Upload
Login or register
Anonymous comments allowed.
#24 - timetravelzero ONLINE
Reply +40
(01/03/2014) [-]
It doesn't matter if you're the happiest person, an unfortunate weeper, a powerful beast, or a terrifying creature. We're all equal in the eyes of the Reaper.
#159 to #24 - irwincardozo
Reply +2
(02/03/2014) [-]
sorry forgot to log in
#160 to #159 - timetravelzero ONLINE
Reply 0
(02/03/2014) [-]
Anytime, IrwinC. If I'd remembered it was you, I'd have cited you as the source.
#161 to #160 - irwincardozo
Reply +2
(02/03/2014) [-]
no need for that, my love
#158 to #24 - anon
Reply 0
(02/03/2014) [-]
you quoted me, im happy
#114 to #24 - wtfduud
Reply 0
(01/03/2014) [-]
If that's true, then how come some of us grow older than others?
#154 to #114 - timetravelzero ONLINE
Reply 0
(01/04/2014) [-]
A couple of years longer versus the billions the universe has existed... Its an almost 0% difference when it comes to the scale of everything else. Also, I'm pretty sure Death just had a bit of a backlog and got to some people later than others.
#155 to #154 - wtfduud
Reply +1
(01/04/2014) [-]
But in terms of how long we live relative to how long others live, some live to be 100 times older than others. Some are dead at birth and some die of old age when they are 110 years old.
#157 to #155 - timetravelzero ONLINE
Reply +1
(01/04/2014) [-]
But otherwise, a good point.
#156 to #155 - timetravelzero ONLINE
Reply 0
(01/04/2014) [-]
You're implying that humans are the benchmark of time. Between an attosecond and an eon, human lifespans fall pretty squarely in the middle, with standard deviation making even a couple centuries a statistically zero percent difference. You could be dead on arrival or live to an absurd age of 200+ years old and still be "equal" on a universal scale. The entropy that eventually takes everything (i.e. "The Reaper") makes no distinction between even our middle-ground of life, the lifespan of a galaxy, and the time it takes an electron to make a single revolution.
TL;DR - Time takes us all without distinction.
#60 to #24 - wolviewolverine
Reply 0
(01/03/2014) [-]
This image has expired
Yea.. you and your mom.
#68 to #52 - revengeforfreeze
Reply 0
(01/03/2014) [-]
>Has a shot
>Doesn't link to "technological singularity"
pleb
#57 to #52 - timetravelzero ONLINE
Reply +2
(01/03/2014) [-]
>Biologically immortal by a regeneration method of some sort
>Not invulnerable (can still be killed)
>Still able to die
#26 to #24 - ludislavonac
Reply +4
(01/03/2014) [-]
Ahhh yes, death, one of the best characters in sn
Ahhh yes, death, one of the best characters in sn
#27 to #26 - timetravelzero ONLINE
Reply +1
(01/03/2014) [-]
Why do all of the main bad guys have such endearing personalities?
Why do all of the main bad guys have such endearing personalities?
#28 to #27 - ludislavonac
Reply +1
(01/03/2014) [-]
You got any more gifs/pics?
You got any more gifs/pics?
#30 to #28 - timetravelzero ONLINE
Reply +2
(01/03/2014) [-]
I might.
I might.
#31 to #30 - ludislavonac
Reply +1
(01/03/2014) [-]
Moar pls?
Moar pls?
#38 to #31 - timetravelzero ONLINE
Reply +2
(01/03/2014) [-]
Comment Picture
#79 to #38 - mypenisismoist
Reply +2
(01/03/2014) [-]
Oh no! I can't watch Bobby the same anymore! Noooo!I got to THAT part.
#142 to #79 - ludislavonac
Reply 0
(01/03/2014) [-]
Crap, I hated that part too
#162 to #142 - zaiopeperse
Reply 0
(06/13/2014) [-]
which of the "that part"s?
#36 to #31 - timetravelzero ONLINE
Reply 0
(01/03/2014) [-]
#35 to #31 - timetravelzero ONLINE
Reply 0
(01/03/2014) [-]
Comment Picture
#34 to #31 - timetravelzero ONLINE
Reply 0
(01/03/2014) [-]
Comment Picture
#33 to #31 - timetravelzero ONLINE
Reply 0
(01/03/2014) [-]
Comment Picture
#32 to #31 - timetravelzero ONLINE
Reply +2
(01/03/2014) [-]
k
k
#37 to #32 - ludislavonac
Reply +1
(01/03/2014) [-]
Excellent!
Excellent!
#100 to #37 - acidjunk
Reply 0
(01/03/2014) [-]
Comment Picture
#40 to #37 - timetravelzero ONLINE
Reply 0
(01/03/2014) [-]
Comment Picture
#39 to #37 - timetravelzero ONLINE
Reply +1
(01/03/2014) [-]
Comment Picture
#69 to #39 - bodox
Reply +1
(01/03/2014) [-]
folder dump!
folder dump!
#70 to #69 - bodox
Reply +1
(01/03/2014) [-]
Comment Picture
#71 to #70 - bodox
Reply +2
(01/03/2014) [-]
Comment Picture
#72 to #71 - bodox
Reply +2
(01/03/2014) [-]
Comment Picture
#73 to #72 - bodox
Reply +2
(01/03/2014) [-]
Comment Picture
#74 to #73 - bodox
Reply +2
(01/03/2014) [-]
Comment Picture
#75 to #74 - bodox
Reply +2
(01/03/2014) [-]
Comment Picture
#76 to #75 - bodox
Reply 0
(01/03/2014) [-]
Comment Picture
#77 to #76 - bodox
Reply +1
(01/03/2014) [-]
Comment Picture
#78 to #77 - bodox
Reply +1
(01/03/2014) [-]
Comment Picture