Can I poke the us?. The puma ready stick.. WWY lit A NUT sum. >Everyone saying how evil America is for nuking Japan >Everyone forgetting about how Japan threw there babies then themselves 95% of the time off a cliff  family guy is th
Upload
Login or register
Hide Comments
Leave a comment Refresh Comments (177)
[ 177 comments ]
Anonymous comments allowed.
asd
User avatar #34 - mendelevium
Reply +84 123456789123345869
(05/18/2014) [-]
>Everyone saying how evil America is for nuking Japan
>Everyone forgetting about how Japan threw there babies then themselves 95% of the time off a cliff to escape "The White Devil"
>Everyone forgetting Kamikazes
>Everyone forgetting torturous POW camps
>Everyone forgetting mass killings of Japanese Civilians by Japanese
>Everyone forgetting Japanese Dictatorship / King / God
>Everyone forgetting the US constantly dropping warnings before the bombs

10/10 knowledge of WW2 by funnyjunk

Japan would have ****** itself into oblivion before it surrendered, more would have died on both sides then any 2 nukes could do, and much more painfully.
User avatar #84 to #34 - whtkid
Reply -5 123456789123345869
(05/18/2014) [-]
First bomb was dropped without warning, as to withhold the shock value. The only warnings we gave them before that were for the firebombings that we were doing. The second bomb we gave them warning for.

I agree with your points, and I am someone who fully supports the decision of dropping the bombs, but it's just a topic I know very in depth and I needed to correct you
#96 to #84 - anon id: b2fe641d
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(05/18/2014) [-]
**anonymous rolled image** false we had given warnings beforehand of the bombs and they ignored them. get you facts strait before you embarrass yourself
User avatar #174 to #96 - whtkid
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(05/18/2014) [-]
#103 to #96 - anon id: 28e0e99e
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(05/18/2014) [-]
you say we as if youre any part of it what so ever
#114 to #103 - anon id: b2fe641d
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(05/18/2014) [-]
**anonymous rolled image** i was there when it happened
User avatar #132 to #34 - nustix
Reply -2 123456789123345869
(05/18/2014) [-]
Thinking japan had a king 10/10 history knowledge. Also the main reason most of those things happpened was the emperor. If they would have bombed the royal palace it would have made more sense.
User avatar #109 to #34 - theshadowed
Reply -1 123456789123345869
(05/18/2014) [-]
Perhaps, though we don't know that. Also, were 2 nukes necessary? A warning could've been gave after the 1st one, maybe Japanese dignitaries given a showing of a nuclear test to warn them, just frighten them off.
User avatar #125 to #109 - sharklazers
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(05/18/2014) [-]
first nuke was to make 'em stop, they still didn't stop so they dropped the second nuke on nagasaki. that one had dual purposes : make them stop once and for all, and to show the ruskies who was boss
#51 to #34 - mamaluweegee
0 123456789123345869
has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #52 to #51 - mendelevium
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(05/18/2014) [-]
Source?
#54 to #52 - mamaluweegee
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(05/18/2014) [-]
Welp, ****.  I heard it at some point and I guess it just made enough sense that I accepted it as fact.  I'm a dingus.
Welp, ****. I heard it at some point and I guess it just made enough sense that I accepted it as fact. I'm a dingus.
User avatar #57 to #54 - mendelevium
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(05/18/2014) [-]
At least you know now that you dont know, and that's part of knowing what to know.
#134 to #57 - dross
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(05/18/2014) [-]
"Don't do what Donny Don't does.... Oh man...."
#110 to #34 - anon id: 61923f81
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(05/18/2014) [-]
Just because someone else is committing atrocious acts doesn't justify your own acts of genocide. The Japanese never slaughtered millions of American civilians. If the bombs were dropped on military targets then people wouldn't have had as much of a problem with it, but they didn't. They purposely targeted civilian populations to kill as many people as possible, innocent or not.

