Upload
Login or register
Hide Comments
Leave a comment Refresh Comments (118)
[ 118 comments ]
> hey anon, wanna give your opinion?
asd
User avatar #7 - themastermorris
Reply +186 123456789123345869
(08/13/2014) [-]
God I love the aristocrats joke and the cards just made it a thousand times better
User avatar #43 to #7 - fjaggot
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(08/13/2014) [-]
could you explain the joke cause I don't get what's so funny
User avatar #110 to #43 - ilikeweed
Reply +2 123456789123345869
(08/13/2014) [-]
the joke is called the aristocrats. the base of the joke is always the same. a family walks into an agents office and says they have act to show them. the agent says okay let's see it. this is the part that's a filler. you can say anything you want after this point. but the idea is to say the grossest most offensive **** possible for the family to be doing. most people go towards incest and ******** and pissing all over everybody. after that the closing of the joke is the most important. the agent says" wow, what do you call yourselves" and the punchline is " the arictocrats". its a really famous well known joke the a lot of comedians know. there's even a documentary of it on netflix. or at least there was. i don't know if its up there anymore. but yeah. that's it. i don't really think it's funny at all but supposedly it's one of the funniest/most well known jokes of all time.
User avatar #49 to #43 - feffog
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(08/13/2014) [-]
same, i dont get it
#55 to #49 - nufull
Reply +13 123456789123345869
(08/13/2014) [-]
The humor of the punch line is usually considered to derive either from the extreme discordance between the group's sophisticated name (and the regal "flourish" when stating it) and the vile acts they perform, or as a form of social satire aimed at the decadence of the aristocracy. - wikipedia
#76 to #55 - junahi
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(08/13/2014) [-]
Could I get that in english please?
User avatar #79 to #76 - fukkenbisharp
Reply +10 123456789123345869
(08/13/2014) [-]
its funny because its a fancy name and tone of voice for such a dirty joke
#113 to #76 - nufull
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(08/14/2014) [-]
it is funny because either:
a: saying that the aristocracy is **** (satire)
or
b: the irony of having such a fancy name while doing such stupid ****.
User avatar #70 to #49 - theantihipster
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(08/13/2014) [-]
He also does the whole joke with the "Aristocrats" brand playing cards, note the cartouche back design.
#9 - angrybarts
Reply +48 123456789123345869
(08/13/2014) [-]
I dont get it
I dont get it
User avatar #33 to #9 - thedungeonmaster
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(08/13/2014) [-]
Go watch Gilbert Gottfried's version of the aristocrats joke. You still won't get it but its hilarious.
User avatar #50 to #9 - hellsjester
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(08/13/2014) [-]
think of it this way. you make essentially a 4chan gore thread/ scat thread and make the story so rancid that nothing else could be said then you simply say the aristocrats. this is kinda the dumbed down version to give people an idea about the joke.
User avatar #53 to #9 - hottbill
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(08/13/2014) [-]
www.imdb.com/title/tt0436078/

Fantastic documentary, give it a watch.
User avatar #10 to #9 - goodguygary
Reply +134 123456789123345869
(08/13/2014) [-]
i went and looked it up because it was confusing me too, the aristocrat joke isn't about the punchline, rather about a being as dirty as it possibly can
User avatar #21 to #10 - zaach
Reply +13 123456789123345869
(08/13/2014) [-]
Well the punchline (we're the aristocrats) is the important part. While it's important that the joke is as dirty as it possibly can, the joke is that they are that dirty and disgusting and call themselves 'The Aristocrats' which suggests that they are sophistcated.
#64 to #10 - anon id: ec5b08d8
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(08/13/2014) [-]
no one else thumb him up 69 is perfect
#27 - zomaru
Reply +30 123456789123345869
(08/13/2014) [-]
How the **** did make the card disappear and the box change?
User avatar #54 to #27 - skateabuga
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(08/13/2014) [-]
sleight of hand
User avatar #118 to #27 - drainbamage
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(08/17/2014) [-]
When you see him placing the card, he pulls it back onto the top of the deck, just an illusion. and I'm assuming the box had some sort of flipping mechanism on the from so that he could blow on it and have the flap flip up.
User avatar #38 to #27 - skeptical
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(08/13/2014) [-]
The card just never got put down, he made it look like it did and drew attention away from the fact that it was still displaced on the deck long enough for him to fix it
The box was simple sleight of hand, if you look closely you'll see that's the back of a card in front of the box
User avatar #40 to #27 - oosime
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(08/13/2014) [-]
look carefully, he never actually put the card on the table, he pushed it onto the table to slide it back into his hand.
User avatar #69 to #27 - freakyorange
Reply +2 123456789123345869
(08/13/2014) [-]
Look closely at the last frame, you'll see a crease right through the word "Aristocrats" This is the clue to the fact that there's a false front that can fall down to display the word "Aristocrats", but when folded up it looks like a normal card box.
#31 to #27 - gentlemanofbacon
Reply +3 123456789123345869
(08/13/2014) [-]
#30 to #27 - implosay [OP]
Reply +70 123456789123345869
(08/13/2014) [-]
It's magic. I ain't gotta explain ****.
User avatar #57 to #30 - magicexplain
Reply +4 123456789123345869
(08/13/2014) [-]
I beg to differ!
#98 to #57 - lolzordz
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(08/13/2014) [-]
magicexplain? I HAVE SO MANY QUESTIONS
magicexplain? I HAVE SO MANY QUESTIONS
#59 to #30 - gigamuffin
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(08/13/2014) [-]
For the love of god, source?
#60 to #59 - implosay [OP]
Reply +6 123456789123345869
(08/13/2014) [-]
She's the Sorceress from Dragon's Crown. You don't need me to find porn of her, believe me.
#77 to #60 - gigamuffin
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(08/13/2014) [-]
Thanks, you magnificent bastard!
Thanks, you magnificent bastard!
User avatar #83 to #59 - capslockrage
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(08/13/2014) [-]
some ******* cartoon woman, calm your ****
User avatar #87 to #83 - gigamuffin
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(08/13/2014) [-]
Some ******* carton woman with humongous tits!
User avatar #88 to #87 - capslockrage
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(08/13/2014) [-]
Yes, tits like that are in no way a good thing.

