Double Standards (Links in Desc.). First story: www.youtube.com/watch?v=rdxu23EG-a4 Second story:www.dallasnews.com/news/community-news/mckinney/headlines/20131 double standard
x
Click to expand

Double Standards (Links in Desc.)

This was the best image I could find, she is holding his arms
and taking ofthis shirt.
Two young girls strip a tth grade hey to wear he has no clothes
and we girl films it and puts it en Touture. They are each given
misdemeanors; Real charges would have been sexual assault and
indecency with a child, upto a couple weeks in Juvenile prison.
A 17 year old man sexually assault a 13 year old girl, she
wantedto give him "oral" to make herself seem cool. She said
she was forced, the high school kid convicted said she lied about
her age and about being forced (' re blowing sameone
because they force you, bite their dick off). He got 5 years in
prison and lest all of his football scholarships.
...
  • Recommend tagsx
+574
Views: 39124
Favorited: 60
Submitted: 10/09/2013
Share On Facebook
Add to favorites Subscribe to autoflame submit to reddit

Comments(185):

[ 185 comments ]
What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
User avatar #6 - slone (10/09/2013) [+] (44 replies)
stickied by autoflame
being forced naked and being forced (or tricked) into giving oral sex are on two completely different levels
#5 - kanedam (10/09/2013) [+] (4 replies)
The girl said that she barely knew what oral sex was but that she did it anyway.

“I wanted them to think I was cool,” she testified.

The girl told conflicting stories to police, to forensic interviewers and to her parents.

“I over-exaggerated what happened so my parents wouldn’t judge me,” she said.

Sylvan argued during the trial that White was manipulated and that the girl lied about being forced and about her age.

Levonius told jurors that the girl’s consent was not relevant.

“A 17-year-old may not have sexual contact with a 13-year-old,” she said.



what the **** man?!
#59 - Imbtrtenu (10/09/2013) [+] (4 replies)
Is that a ******* pun.
#22 - pimpvader (10/09/2013) [+] (2 replies)
**pimpvader rolled a random image posted in comment #48 at Lots of R34 for this book ** I have no picture to express how much this angers me
User avatar #21 - whereistherumgone (10/09/2013) [+] (17 replies)
"if you're blowing someone because they force you, you bite their dick off"

what the ****
User avatar #35 to #21 - heartlessrobot ONLINE (10/09/2013) [-]
Well, there's a reason no one ever gets raped in the mouth. There's teeth there.
User avatar #14 - silverjet (10/09/2013) [+] (4 replies)
He should not have let a 13 year old suck his dick just sayin
User avatar #19 - animalsgreenberet (10/09/2013) [+] (14 replies)
i'm curious, how old were the girls in the first situation? if they were also fifth graders or only a little older, they might not have known what they were doing. but in the second case, a 17 year old should know she was 13. no offense, but there's a big difference between a 13 year old body and an 18 year old body.

i
#66 - baskisk (10/09/2013) [+] (1 reply)
Two young girls? How old are they, because if they're just stupid 5th grade girls, then the punishment is suitable, but if it's two teenage girls then they should have gotten worse punishment. Also, we don't know how credible the 17 year old guy was in the second one. You can obviously tell the difference between a 13 year old and a high school girl. The girl still could have been lying though. We just don't have enough info to make assumptions here people.
#40 - anticitezenone ONLINE (10/09/2013) [-]
User avatar #111 - defeats (10/10/2013) [+] (6 replies)
Taking somebodies clothes off isn't the same as sticking your dick into a child's mouth.
I don't know why it isn't stated whether the boy was forcefully stripped or not, so I'm going to assume he wasn't.
Whether a 13 year old wants to suck your dick or your force them it is wrong, don't do it.

"She lied about her age" isn't an excuse. It sucks, but it isn't.
User avatar #105 - RoyalNightmare (10/09/2013) [+] (1 reply)
"Two young girls". So you're saying, they could be 5th graders too? You can't really slap severe charges on kids, especially for that sort of thing. An older teenager (An adult, depending on where you live) having sex with a 13-year-old minor is completely different. The girl shouldn't have lied, but 13 is 13. Even if she looked a bit older, she'd still clearly be a minor. This isn't really a double standard, just two extreme examples put side-by-side to make it look like one.

Stop touting the "double standard" bandwagon, please.
#63 - queencardvike (10/09/2013) [+] (4 replies)
How can you not tell the difference between a 13 year old and a 15-20 year old.
User avatar #1 - ubercookieboy (10/09/2013) [+] (4 replies)
I swear if any of this crap is true...
User avatar #81 - edenone (10/09/2013) [+] (5 replies)
regardless of how you cut it they should all be in jail. i have no sympathy for any of the offenders.
there is no context on the first case with the girls, and the boy was old enough to be responsible for his actions regardless if the girl was 13 or not. it is his responsibility to as an "adult" to be sure of this.
as far as i am concerned based on the fact that there is no context on the girl case i cant see how you can use this as an example of a double standard.
#17 - imofcnotharveydent (10/09/2013) [-]
hey everyone, we should rename Funny Junk to Political Junk be it women, religion, or lifestyle, you're all taking the funny off this site
User avatar #96 - cptmctavish (10/09/2013) [-]
Beside the gender **** ...
Isn't that actually publishing child pornographc stuff? I mean... Some guys may fap to this.
And according to the german law you would be 5 years and above in prison...
#61 - zomaru (10/09/2013) [-]
We can't win, no matter what.
We can't win, no matter what.
#28 - iamspika (10/09/2013) [-]
**iamspika rolled a random image posted in comment #266 at :L **
**iamspika rolled a random image posted in comment #266 at :L **
[ 185 comments ]
Leave a comment
 Friends (0)