capitalism
Fig. 1: Capitalism Fig. 2: Socialism
explained by Capitalists explained by Socialists
Supply Equilibrium Value (relative to Inflaming, him This system will evenutally
T f Tax compensation (Businesses and Rich don' t pay taxes; eliminate the poof and rich
Higher Lower they tag them to the prices) _ .. '
Value Equilibrium Value t Labor can and theate we big working
Value
Price (Higher than equilibrium, as result oi costs)
I fire t h I
least fortunate members of
fps, society will be assisted
Middle
is the price too high tor a particular consumer's ()
Yes No
Equilibrium Value < cos
Equilibrium Value e cos
b a Potential sales lost: L s!., A, R I
f Potential capital lost C I ass egu’ at‘ On
Potential no Growth lost
Shares
Executive income
The employed get money to spend " the market, in turn not
only funding other workers via trade, but the businesses who .
employ more workers, the result is a ; economy _ Marketing
without recourse to government (taxes and labor costs would - Research and Development s
reduce in the amide oi intervention. lowering prices and _ Expansion
Improving the number oi sales)
Fig. 3: Socialism Fig. 4: Capitalism
explained by Capitalists explained by Sociales s
t. The aim of socialism is to bring the lower
classes into the middle class and dissolve the
ext awe a Ce m we won on y
1 trs, 3 "'"'"tr""'" set up a new upper class or ‘bureaucratic Mites',
F- privileging themselves with the primary hold on
Middle Bu retrace capital and resources as they monopolize dismay-
Cl ass i A 6 solution to 'class warhol" detects Merv.
N 2 While some individuals are truly disadvantaged
Industry and in need at help, automatically labeling the poor
as "In need‘ is a sure way to keep them so Not
Rich Labor only is the welfare system law" in acting as a r
we lunch" to the win my but also a WED. waiting D '
7 to as soon as div oats standard owing
Taxes
raises to a point when they no longer duality tor
aid, outwit not maintain a good standard of living .
tor some time until they are independent
3, The services provided by bureaucracy are poor and make tor a tax more expensive than any bill or wooing on in
new t; they are poor tor the same reason a diabetic has more incentive to excercise than a perfeclty ht Andrei up
trues always the threat oi health, metaphorically we security Also, they are more expensive due to additon
costs (paperwork, wages, Ma) and the cost tor the actual services themselves, even more so tor high-
and service. 4. By putting the tax widen on the rich and business, one is slim to hamper industry; every cantata
horn taxed is a cent lost to who able to provide more jobs, better goods and services, and a better working facilely.
this is to assume that the bureaucracy wont own and manage the workplaces. in which the threat oi tenure and
horn loss would not factor in tor the / s ) best interests 5 The fallacy in criticizing
he rich as greedy, manipulative, and augmentative is that socialism' s alternative, bureaucracy, is in essence no dither,
am: the problem howls the cronies are working together instead strumpeting. Like taxation, regulation is a hin-
hence to industry; instead oi directly cutting into capita S a loss oi potential gains while they are good meaning,
ea Mons hinder the concience and production ca bi es oi NT workplace. only hurting the worker in the end, 7
Soviet Russia, China and Monti Korea socialist economy on up, America
Socialism: the 'creation science' of economics
explained by Capitalists explained by Socialists
Supply Equilibrium Value (relative to Inflaming, him This system will evenutally
T f Tax compensation (Businesses and Rich don' t pay taxes; eliminate the poof and rich
Higher Lower they tag them to the prices) _ .. '
Value Equilibrium Value t Labor can and theate we big working
Value
Price (Higher than equilibrium, as result oi costs)
I fire t h I
least fortunate members of
fps, society will be assisted
Middle
is the price too high tor a particular consumer's ()
Yes No
Equilibrium Value < cos
Equilibrium Value e cos
b a Potential sales lost: L s!., A, R I
f Potential capital lost C I ass egu’ at‘ On
Potential no Growth lost
Shares
Executive income
The employed get money to spend " the market, in turn not
only funding other workers via trade, but the businesses who .
employ more workers, the result is a ; economy _ Marketing
without recourse to government (taxes and labor costs would - Research and Development s
reduce in the amide oi intervention. lowering prices and _ Expansion
Improving the number oi sales)
Fig. 3: Socialism Fig. 4: Capitalism
explained by Capitalists explained by Sociales s
t. The aim of socialism is to bring the lower
classes into the middle class and dissolve the
ext awe a Ce m we won on y
1 trs, 3 "'"'"tr""'" set up a new upper class or ‘bureaucratic Mites',
F- privileging themselves with the primary hold on
Middle Bu retrace capital and resources as they monopolize dismay-
Cl ass i A 6 solution to 'class warhol" detects Merv.
N 2 While some individuals are truly disadvantaged
Industry and in need at help, automatically labeling the poor
as "In need‘ is a sure way to keep them so Not
Rich Labor only is the welfare system law" in acting as a r
we lunch" to the win my but also a WED. waiting D '
7 to as soon as div oats standard owing
Taxes
raises to a point when they no longer duality tor
aid, outwit not maintain a good standard of living .
tor some time until they are independent
3, The services provided by bureaucracy are poor and make tor a tax more expensive than any bill or wooing on in
new t; they are poor tor the same reason a diabetic has more incentive to excercise than a perfeclty ht Andrei up
trues always the threat oi health, metaphorically we security Also, they are more expensive due to additon
costs (paperwork, wages, Ma) and the cost tor the actual services themselves, even more so tor high-
and service. 4. By putting the tax widen on the rich and business, one is slim to hamper industry; every cantata
horn taxed is a cent lost to who able to provide more jobs, better goods and services, and a better working facilely.
this is to assume that the bureaucracy wont own and manage the workplaces. in which the threat oi tenure and
horn loss would not factor in tor the / s ) best interests 5 The fallacy in criticizing
he rich as greedy, manipulative, and augmentative is that socialism' s alternative, bureaucracy, is in essence no dither,
am: the problem howls the cronies are working together instead strumpeting. Like taxation, regulation is a hin-
hence to industry; instead oi directly cutting into capita S a loss oi potential gains while they are good meaning,
ea Mons hinder the concience and production ca bi es oi NT workplace. only hurting the worker in the end, 7
Soviet Russia, China and Monti Korea socialist economy on up, America
Socialism: the 'creation science' of economics
...
| |