I notice how you're not supporting 9/11, by posting all of America's evils, when it's the exact same situation only America was on the receiving end instead.
#115 to #110 - stallioncock
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(05/18/2014) [-]
I'm pretty sure the U.S chose the cities as bomb targets because they held a lot of military factories and **** like that. Therefore by bombing them, they can't reinforce their soldiers.
#119 to #115 - anon id: 61923f81
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(05/18/2014) [-]
Hiroshima was chosen because it was a large industrial city with a large urban population. Nagasaki was chosen because they wanted to see if the hills in the location would focus the blast. But both were intended to cause as much damage as possible by choosing targets that had not been targeted by firebombing. So, hitting them where they felt safest.
User avatar #159 to #34 - scorcho
Reply +2 123456789123345869
(05/18/2014) [-]
>Japanese are evil for killing themselves
>let's kill them
User avatar #172 to #159 - nigeltheoutlaw
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(05/18/2014) [-]
>implying that's all the evil **** they did
User avatar #101 to #34 - iridium
Reply +7 123456789123345869
(05/18/2014) [-]
>Not mentioning the **** Japan did to China or other Pacific Islands

Dude that **** is the worst they did by far. They treated them like ******* puppets.
#11 - include
Reply +80 123456789123345869
(05/17/2014) [-]
#168 to #11 - gisle
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(05/18/2014) [-]
#17 to #11 - otroviciado
Reply +2 123456789123345869
(05/17/2014) [-]
Space Jam Theme Song
#33 - theseamonster
Reply +43 123456789123345869
(05/18/2014) [-]
'Murica was ready alright.
#120 to #33 - freddyhollensen
Reply +4 123456789123345869
(05/18/2014) [-]
unfounded...
unfounded...
User avatar #124 to #120 - coursicar
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(05/18/2014) [-]
it got me too. lol
#1 - anon id: 256b02af
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(05/17/2014) [-]
Someone should have paid more attention in history class.
Someone should have paid more attention in history class.
User avatar #160 to #1 - shadowoflife
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(05/18/2014) [-]
It's a joke.
User avatar #2 to #1 - theblargypargler
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(05/17/2014) [-]
Looks accurate to me, why?
#15 to #1 - gibroner
Reply +16 123456789123345869
(05/17/2014) [-]
Granted it's not the best metaphor for ww2 but it's not entirely inaccurate either this polandball comic does a better job at explaining it
#156 to #15 - anon id: c83388c0
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(05/18/2014) [-]
trade embargo on japan and also freeze asset they had within the usa you exapt them not to attack ?
#141 to #15 - bearguy
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(05/18/2014) [-]
Except that the second Sino-Japanese wars started two years before World War 2.
User avatar #3 to #1 - bigfriendlyginger
Reply +41 123456789123345869
(05/17/2014) [-]
Given that the US let everyone else try to stop the Axis ages until the Japanese forced your hand by attacking you i think it's pretty much a perfect representation.
User avatar #43 to #3 - damping
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(05/18/2014) [-]
I'm willing to bet you are too stupid to realize that the US only joined 6 months after the USSR.
#63 to #43 - oceanfrank
Reply -1 123456789123345869
(05/18/2014) [-]
The USSR was on the axis side since Hitler invaded Poland but were turned on in 1941 by Hitler himself. Also what the **** does this "fact" have to do with the US entering WWII because of Japans actions?
User avatar #64 to #63 - damping
Reply -1 123456789123345869
(05/18/2014) [-]
He claimed everyone had been fighting the axis for ages before the US entered the war. Can't read?
User avatar #67 to #64 - oceanfrank
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(05/18/2014) [-]
It's ******* true though lol, 1 country that was on the axis side at first doesn't equal the entire world lol. What he said was true, what you said was irrelevant as **** to his statement.
User avatar #68 to #67 - damping
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(05/18/2014) [-]
Russia was never on the axis side. In fact Stalin and Hitler were very wary of each other.
And how is joining in 1941 ages when the war started in 1939 and ended in 1945?
User avatar #144 to #68 - tkfourtwoone
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(05/18/2014) [-]
"Russia was never on the axis side"

******* historically illiterate cunt!

Ribbentropp-Molotov say anything to you, straya bitch?!

FYI, for the Russians the war started in 1941 (their whole "Great Patriotic War", bla bla bla) when Germany launched Operation Barbarossa.

inb4 the Winter War against Finnland.

******* mongrel.
User avatar #175 to #144 - damping
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(05/18/2014) [-]
Really a non aggression pact means they are on the same side? I guess the nuclear disarmament treaties between the US and the USSR also meant they were on the same side huh?

Dumbass.
User avatar #177 to #175 - tkfourtwoone
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(05/18/2014) [-]
It was more than a non aggression act, dummy.

