Equal
| |
Anonymous comments allowed.
147 comments displayed.
#2
-
reloadedhamster (12/19/2014) [-] Well yeah if you show a titty anywhere people will look, thats just physics yo
#77 to #2
-
rothingham (12/20/2014) [-] Every man has electrons in his head that are quantum-entangled to some electrons in every woman's breasts. Every time some girl's boobs are revealed, a reverse in spin is triggered in these pairs of electrons; causing us men to look towards those boobs.
#11 to #8
-
gabsmatags (12/20/2014) [-] Pretty sure dem boobies got a gravitational pull, isn't that why guys orbit them as such?
#23 to #8
-
tastycrisps (12/20/2014) [-] More like psychology than biology, to be honest.
yes i know psychology is part of biology but you know what I mean
yes i know psychology is part of biology but you know what I mean
#53 to #52
-
tastycrisps (12/20/2014) [-] Physical attraction, especially to traits that are emphasized by a culture, falls more into psychology than to biology as a whole.
#180 to #8
-
russiaexplain (12/20/2014) [-] It's more geography, can you see those rock formations? They're perfect!
#129 to #8
-
ciacheczko (12/20/2014) [-] Nah, it's physics. 100% heterosexual woman I just can't deny - when there are boobs, eyes always look at them eventually. i'ver already discussed thatr matter with other girls, and we all came to an agreement - it's definitely some gravitational pull directly affecting eyes, regardless of whether they are willing or not.
#72 to #8
-
kurusudarling ONLINE (12/20/2014) [-] biology is really just chemistry and chemistry is really just physics
#201 to #70
-
magicexplain (12/20/2014) [-] Brooooo you should know by now half passed comments get thumbs. Simple and stupid its how I live. Its how I roll. Don't be hatin you communist
#204 to #203
-
magicexplain (12/20/2014) [-] Also replying first to content that is in the newest uploads to get more thumbs is soooo idiotic because sometimes its not about being the best but about being the first ;) ... Just some dumb ramblings from moronic person.
#65 to #29
-
niggernazi (12/20/2014) [-] I'd ram my fully erect veiny schlong up her asshole until she screams for mercy and **** blood for another week and then shoot my mighty cumshots on her small premature tits and then slap my flaccid schlong on her face back and forth if you know what i mean.
#208 to #200
-
tfwigetbanned (12/21/2014) [-] sorry m16 : ( the comment just gave me a feeling like someone on facebook when posting ragecomics. **** syntax
#64
-
Jenisist (12/20/2014) [-] fake. what girl works out without a sports bra? dem things be bouncing everywhere otherwise.
#159 to #64
-
QuestionMarks ONLINE (12/20/2014) [-] my wife
if you get used to the bounce and strain then it doesn't hurt as much
(she's a C)
if you get up to D and Beyond ok
if you get used to the bounce and strain then it doesn't hurt as much
(she's a C)
if you get up to D and Beyond ok
#47
-
seras (12/20/2014) [-] Ah, yes, Knallerfrauen. Basically Sex Jokes The Sketch Show.
Martina Hill is pretty awesome, though.
www.youtube.com/watch?v=okFWkvbRMkc
Martina Hill is pretty awesome, though.
www.youtube.com/watch?v=okFWkvbRMkc
#115 to #103
-
AnonsForSure (12/20/2014) [-] There's even hungarians on here, so why do you think it's that unlikely?
#134 to #133
-
fapperdefap (12/20/2014) [-] Long time waiting... and mine has always had a flow like that. Its not as fab when its windy though
#136 to #134
-
fapperdefap (12/20/2014) [-] Also you have to accept that no matter how long your beard is, people will confuse you for a woman from behind
#209 to #136
-
thejudgingmoose (12/21/2014) [-] Probably your hips.
Nice hair though, my friend. You have my approval.
Nice hair though, my friend. You have my approval.
