Upload
Login or register
x

Can't Stump The Trump

Can't Stump The Trump. But why don't poor people just buy more money?. TO BE m HEAT . A . littlee. IT Wm UPSET A HIT III’ THAT I HATE. this is the worst reason for choosing a leader of a whole country i have heard in awhile.

But why don't poor people just buy more money?

TO BE m HEAT .
A . littlee. IT Wm UPSET
A HIT III’ THAT I HATE
...
+212
Views: 11336
Favorited: 3
Submitted: 01/06/2016
Share On Facebook
submit to reddit +Favorite Subscribe to Ragumshnagum

Comments(94):

Leave a comment Refresh Comments Show GIFs
12>
[ 94 comments ]
Top Rated Controversial Best Lowest Rated Newest
Anonymous comments allowed.
90 comments displayed.
Reply
+89
User avatar #11 - gittons (01/06/2016) [-]
this is the worst reason for choosing a leader of a whole country i have heard in awhile.
Reply
0
#85 to #11 - donfailed ONLINE (01/07/2016) [-]
I'm honestly afraid. It's at the point where I want to vote for him because I'm so god damn spooked about liberal policies and what's been going on in Europe. Hillary's looking like she'd be a Bond villain while enacting said policies for her own gain and Sanders, as genuinely good as he looks, looks like he'd enact similar policies out of good will. Meanwhile with Trump, as much as I agree with him on some things, foreign relations is going into the toilet and he's closer to one of those old school republicans who think video games cause violence. **** , where's Deez Nuts when you need him?
Reply
+4
User avatar #55 to #11 - enkmaster (01/07/2016) [-]
Thats what got Justin Trudeau and the libs elected here in Canada. Everyone was saying "Ill vote for anyone who isnt Harper".
Reply
+62
User avatar #13 to #11 - Ragumshnagum [OP](01/06/2016) [-]
I don't think it's any worse than when we elected Obama just because we wanted to see the first black president take office.
Reply
+27
User avatar #37 to #13 - Shiny ONLINE (01/07/2016) [-]
About as many people voted for Obama because he's black as they voted against him because he's black. In 2012 his main appeal was not being Romney.
Reply
+13
User avatar #32 to #13 - theism ONLINE (01/06/2016) [-]
That's not the only reason people voted for Obama. After Bush a great deal of Americans were disillusioned with the republican party. Additionally people felt that McCain's decision to make Sarah Palin his running mate reflected poorly on him as a candidate.
Reply
+8
#42 to #32 - anon (01/07/2016) [-]
Sarah Palin was a ****** idiot.
Reply
0
#54 to #42 - anon (01/07/2016) [-]
This is how I know you are a reasonable person
Reply
0
#70 to #32 - bann ONLINE (01/07/2016) [-]
When Sarah Palin came around, everyone knew the republican party had lost that year.
Reply
+5
User avatar #14 to #13 - gittons (01/06/2016) [-]
pretty damn close actually.
Reply
+1
#43 to #13 - funpunk (01/07/2016) [-]
I think it kinda worked out somewhat ok.
Reply
+2
#49 to #43 - anon (01/07/2016) [-]
arguable, he didn't live up to his campaign promises of pulling troops out of iraq until 2011 the year before his reelection. His health care bill, although his heart was in the right place, is seriously crippling the finances of an already overburdened government.
Reply
0
#56 to #13 - nigrfagitgingerjew (01/07/2016) [-]
speak for yourself ******* ain't no way in hell I'll ever vote sarah palin into any kind of office
Reply
+20
#35 - adplum (01/07/2016) [-]
"I want to **** up a country just to make people angry"
Reply
+11
User avatar #36 to #35 - Ragumshnagum [OP](01/07/2016) [-]
Didn't you read his hat? He's trying to make America less ********* .
Reply
+3
#47 to #36 - lipidregent (01/07/2016) [-]
the hat is to hide his scaly head, he's one of the reptilians
Reply
+10
User avatar #2 - platinumaltaria ONLINE (01/06/2016) [-]
That is terrible reasoning. You should judge a good leader by their merits, not by how many people will hate them.
Reply
+26
#27 - anon (01/06/2016) [-]
Donald Trump is the only candidate with sensible immigration policies. The media is trying to make him look bad, and idiots will eat it up and call him "racist", with no facts to prove it. Political correctness has taken over the West, and Donald Trump is ardently against it, unlike other politicians.
Reply
+9
User avatar #38 to #27 - Shiny ONLINE (01/07/2016) [-]
Sanders (yes, the old libtard) and some other GOP candidates want to limit immigration too. Criticism of Trump's policies isn't about "das waicis", it's about them being hamfisted, useless and un-American.
Reply
+1
User avatar #44 to #38 - sircool (01/07/2016) [-]
how so? Wanting inability of people to go around the system and those who avoided it entirely is useless?