In that pact they agreed on splitting the territories of other countries. They were ALLIES. Period.
User avatar #178 to #177 - damping
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(05/18/2014) [-]
If they were allies they would have declared war on France and England along with Germany. They were not allies. They just decided to write a truce while they dealt with other things. Everyone knew, including Stalin, that Hitler would attack at some point.
User avatar #70 to #68 - oceanfrank
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(05/18/2014) [-]
He phrased it wrong and if that's the case then explain to me why Russia helped Germany invade Poland, Sweden, and most of Eastern Europe? No **** they were wary of each other, one was starting a world ward, the other was being plotted against.
User avatar #71 to #70 - damping
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(05/18/2014) [-]
He didn't phrase it wrong looked further below. He talks about how the US "swooped in towards the end."

Stalin and Hitler knew they would go to war at some point. Stalin wasn't ready yet so there was a tentative peace between the two. Hitler also wanted to take France before hitting the USSR to avoid a WW1 style two front war. They hated each other, but it was beneficial to wait a little bit for both of them. Dividing up Poland was to appease each other.
User avatar #72 to #71 - oceanfrank
Reply -1 123456789123345869
(05/18/2014) [-]
Then hes retarded too. Look just know the USSR was in the war since 1939. that's all that matters.
User avatar #73 to #72 - damping
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(05/18/2014) [-]
They were not in the World War. They were in a small war with Finland.
User avatar #13 to #3 - davidteninch
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(05/17/2014) [-]
Half of the US population at the time didn't want to get involved in another European war. It would have been bad if FDR forced an unwilling nation to fight a war they didn't want to.
Think about Vietnam, resentment for that war rose incredibly quickly.
#23 to #13 - anon id: 098f4de3
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(05/18/2014) [-]
Not really, until the tet offensive the majority of the people were on board with the Vietnam war.
User avatar #92 to #23 - nitsuan
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(05/18/2014) [-]
Which is the funny thing because the Tet offensive actually worked in our favor, but the media played it off as devastation.
#31 to #3 - anon id: bf58b3a3
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(05/18/2014) [-]
Again, the US SUPPLIED ALL THE ALLIES WITH WEAPONS TO GET US OUT OF THE GREAT DEPRESSION. Then we kicked their ass. Do you guys not realize how important weapons are in a ******* war? AND we showed up, and kicked their ass as well. You're just ungrateful of the guys that gave you the guns to shoot them with. You do realize without the ENTIRE US NATION making weapons for you all, you WOULDN'T HAVE HAD ENOUGH WEAPONS. Jesus, what a bunch of ungrateful pricks.
User avatar #39 to #31 - kungfulouie
Reply +5 123456789123345869
(05/18/2014) [-]
Anon is kind of right actually. We gave our allies an incredible amount of different weapons, and we were doing that as soon as the war began, providing them with the things they lacked and needed to defeat the Nazis while appearing to remain neutral to be more effective. We fought the war from the beginning not only by massively helping out the greater cause of the people on the right side, but also got ourselves out of the Great Depression. Nationally, it was a brilliant plan, and it worked great. We also fought them in person, quite well at that. It's just that our first moves in the war were kept in secret, and still remain quite frequently unrecognized.
User avatar #94 to #39 - irico
Reply +8 123456789123345869
(05/18/2014) [-]
"Gave" implying you didn't charge extremely high rates for the supplies and the money you made from WW2 is what caused you to become the superpower it is today. Also you were extremely reluctant to join the war at all, you had a policy of extreme isolationism after WW1. The only reason you joined was because you needed to save face after Pearl Harbor.
User avatar #128 to #94 - kungfulouie
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(05/18/2014) [-]
Not really. While we did charge for the weapons we supplied, we charged necessary prices as we were supplying the war effort and fixing the collapse of our nation. Keep in mind that we were literally the Allies secret weapon. And while the money we made did get us out of the Great Depression (which was important for us to do), technically allowing us to become a superpower, that's because it stopped us from starving to death. Of course, that's ignoring all of the technological and scientific advancements we made, both during and since WWII, and there have been a lot, but I can secede to the "we needed to end the Great Depression" point I guess, because we did, so you can sort of have that one.