#189 to #136
-
fuzzywussi (12/20/2014) [-] just hold on a second, u are a dude ?¿ how dare you trick me with those fabulous blonde hair of yours
#158 to #136
-
isolovegames (12/20/2014) [-] unless you give yourself an amazing handlebar beard thing that you can see from behind your head.
#141 to #136
-
cookiecoketwo (12/20/2014) [-] What if I do a ****** dwarf beard? And make sure people see it.
#148 to #136
-
thebritishguy (12/20/2014) [-] wearing skinny jeans is a bad idea if you don't want to be mustaken for a femaLe
#63
-
Karfeyenta (12/20/2014) [-] that would actually be equality. "public indecency" should be the revealing of genitalia. Boobs are not genitalia.
#104 to #63
-
aurumleo (12/20/2014) [-] What equality? The biological differences of men and women are painfully obvious. If the sexuality of women' breasts are normalized like the nature of men' chest, then it would be ******* bor-- Hmm well, topless girls with jumping rope would be arousing sight for me. However, look at the tribes in Africa: Men walking around topless women as if men have no sexual interest in women' breasts. I don't ******* want my future descendents to become like those people with lack of sex drive toward to women' breasts.
*cough* Back to my original topic. Equality is about equal opportunities, not equal biology. Am I wrong, people?
*cough* Back to my original topic. Equality is about equal opportunities, not equal biology. Am I wrong, people?
#156 to #63
-
tarabostes (12/20/2014) [-] I don't think men would mind that much, maybe for the old women with saggy-ass tits... But what?Do some people think if their child will see a topless woman they'll become perverts? I could have seen no tits at all and i would still be a pervert! I mean , if a kid is raised seeing bewbs , he won't make a big deal out of it, but now in some families, if there's a woman topless walkin' the momma will cover her kids's eyes. Must be those strong-ass religious 'merican families i guess....... But i would not mind seeing women walkin' around topless.... Meh , maybe some flat-chested bishes will die of jealousy if they see your breasts? hehe
Man, i sure do love this image....
Man, i sure do love this image....
#74 to #73
-
Karfeyenta (12/20/2014) [-] that's not the evolutionary purpose of breasts. Some breasts are sensitive, but most of the girls I've dated either had a personal bias against breast play, or they weren't sensitive enough to be enjoyable to both partners.
Breasts, in no way, improve the process of reproduction. They're there as a food source to young children once it's already been 'produced', to use crude terms. People are attracted to breasts for the same reasons a woman would be attracted to larger muscles or broad shoulders: it's an attractive trait that is subconsciously tied to the ideal mate.
Breasts are NOT sex toys. Not to sound like a tumblr bitch, but not even the parts actually used in the process of reproduction should ever be referred to as "toys". If your partner is submissive and gives you consent to refer to him or her as your toy, that's different.
Breasts, in no way, improve the process of reproduction. They're there as a food source to young children once it's already been 'produced', to use crude terms. People are attracted to breasts for the same reasons a woman would be attracted to larger muscles or broad shoulders: it's an attractive trait that is subconsciously tied to the ideal mate.
Breasts are NOT sex toys. Not to sound like a tumblr bitch, but not even the parts actually used in the process of reproduction should ever be referred to as "toys". If your partner is submissive and gives you consent to refer to him or her as your toy, that's different.
#87 to #86
-
Karfeyenta (12/20/2014) [-] I agree. But a lot of women agree that the neck can be stimulated in a way as to turn her on. Many areas can be stimulated in such a way. The butt cheeks do nothing at all for reproduction other than look attractive (which doesn't count in my opinion), and yet that can be erogenous.
#78 to #74
-
telmerthisisasix (12/20/2014) [-] They are related to reproduction though. Healthy breasts suggests ability to feed offspring, appealing to paternal instinct and causing arousal. Hence their being viewed as I dunno what the term would be, but how 'bout reproductive organs.