they are unshapely bags of fat
User avatar #89 to #88 - gigamuffin
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(08/13/2014) [-]
they are unshapely bags of fat that I can yank my wanker to.
User avatar #90 to #89 - capslockrage
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(08/13/2014) [-]
They are gross, why would you jerk off to them?
User avatar #91 to #90 - gigamuffin
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(08/13/2014) [-]
Son, you gay?
User avatar #92 to #91 - capslockrage
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(08/13/2014) [-]
No, I just like good boobs, not ugly ones.

www.funnyjunk.com/nsfw/dphMLqc/Riding+a+washing+machine/
these are good boobs
User avatar #93 to #92 - gigamuffin
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(08/13/2014) [-]
User avatar #94 to #93 - capslockrage
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(08/13/2014) [-]
I would rather jerk off to real women, I'm a man, not a little boy.
#119 to #94 - anon id: 058f6aba
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(02/01/2015) [-]
Wow very mature
much jerk off
not little boi
so pro
very legit
#101 to #94 - implosay [OP]
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(08/13/2014) [-]
Well, aren't you a fun one. If for you being a man or not depends on what your jerk off to and belittle those who enjoy erotic art, art that has existed ever since mankind has been clever enough to draw, I don't really think you should call yourself a man considering how puerile that is. Especially since porn is just as fake as any drawing.
User avatar #102 to #101 - capslockrage
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(08/13/2014) [-]
Hahahaha "art"

you mean pictures of drawn little girls for pedophiles to jerk off to?

you're ******* ridiculous.
#103 to #102 - implosay [OP]
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(08/13/2014) [-]
Who talked about little girls? You're the only one associating porn drawings with little girls. Tell me if that sorceress looks like a little girl.

Have you ever taken interesting in the evolution of art over the centuries? Porn was already everywhere.
User avatar #104 to #103 - capslockrage
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(08/13/2014) [-]
The picture you posted above the girl looks like she is 10 years old, **** half the anime drawings or whatever look like little girls.

and it's not art, you can't just take something and call art and demand respect for it.
User avatar #105 to #104 - implosay [OP]
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(08/13/2014) [-]
We're talking about erotic/porn drawing. If for you that picture is porn, what is real porn to you...?

Tell that to famous artists over the centuries. It doesn't need to be made by Van Gogh to be art. Art has always existed, and still exists, stronger than ever all thanks to modern technology and the internet. Get over yourself man. You have no idea how stuck up you sound.
User avatar #106 to #105 - capslockrage
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(08/13/2014) [-]
I'm not saying that picture was porn, but there are plenty similar that are.


It's just pathetic.
User avatar #107 to #106 - implosay [OP]
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(08/13/2014) [-]
That is true. But nobody forces you to look them up. Now granted, I don't consider those art either.

Calling art pathetic makes you the pathetic one, honestly. Mankind has been expressing itself through it for millenniums. And we're one of the horniest species on earth. Of course porn drawings have always been a thing. And they'll always be. Especially since we have official characters from video games and anime that have glorified bodies nowadays. That sorceress up there is the perfect example. It's there to bring out fantasies by putting huge accents on what makes women appealing, which are breasts, waist and hips.

To get off the porn topic, do you really see art as a whole as a pathetic thing?
User avatar #108 to #107 - capslockrage
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(08/13/2014) [-]
I'm not talking about real art, I'm calling this ******** you claim to be art pathetic.


