Home Original Content Funny Pictures Funny GIFs YouTube Funny Text Funny Movies Channels Search

hide menu
What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
#62 - jackassalope (11/15/2013) [-]
Even ignoring the other gross assumptions here, its asking a lot to have every group of 20 people kill 200 zombies every single month for a year straight. There's no reason to. You would aboid the cities where most of the zombies are. You would clear out one safe area, and find a way to live off the land. That's the point of having a group, you don't have to roam and forage, you can work together.
User avatar #70 to #62 - hellomynameisbill ONLINE (11/15/2013) [-]
but, cities are the best places for supplies.
#72 to #70 - jackassalope (11/15/2013) [-]
It's not that hard to survive in the woods with nothing but a good knife. I'd prefer safety over fighting a horde of zombies for poptarts. I assume the 1% left would have similar priorities.
User avatar #76 to #72 - hellomynameisbill ONLINE (11/15/2013) [-]
approx 60% of establishments in a city are shops best places for supplies and the rest are places where people inhabit on a higher basis people require supplies . Higher difficulty, but much better loot.
User avatar #115 to #76 - noideawhatimdoing (11/15/2013) [-]
And they found a way to do this at the jail.. BUT now people are sick and need specialized medicines -not just an Advil, and then the baby... no mom to feed it.. and kids and people kill their clothes.. you can advocate living off the land all you want, but when its winter youll be on a trip for clothes and blankets.

Also, hygeiene, overlooked in the show IS important.. nobody can eat with rotten teeth, let alone not get infected/very ill from all the bodily fluids flying around.
 Friends (0)