Upload
Login or register
x

Comments(165):

Leave a comment Refresh Comments Show GIFs
12>
[ 165 comments ]
Top Rated Controversial Best Lowest Rated Newest
Anonymous comments allowed.
145 comments displayed.
Reply
+330
#5 - jaxonnn (09/11/2015) [-]
Reply
+31
User avatar #41 to #5 - dorg (09/11/2015) [-]
I have not watched the "western" OLDBOY but the original one is pretty nice, so I would not be surprised if what that critics says is true.
Reply
0
User avatar #147 to #41 - gypsydude (09/11/2015) [-]
DO not watch the Western Oldboy. Its trash and no their is no point to why they made a remake of it
Reply
0
User avatar #158 to #147 - ponchosdm (09/11/2015) [-]
I havent seen the American version but I really think that remake was to bring a great and crazy story to the American audience, and see if the director would make the other ones, I mean is to try to expand the market and make money
Reply
+15
#99 to #5 - anon (09/11/2015) [-]
It's true though.
Reply
+20
#102 to #5 - kez (09/11/2015) [-]
Imdb ratings:

Original - 8.4
Remake - 5.7
Reply
+31
User avatar #10 to #5 - oceanmist (09/11/2015) [-]
the original korean film is way, way better. If you like this one you should watch the original
Reply
+29
User avatar #35 to #5 - kokkoderrisch ONLINE (09/11/2015) [-]
That's because it is. The original film is actually good.
Reply
+39
#6 to #5 - tandemwarelephant (09/11/2015) [-]
it hurts to watch
Reply
+4
#7 to #6 - anon (09/11/2015) [-]
YESSSSSS that gif makes me want to watch it again. Thanks.
Reply
0
User avatar #44 to #6 - darkbladept (09/11/2015) [-]
.
Reply
+76
#43 - jdizzleoffthehizzl (09/11/2015) [-]
Anything with Tom Hardy has a base score of three stars and just goes up from there
Reply
+13
User avatar #100 to #43 - apietotheface (09/11/2015) [-]
Loved Bronson, even though it was weird as **** .
Reply
+12
#101 to #100 - apietotheface (09/11/2015) [-]
**** , forgot the gif.
Reply
+444
#2 - anon (09/11/2015) [-]
Saw this today and it was fantastic. The Guardian reviewer is just a massive cunt. He basically tore into it because he thhught it was too entertaining/funny for a biopic on some gangsters.
Reply
-29
User avatar #34 to #2 - kokkoderrisch ONLINE (09/11/2015) [-]
It's got a 59 on metacritic and a 6.1 on Rotten Tomatoes. The Guardian's critic didn't rate it much lower than the average.
Reply
+54
User avatar #51 to #34 - reaperriley ONLINE (09/11/2015) [-]
Everyone knows that metacritic is a **** review site and rotten tomatoes inst much different.

Just like with mad max, critic reviews =/= consumer opinion.
Reply
+16
User avatar #52 to #51 - kokkoderrisch ONLINE (09/11/2015) [-]
Metacritic and Rotten tomatoes aren't review sites...
They're aggregators, they add all top critic reviews and then divide them to get an average score.

Consumers also have **** taste.
Reply
+17
User avatar #53 to #52 - reaperriley ONLINE (09/11/2015) [-]
So you have **** taste then.
Reply
-21
User avatar #54 to #53 - kokkoderrisch ONLINE (09/11/2015) [-]
I'm on the critics side here, so nope.

Also, what do you mean by Mad Max? Didn't the vast majority of people like it?
Reply
+17
User avatar #55 to #54 - reaperriley ONLINE (09/11/2015) [-]
I forgot to add "video game" to it. The mad max video game had extremely high consumer reviews while critics gave it subpar views.

But video games and movies dont exist to make critics happy, they exist to sell to the consumer. If a critic isnt serving the consumer, then they are **** at their job and shouldnt be there. Just because you think something is **** , doesnt mean others will think so.

I will now talk about negative Mad Max reviews for just over 40 minutes
Reply
+5
#111 to #55 - anon (09/11/2015) [-]
Ya, because user reviews totally aren't one sided as **** . The only people who EVER comment on Metacritic's user section are the people who really love it or hate it, so they're either blindly hating or fanboys ignoring any flaws. Not to mention there ARE legit complaints about the repetitiveness of the game, and the combat that's less complex than a game as simple as Arkham Asylum, that's bad.