Paintings of interesting things and sculptures are cool, whereas these little anime pictures are just scribbles from weeaboos.
#117 to #108 - oosime
0 123456789123345869
(08/14/2014) [-]
than that anime stuff
#116 to #108 - oosime
0 123456789123345869
(08/14/2014) [-]
is so much better
#115 to #108 - oosime
0 123456789123345869
(08/14/2014) [-]
because this
#114 to #108 - oosime
0 123456789123345869
(08/14/2014) [-]
yeah, lets get some real art up in here.
User avatar #109 to #108 - implosay [OP]
0 123456789123345869
(08/13/2014) [-]
Ask yourself this, is there such a thing as real art? What may be ugly to you can be really inspiring for someone else. Picasso is the greatest artist ever for some, while for others he's just really overrated. Skillfully drawing a picture, be it porn or anything else, isn't given to everyone. It's much more than scribbling randomly on your tablet and upload it on deviantart. Not only does it require skill, but also knowledge. We all know what a human body looks like and what it's capable of, but can you draw something anatomically correct AND appealing? By giving the right things the right amounts of light, perspective ect? Those who mastered these make art. Those who can mimic the liveliness of a body while still keeping things as fantasies understood what makes art, art, even if it's simply porn.
User avatar #97 to #94 - critality
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(08/13/2014) [-]
**** dude, ever heard of a thing called personal preference?
User avatar #95 to #94 - gigamuffin
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(08/13/2014) [-]
I'm a horny teenager, so I could jerk off to a rock.
#1 - internetexplain
Reply -7 123456789123345869
(08/12/2014) [-]
**internetexplain rolled image**
Audience's FW
User avatar #2 to #1 - greensofa
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(08/13/2014) [-]
*roll image* no, dont make us feel sad
#4 to #2 - nuclearchurro
Reply +33 123456789123345869
(08/13/2014) [-]
**nuclearchurro rolled image**
#3 to #2 - greensofa
Reply +3 123456789123345869
(08/13/2014) [-]
**greensofa rolled image** ****
#25 to #2 - murphyslawtesties
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(08/13/2014) [-]
**murphyslawtesties rolled image** git gud skrub
User avatar #26 to #25 - greensofa
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(08/13/2014) [-]
**greensofa rolls 69,492** yeah, i know.
#65 to #2 - subspacessparta
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(08/13/2014) [-]
**subspacessparta rolled image**
#12 - pebar
Reply +29 123456789123345869
(08/13/2014) [-]
Very related
Bill Malone presents "Sam the Bellhop" Very related
User avatar #28 to #12 - RlCK
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(08/13/2014) [-]
**RlCK rolls 72** If you like there, here's another entertaining and pretty similar card trick. www.youtube.com/watch?v=U9lFe504i2s
User avatar #17 to #12 - crazyanimal
Reply +3 123456789123345869
(08/13/2014) [-]
Those false shuffles were beautiful
#35 - antzell
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(08/13/2014) [-]
No matter what card you choose it will change.
User avatar #45 to #35 - sefi
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(08/13/2014) [-]
Dynamo, the reason we can still believe in a lil' bit of magic.
#63 to #35 - jewishcommunazi
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(08/13/2014) [-]
Pretty old concept, I remember seeing that trick and figuring out how it worked about like 7 years ago.
User avatar #84 to #35 - capslockrage
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(08/13/2014) [-]
Yes because they are totally different cards, old boring trick.
User avatar #47 to #35 - arbitercu
Reply +2 123456789123345869
(08/13/2014) [-]
That was pretty damn simple,

i remain unimpressed
User avatar #52 to #35 - nickotak
Reply +3 123456789123345869
(08/13/2014) [-]
GUYS HE'S TALKING TO ME
User avatar #36 to #35 - thismustbeseen
Reply +22 123456789123345869
(08/13/2014) [-]
That's because he replaced all of them
User avatar #37 to #36 - antzell
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(08/13/2014) [-]
No ****. He is still a good illusionist.
#62 - samoaspider
Reply +8 123456789123345869
(08/13/2014) [-]
w-well I don't get it
#66 to #62 - baitdoesnttalkback
Reply -7 123456789123345869
(08/13/2014) [-]
theres a whole movie based on the aristocrats joke you dumbass
#82 to #66 - implosay [OP]
Reply +5 123456789123345869
(08/13/2014) [-]
Comment Picture
#112 to #82 - baitdoesnttalkback
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(08/14/2014) [-]
Comment Picture
User avatar #67 to #66 - samoaspider
Reply +2 123456789123345869
(08/13/2014) [-]
I was making a South-Park reference, dumbass.
#68 to #67 - baitdoesnttalkback
Reply -9 123456789123345869
(08/13/2014) [-]
i dont care what you were doing. **** you
#73 to #68 - tkellster
Reply +2 123456789123345869
(08/13/2014) [-]
get along children
#74 to #73 - baitdoesnttalkback
Reply -4 123456789123345869
(08/13/2014) [-]
**** off bitch
#75 to #74 - tkellster
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(08/13/2014) [-]
rude
rude
#100 to #66 - vynnle
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(08/13/2014) [-]
?
#111 to #100 - baitdoesnttalkback
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(08/14/2014) [-]
um yeah that
User avatar #6 - CaptainExplosion
Reply +4 123456789123345869
(08/13/2014) [-]
Took me a minute. That was pretty cool.
#44 - barsaka
Reply +3 123456789123345869
(08/13/2014) [-]
Great voice tho...
User avatar #5 - xplosevdiarrhea
Reply +3 123456789123345869
(08/13/2014) [-]
Aristocrats and magicians? I don't know how this joke could get any better.

Unless it's Gilbert Gottfried.