Upload
Login or register
x

Christians:1

 
Christians:1. Saw this on one of those Christians Against Science pages.. If The Theng of Evolution Were True and millions of these There are millions of these

Saw this on one of those Christians Against Science pages.

If The Theng of Evolution Were True
and millions of these
There are millions of these
So where are the millions of these?
The Between Species)
...
+166
Views: 8846
Favorited: 3
Submitted: 10/23/2015
Share On Facebook
submit to reddit +Favorite Subscribe to theholyboognish

Comments(69):

Leave a comment Refresh Comments Show GIFs
12>
[ 69 comments ]
Top Rated Controversial Best Lowest Rated Newest
Anonymous comments allowed.
68 comments displayed.
Reply
+4
User avatar #32 - theholyboognish [OP]ONLINE (10/24/2015) [+] (2 replies)
stickied by theholyboognish
Holy **** . Forgot I posted this. Thanks for making it my first successful post! Everyone got the joke and no-one assumed I was being an idiot. This is a strange day on FunnyJunk.
Reply
+43
#7 - nyamazon ONLINE (10/23/2015) [-]
*sigh* The first creature isn't a chimp or any other modern ape, but the common ancestor to them and humans, which are extinct now. And to be nitpicky, there are only thousands, not millions, of chimps left in the wild, so this is a double fail by my books. If only these people could actually do some research instead of spewing ******** claims against evolution that are easily dismissable by anyone with a brain.
Reply
-28
#26 to #7 - stalini (10/23/2015) [-]
Anyone with a brain
Translation: people who agree with me

p.s i don't disagree with ya
Reply
+14
User avatar #27 to #26 - jamesisawesome (10/23/2015) [-]
When every credible scientist and all the available facts agree with one viewpoint, disagreeing with it is stupid.
Reply
-25
#28 to #27 - stalini (10/23/2015) [-]
Credible scientist
Translation: Scientist i agree with
Reply
+3
#46 to #28 - skelebones ONLINE (10/24/2015) [-]
dude really? when even james, one of the biggest trashiest cucks on funnyjunk disagrees with you... you must be really really bad you filthy degenerative ******* .
Reply
-9
#33 to #28 - robuntu (10/24/2015) [-]
This is why FJ suck.

Stalini is 100% right - using phrases like 'every credible scientist' is a logical fallacy...and should be avoided. Because, in it's use, 'credible' will end up meaning 'Any scientist I agree with'.