I'm guessing you just really like the game so you're gonna drown out any legitimate complaints. Just like when people threw tantrums over IGN giving a remake of an old game almost 8/10 because anything lower than 8 triggers fanboys.
Reply
0
User avatar #121 to #111 - reaperriley ONLINE (09/11/2015) [-]
Either you are trying to bait me to death or you yourself are over emotional and you are worried about red thumbs, hence the anon status.

But in all seriousiness, watch the video. It addresses you comments plus additional points. I personally dont own Mad Max, but people are entitled to their opinion as long as they arent trying to silence others.
Reply
-17
User avatar #56 to #55 - kokkoderrisch ONLINE (09/11/2015) [-]
Video games and Hollywood movies of the braindead variety*

This is also why neither of them are art, especially video games.
Reply
+4
User avatar #57 to #56 - reaperriley ONLINE (09/11/2015) [-]
Yeah, as far as Im concerned now you are trolling.

Have a nice life.
Reply
-17
User avatar #58 to #57 - kokkoderrisch ONLINE (09/11/2015) [-]
Try watching a film by Bergman, Tarkovsky, Godard, Visconti etc. That's true art, nothing like the schlock that the average consumer consumes.

There's a reason arthouse exists.
Reply
+18
User avatar #60 to #58 - hydraetis (09/11/2015) [-]
Careful dude, don't want to trip over your 8-foot scarf and break your 1-inch diameter full-moon glasses.
Reply
-18
User avatar #61 to #60 - kokkoderrisch ONLINE (09/11/2015) [-]
>implying any of the directors I listed are hipster

Is your taste so **** that you haven't even heard of them?
Reply
+11
User avatar #62 to #61 - hydraetis (09/11/2015) [-]
They might not be hipster, but you sure as **** are.
Reply
-17
User avatar #63 to #62 - kokkoderrisch ONLINE (09/11/2015) [-]
How? Video games aren't considered art in academia, neither are Hollywood action flicks.

Disagreeing with these facts puts you on the same level as anti-vaxxers.
Reply
+10
#68 to #63 - anon (09/11/2015) [-]
I can practically smell the starbucks you must spend all your time in.

Don't confuse pretension with academic excellence or merit.
Reply
-11
User avatar #70 to #68 - kokkoderrisch ONLINE (09/11/2015) [-]
I stated a fact.
Reply
+4
#82 to #70 - anon (09/11/2015) [-]
You did no such thing. It depends really on if you consider the oppinion of 'elite' art institutions the be-all-end-all. If you do, then you've entirely missed the point.

In terms of academia: there are a great deal of places that do consider blockbuster films art and in fact dedicate time to understanding how CGI and visual effects have changed our perceptions and how we approach artistry in general.
Reply
-9
User avatar #84 to #82 - kokkoderrisch ONLINE (09/11/2015) [-]
Stop putting academia up in ivory towers. Academia is not meant to be elitist, they want laymen like you to read good works.
Reply
+1
#88 to #84 - anon (09/11/2015) [-]
'Elite' art instituions are not the entirety of academia. If you had actually attended some form of higher education I would expect you to know this.

Once more: do not confuse pretension with quality.
Reply
-6
User avatar #90 to #88 - kokkoderrisch ONLINE (09/11/2015) [-]
I literally said that YOU shouldn't put academia up in ivory towers. Learn some English, dumbass.
+3
#91 to #90 - anon (09/11/2015) [-]
Reading comprehension doesn't seem to be your strong suit. Try again and then formulate a valid, rather than retarded, response.
Reply
-8
User avatar #92 to #88 - kokkoderrisch ONLINE (09/11/2015) [-]
Wow, what a dumbass.
+5
#93 to #92 - anon (09/11/2015) [-]
Oh dear, you've devolving further.

Probably best if you just **** off now sweet cheeks. You're no more popular here than you were in highschool.
+5
#109 to #92 - jackleeswagger ONLINE (09/11/2015) [-]
Reply
-10
User avatar #95 to #88 - kokkoderrisch ONLINE (09/11/2015) [-]
>Doesn't know what context is
>nitpicks based on said severe lack of what context is

Yes, you are a retard. Stop projecting your own ****** childhood on me.
+4
#96 to #95 - anon (09/11/2015) [-]
> Claimed video games and blockbusters aren't considered art in academia.
> Said this was 'fact'
> Called out on complete bollocks
> Bitches and whines like a little girl.