What I will not agree to is your point of "saving face" being the only reason we joined. The president's plan was to fight the Axis, he just kept that a secret for us to appear neutral to them, so we could freely supply all of our Allies with the supplies they needed, with as little interference as possible. It was a brilliant tactic. That is the reason America's early role is often overlooked, as it was intentionally in cognito. We had clearly chosen a side. To say otherwise is to insinuate that the rest of the Allied war effort wasn't incredibly grateful for what we did, even if only a select few people knew we were doing anything. That was the plan, and it worked.

So even if we weren't on the front lines as long, do not discredit us, as the few people that knew the plan never would. And then, once we started sending troops along with our secret weapons, all the Allies together **** stomped the Nazis, and Hitler decided to take the pussy way out.
User avatar #123 to #94 - demigodofmadness
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(05/18/2014) [-]
The really reason the government sold those supplies was to provoke one of the axis into attacking us, so that we could retaliate without the people being upset we broke our policy of isolationism. The reason we waited so long to join was to save face, not the retaliation itself.
User avatar #135 to #123 - securityexplain
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(05/18/2014) [-]
Wouldn't provoking work better if you gave the supplies, rather than sold them? Selling them looks a lot like war profiteering, and if I were a country, I wouldn't really be mad if someone was making money for it. At least I knew that they're in it for money.

Giving away stuff to my enemies during a war, well... I would know that they're out to get me, and would retaliate accordingly.

So, yeah, I'm just going to assume you're full of ****.
User avatar #179 to #135 - demigodofmadness
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(05/19/2014) [-]
It's more about that they were selling supplies exclusively to allied members. Making it seem like an unofficial alliance.

Let's put it in smaller terms, if you're about to fight some dude, and some guy offers to sell the guy a semi-automatic rifle, and doesn't make the same offer to you, are you saying you'd really say, "Ah well, he's only in it for the money, can't hold anything against him."?

Because if so I'm going to assume you're full of ****.
#122 to #31 - caddelta
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(05/18/2014) [-]
Over 80% of German casualties in Europe were in the eastern front. The Allies did next to nothing in comparison to Russia in Europe.

Front Total Dead
Eastern Front until 12/31/44 2,742,909
Western Europe until 12/31/44 339,957
Final Battles in Germany 1945 1,230,045
Other (including sea and air war in Germany) 245,561
Italy 150,660
The Balkans 103,693
Northern Europe 30,165
Africa 16,066
Prisoners of War 459,475
Total 5,318,531

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/German_casualties_in_World_War_II

Inb4 Wikipedia not legit
#131 to #122 - anon id: bf58b3a3
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(05/18/2014) [-]
More Russians and Europeans died because THE NAZIS WERE TRYING TO TAKE OVER RUSSIA AND EUROPE. Use some ******* logic man.
#142 to #131 - anon id: bf58b3a3
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(05/18/2014) [-]
Finally some one said it.  Turns out you lose a lot of people when you lose some cities, or countries
Finally some one said it. Turns out you lose a lot of people when you lose some cities, or countries
#151 to #131 - caddelta
Reply -1 123456789123345869
(05/18/2014) [-]
What the **** are you talking about, these are the German casualties you illiterate nincompoop.
#107 to #31 - gaytard
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(05/18/2014) [-]
ITT: americans denying warcrimes
User avatar #176 to #107 - damping
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(05/18/2014) [-]
Since when is using a weapon a war crime?
User avatar #171 to #107 - imnotkickthecat
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(05/18/2014) [-]
Hey, if the japanese can deny the rape of nanking, we can deny nuking the **** out of them was a war crime.
User avatar #5 to #3 - Ankou
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(05/17/2014) [-]
Not disputing what you said, by the way
User avatar #4 to #3 - Ankou
Reply -4 123456789123345869
(05/17/2014) [-]
At least the US actually waited until they were ready, unlike everyone else in the war, especially the Germans
User avatar #6 to #4 - bigfriendlyginger
Reply +5 123456789123345869
(05/17/2014) [-]
oh don't get me wrong, I'm not saying it was a bad move on the US's part. from the perspective of the US it was the best choice for them to swoop in towards the end with the appropriate preparations, I'm just not fond of the whole "America saves the day" misconception that people seem to have without taking into account that the only reason they got involved at that point is because japan brought them into it.
User avatar #8 to #6 - IamSofaKingdom
Reply +5 123456789123345869
(05/17/2014) [-]
Before Japan attacked the US they were already sending supplies and such to the English and had been attacked at sea several times by the Germans who were trying to prevent them from receiving anything. America didn't deploy but they made their side of the conflict obvious long before entering and that is probably why Hitler had already drawn up plans for invading the US after conquering Europe.
#21 to #6 - anon id: da8dba32
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(05/17/2014) [-]
The US didn't "save the day", but their role was absolutely crucial to the success of the allies, mostly for the supplies they gave towards the beginning, but also a large part given to their military's success in defeating a, debatable, weaker Germany.