repeating a system that was effective prior to not allow possible members of a dangerous group from coming here is hamfisted?
Reply
+4
User avatar #45 to #44 - Shiny ONLINE (01/07/2016) [-]
Mainly the wall thing, which is like troll physics applied to international politics and will destroy our economy faster than any "socialist" or Reaganomic policies. Mexican immigration has leveled off in recent years anyway, with more illegals leaving than entering. Banning Muslim immigration is also ridiculous because persecuting the entire religion is literally what ISIS wants.
Reply
0
#77 to #45 - anon (01/07/2016) [-]
How would a wall ruin the economy?

Anyway, americunts are ****** . The only four candidates that seem to have a real chance of winning are Trump, Bush, Clinton and Sanders.

Clinton is ******* feminazi insane with the whole "gender pay gap"-myth and believing men accused of rape are guilty untill proven innocent. Also involved in way to much shady **** and the only reason she isn't in jail where she belongs is because democrats are in power.

Sanders has a ton of ideas, one more economically unviable than the next. Which will only end up burdening the middle class even more. This man also has no spine, he is virtually a gelatinous blob when dealing with "minorities". Feminazi's, and other such "well intented" groups will devour this guy alive.

Then there is another Bush. I guess you vote for him if you want yet another war in the middle-east. This whole family is toxic.

Trump may be Trump, but compared to the other candidates he's a very realistic option. This whole presidential campaign is the americans picking their poison.
Reply
0
User avatar #81 to #77 - Shiny ONLINE (01/07/2016) [-]
"How would a wall ruin the economy?"
Like ten or twenty billion dollars of real, hard money, not the imaginary **** we usually throw around.
"Sanders has a ton of ideas, one more economically unviable than the next. Which will only end up burdening the middle class even more. This man also has no spine, he is virtually a gelatinous blob when dealing with "minorities". Feminazi's, and other such "well intented" groups will devour this guy alive."
He has to toe the Democrat party line, you should know how bad that can be. Before the campaign he was infamous in identity politics circles for blaming inequality on economics and not their creepy fetish for territoriality and postmodern universal subjectivity. And even if his ideals are economically unsound, I have seen little evidence of it that hasn't been refuted.

I agree on the other candidates, though, and how Trump can have some appeal. But I think Sanders is mainly under fire by the usual "le uder ppls muney" thought terminating cliches, like how the right gets race carded.
Reply
+8
#58 - tealcanaan (01/07/2016) [-]
Real Reasons I Like Trump
>Wants to raise tariffs to bring parity to international trade this is especially relevant in the entirety of asia moh manufacturing jobs *****
>Wants to actually stop the flow of uneducated workers from down south,keeping with the status quo only benefits the wealthy service industry leaders, for the common man it create an ever growing underclass and completely stagnates social mobility
>Wants to limit H1-B/H2-B visas, this is particularly of interest to me as an engineer these visas result in the stagnation and undercutting of professional level workers, further devaluing out colleges degrees, as well as again, promoting the stagnation of social mobility, and furthering the degradation of the middle class.
>His tax plan won't encourage capital flight, along with his tariff proposal, will result in more wealth distributed down to workers from jobs created

seriously look at the US import taxes, they are ridiculously low compared to the nation we export to, I believe in fair trade, but when we have supper high taxes against us and nothing comparatively, we are not on fair ground

**** , I don't even have to get into the cultural factors as to why I want to vote for him and I like him already.
Reply
-4
#1 - anon (01/06/2016) [-]
same
theres too many faggots in the governament and high places
they hate trump because hes not a cuck puppet like sanders

inb4 le trump bad! he gon do bad things to ameriga xdddd

>implying sanders will do any good

hes a faggot sjw liberal
willing to legalize anything or suck anyone's cock to get votes
"le ***************** "
"le poor refuges we ned to help dem"
"legalize le drugs xdd"
liberals belong in the thrash
Reply
-8
User avatar #3 to #1 - platinumaltaria ONLINE (01/06/2016) [-]
>implying sanders isn't the only valid choice.
>implying trump has even a tiny chance

