Upload
Login or register
x
Refresh Comments
Anonymous comments allowed.
7 comments displayed.
#2 - mrohnoez (11/26/2015) [-]
only 40,000 dollars..?
Gyad dayum....Give me a little airhogs piece of **** for 40 bucks and Ill slap on a little camera on that bitch... save some money
User avatar #16 to #2 - hamsterball (11/27/2015) [-]
well military hardware is designed to be rugged and durable, and it takes a lot of time and money to figure out how to make it rugged. it's not some little RC plane that they took off of a toys r us shelf, it took some serious R&D.
User avatar #24 to #16 - ninesundev ONLINE (11/27/2015) [-]
No it is not. It is a hoax by a webdesigner. It clearly reads:_ © 2000-2015 Destino AS. All rights reserved._ which belongs to a webdesigner who wants attention and jobs.
User avatar #7 to #2 - gilliam (11/26/2015) [-]
Considering the US militairy frequently fires of 90k Javelin missiles to destroy a single target, i think 40k on a reusable item, that might actually save some lives with good intel might not be that bad.
#20 to #7 - timecop (11/27/2015) [-]
and on that note those 90k missles take out tanks that have way more value so its a win
User avatar #21 to #20 - gottobeskippy (11/27/2015) [-]
usually to the tune of 5 to 10 million dollars a tank if its a big boy main battle tank
User avatar #6 to #2 - herptyderpies (11/26/2015) [-]
probably the 2 miles part
 Friends (0)