The US played just as large of a role as any nation did.
User avatar #7 to #6 - Ankou
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(05/17/2014) [-]
Eh, most people seem to be stupid and don't pay attention to actual facts, I try not to let it bother me, but it doesn't always work
#40 - funnyjunkelite
Reply -17 123456789123345869
(05/18/2014) [-]
US stops importing oil to Japan, and then Japan attacked the US. US later bombed two major cities with nuclear arms. What's so hard to understand? Japan didn't attack just because they felt like it and US didn't stop importing oil because they were tired of sending oil that far. Why not learn some history, pleb.
#158 to #40 - mrmcput
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(05/18/2014) [-]
Now tell me. What was Japan doing with that oil?
User avatar #44 to #40 - damping
Reply +5 123456789123345869
(05/18/2014) [-]
The word you are looking for is exporting.
#45 to #44 - funnyjunkelite
Reply +4 123456789123345869
(05/18/2014) [-]
Comment Picture
User avatar #46 to #45 - damping
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(05/18/2014) [-]
Well you made me laugh, I will give you that.
User avatar #82 to #40 - tacticulbacon
Reply +5 123456789123345869
(05/18/2014) [-]
Japan bombed the US with the intention of scaring them/ crippling their navy so that they wouldn't get involved in the war with the allies. Which turned out to be a pretty dumb decision, because the US isn't very well known for being easily intimidated or doubtful of going to war.
#100 to #82 - anon id: 28e0e99e
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(05/18/2014) [-]
yet they sit of their asses when hitler is murdering millions. good one
#47 to #40 - PVTDickStryker
Reply +34 123456789123345869
(05/18/2014) [-]
"What's that? My business partner decided to stop supporting me in order to maintain a neutral status because im joining a genocidal maniac bent on world conquest while instituting my own Manifest Destiny on pre-owned Asian territory? I better talk **** on the airwaves and kill their sleeping soldiers because of this act of extremely neutral betrayal."
During that time period, Japan was just BEGGING for a cock on the face with all the **** they were pulling. Dont you think theres a reason why Korea, Vietnam, and a bunch of Island nations despise Japan's utter guts?
User avatar #80 to #47 - Endofzeeworld
Reply -1 123456789123345869
(05/18/2014) [-]
I agree with the sentiment, but the oil and iron embargoes were a little more debilitating than just the loss of a business partner.
#49 to #47 - funnyjunkelite
Reply -5 123456789123345869
(05/18/2014) [-]
All I'm saying is that US embargoed Japan because they wanted to attack China, along for joining the axis. And this embargo caused Japan to finally attack the US.
#55 to #49 - PVTDickStryker
Reply +13 123456789123345869
(05/18/2014) [-]
Because Japan didn't instigate the embargo itself by trying to uh...embargo all major imports into China, including American-purchased weapons. Dude, face it, Japan got ****** because the Japanese military thought it was steaming hot **** after some expansion into other parts of Asia.    
   
Pic semi-related.
Because Japan didn't instigate the embargo itself by trying to uh...embargo all major imports into China, including American-purchased weapons. Dude, face it, Japan got ****** because the Japanese military thought it was steaming hot **** after some expansion into other parts of Asia.