Yup, I'm the retard here. ;) When will your carers be taking you away for de-dribbling?
+3
User avatar #125 to #95 - italianfrosttroll (09/11/2015) [-]
You got shut the **** up and now you're attacking him personally? You sure don't seem like a but mad wailing cunt...
Oh wait, that's exactly what you seem like.
Reply
+3
User avatar #71 to #63 - hydraetis (09/11/2015) [-]
Careful with the butthurt there, wouldn't want you to break your vintage 1928 pipe (made in 2008)
Reply
-2
#73 to #71 - kokkoderrisch ONLINE (09/11/2015) [-]
This is you.
Reply
+5
User avatar #80 to #73 - centraldogma (09/11/2015) [-]
I really want to believe that you realize the incredibly rich irony inherent in a comic touting objectivity relying upon such a shoddy strawman... but I get the feeling that you wouldn't have posted it if you had.
Reply
-5
User avatar #81 to #80 - kokkoderrisch ONLINE (09/11/2015) [-]
Are you really so stupid that you can't even get a comic like this? I don't expect much from genre fiction lovers, but holy **** !
It's obviously not for objectivity, only the dumbass (aka you guys) thinks it is. It simply states that maybe, just maybe, an expert who's read thousands of more books than you and studied them rigorously, with the proper knowledge and context, has an opinion that holds far more weight than yours in this given subject.
Reply
+4
User avatar #87 to #81 - centraldogma (09/11/2015) [-]
I apologize. Clearly I misunderstood the deep and insightful nature of the artistic masterpiece you just posted. Truly, you are a wise man far beyond your years, as your other comments attest.
have fun messing with the rest of the people that bother replying to you
Reply
-8
User avatar #89 to #87 - kokkoderrisch ONLINE (09/11/2015) [-]
Wow, what a copout. You're still a ******* idiot.
+3
User avatar #94 to #89 - centraldogma (09/11/2015) [-]
I really shouldn't take the bait, but oh well. You ignored the points I made, put words into my mouth, and proceeded to spew ******** , as you've been doing for most of your other comments in this thread. After I responded, you resorted to the cultured method known as "name-calling". Call me what you will, but if you expect me to get upset over mediocre attempts at trolling, think again. Feel free to get in the last word if you'd like, I've wasted more time here than I'd have liked to already.
Reply
+3
#97 to #73 - anon (09/11/2015) [-]
You're comparing different qualitative meanings of good. Here the professor means 'good' in a technical writing sense. The average consimer however will measure 'good' based on the entertainment value.

Apples to oranges.
Reply
-7
User avatar #72 to #71 - kokkoderrisch ONLINE (09/11/2015) [-]
Are you mad that I stated a fact?

Video games will never ever be considered art as long as it panders to braindead idiots. Deal with it.
Reply
+4
User avatar #74 to #72 - hydraetis (09/11/2015) [-]
I'm just remarking about how much of a hipster you are. I never said I gave a **** whether video games are a form of art or not.
Reply
-7
User avatar #75 to #74 - kokkoderrisch ONLINE (09/11/2015) [-]
So anyone who states a fact get called a hipster in your world? You're probably a global warming denier, aren't you?
Reply
+4
User avatar #76 to #75 - hydraetis (09/11/2015) [-]
And I'M the one who was supposedly mad? lol.

You're basically just another version of the cringiest of fedora-neckbeards.
Reply
-4
User avatar #77 to #76 - kokkoderrisch ONLINE (09/11/2015) [-]
What are you trying to prove?
Reply
+2
#85 to #52 - anon (09/11/2015) [-]
Add together several piles of **** and divide evenly and you'll still have a pile of **** .

Consumers are the target audience. You have no right to decide who has ' **** taste.'
Reply
0
User avatar #65 to #52 - Rockaman (09/11/2015) [-]
When the critics stop being corrupt as **** , then I'll agree that critics have good taste and consumers worse...

