reply
0
#98 to #96 - xseargeantxpainx (10/11/2015) [-]
From his perspective, since Yugioh only has a limit of 3 cards of the same name, if anything happened (Some spy went in and took one of his blue eyes kind of ordeal), he didn't want anyone else to have it, even if it was a possibility.

To be fair though he could have given one to his brother or something...
Reply
0
User avatar #100 to #98 - imdan (10/11/2015) [-]
Its the TV show, they break the rules all the time. Him just as much as anyone else, he's got the money to do it.
Reply
+31
User avatar #11 - willindor ONLINE (10/10/2015) [-]
And people find it strange that I snort rhino horn nowadays because of the high price on smack
Reply
+30
User avatar #5 - decapitation (10/10/2015) [-]
£40 for a gram of coke round here
Reply
0
#261 to #5 - anon (10/11/2015) [-]
That must be really **** coke... A good g of coke costs at least £60, but then it goes up to £100 for a g; supposedly really good coke, but will always be cut with something.
Reply
+10
User avatar #84 to #5 - TheBigGummyBear ONLINE (10/11/2015) [-]
Are you telling us or are you selling?
Reply
+17
User avatar #14 to #5 - sirrelevant (10/10/2015) [-]
That price is probably the price for a gram of pure coke, not the cut up **** you buy from your dealer.
Reply
+11
User avatar #18 to #14 - Jewssassin (10/10/2015) [-]
Well it kinda has to be cut for human consumption.
Reply
-3
User avatar #19 to #18 - Tusura (10/10/2015) [-]
Said no true coke head ever.
Reply
+9
User avatar #20 to #19 - Jewssassin (10/10/2015) [-]
Well I dont exactly do coke as an every day drug, but my understanding is that if you do a line of uncut coke, you're probably going to die, or want to be dead. And that if you want to tell if coke is really uncut you just gum it.
Reply
+1
User avatar #174 to #20 - BeaverBalls (10/11/2015) [-]
if you do a line of uncut cocaine you will feel like the king of this world but there is a very thin line between a great cocaine high and a cocaine overdose
Reply
0
User avatar #21 to #20 - Tusura (10/10/2015) [-]
It takes a while to get to the tolerance to be able to do straight uncut coke.

I agree though, the average person would want to kill their self from a single line.
It'd be like someone taking a wax dab as their first time smoking marijuana, except you can actually OD on cocaine.
Reply
+5
User avatar #22 to #21 - Jewssassin (10/10/2015) [-]
Ok cool, I understand now.
Reply
0
User avatar #157 to #20 - daviid (10/11/2015) [-]
That's why you just do a bump every so often. You'll be relatively okay.
Reply
0
#280 to #18 - anon (10/11/2015) [-]
www.youtube.com/watch?v=dp3ZzcRP33Q
No you idiot. Cutting it maximizes profits. Plain and simple. Drug dealers don't care about ur health they care about $$$. Pure cocaine used to be used by dentists and doctors as an anesthetic until it was banned due to the highly addictive properties. In the 80s average cocaine on the streets used to be up to 80% pure and done in small doses. The dealer with the best coke and least cut coke used to get all the customers. Now with the war on drugs there are less dealers who are trying to maximize profits with the product they have. Average cocaine now on the streets is at best 30% pure.
Reply
0
User avatar #124 to #14 - Kingsteveooo (10/11/2015) [-]
Canada here, $100 for the cut **** , $120 for uncut per gram
Reply
0
#207 to #124 - Longboarder (10/11/2015) [-]
120$ for uncut up here? thats pretty cheap. It has along ways to travel to make it up here to Canada getting stepped on each stop on the way. However; you may have a way better hook up than me. I find the base rate for it here is 100$ no matter what quality. But if you in Columbia you can buy a Gram uncut for like 5-10$ (usd)
Reply
0
User avatar #172 to #14 - bongpebbles (10/11/2015) [-]
pure coke is no more than $150
Reply
+37
User avatar #10 to #5 - articulate (10/10/2015) [-]
What weighs more £40 of feathers or £40 of coke?
Reply
+4
User avatar #16 to #10 - theflyingdick (10/10/2015) [-]
but kuke is heaviur than fethaurs
Reply
+3
User avatar #78 to #10 - masseffectexplain (10/11/2015) [-]
They both weigh 40 £s
Reply
+3
User avatar #24 to #10 - decapitation (10/10/2015) [-]
well with £40 of feathers, you also carry the weight of all them birds you made naked
Reply
+20
#150 - revisempai (10/11/2015) [-]
painite, is that pain in rock form
Reply
+5
#217 to #150 - spanishninja (10/11/2015) [-]
Click to show spoiler
ITS A MINERAL
Reply
+15
#29 - donfailed ONLINE (10/10/2015) [-]
Gonna say right now that diamonds are completely flooded in the market. They're not worth their market price, but still sell at it
Reply
+9
#30 to #29 - anon (10/10/2015) [-]
they sparkle nice and people buy into **** about them being rare or some ****

even though there are hundreds of prettier and more appealing gems...Opals, Pearls or Rubies for me being one example
Reply
+7
#79 to #30 - brisineo (10/11/2015) [-]
After talking with a jeweler, Moissanite is the best.