Pic semi-related.
#58 to #55 - funnyjunkelite
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(05/18/2014) [-]
*****, I never said the Japanese didn't think they were hot ****. All im trying to get across is that the embargo broke the camels back
*****, I never said the Japanese didn't think they were hot ****. All im trying to get across is that the embargo broke the camels back
User avatar #59 to #58 - PVTDickStryker
Reply +6 123456789123345869
(05/18/2014) [-]
But in this particular case, the camel donkey-kicked a house's support beam and attempted to keep the building from collapsing on his own.
#60 to #59 - funnyjunkelite
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(05/18/2014) [-]
I don't even know what we're arguing about anymore
#61 to #60 - PVTDickStryker
Reply +4 123456789123345869
(05/18/2014) [-]
Something about defecation of a high temperature and camels.....
Something about defecation of a high temperature and camels.....
User avatar #56 to #49 - themasonrocks
Reply +8 123456789123345869
(05/18/2014) [-]
Japan attacked china before the embargo, partially because the the Open Door policy which was controlled by the U.S., and then later spread to French Indochina which was very close to Hawaii. This lead to the embargo from the U.S.
#50 - thelastelephant
Reply +24 123456789123345869
(05/18/2014) [-]
I laughed, but my god was that second panel hard to read.
User avatar #99 to #50 - mastercolossus
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(05/18/2014) [-]
needs quote marks.
#118 - asurasxnight
Reply +8 123456789123345869
(05/18/2014) [-]
total truth here was US cuts off oil and stuff to Japan, Japan gets pissed, bombs Pearl Harbor. All a calculated move by the US to rally our people to fight Germany.
Flash forward to 2001, twin towers fall, Osama was is Afghanistan, we somehow declare war on Iraq
User avatar #129 to #118 - listerthepessimist
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(05/18/2014) [-]
dont forget the mauritania
User avatar #165 to #118 - thatoneiranianguy
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(05/18/2014) [-]
Roosevelt had cut Japan's oil supply because we had warned Japan about invading China and violating their sovereignty...which they did.

Our response was cutting their resources, because several years back 1899 and onward John Hay, the Secretary of State under McKinley at the time, enforced and signed in the Open Door Policy note that protected American interests in China by clarifying China's "doors" need to stay open to everyone in the world to prevent invasions of China to protect interest.

...need to tell the whole story.

User avatar #166 to #118 - thatoneiranianguy
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(05/18/2014) [-]
Also Iraq (2003 invasion) was another issue mostly unrelated to 9/11, and a result from years of previous post-WWII foreign policy in regards to Communism and Iran (Iran-Iraq War, we propped Sadaam, funded him with chemical weapons to fight the Iranians with.)

This followed by the Gulf War, which was the defense of Kuwait, and a combination of internal government politics, we destroyed Iraq and Sadaam, but didn't take the chance to get rid of any chemical weapons he may have still had (which we gave him) and take Sadaam out (whom of which we propped up.)

In many ways, these were contributions to the 2003 Iraq Invasion.

Seriously, do you even history?
#10 - nekaz
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(05/17/2014) [-]
i thought the general idea starting out was
us was not prepared and the surprise attack initially costed 4-5 ships
but
it also woke the beast metaphorically speaking and america was war ready within (insert specific amount of time here) months

so tl:dr it would be more accurate if the lion was not paying attention and also the stick was a bit bigger
User avatar #16 to #10 - lave
Reply +8 123456789123345869
(05/17/2014) [-]
America was ready for war when Japan attacked, america had been recruiting building tanks / ships and basically preparing for a fight to the death since Germany began its conquering of Europe, however they wanted to remain neutral due to political BS and fear. Japan saw this as a sign of weakness and decided to attack. We all know how that went.
User avatar #76 to #16 - confusedasian
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(05/18/2014) [-]
Japan only attacked because we stopped exporting stuff to them. They saw the building fleets and thought it was going to be attacking them.
User avatar #20 to #16 - nekaz
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(05/17/2014) [-]
hmmm, well i had seemed to recall that they only got up to "proper" levels after the attack
perhaps i am mistaken
#19 to #16 - anon id: b790fac7
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(05/17/2014) [-]
Basically, we were ready to fight Germany, but we were so busy looking towards Europe that we forgot to check six and got shot in the ass for it.
#116 - fearoffailure
Reply +6 123456789123345869
(05/18/2014) [-]
#139 to #116 - dross
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(05/18/2014) [-]
MFW hungover from FA Cup final and taking a solid minute to work that out.   
   
...It's about when Brigadier General Anthony McAuliffe told the Germans 'Nuts!' in Bastogne in December 1944.
MFW hungover from FA Cup final and taking a solid minute to work that out.

...It's about when Brigadier General Anthony McAuliffe told the Germans 'Nuts!' in Bastogne in December 1944.
User avatar #12 - Visier
Reply +5 123456789123345869
(05/17/2014) [-]
Lil' Hitler
User avatar #28 to #12 - groovierpoet
Reply +2 123456789123345869
(05/18/2014) [-]
By far, The best way to explain WW2