Also when they stop giving 5*s to ****** arthouse films that have **** all happening in them!
Reply
-6
User avatar #67 to #65 - kokkoderrisch ONLINE (09/11/2015) [-]
Maybe you're just stupid?
Reply
0
#69 to #67 - Rockaman (09/11/2015) [-]
Must be a troll, stop feeding him people!
Reply
-1
#123 to #69 - anon (09/11/2015) [-]
this counts as food
Reply
0
#110 to #69 - jackleeswagger ONLINE (09/11/2015) [-]
He's not a troll. Check the account. Drown him in reds
Reply
-1
User avatar #114 to #52 - Petroleum ONLINE (09/11/2015) [-]
Yeah, insult all those consumers who are the ones who pay for the products they're selling, that'll get 'em!
Reply
-1
#78 to #52 - anon (09/11/2015) [-]
not sure that's how it works, consumers tastes > critic tastes considering one buys the **** the other just complains it wasnt their idea
Reply
-7
User avatar #79 to #78 - kokkoderrisch ONLINE (09/11/2015) [-]
What the **** are you even trying to say?

Consumers are stupid and don't have a lick of taste except for a tiny minority.
Reply
-1
User avatar #155 to #79 - kresh (09/11/2015) [-]
>generalizing
>ever
>i shiggy diggy
Reply
0
#119 to #51 - Sevenseas (09/11/2015) [-]
what about imdb?
Reply
0
User avatar #33 to #2 - thetoxicketchup (09/11/2015) [-]
Well movie critics don't like fun, so that's not surprising.
Reply
+1
User avatar #36 to #2 - bombadier ONLINE (09/11/2015) [-]
How many c's are in cunt?
Reply
+12
#98 to #36 - anon (09/11/2015) [-]
Just one. But there are 3 k's because the proper spelling of cunt is kokkoderrisch
Reply
+1
User avatar #103 to #98 - logicstrike (09/11/2015) [-]
I had to read through the thread to get this joke, good job anon
Reply
+2
User avatar #38 to #36 - EdwardNigma ONLINE (09/11/2015) [-]
Three, because if you turn the U and lowercase N the right way, they become (Retarded looking) C's!
Reply
+3
User avatar #40 to #38 - bombadier ONLINE (09/11/2015) [-]
Oh
It was a quote from the film but now its something much more deeper than that
Reply
+1
User avatar #49 to #2 - thewanderinghatter (09/11/2015) [-]
The Guardian is generally garbage anyway
Reply
+1
#104 to #2 - dakkadakka (09/11/2015) [-]
Everyone knows Guardianistanis are cunts
Reply
+2
User avatar #108 to #2 - kristovsky (09/11/2015) [-]
The gaurdian doesn't rate anything that isn't either blockbuster cash grab or progressive gay **** highly.
Reply
+2
User avatar #116 to #2 - baditch (09/11/2015) [-]
I swear some critics just give bad scores to be edgy. I read a review for Dark Souls 2 and the guy was like "I have 200 hours logged in and all you do is fight enemies and roll around constantly. This game sucks."
Reply
+10
User avatar #11 to #2 - AngryRedMidget (09/11/2015) [-]
e.g. most movie critics
Reply
+1
User avatar #13 to #11 - xredsoxmuffin (09/11/2015) [-]
I've seen critics say that the movie was too long for a 100 minute action flick and gave it a 2 1/2.
Reply
+1
User avatar #14 to #13 - AngryRedMidget (09/11/2015) [-]
I get movie ratings from crowdsourced sites, like imbd or RT, I've never read a critical review that actually seemed to understand what the movie was trying to give us.
Reply
0
User avatar #15 to #14 - xredsoxmuffin (09/11/2015) [-]
Its a movie, all you're doing is watching it and taking it in for about 2 hours. Because people complain about movie times the new Avengers was **** (like it would have been good in the first place gg Guardians of the Galaxy the best marvel movie waifu )
Reply
+4
#18 to #15 - exyted (09/11/2015) [-]
Well.
Reply
+20
User avatar #21 to #2 - bluerangermartin (09/11/2015) [-]
The guardian is a libcuck website
Reply
-15
#22 to #21 - anon (09/11/2015) [-]
Says the dude with the trap faggot demon for an avatar.
Reply
+15
User avatar #23 to #22 - bluerangermartin (09/11/2015) [-]
thats tom hardy
Reply
+2
User avatar #1 - cubicalpayload (09/11/2015) [-]
Why even put two stars on there? They aren't obligated to put reviews on the cover, good or bad.
Reply
0