Also come on anon, defeating your own strawman doesn't make you look smart.
Reply
-5
#51 to #3 - shrinkzz (01/07/2016) [-]
I want to hear those /pol/tards scream, and they just might.
Reply
+2
User avatar #50 to #1 - lipidregent (01/07/2016) [-]
legalizing drugs would bring in tons of tax revenue
that's more money to pay for government programs
and less money going to drug cartels

people are going to buy drugs anyways, might as well benefit from it
Reply
0
User avatar #61 to #50 - asschwitz (01/07/2016) [-]
Why should the government continue to recieve funding as it continually proves itself inept? Not saying we should legalize marijuana, just that the money should go back to the tax payers as they are the ones being robbed. Of course that will never happen, but it's a nice thought.
Reply
0
User avatar #62 to #61 - lipidregent (01/07/2016) [-]
who would you rather have all that money, the inept government or drug cartels?
Reply
0
User avatar #68 to #62 - Silver Quantum (01/07/2016) [-]
he already knew you were right. he just wanted to argue for the sake of arguing
Reply
0
User avatar #69 to #68 - lipidregent (01/07/2016) [-]
oh, my bad then
Reply
+7
#39 to #1 - anon (01/07/2016) [-]
>faggot sjw cuck

Sounds like voting for Sanders would trigger the **** out of /pol/.
Reply
+3
#52 - anon (01/07/2016) [-]
It's not that I like Trump or agree with anything he says. But it's obvious that Clinton's going to be the Democratic candidate no matter what, and I really_ really_ dislike her. I'd vote for Satan if he was running against Hillary Clinton.
Reply
+1
#53 to #52 - anon (01/07/2016) [-]
Hillary IS Satan 's bitch
Reply
+3
#33 - ninjabadger (01/07/2016) [-]
GIF
I'm voting for him
Reply
+2
#65 - anon (01/07/2016) [-]
I want Trump to lose only because it would upset people in FJ and 4chan.
Reply
0
User avatar #84 to #65 - Ragumshnagum [OP](01/07/2016) [-]
You haven't spent a lot of time on FunnyJunk.

And I don't know what 4chan boards you visit, but /pol/ is not one of them.
Reply
-12
#4 - randomuploads (01/06/2016) [-]
You idiots deserve to get ****** by Trump. USA the greatest country in the world, but it's citizens don't give a crap about it's future.
Reply
0
User avatar #5 to #4 - thevaulthunter (01/06/2016) [-]
Many of us do.
Reply
0
#6 to #5 - randomuploads (01/06/2016) [-]
Well from the outside your elections look like one big comedy show. "Vote Trump brah! It'll be hilarious!"

From what I've seen, which is not a lot, you guys have a single candidate that doesn't make himself ridiculous by saying retarded things in the media. But the discussion never proceeds any further than "Sanders = libtard cuck".
Reply
+1
#29 to #6 - miasaki ONLINE (01/06/2016) [-]
You're telling me that to those not in the U.S., the selective tidbits of info that the media shows and those that are online do not paint the elections in a somewhat decent light? Who would have thought. Its almost as if news networks are businesses aimed at making money and people on the internet tell lies and joke around.
Reply
-1
#60 to #29 - randomuploads (01/07/2016) [-]
As if it's any different for people inside the US. Or are you saying the TV news is extremely reliable over there...?
Reply
0
#71 to #60 - miasaki ONLINE (01/07/2016) [-]
Oh yeah, my bad. I almost forgot that everything some unimportant passerby sees in a different country, possibly continent, is all the ******** involved in a presidential election.

Of course it is different, or does your country fawn over the U.S. to the point that the populous sees every debate, discussion and interview with potential candidates? You are extremely narrow minded and set on matters that you have little to no idea about.
Reply
-1
#75 to #71 - randomuploads (01/07/2016) [-]
Thanksfully we don't get that much coverage about the whole circus. But I'm very reluctant to believe that anything changes once you live there. But fine if you wanne go and defend the US democracy as fair and just, go right ahead. It'll tell me how serious I have to take you.
Reply
0
#79 to #75 - miasaki ONLINE (01/07/2016) [-]
Topic: Whether the news at home is the same as the news elsewhere.

