Home Funny Pictures Funny GIFs YouTube Funny Text Funny Movies Channels Search
Anonymous commenting is allowed
#15 - thechosentroll (10/27/2013) [-]
I think he may have meant this.
I think he may have meant this.
#108 to #15 - nigeltheoutlaw (10/27/2013) [-]
Flagged for gore.
#109 to #108 - thechosentroll (10/27/2013) [-]
You can't flag mods and the day I get flagged by a person who uses cropped porn as reaction pics is the day a flaming monkey shoots out my ass.
#159 to #109 - nigeltheoutlaw (10/27/2013) [-]
I know I'm right, which is why I'm annoyed in the first place by the situation on one of my favorite websites.

I can live with you thinking that I'm a **** .
User avatar #160 to #159 - thechosentroll (10/27/2013) [-]
No, it's not just me thinking. You're objectively being a **** .
#161 to #160 - nigeltheoutlaw (10/27/2013) [-]
Only to you and other mods that I don't like.
User avatar #162 to #161 - thechosentroll (10/27/2013) [-]
No, you've proven your point multiple times, you have nothing to gain from this and yet you still continue with this **** . You are by definition a **** .
#164 to #162 - nigeltheoutlaw (10/27/2013) [-]
You pissed me off by being an ass for a little joke, so yes, I am being a **** . I'll stop though since the novelty of it is wearing off.
User avatar #165 to #164 - thechosentroll (10/27/2013) [-]
In all fairness, it was a ****** joke.
#110 to #109 - nigeltheoutlaw (10/27/2013) [-]
>I don't know what a joke is.
Take that dildo out of your ass pls.

These girls are just happy. You can't flag happy girls.
#111 to #110 - thechosentroll (10/27/2013) [-]
Actually, I could flag whatever I want. It doesn't have to be illegal for me to flag it. I'll just get yelled at if it's not. I could ban you and then unban you just to demonstrate how east it is.
#113 to #111 - nigeltheoutlaw (10/27/2013) [-]
Fine, do it. Every mod I've encountered so far (with gwenisghey as the only exception) has been an insufferable **** that abused their powers, so you wouldn't want to break the trend.
#118 to #113 - EdwardNigma ONLINE (10/27/2013) [-]
Even me, glorious Edward Nigma?
#120 to #118 - nigeltheoutlaw (10/27/2013) [-]
I said "every mod I've encountered so far", so not you. Yet. Time will tell.
#186 to #120 - walcorn (10/28/2013) [-]
Have you encountered me yet, or do you have a complaint to come with?
User avatar #187 to #186 - nigeltheoutlaw (10/28/2013) [-]
I haven't met you before, so no complaints. I know I was making a big generalization, but that's also why I stipulated that it was only mods that I had met up until that point.
#114 to #113 - thechosentroll (10/27/2013) [-]
Calm your porncropping tits. I don't intend to ban you, since it's technically SFW. Sort of. I'm just saying that I could.
Calm your porncropping tits. I don't intend to ban you, since it's technically SFW. Sort of. I'm just saying that I could.
#116 to #114 - nigeltheoutlaw (10/27/2013) [-]
I'm calm, just annoyed.

It is SFW, even by the stupid new rules. Good for you; you're parents must be proud of your new power.
Comment has been flagged   Hide Hide All +Fav (0) Reply 0
#122 to #116 - thechosentroll (10/27/2013) [-]
Flagged Comment Picture
This image was flagged 12/13/2013
#127 to #122 - nigeltheoutlaw (10/27/2013) [-]
It's a small protest against the new rules. I only do it when talking to mods, otherwise I use normal reaction images.
#129 to #127 - thechosentroll (10/27/2013) [-]
I hope you realize how ******* stupid this is. Because mods post borderline stuff, you're intentionally provoking them with VERY borderline NSFW pics, which in turn makes them start banning even more borderline stuff. You're doing more harm than good. Not to mention making me want to ban you, since I consider pics with no purpose other than to arouse as NSFW, even when they don't show anything. NSFW doesn't just mean tits and ass. Anything inappropriate for the situation is NSFW. That's why it's called NSFW and not just porn.
#131 to #129 - nigeltheoutlaw (10/27/2013) [-]
There's nothing NSFW about the images I'm posting by the new rules, except maybe "Soft porn that is suggestive", though in my opinion that'd be a weak case. Your personal interpretation is wrong, but I guess telling you that is a waste of time since you'll use your criteria to ban whether or not it's incorrect.

The only reason mods would ban more borderline stuff because of little old me is if they were vindictive or mentally defective, neither of which would be my problem. Are you going to go around being even stricter with bans because I made you angwy by posting cropped faces?

Don't bring Franken Fran into this.
#133 to #131 - thechosentroll (10/27/2013) [-]
**** you I post what I want. What I'm saying is that provoking mods isn't going to help in the slightest. You're not being a rebel. You're being a dick.
#134 to #133 - nigeltheoutlaw (10/27/2013) [-]
I post what I want as well. I guess we have something in common after all.