You can read about it on Wikipedia - en.wikipedia.org/wiki/No_true_Scotsman
Reply
0
User avatar #36 to #26 - langweilig (10/24/2015) [-]
youre a good troll dude
Reply
-1
#1 - Sperit (10/23/2015) [-]
the answer is
n_ggers
you have 1 letter
Reply
-1
#14 to #1 - anon (10/23/2015) [-]
Needs more lewdness
Reply
+1
User avatar #19 to #1 - demonbreadofnorth ONLINE (10/23/2015) [-]
nfggers
Reply
+7
User avatar #2 to #1 - Zaxplab (10/23/2015) [-]
Naggers?
Reply
+7
User avatar #5 to #1 - captainprincess (10/23/2015) [-]
naggers!
Reply
-7
#6 to #5 - Sperit (10/23/2015) [-]
Yo what the **** man
Reply
+1
#8 to #6 - captainprincess (10/23/2015) [-]
naggers gonna nag
Reply
+6
#24 to #1 - nignogprime ONLINE (10/23/2015) [-]
nuggers
Reply
+7
#9 to #1 - Abortedwafflez (10/23/2015) [-]
It's gotten to the point where you are purposely using 3-5 recycled pictures off of google images. Come on man, how many times do I gotta say it?
Reply
+1
#30 to #9 - anon (10/23/2015) [-]
Sperit in real life...
Reply
+1
User avatar #38 to #30 - iexs (10/24/2015) [-]
What a meme
Reply
-4
#10 to #9 - Sperit (10/23/2015) [-]
im just too lazy to use anything other than the stuff on the recent pictures
Reply
+1
User avatar #13 to #10 - tenaciouslee ONLINE (10/23/2015) [-]
You realize you could go to some art site and get literal thousands?
Reply
0
User avatar #54 to #9 - dubstepforme (10/24/2015) [-]
Inb4 leavesperitalone.jpq
Reply
+5
#25 - sinery (10/23/2015) [-]
Africa.
Reply
+4
#17 - selfrazedzealot (10/23/2015) [-]
Asshat.
Reply
0
#34 - xerodeath ONLINE (10/24/2015) [-]
So like a legitimate question here, why isnt there any or even anything like the inbetween species, i feel a little stupid for asking but really wanna know
Reply
0
User avatar #37 to #34 - theism ONLINE (10/24/2015) [-]
Extinct mostly.
Reply
0
#39 to #37 - xerodeath ONLINE (10/24/2015) [-]
but how and why
Reply
+2
User avatar #43 to #39 - theism ONLINE (10/24/2015) [-]
All hominids fill the exact same reproductive niche, homo sapiens fill that niche the best so they won the genetic arms race/
Reply
0
User avatar #45 to #43 - justaperson (10/24/2015) [-]
Man that was so much simpler than how I worded it. I should have read yours first.
Reply
0
User avatar #42 to #39 - swimmingprodigy (10/24/2015) [-]
too stupid to survive
Reply
0
User avatar #40 to #34 - justaperson (10/24/2015) [-]
Ok before I even get started, you do know humans didn't actually evolve from monkeys right?
Reply
0
#41 to #40 - xerodeath ONLINE (10/24/2015) [-]
yeah i know that im just thinking there had to be some that were separated off and didnt evolve in he same way or stayed the same way or some ****
Reply
0
#62 to #41 - marioauditore (10/24/2015) [-]
Scarcity of resources. Different groups are going to fight for the resources. The group that can't adapt to survive elsewhere is going to die. Another possibility is cross-breeding. They found traces of neanderthal dna in the european genetic pool.
This is assuming that the different species are coexisting in the same time. This doesn't usually happens. The useful genetic traits are eventually going to spread to all the population and accumulate through time. So if one particular group manage to not being affected by the change, there must be some obstacle that kept the group completely isolated. But no obstacle could stand in the way of Homo Sapiens.
Reply
0
User avatar #44 to #41 - justaperson (10/24/2015) [-]
We evolved from animals that would resemble a modern monkey but were not monkeys that we see today. And like the other guy said the in between stuff went extinct because that's just how evolution works. Survival of the fittest means that the ones that are most well adapted will pass on their genetic material and those that aren't won't. This continues to happen every generation for every organism. So as time went on one species would eventually evolve into the next and the species before would fade out because those traits that would be associated with that prior species would be less desirable and in turn bred out. Of course there tons of other factors involved and sometimes it wasn't always breeding issues that would cause a genus to go extinct but this is a generalization.
Reply
0
User avatar #47 to #34 - lolollo (10/24/2015) [-]
We do have the between species. Evolution progresses much like a numerical system, 1-2, 2-3, 3-4 with each number being a distinct species between 1 and 4, but then there's all of the **** in between each number which represent the individual generations. Between 2 and 3 is all of the decimal points where 2.1 isn't quite 2 or 3 but 2 on its way to becoming 3. Then you get 2.9, which still isn't quite 3 but is sure as **** closer to 3 than it is 2.

It also explains why "but wheres the missing link!?" is an incredibly unintelligent argument against evolution. "Prove 3 is greater than 2!". 2.5 is greater than 2 but less than 3... "But prove 3 is greater than 2.5!" 2.7 is greater than 2.5 but less than 3..."but prove 3 is greater than-"