Where you are at: Whether "US Democracy is fair and just".

Do you see what I mean when I say your reading comprehension is **** ? Those are in no way related other than they are under the umbrella of politics.

As for our original discussion, you just said you don't get much news about the race, its everywhere over here. That much should be obvious. If anyone cared enough to pay attention to your nations political ******** from the states or even Mexico or Canada, do you honestly think they would have coverage of any kind to the general populous? In the event that you missed it or fail to read anything but the first two lines as you seem to often do(Yes, I know, that means you may not read this. Meh.), the answer should be "No".

And you are free to take me as seriously as you want, I don't really care. This is some random convo online. Ive been going along with this to stay awake. You do not stay on topic, know what you are talking about nor do you have any idea what all politics encompass.
Reply
0
User avatar #7 to #6 - thevaulthunter (01/06/2016) [-]
I said many, not most.
The requirements for running for president never mention the massive amount of cash it takes to run, so almost all candidate with even the slightest chance of being elected are either rich or being helped by another group, who totally would never influence the candidates decisions. Really, US elections have been a "pick the shiniest turd" situation since after Reagan. Unfortunately, Trump has a good chance on account of him appealing to the incredibly large "Immigrants are criminals, no exceptions" demographic. One more terrorist attack from outside the country, and I promise you, Trump will be our next president.
I fear the future.
Reply
-1
#8 to #7 - randomuploads (01/06/2016) [-]
Getting some poor arab ****** to blow himself up in exhange for some cash for his family is child's play.
Reply
0
User avatar #9 to #4 - Ragumshnagum [OP](01/06/2016) [-]
Well at least I give a crap about the distinction between "its" and "it's."
Reply
0
#10 to #9 - randomuploads (01/06/2016) [-]
I can carry on this conversation in my native language if you can't deal with minor mistakes..?
Reply
0
User avatar #20 to #10 - Ragumshnagum [OP](01/06/2016) [-]
I just assumed English was your first language. I wouldn't have said anything about the grammar otherwise.

But yes, you're absolutely right. I don't really care about what happens. Honestly though, I think that the idea of how bad Trump would be as president is pretty grossly exaggerated (personally I think we have more to worry about with Clinton).
Reply
0
#21 to #20 - randomuploads (01/06/2016) [-]
I don't understand what's wrong with Sanders. When he talks I get the impression I'm listening to an intelligent human being. Maybe I haven't heard him talk enough.
Reply
0
User avatar #23 to #21 - Ragumshnagum [OP](01/06/2016) [-]
Sanders is a very nice man who has a good heart and righteous intentions, but his ideas are not practical. Everything he has proposed that the millennials are eating up calls for quite a bit of money, from which the source would inevitably be taxpayers. I do not think that he should be president, and I am completely confident that he will not be.
Reply
0
#24 to #23 - randomuploads (01/06/2016) [-]
I don't know how much tax people pay in the US but I don't think it's nearly as high as the average among western countries. For example as far as I recall here in the Netherlands you pay 38% up to 52% income-tax based on how high your total salary is.

And I like it that way, it's like everybody puts in their part and together we can deal with the problems that face our country.

Reply
0
#31 to #24 - miasaki ONLINE (01/06/2016) [-]
The thing with socialism ideals and the U.S. is that the vast majority of people wish to keep what they have earned for various reasons, Going from our current tax rates to those needed to sustain such an infrastructure would be crippling if done too fast and many jobs would be lost (Look at Obamacare. Side note: That was such a ****** excuse for national health care, its no wonder why towards the end of his term all he can do is push through executive actions on firearms and say that his input is helping the mentally ill while doing nothing. Rant over.) as businesses try to keep profits on the up and up and if done too slow, welp, that would just **** up those plans as well. The U.S is massive to try and inject that type of infrastructure, keep in mind that we cannot only worry about what this does to our country, but to those that we trade with, forces we have deployed to foreign lands to either combat what we take as a threat at this point in time or to supplement others forces, not to mention the aid that comes from the U.S.
Reply
-1
#64 to #31 - randomuploads (01/07/2016) [-]
Ah yea it's always the ******* US military isn't it. Well it's not my problem the US will probably slide down to 2nd world level somewhere in this century. Good luck with that.
Reply
0
#72 to #64 - miasaki ONLINE (01/07/2016) [-]
The more comments of yours I see the more I think that your just some foreign kid that is yet to take a politics or history class and pass. Don't even try with reading comprehension, you are way the hell in left field with that **** .