User avatar #19 to #1 - ora ONLINE (09/11/2015) [-]
Because it looks like 4 stars with heads in the way. Thus, they put a bad review there just to **** with them.
Reply
+1
User avatar #8 to #1 - wertologist (09/11/2015) [-]
Probably out of spite. If a movie has tons of 5 star ratings on the cover it will generally be viewed as a good movie. Those people gave it two stars. Producers are mad since everyone else gave them 5s and 4s. Put the 2 star on it so it looks like it's being cut off by the image.
Reply
+3
User avatar #9 to #1 - miscreant (09/11/2015) [-]
You know Daft Punk? They call themselves that because that's what a reviewer called their music after their first album. "A daft, punky thrash".
Sometimes, we take bad things others call us and we wear it as armour.
Reply
0
#12 to #9 - jimkid (09/11/2015) [-]
or the band Lynyrd Skynyrd
Reply
0
User avatar #30 to #12 - discobleach ONLINE (09/11/2015) [-]
or Deerhunter, who called their first album " turn it up, faggot " after something an audience member screamed once
yes the singer is gay
Reply
+38
User avatar #3 to #1 - SirSheepy (09/11/2015) [-]
spite
Reply
+41
#16 - armenia (09/11/2015) [-]
"In cinemas Sept. 9"...
Biggest lie I've ever seen
Reply
0
User avatar #83 to #16 - oiman (09/11/2015) [-]
is that **** or vomit? i cant tell
Reply
+3
#47 to #16 - orkamungus (09/11/2015) [-]
Dear Lord, your gif made my laugh my guts out for a good solid minute Yes I kniw, i'm easily entertained... . Thanks for this and have all the thumbs I can spare!
Reply
+12
User avatar #50 to #47 - iqequalzero (09/11/2015) [-]
Its pretty amazing isnt it? Such finesse, such elegance in the throw. The hallmark of years of practice. And thats before we get into the flawless bowel control.
Reply
+32
#107 - riddari (09/11/2015) [-]
Was getting a low rating from the guardian part of Tom Hardy's plan?
Reply
+10
User avatar #130 to #107 - schwerdaddy (09/11/2015) [-]
If I gave you a bad rating, would your movie flop?
Reply
+10
#132 to #130 - riddari (09/11/2015) [-]
It would be extremely unpolite.
Reply
+8
User avatar #133 to #132 - schwerdaddy (09/11/2015) [-]
You had a big budget.
Reply
+3
#148 to #132 - thempc (09/11/2015) [-]
i'm both glad and scared that i know where that's from
Reply
+1
User avatar #150 to #148 - EdwardNigma ONLINE (09/11/2015) [-]
Alright, I'll ask.
Whats it from?
Reply
+4
#152 to #151 - EdwardNigma ONLINE (09/11/2015) [-]
Jesus
Reply
+1
User avatar #161 to #160 - thempc (09/11/2015) [-]
what an applicable username
Reply
+15
User avatar #86 - inquisition (09/11/2015) [-]
The Guardian is for left winged cuckold anyway
Reply
+1
#117 to #46 - Marker ONLINE (09/11/2015) [-]
"There’s something maddeningly brilliant about this promotional sleight of hand. Technically, there’s nothing dishonest about the use of my rating. I gave it two stars and there are just two stars on display. I’ve been trolled and I’m totally alright with it. The word “chutzpah” has been used a lot on Twitter."
Reply
-1
#153 to #117 - anon (09/11/2015) [-]
******* with your gay ass weeb comment you cunt!!! This isn't an anime post, so don't leave anime comments.
Reply
+1
#154 to #153 - Marker ONLINE (09/11/2015) [-]
Reply
0
User avatar #149 to #117 - thempc (09/11/2015) [-]
reviews for Legend: "maddeningly brilliant" -The Guardian
Reply
+2
User avatar #48 - poorpup ONLINE (09/11/2015) [-]
My cousin has a small role in this. Super proud
Reply
0
User avatar #129 to #48 - bitchitroll ONLINE (09/11/2015) [-]
ill have to watch this movie just to find your cousin
Reply
0
User avatar #131 to #129 - poorpup ONLINE (09/11/2015) [-]
Square head, dark brown hair, blues eyes and quite pale : )
Reply
+1
User avatar #64 to #48 - nowthatsedgy [OP](09/11/2015) [-]
what character does he play?
Reply
+5
User avatar #66 to #64 - poorpup ONLINE (09/11/2015) [-]
He's a cousin of the Krays, so I think he's in most scenes when there's a group of them. Not a main character but I think he has a good few lines