Shinier than a diamond, brighter colors than a diamond, and far cheaper than a diamond. Actually all but experts can't tell the difference unless you put it under specific tests.
Reply
+3
User avatar #46 to #30 - masterboll (10/11/2015) [-]
not to mention CZ, which looks just like diamond
Reply
+3
#31 to #30 - donfailed ONLINE (10/10/2015) [-]
Cuprite looks pretty nice to me if it counts for anything
Reply
+24
#113 - Dember ONLINE (10/11/2015) [-]
Damn, that Californium sure is expensive... can we trade some for water? : /
Reply
+8
#144 - denniswilles (10/11/2015) [-]
I'm glad admin implemented this
Reply
+8
#82 - trapjesus (10/11/2015) [-]
Somebody is getting ripped the **** off if you're coke is over $200 a gram. Even 100 is considered high unless it's premo **** .
Reply
+1
#166 to #82 - anon (10/11/2015) [-]
my coke is only 14 dollars for a 12 pack.
Reply
+2
User avatar #169 to #166 - Stamyham ONLINE (10/11/2015) [-]
Jesus Christ! Where the hell do you live?
I consider a 12 pack of soft drinks to be too expensive when it breaks $5.
Reply
+3
#162 to #82 - anon (10/11/2015) [-]
The prices are based off of 100% pure material.
If you were to literally buy 1 gram of cocaine without anything cut into it, it'd probably be $200.
Reply
0
User avatar #241 to #162 - trapjesus (10/11/2015) [-]
In my area, 50/50 **** is about 50 a gram. 100-120 (high end for yet unfamiliar clients) for the raw sheit.
Reply
+6
User avatar #122 - fknparra (10/11/2015) [-]
Who the **** buys a gram of coke for $215?
Reply
0
User avatar #129 to #122 - bodeejus (10/11/2015) [-]
I know that one is way off. I wouldn't spend more than $80, but usually it's around $60 where I'm from.
Reply
+3
#154 to #129 - anon (10/11/2015) [-]
These estimates are assuming the purest substance obtainable. What you buy would be considered garbage to the people who pay 215 dollars a gram.
Reply
0
User avatar #235 to #122 - iatedub (10/11/2015) [-]
I was thinking the same thing, its been a few years, but Jesus Christ.

Reply
+6
User avatar #91 - campetersen (10/11/2015) [-]
YOU TELLIN' ME I'VE BEEN SPENDING MY MONEY ON WEED WHEN I COULD HAVE BEEN BUYING SAFFRON!?!?!?!?
Reply
+2
User avatar #155 to #91 - Greevon (10/11/2015) [-]
Dude, you messed up. Saffron chicken is the ******* best, way better than pot.
Reply
+4
#177 - hondasupermoto (10/11/2015) [-]
Cocaine doesnt ******* cost 215$ for a gram dammit ...
Reply
0
#224 to #177 - anon (10/11/2015) [-]
It probably does if you're talking about 100% pure cocaine.
Reply
0
User avatar #236 to #224 - iatedub (10/11/2015) [-]
Even extremely high quality fish scale doesn't go for that much, well when I last bought some it wasn't.
Reply
0
User avatar #273 to #177 - kassdesu (10/11/2015) [-]
I was thinking the same thing.
Reply
+4
#170 - oosulley (10/11/2015) [-]
ITT: Everyone on FJ is either a drug user or drug dealer
Reply
+4
User avatar #127 - CrispyBacon (10/11/2015) [-]
Isn't the price of diamonds artificially inflated though? Like they've found some mines that have a **** ton of diamonds but jewelry companies only allow them to mine so many a year or something I think.
Reply
0
User avatar #153 to #127 - Greevon (10/11/2015) [-]
One company owns almost all the diamonds in the world and the prices are set by them. It's been like this since the late 1800's I think.

But even an artificially raised price is still the price of the item.
Reply
0
User avatar #222 to #153 - thesovereigngrave (10/11/2015) [-]
I don't think it's been an actual monopoly since the 80s. But they are still the largest by far, and the other companies pretty much do the same thing since it helps their prices.
Reply
+4
User avatar #42 - godofcorndog (10/11/2015) [-]
Diamonds are pretty much worthless. Their market is controlled by one company who determines their price.
Reply
+6
#86 - crispytg (10/11/2015) [-]
Weed - 420 *********** /gram
Reply
0
User avatar #106 to #86 - meltdownlol (10/11/2015) [-]
$16.66 a gram where I live but know body sells them per gram normally it is 25 for 1.5-1.7
Reply
0
User avatar #121 to #106 - alucardthemagician (10/11/2015) [-]
usually like 20-25 for an eighth here. but now that everyone grows in oregon i get smoked out all the time
Reply
+1
User avatar #175 to #121 - BeaverBalls (10/11/2015) [-]
**** both of you its goddamn $20 a gram for loud down in mississippi and youre lucky if those goddamn ******* actually give you 1.0 and not ******* 0.7
Reply
0
User avatar #271 to #175 - kassdesu (10/11/2015) [-]
California, 10/gram.
Reply
0
User avatar #214 to #175 - ileesin (10/11/2015) [-]
10 euros / gram if you know the guy
Reply
0
#116 to #106 - crispytg (10/11/2015) [-]
i ahvent bought weed in forever but i think i remember buying a gram (usually threw in more cuz they were cool like that) for like 20. it was usually good higher end stuff though
Reply
0
User avatar #253 to #86 - ilusha (10/11/2015) [-]
>tfw people sell me 6 euro/ gram
>tfw all of you are getting ripped off
Reply
+3
User avatar #198 - englishwitch (10/11/2015) [-]
The market price of diamond is totally artificial. They hold back stocks of diamonds and release them slowly into the market to keep the price high. Russia has huge diamond deposits they won't touch because even a tiny percent of it being released to the market would lower the price far enough to disrupt the world economy. Africa would lose it's huge diamond trade. Several African countries have economies that are totally dependent on their diamond trade.
12345>
[ 309 comments ]
Leave a comment
<
>
 Friends (0)