If you missed it, a country's military is kind of a big deal when it comes to politics, especially one as large as the U.S. I don't know nor care where your homeland is as its not relevant to the conversation, but I am willing to bet that your military is hardly a defense force and you have not had a major conflict in a few decades or so.

The funny part is that taking into account how interwoven the world economy is with the U.S in just about every industry, if we go down, someones coming with us and its like dominoes from there. Not completely shot to **** , but everyone's gonna feel it in one way or another, regardless of how much bravado their uneducated youth put forward.

Have a great day!
Reply
-1
#74 to #72 - randomuploads (01/07/2016) [-]
"Way into the left field". There you go again, dividing the political landscape into arbitrary woefully inadequate boxes. For instance, I am pro civilian gun owenrship.
Reply
0
#76 to #74 - miasaki ONLINE (01/07/2016) [-]
My apologies. "Way into the left field" is a colloquialism in the states that basically means "odd", "strange" or a bit more different than different. I sometimes toss that stuff in there without thinking about the context and whether everyone involved will understand it, my bad.

As for the rest of the comment, I did not divide **** in this or any other discussion. I could not care less whether someone is left. right, or at the damn origin. Someone stating that they are aligned with a side does not mean that they have, nor know, the reason(s) for supporting that side. Everyone has personal opinions that don't fit completely on one end of the spectrum.
Reply
-1
#86 to #76 - randomuploads (01/07/2016) [-]
That's twice now you have to adjust your reply because you missed something. And you're saying my reading comprehension is bad..?

I'm so tired of yanks that think an army is important for their politics. How much more proof do you need that the USA simply takes what it wants by force. The US is the only country in the world that "needs" such a disproportionate ammount of cash for their army, didn't you ever wonder why...?
Reply
0
#90 to #86 - miasaki ONLINE (01/08/2016) [-]
You not knowing some sayings from a different country is not me missing something or having poor reading comprehension. I don't care where you are from and I sure as hell wont go to great lengths to spell out every little thing when you cant read well to begin with. I forgot that you stated that you are from the Netherlands, big whoop, the country as a whole is hardly worth discussion. The statements I made still stand. To help you out with this I have gathered a little link here to help you out as you seem to have issues using a search engine: lmgtfy.com/?q=reading+comprehension+definition

If you are tired of something that you cannot comprehend then educate yourself. You do have access to the internet after all.
Reply
-1
#93 to #90 - randomuploads (01/08/2016) [-]
So this entire reply is just to attack my person instead of arguments in our discussion. Thanks for playing.
Reply
0
#94 to #93 - miasaki ONLINE (01/08/2016) [-]
Oh yeah, because you stay on topic most of the time. >>#86 >>#64 and just about half the other comments. The last one in this string that was pertaining to the topic at hand was >>#24 and even then you failed to grasp a simple concept of size, and research. Every time I state something that you cannot refute because you have no clue what you are talking about you just either ignore it, state something completely irrelevant or make a comment about yanks. That's all you do.

All in all, its not so much to attack you personally, its me calling you out on all the stupid **** you keep doing. Ive been trying somewhat to keep the conversation constructive, but as I said, you were lost a while back, not worth the time to explain every little thing or big words. That was quite surprising though.

Good game. Good luck, have fun!
Reply
0
#73 to #72 - miasaki ONLINE (01/07/2016) [-]
My bad, I skimmed over your mention of the Netherlands earlier, I failed to re-read the comment string and I went off of what information I could recall this late at night. However, the rest of my comment still stands.
Reply
-1
User avatar #12 to #4 - sinery (01/06/2016) [-]
Why America is NOT the greatest country in the world, anymore. Don't mind me.
Reply
+1
User avatar #59 to #12 - pebar (01/07/2016) [-]
Newsroom Rebuttal: America Is Not The Greatest Country In the World?
Milton Friedman - What is America? (Lecture) that show is so full of ****

when people get arrest for saying things that offend people (reference many European countries) that's not freedom
Reply
-2
#15 to #12 - randomuploads (01/06/2016) [-]
"Oh he said something negative about one aspect of my country, he must hate the entire nation with everyone in it".