Unless you get a perfect family tree spanning millions of years back, you're not gonna be able to argue that to completion...and even then we'd be asked to prove how we know sons defended from fathers.
Reply
0
User avatar #48 to #34 - sketchysketchist (10/24/2015) [-]
Humans didn't evolve from monkeys.
We evolved alongside them.
We evolved from a similar animal at some point in history.
Reply
-3
#4 - fedorlesnar (10/23/2015) [-]
<-- There they are! In fact there are a billion of these ******* . The common logic human beeing calls them " ****** ", but the correct scientific name is "homo ******** gaylordus". If you are in africa an shout "he didndo nuffin", "muh dick" or "alahu snackbar", they come in hordes and try to breed with you - so be careful.
<-- There they are!
In fact there are a billion of these ******* .
The common logic human beeing calls them " ****** ", but the correct scientific name is "homo ******** gaylordus".
If you are in africa an shout "he didndo nuffin", "muh dick" or "alahu snackbar", they come in hordes and try to breed with you - so be careful.
Reply
+2
User avatar #16 to #4 - platinumaltaria (10/23/2015) [-]
God damn look at that edge.
Reply
+1
User avatar #53 - kieranbaker (10/24/2015) [-]
I am a Christian who believes in evolution, AMA
Reply
0
#55 to #53 - marioauditore (10/24/2015) [-]
You make it sound like that's uncommon, somehow. I've never met a creationist in my entire life.
Reply
0
User avatar #56 to #55 - kieranbaker (10/24/2015) [-]
I have never met a creationist either
Reply
0
#57 to #56 - marioauditore (10/24/2015) [-]
So my first question is: Do you believe creationists actually exist?
Reply
0
User avatar #67 to #57 - kieranbaker (10/24/2015) [-]
of course, I doubt there are a whole lot but they are out there
Reply
0
#68 to #67 - marioauditore (10/24/2015) [-]
But how can we be sure, I mean...this could be just an extremely elaborate prank. I think that if creationism really exists that must be proof of the existence of God: How can somebody be that stupid without an intelligent design?
Reply
0
User avatar #69 to #68 - kieranbaker (10/25/2015) [-]
True, but then again I am pretty sure Jesus was against blind faith.
Reply
-1
#58 to #57 - anon (10/24/2015) [-]
I'm Eastern Orthodox Christian who doesn't believe in the evolution theory.
Reply
0
#59 to #58 - marioauditore (10/24/2015) [-]
I don't know, man. For all I know you could be lying to me. And posting as anon doesn't really help your case.
Reply
0
User avatar #15 - platinumaltaria (10/23/2015) [-]
Fun fact: All other species of hominid were killed off by competition with humans, or other factors.
Reply
0
#22 to #15 - walcorn (10/23/2015) [-]
Also
Imagine this, but replace aboriginal with non-sapien and australian/irish/scottish with sapien.
Homo Sapiens had greater numbers (faster rate of reproduction and better survivability I guess) , and so the non-sapien numbers were reduced with each generation, as their descendants became more and more sapien through interbreeding
Reply
+1
User avatar #23 to #22 - platinumaltaria (10/23/2015) [-]
Aboriginals, and in fact all humans with ethnicity are homo sapiens.
Reply
0
User avatar #35 to #23 - walcorn (10/24/2015) [-]
I never implied otherwise
Reply
+1
User avatar #3 - peanutsaurusrex (10/23/2015) [-]
I'm favoriting this so I can see the 47 disputes over this topic that are going to form by the end of the 24 hour cycle
Reply
0
#65 - anon (10/24/2015) [-]
we probably killed and ate them.
Reply
0
User avatar #63 - lamarsmithgot (10/24/2015) [-]
give me sound evidence that evolution isn't a fact

protip: you cant
Reply
-1
User avatar #60 - mrblueftw (10/24/2015) [-]
if the monkeys evolved then why are there still monkeys?
checkmate spaghettists
superior person (me): 1
everybody else: -sideways eight
Reply
0
#52 - anon (10/24/2015) [-]
Just to be clear: Intermediate species are no longer with us as each generation becomes better at collecting a limited resource. Those less adapted produce fewer offspring.

(cant say "this is how it happened" but it is a defensible theory)
Reply
0
#51 - mrpotatofudge (10/24/2015) [-]
Silly Creationists at it again!
Reply
0
User avatar #50 - cravetheinsanity (10/24/2015) [-]
Detroit...?
Reply
0
#49 - affix (10/24/2015) [-]
There WERE millions of early ape.
And there ARE millions of man.

The monkeys and apes you see today are not close to us, but slightly similar.
The same reason there are still wolves when dogs descended from them.



Reply
0
#20 - speedosnake (10/23/2015) [-]
You better be looking to start a flame war, posting **** like that.
Reply
0
#12 - mobilebull (10/23/2015) [-]
**mobilebull used "*roll picture*"**
**mobilebull rolled image** why, just why
12>
[ 69 comments ]
Leave a comment
<
>
 Friends (0)