Cops Shoot a Black Man For No Reason
| |
Anonymous comments allowed.
28 comments displayed.
#5
-
unladenswallow (11/06/2015) [-] No reason. Dude tried to run over several cops and endangered everyone in the area. Definitely justifiable.
#3
-
sonsofsol (11/06/2015) [-] A moving car in this kind of situation can be deadly. Plus he had an officer in the car. Clearly known to the officers, definitely justified.
#27 to #3
-
niggerjack ONLINE (11/07/2015) [-] vehicular manslaughter
assault with a deadly weapon
assaulting a law official with a deadly weapon
these and more could be applied charges if they aren't already. The officer reacted very well for the situation.
assault with a deadly weapon
assaulting a law official with a deadly weapon
these and more could be applied charges if they aren't already. The officer reacted very well for the situation.
#20
-
Thebiggeorgy (11/07/2015) [-] I don't think we need to purge this race,
but damn, there needs to be a culture purge,
They Glory Criminal acts and criminal statue.
He had a 9mm (no mention of it being registered to him or not), 2 grams of crack in his pocket, other drugs in his car, then ran a cop over had one stuck in his car.
He's garbage, simply put. He's pushing drugs, I have no sympathy for him, the cops reacted as they should, He was a threat, they stopped him.
but damn, there needs to be a culture purge,
They Glory Criminal acts and criminal statue.
He had a 9mm (no mention of it being registered to him or not), 2 grams of crack in his pocket, other drugs in his car, then ran a cop over had one stuck in his car.
He's garbage, simply put. He's pushing drugs, I have no sympathy for him, the cops reacted as they should, He was a threat, they stopped him.
#10
-
zalda ONLINE (11/07/2015) [-] "Corrupted system"
I always find it so cute, when a dead beat mom tries to justify the actions of a little monkey.
I always find it so cute, when a dead beat mom tries to justify the actions of a little monkey.
#38
-
milkyhammer (11/07/2015) [-] according to the model of escalation of force police officers [at least in america] follow, lethal force was more than justified in this situation--as a vehicle can be considered a lethal weapon.
Use of Force Continuum:
1. Officer Presence
2. Verbal Commands
3. Soft-Hand Tactics [joint locks, etc. they're not meant to be comfortable]
4. Hard-Hand Tactics [strikes, punches, kicks, etc. again, not meant to be comfortable]
5. Non-Lethal Intervention [pepperspray, tazers, etc]
6. Lethal Intervention [firearms, vehicles, weapons of opportunity, etc]
When a suspect drives recklessly in that manner, it can be reasonably assumed that the suspect has become an active aggressor [trying to either seriously injure or kill the officer], lethal force, according to the use of force continuum, is appropriate for the officer to defend his or herself.
bring me the tides of red thumbs
![according to the model of escalation of force police officers [at least in america] follow, lethal force was more than justified in this situation--as a vehicle can be considered a lethal weapon.
Use of Force Continuum:
1. Officer Presence
2. Verbal Commands
3. Soft-Hand Tactics [joint locks, etc. they're not meant to be comfortable]
4. Hard-Hand Tactics [strikes, punches, kicks, etc. again, not meant to be comfortable]
5. Non-Lethal Intervention [pepperspray, tazers, etc]
6. Lethal Intervention [firearms, vehicles, weapons of opportunity, etc]
When a suspect drives recklessly in that manner, it can be reasonably assumed that the suspect has become an active aggressor [trying to either seriously injure or kill the officer], lethal force, according to the use of force continuum, is appropriate for the officer to defend his or herself.
bring me the tides of red thumbs](http://2static2.fjcdn.com/comments/According+to+the+model+of+escalation+of+force+police+officers+_5498e098db2bcabbc5899d4d3a4f4399.jpg)
Use of Force Continuum:
1. Officer Presence
2. Verbal Commands
3. Soft-Hand Tactics [joint locks, etc. they're not meant to be comfortable]
4. Hard-Hand Tactics [strikes, punches, kicks, etc. again, not meant to be comfortable]
5. Non-Lethal Intervention [pepperspray, tazers, etc]
6. Lethal Intervention [firearms, vehicles, weapons of opportunity, etc]
When a suspect drives recklessly in that manner, it can be reasonably assumed that the suspect has become an active aggressor [trying to either seriously injure or kill the officer], lethal force, according to the use of force continuum, is appropriate for the officer to defend his or herself.
bring me the tides of red thumbs
#34
-
stianan (11/07/2015) [-] HE'S A GOOD BOY
HE WENT TO CHURCH N' ****
HE BUILT 10 THOUSAND SCHOOLS WITH HIS OWN HANDS
HE DINDU NUFFIN
HE WENT TO CHURCH N' ****
HE BUILT 10 THOUSAND SCHOOLS WITH HIS OWN HANDS
HE DINDU NUFFIN
#32
-
ohgodstopscrolling (11/07/2015) [-] I Have many relatives that are police officers. this **** makes me so pissed.
#13
-
norkasthethird (11/07/2015) [-] HE DINDU NUFFIN HE A GUD BOI HE WAS GOIN TU CHURCH WEN DEM RAYSISS COPS SHOT HEEM FOA NO REESON I NEED MONEY FO DEM PROGRAMS
#25
-
installation (11/07/2015) [-]
The beginning was click-baity as **** .
No, police officers don't go through this every day. Not ever officer has to go through this either. It's not rare either, but saying that this is an every day occurrence is just not true.
No, police officers don't go through this every day. Not ever officer has to go through this either. It's not rare either, but saying that this is an every day occurrence is just not true.
#30 to #25
-
ohgodstopscrolling (11/07/2015) [-] Its not the fact the **** happens everyday its the fact that is alot more of a possibility to happen to them
#39
-
kmichel (11/07/2015) [-]
This is exactly why we need body cams on all the cops. Show what really happens in the 0.01% of arrests where the suspect is shot and killed. The reality is that the rate of arrest-related killing is exactly equal between blacks and whites, so there is no racial bias in killings as the BLM protesters would have you believe.