I already tried the reasonable and understanding route and it got me a few bans and a resounding " **** off" from those that I appealed to. I'm not trying to rebel or change anything, but you are right that I'm just being a dick in my mild protest because I feel slighted. Your powers of deduction are astounding.
#139 to #134 - thechosentroll (10/27/2013) [-]
And instead of thinking "OK, maybe I should try to follow the new rules." your first reaction was "GET THE PORN!"? It's ******* like you that keep mods busy. Oh noes, you were ******* banned for an hour or two. I've been permabanned 4 times for months at times, one of which was a lifetime IP ban. What did I do? I ******* did what I was supposed to, got unbanned, took the rules into consideration and didn't let it happen again. That's how **** works - you don't throw a hissy fit like a little kid, just because someone huwt your feewings. You ******* learn from your mistake and carry on. Now enough with the cropped porn. Or at least switch to a different artist. Get some bloody variety.
#140 to #139 - nigeltheoutlaw (10/27/2013) [-]
As much as I hate them, I am following the new rules. Nothing I'm posting is a direct violations of the rules as they stand. I have 1400 cropped faces and I'm just going down the list. I can post other artists if it bothers you that much.

Good for you.
#142 to #140 - thechosentroll (10/27/2013) [-]
Well, wadda ya know! We've reached the point in the argument, where it's painfully obvious that neither of us is going to yield and agree with the other one, let alone change their actions. So, wanna flip a coin to see if I ban your ass or not?
Well, wadda ya know! We've reached the point in the argument, where it's painfully obvious that neither of us is going to yield and agree with the other one, let alone change their actions. So, wanna flip a coin to see if I ban your ass or not?
#149 to #142 - nigeltheoutlaw (10/27/2013) [-]
Well, I didn't really consider that an argument, but since you insist:

I followed the rules to a tee prior to the rule change since all of the restrictions were fairly reasonable, even if they didn't make sense on what was supposed to be an 18 and up site. Even after the initial rule change I didn't flip my **** and instead tried to make the powers that be realize that the rule change was unnecessary and would only make the site lose users. For my troubles I was banned (yes, it was a small ban, but I was insulted that I wasn't even told that my ideas "would be taken under advisement" or some **** , and that's really the only thing that matter there). Even then I didn't start to be a dick or a pain in the ass; that didn't start until I was banned several more times for images that didn't violate the new rules by mods that just felt like being ******** . So no, my first reaction wasn't to post cropped faces to piss off mods, it was my third reaction.

Not only that, but the TOS states that this site has no mods and that there will be adult content on it, so your position shouldn't even exist. That alone takes away any possible legitimacy that your position as a mod on a website could hold. Your position, and therefore your opinions, hold no water by this statement.

Moving on to the issue at hand:

"Waah, I can't convince this guy that I'm right so I'll threaten to ban him instead!"

I could always post classical nudes if you'd prefer since admin directly said that those no longer violate the rules.

www.funnyjunk.com/FJ+Rules+and+Flags/text/4847895/902#902
#150 to #149 - thechosentroll (10/27/2013) [-]
You are a very dislikable person.
Comment has been flagged   Hide Hide All +Fav (0) Reply 0
#154 to #150 - nigeltheoutlaw (10/27/2013) [-]
Flagged Comment Picture
This image was flagged 11/10/2013
User avatar #157 to #154 - thechosentroll (10/27/2013) [-]
Yes, I don't blame you for that, but you're still being unreasonable. You're technically right, but you're still a **** .
User avatar #30 to #15 - davidsilverman (10/27/2013) [-]
So mods get to post as much gore as they want?
#35 to #30 - thechosentroll (10/27/2013) [-]
Firstly, if I wanted to post gore, I have quite the supply of glorious, drawn, detailed, clear anatomically correct gore. I wouldn't be posting scenes from old movies, where they used tomato sauce as blood. Secondly, it's not gore. Lastly, no, mods can't post whatever they want, since other mods can, will and are obliged to ban them for it. Except Phanact and Fagmin. Only fagmin can ban those two.
User avatar #75 to #35 - danilawleit (10/27/2013) [-]
FrankenFran4Lyfe
User avatar #76 to #75 - thechosentroll (10/27/2013) [-]
indeed
User avatar #77 to #76 - danilawleit (10/27/2013) [-]
I haven't read all of it yet but dear God is it awesome. im pretty sure it was in some comment thread of yours that I found it.
User avatar #80 to #77 - thechosentroll (10/27/2013) [-]
Probably. I use Fran as a mascot when I don't have any relevant pics.
User avatar #82 to #80 - danilawleit (10/27/2013) [-]
It'd be pretty cool if they animated it too...
User avatar #84 to #82 - thechosentroll (10/27/2013) [-]
Nah, they'd have to censorize too much.
User avatar #36 to #35 - guiguito (10/27/2013) [-]
actualy they get to post what they want, and i've seen mods baning halloween costumes more than once and banning bikini pics that they themselfs posted minutes apart, i don't mind monty python but i do mind hypocrisy.
User avatar #37 to #36 - thechosentroll (10/27/2013) [-]
Well, I get bitched at for rarely banning people, so I doubt I was one of those ******* .
User avatar #32 to #30 - DisgruntledTomato (10/27/2013) [-]
It's Monty Python you tight arsed clown, get a ******* grip.
User avatar #34 to #32 - FligFlag (10/27/2013) [-]
This gif offends me. Please take it down.
User avatar #33 to #32 - davidsilverman (10/27/2013) [-]
Still I'm sure people got banned for less than this
 Friends (0)