Deception. Here's a media post not about Nelson Mandela.. DE CAUCH it' s this easy... ill beware of disinformation. Yep.
Home Original Content Funny Pictures Funny GIFs YouTube Funny Text Funny Movies Channels Search

hide menu

Deception

Here's a media post not about Nelson Mandela.

DE CAUCH
it' s this easy...
ill
beware of disinformation
...
  • Recommend tagsx

Comments(109):

[ 109 comments ]

Show All Replies Show Shortcuts
Show:   Top Rated Controversial Best Lowest Rated Newest Per page:
Order:
What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
User avatar #1 - whatugawkinat (12/10/2013) [+] (24 replies)
I don't get it?
User avatar #2 to #1 - hashtronaut (12/10/2013) [-]
... How the **** do you not get it?
#15 - nightstar (12/10/2013) [+] (7 replies)
Yep.
#53 - birthdaybrony (12/11/2013) [+] (14 replies)
This is why I only trust one news source to give it to me straight.
User avatar #4 - twofreegerbils (12/10/2013) [+] (4 replies)
CNN Fake Iraq War Newscast Footage

Daily reminder that your news media is full of shills and that you should form your own opinions on a subject based on your own research.
#34 - anonymous (12/11/2013) [+] (5 replies)
what the hell is disinformation?
User avatar #42 to #34 - Keoul (12/11/2013) [-]
It's like misinformation but dis is more serious.
Probably.
#18 - ryderjbudde (12/10/2013) [-]
omj those tyrants made us think there were more people there than there actually was, how dare they
#35 - deadmuerto (12/11/2013) [+] (1 reply)
news is always bad in my town

I don't know why

I still love good ol' rapetown, Wisconsin
#13 - anonymous (12/10/2013) [+] (8 replies)
This is why it pisses me off when everyone just bandwagons on fox news hate. All news sources are like this, not just one. Stop thinking your CNN is any better.
User avatar #27 to #13 - thejerseyjenn (12/11/2013) [-]
The thing is, CNN caters to liberals. News is all about profit now. If a story won't get high ratings it won't get aired. Few news channels are truly neutral now, they try to appeal to a specific group.
#72 - knurl (12/11/2013) [-]
MFW the full thirty seconds it took for me to catch what was wrong.
#93 - insulation (12/11/2013) [-]
how dare they?
such money-hunger that they can't even fill the bowl


i ******* want cereal now....
#70 - zenrath (12/11/2013) [-]
To all the stupid people.

Top pic = Large crowd protesting

Bot pic = Small crowd squished together
+3
#57 - iviagic has deleted their comment [+] (1 reply)
User avatar #48 - fifteensecondchug (12/11/2013) [+] (4 replies)
A media post not about Nelson Mandela? As an American I obviously don't want to hear it. Good God who do you think I am? Hitler? For ***** sake, cram Nelson Mandela down my throat til I cum inspirational quotes.
User avatar #87 - samous (12/11/2013) [+] (5 replies)
Pro tip: only trust the bird's eye view when judging a protest.
I live in one of the arab spring countrys
User avatar #82 - monswine (12/11/2013) [+] (5 replies)
So it's a political rally about fiscal policy in France that flopped (nobody showed up). That dude is the party leader.
#113 to #112 - carlsagouin (12/12/2013) [-]
On est pas obligés de voir le mal partout non plus.
Cette interview a été réalisée avant le début de la manif, il n'y avait donc presque personne.
Fatalement, il fallait donner une bonne image, donc ces gens se sont rassemblés derrière lui pour qu'on les voit tous. Quand on regarde bien l'image et qu'on la compare à des vraies images de foule, on se rend compte qu'elle est pas si impressionnante.
Depuis quand est-ce qu'un rassemblement de 30 personnes est choquant ? Est-ce que Mélenchon a dit à ce moment là qu'il y avait 100 000 personnes derrière lui ?
L'image est drôle mais ça s'arrête là. On dirait une manipulation, mais ça n'en est pas. C'est un bon cadrage, voilà tout. Si on veut lui reprocher ça à lui (et pourquoi pas à TF1, qui aurait pu attendre qu'il y ait des gens pour faire cette itv ?) alors on peut très bien lui reprocher d'être maquillé lorsqu'il va sur un plateau, c'est pareil.
TF1 a fait ce cadrage, la quasi intégralité des médias ont dénoncé ce cadrage, on voit de quel côté le système s'est rangé. D'ailleurs le fait qu'ils se servent de ce cliché pour dire que la manif était ratée et de ne diffuser ceux qui montrent des places et des rues bondées montre bien qu'ils sont malhonnêtes. Seulement ils se cachent derrière une accusation et les gens crédules ont tendance à voir le mal chez les accusés et ne jamais soupçonner les accusateurs.
Les journalistes s'érigent en gardiens de la démocratie, de l'honnêteté, etc. Mais comme a dit Juvenal, qui gardera les gardiens ?
#75 - clufromtron (12/11/2013) [-]
<what they told the actors
#102 - carlsagouin (12/11/2013) [-]
It's not, though. This was an interview done BEFORE the demonstration and there were almost no people there yet. Of course they gathered behind him.
I know this is le fahnny but don't judge too fast.
User avatar #76 - anotherponyaccount (12/11/2013) [-]
Look further back They're still there
#61 - anonymous (12/11/2013) [-]
so it's bad to keep distance for making a better quality view for a viewer?
User avatar #40 - danmanjonesnz (12/11/2013) [+] (1 reply)
this happens all the time. Camera crew will always make it look as large as possible. The closer the protesters are to the camera, the smaller the protest, generally
[ 109 comments ]
Leave a comment
 Friends (0)