#81 to #78
-
Karfeyenta (12/20/2014) [-] that's exactly what I said though. You see healthy breasts and your subconscious mind thinks that's a good trait for a mate to have. That's what all attraction is. That's why women like stronger men, or richer men. Women want to be taken care of, so they tend to look for certain traits. Evolutionarily speaking, men want to find a woman that will make a good mother. Wider hips mean that she will most likely not die during childbirth (da booty) and so on.
We're describing the psychological basics of attraction here. If we were to hide everything that could be considered attractive, everyone would be wearing burkas. Just because it's attractive, doesn't mean it's sexual.
We're describing the psychological basics of attraction here. If we were to hide everything that could be considered attractive, everyone would be wearing burkas. Just because it's attractive, doesn't mean it's sexual.
#83 to #81
-
telmerthisisasix (12/20/2014) [-] Hey, I'm not against the hiding of breasts, and I think a lot of dudes would be with me on that. Just trying to make sense of legal stuffs.
#84 to #83
-
Karfeyenta (12/20/2014) [-] that makes perfect sense, and if I came off as rude, then I apologize. I tend to explain my opinions in a matter-of-fact tone.
#132 to #74
-
anon (12/20/2014) [-]
So your point it's, as breasts are not there to use them for sex, they should have the same treat as the male counterpart.
Yeah my ex-gf said the same thing, and it was not like I didn't agree with her, I don't mind girls going topless. But I don't see that as a good argument. They're not for sex, but they are USED for that, making them sexual, and then having the same treat as sexual organs.
Once again, I'm not against topless women, I just don't like the argument of "evolution", I'm sure there's a simpler way to excuse that women should be allowed to be topless in public just as men.
Yeah my ex-gf said the same thing, and it was not like I didn't agree with her, I don't mind girls going topless. But I don't see that as a good argument. They're not for sex, but they are USED for that, making them sexual, and then having the same treat as sexual organs.
Once again, I'm not against topless women, I just don't like the argument of "evolution", I'm sure there's a simpler way to excuse that women should be allowed to be topless in public just as men.
#90 to #73
-
hoponthefeelstrain (12/20/2014) [-] men's nipples are just as sensitive as female nipples.
#197 to #175
-
commontroll (12/20/2014) [-] All of Texas bruh. It's just that nobody does it except in Austin.
******* hippies. Just kidding, I love Austin.
******* hippies. Just kidding, I love Austin.
#131 to #95
-
anon (12/20/2014) [-]
> "Women have the equal chance to be topless as men"
> "Poor women! They don't show a sexual part of their body because people will say nice things about it"
This has two easy solutions, either stop using tits for sexual arousal OR give up and accept that, if you go showing your tits, people will comment on it.
> "Poor women! They don't show a sexual part of their body because people will say nice things about it"
This has two easy solutions, either stop using tits for sexual arousal OR give up and accept that, if you go showing your tits, people will comment on it.
#92 to #76
-
smashingtonic (12/20/2014) [-] It's legal in San Francisco to be nude it public. You just have to carry a towel around if you plan on sitting down anywhere. It was a while ago when I heard that, so I wouldn't know if they've changed it or not
#94 to #93
-
smashingtonic (12/20/2014) [-] It's not something you'd see all the time, or even a lot people doing it. It's pretty cold in San Fran
#139
-
amsel (12/20/2014) [-] TBH girls should be able to go topless wherever guys can go topless. In most countries of the world they already can. Sweden doesn't have "topless beaches" because every beach is a topless beach if you want it to be. The UK and subsequently America sort of invented the idea that women need their tops covered as well (and we make fun of Islamic countries for a very similar extension of that rule).
It should still be socially inappropriate (but not illegal) for both men and women though to run around topless on like city streets, in retail establishments, their places of work, parties that aren't topless themed, etc. It makes people focus on the wrong things in life when everyone is topless.
It should still be socially inappropriate (but not illegal) for both men and women though to run around topless on like city streets, in retail establishments, their places of work, parties that aren't topless themed, etc. It makes people focus on the wrong things in life when everyone is topless.
#58
-
megaton (12/20/2014) [-] i was expecting them to take their pants off to see if she would follow suit