Reply
0
User avatar #112 to #66 - Marker ONLINE (09/11/2015) [-]
is it enough to be credited?
Reply
0
User avatar #113 to #112 - poorpup ONLINE (09/11/2015) [-]
I think so. He was at the 'blue' carpet, did a few interviews so he was important enough to go there so likely
Reply
0
User avatar #115 to #113 - Marker ONLINE (09/11/2015) [-]
Yeah I don't really know British film laws. In the US you have to have a certain minimum number of words/lines to have to be credited. Exceptions, of course, include film makers who choose to credit those who didn't meet the criteria (e.g. Aaron Sorkin appearing in most of his own stuff as "man in bar"), or when the actor chooses nto to be credited despite meeting the criteria and then some (e.g. Bob Saget in How I met yout Mother).
Reply
0
User avatar #118 to #115 - poorpup ONLINE (09/11/2015) [-]
Ah ok, he may not be credited in america but I am sure he's got like a relevant role in it, otherwise he wouldn't even have told me
Reply
+5
User avatar #4 - rogaa (09/11/2015) [-]
I ******* love tom hardy. gonna watch this 10/10
Reply
0
User avatar #37 to #4 - bombadier ONLINE (09/11/2015) [-]
I'd say his best performance yet.. Good bit of cockney humor aswell
Reply
+2
#136 - bohemianblasphemy (09/11/2015) [-]
That's sly even by my standards
Reply
+2
User avatar #137 to #136 - Ulmer (09/11/2015) [-]
What is this gif from and why do I want to watch it so bad.
Reply
+4
User avatar #138 to #137 - undeadmaus (09/11/2015) [-]
It's from Thieves in time, a video game.
Reply
+2
#139 to #138 - Ulmer (09/11/2015) [-]
Comment Picture
Reply
+1
#140 to #139 - bohemianblasphemy (09/11/2015) [-]
Specifically Sly Cooper: Thieves in Time hence the bad pun . This guy's name is Dimitri Lousteau, and he's more or less a pimp.
I'd recommend playing the first three games before this one, though.
Reply
+4
User avatar #39 - pointblankhits (09/11/2015) [-]
Brilliant movie, Would recommend
Reply
+8
User avatar #20 - shadowkingdr (09/11/2015) [-]
i don't trust critics anymore, they started to judge a movie on ******** rather then if its good or not, take Abraham Lincoln vampire hunter, it was a good movie but it got 2 stars because its a serious movie rather than a comody
Reply
+3
#25 - anon (09/11/2015) [-]
**anonymous used "*roll picture*"**
**anonymous rolled image** was it the cats?
Reply
-1
User avatar #156 to #25 - kresh (09/11/2015) [-]
"Just gently clean and measure it"
"THIS IS SPARDA!"
Reply
+2
#141 - jalthelas (09/11/2015) [-]
Damn son, that is pretty sly.
Reply
-1
User avatar #27 - phtholognyrrh (09/11/2015) [-]
but the guardian review was probably SJW ******** anyways
Reply
0
User avatar #105 to #27 - datassman (09/11/2015) [-]
I kinda doubt it. A dude above posted a link to the guy's response to the poster with his 2 stars and he says he called it disappointingly shallow and cartoonish. I mean, Ronnie Kray was bisexual so sjw's will probably trumpet it for representation and all
Reply
0
User avatar #162 - tsubasa (09/11/2015) [-]
That poster designer is a Legend
Reply
0
User avatar #159 - drakonpunch (09/11/2015) [-]
Do they have to put their rating on there? If not why would they?
Reply
0
User avatar #164 to #159 - theelyzian (09/12/2015) [-]
It actually looks cool.
Reply
0
User avatar #146 - nowthatsedgy [OP](09/11/2015) [-]
So one night I post OC and get like 10 thumbs. On the same night, I repost some image on my Facebook feed from a page I liked to FJ, 20 hours later and it makes it into the Top 2 with 1294 thumbs.

I know what I must do to get thumbs.

Reply
0
User avatar #165 to #163 - nowthatsedgy [OP](09/12/2015) [-]
I was thinking of the "Netflix and chill with a twist" one, but I guess the point is my OC hardly gets any thumbs, but I drown in thumbs when I repost.
Reply
0
User avatar #145 - nanako ONLINE (09/11/2015) [-]
The guardian is a marxist mouthpiece. If they hate something its probably good
12>
[ 165 comments ]
Leave a comment
<
>
 Friends (0)