Why are you yanks always so sensitive when it's about your country? Tell a German you don't like Mercedes and he'll be like "Ok". Tell a yank you don't like Chevy and he'll call you a libtard commiecuck.
Reply
0
User avatar #16 to #15 - sinery (01/06/2016) [-]
I said don't mind me, where the **** did you go wrong?

Also, aren't yanks Americans?
Reply
0
#17 to #16 - randomuploads (01/06/2016) [-]
Saying "don't mind me" while posting a provocative video with a clear argument (that the US is responsible for a lot of good things in the world, like youtube) is the same as saying "No offense but..."

Americans are people that live in North or South America. Yanks are "officially" people from the NY area, but people outside the US call everybody from the US yanks because that's the easiest way to adress the entire population of the USA.
Reply
0
User avatar #18 to #17 - sinery (01/06/2016) [-]
Well, I'm not an American so...
Reply
0
#19 to #18 - randomuploads (01/06/2016) [-]
You're just a troll then.
Reply
0
#30 to #4 - chipbowdry (01/06/2016) [-]
* the politicians don't give a crap about our future, and Trump isn't a politician
Reply
0
User avatar #48 to #30 - lipidregent (01/07/2016) [-]
he's not a career politician, but he is a politician, he wouldn't be a politician if he wasn't running at all
Reply
-1
#63 - anon (01/07/2016) [-]
shooting your own leg just for the ***** and gigs, eh? The fact, that Trump is even considered for president is a sign that we live some disturbing times...
Reply
-1
User avatar #66 to #63 - Sunset (01/07/2016) [-]
shut up you faggot commie ****
Reply
0
#91 to #66 - anon (01/08/2016) [-]
faggot commie mad burns bro, it's like the cold-war meets kindergarten... But hey,go vote for trump, maybe he'll take more funding out of the school system, so you'll have more time to sleep with your family members and complain how the mexcicams took'yer'jeeb which you didn't apply for anyways...
Reply
0
User avatar #92 to #91 - Sunset (01/08/2016) [-]
ok you faggot commie ****
Reply
0
User avatar #82 - tittylovin (01/07/2016) [-]
>can't wait for Trump to fix America
>realize I'm poor as **** and will probably suffer
It's worth it if it ***** over even just one Mexican family.
Reply
0
#67 - anon (01/07/2016) [-]
Trump is a hardcore capitalist businessman that knows money.
Money is all that matters. If you disagree, you think we live in the damn matrix.

All the candidates, as always, are douches and turds, but money is all that matters, and Annoying Orange knows the most crucial aspect of our society extremely well.
Reply
0
User avatar #41 - shadowbreech (01/07/2016) [-]
I feel like voting for Donald trump would be like someone with a terminal illness committing suicide. Then end result is the same, but it's just cutting to the chase, only in this case, it's ******* the country very quickly and openly, rather than electing more and more career politicians who wont do what they need to for fear of making their party look bad, or failing to be up for re-election.
This election especially, there's just no winning... god help us, I'm scared.
Reply
0
User avatar #28 - xdiabolicx (01/06/2016) [-]
It will be the most entertaining thing in politics for me.
Reply
-3
User avatar #40 - jamesisawesome (01/07/2016) [-]
Now you know how I feel about Sanders.
Reply
-2
#25 - anon (01/06/2016) [-]
I just want to ******* kill myself.
That had nothing to do with the topic, I just wanted you to know it.
Reply
0
User avatar #34 to #25 - loopymoomoo (01/07/2016) [-]
do it fagit
Reply
0
#87 - ostemad (01/07/2016) [-]
If you mention Bernie Sanders in the comment section, you get thumbs down.
Reply
0
User avatar #80 - jonball (01/07/2016) [-]
This isn't much off a confession tho....
Reply
0
User avatar #83 to #80 - Ragumshnagum [OP](01/07/2016) [-]
Oh no, believe me, it is. If you think that I can say any of this in a real life social setting without being confronted, then you are surely mistaken.
Reply
0
User avatar #78 - aejann (01/07/2016) [-]
Donald Trump is the embodiment of everything the American People want and believe. That doesn't make it a good thing.
12>
[ 94 comments ]
Leave a comment
<
>
 Friends (0)