Upload
Login or register
x

[ C U R R E N T - Y E A R ]

Tags: cmon
5 Anonymous( :
237 KB PNG
2016 GET
3359252959 it
3359252199 it
3359252133 it
3359252152 it
3359252221 it
33592522145 it
3359252415 it
3359252599 it
3359252599 it
3359252359 it
3359253392 it
3359253944 it
3359254132 it
3359254253 it
3359252933 it
3359252129 it
3359252139 it
3359252153 it
3359252239 it
335925233? it
3359252429 it
3359252549 it
3359252513 it
3359252952 it
3359253333 it
3359254993 it
3359254199 it
3359254393 it
3359252931 if
3359252121 if
3359252159 if
3359252135 if
3359252245 if
3359252354 if
3359252434 if
3359252551 if
3359252549 if
3359253223 if
3359254919 if
3359254221 if
3359254339 if
I cannot wait until the first
time I hear a liberal uses
the argument "IT' S 2016!".
That' s when you know the
new year has truly begun.
59252097 it
3359252129 it
3359252155 it
3359252295 it
3359252252 it
59252374 it
3359252459 it
59252597 it
59253700 it
59253927 it
3359254921 it
3359254244 it
3359254415 it
...
+940
Views: 34139
Favorited: 42
Submitted: 01/07/2016
Share On Facebook
submit to reddit +Favorite Subscribe to nickypickle

Comments(143):

Leave a comment Refresh Comments Show GIFs
12>
[ 143 comments ]
Top Rated Controversial Best Lowest Rated Newest
Anonymous comments allowed.
96 comments displayed.
Reply
+438
#12 - tarabostes ONLINE (01/07/2016) [-]
Reply
-18
User avatar #24 to #12 - durkadurka (01/07/2016) [-]
Dat horrible trigger discipline tho.
Reply
+121
User avatar #35 to #24 - lilRican (01/07/2016) [-]
He has an intent to do a mass shooting,

I hardly think he needs it
Reply
+65
User avatar #43 to #35 - tarabostes ONLINE (01/07/2016) [-]
I have an intent to shoot all over your mass




But I still have my discipline
Reply
+10
User avatar #50 to #43 - barakakaka (01/07/2016) [-]
When did FJ become so smooth?
Reply
+17
User avatar #51 to #50 - tarabostes ONLINE (01/07/2016) [-]
I AM BECOME FJ
DESTROYER OF PUSI
Reply
+6
User avatar #52 to #51 - barakakaka (01/07/2016) [-]
Ey b0ss.


Fak u, man!
Reply
+4
User avatar #57 to #52 - tarabostes ONLINE (01/07/2016) [-]
Let's get some pusi tonight!
Reply
+4
User avatar #101 to #57 - velzizar (01/07/2016) [-]
On my way here I ran over my dead dog... but that's ok because I have a new pet and it's name is pussy.
Reply
+3
#136 to #51 - exopatech (01/08/2016) [-]
RIP my sides
Reply
+4
#107 to #50 - nightmarexnxnxnxnx (01/07/2016) [-]
Well it is TB after all.
Well it is TB after all.
Reply
0
User avatar #143 to #107 - tarabostes ONLINE (01/08/2016) [-]
"TB''
Reply
-2
User avatar #59 to #35 - durkadurka (01/07/2016) [-]
Is that the context of the picture?
Reply
+3
User avatar #60 to #59 - lilRican (01/07/2016) [-]
Even then, it can be that he's possibly about to kill someone or himself,
Reply
-1
User avatar #62 to #60 - durkadurka (01/07/2016) [-]
It's John Oliver so I assumed the pic was from some of his anti-gun shenanagins. I honestly don't know the context behind the picture which is why I was asking.

It might even be a shop: I've been looking for the source and cant find it.
Reply
0
User avatar #65 to #60 - tarabostes ONLINE (01/07/2016) [-]
You reply to durka but not to me?
Christ you're a cheater...
Reply
0
#77 to #24 - anon (01/07/2016) [-]
hey guys this guy has bad trigger discipline while posing for a photoshoot gimme thumbs
Reply
+4
#72 to #12 - anon (01/07/2016) [-]
stop with the gun jokes. it's 2016
Reply
+92
#13 - maddboiy (01/07/2016) [-]
"If you don't let the nice immigrant man touch you then you're a racist!! It's 2016 Jessica you can't be doing this!!"
Reply
+35
#56 to #13 - sgtmajjohnson ONLINE (01/07/2016) [-]
Once again, I'm delighted that I get to use this.
Reply
+3
User avatar #95 to #56 - reeeeeeeeeee (01/07/2016) [-]
England. Socialist. We have one 'socialist' aspect of the UK that the US doesn't have. The NHS, which is being ****** by the government.
Reply
+4
#100 to #95 - sgtmajjohnson ONLINE (01/07/2016) [-]
It. is. a. joke. John Oliver also isn't an 18th century British soldier either, but you're not correcting me on that one. The U.K. is actually far and away my favorite country in Europe, and the only countries I prefer to it are my own and some other Anglosphere nations. Cool kids, amirite?
Reply
+2
User avatar #105 to #100 - eddio (01/07/2016) [-]
S-South Africa still counts, right?

Guys? Where are you going?
Reply
+2
User avatar #112 to #105 - sgtmajjohnson ONLINE (01/07/2016) [-]
I tried to find one including SA, but to no avail. Sorry friend, I guess apartheid was what made you cool.
Reply
+2
#116 to #112 - eddio (01/08/2016) [-]
Oh I see you guys are leaving

I'll just catch you guys later
Reply
+2
User avatar #102 to #100 - reeeeeeeeeee (01/07/2016) [-]
Goddamn yeah cool kids #4lyf

Reply
+27
#33 - jdizzleoffthehizzl ONLINE (01/07/2016) [-]
Is Liberal becoming a dirty word in America like socialism now?
Reply
-3
#94 to #33 - sideoffreedom (01/07/2016) [-]
yup and its ******* annoying, god forbid you arent a god forbid you are a little to the right
Reply
+1
#132 to #33 - gerfox (01/08/2016) [-]
Its kinda sad if you ask me. People are entitled to their own opinions, even though they are wrong. In many European countries neo-nazi parties are outlawed for instance. I think that is bad because, even though I don't condone their views and policies, they have the right to express their opinions however they'd like. And national socialism, as an idea, and without the genocidal war mongering element, isnt really a bad idea (the purpose of the state is to give everyone of your own people, first and foremost, an equal chance to succeed or become whatever you want to, and to do everything in your power to make sure that it is so).

In the US, socialism - and all words with socialism in it, has been greatly frowned upon - and been strongly linked with communism - even though for instance social democracy and communism are about as close as a nazi and a liberal. I like how Bernie Sanders suddenly has grown popular though, even though he says what he says about socialism. Maybe the American people are willing to try something new?
Reply
+2
#91 to #33 - anon (01/07/2016) [-]
It's been that way for at least a couple decades now.
Reply
+3
User avatar #120 to #33 - mikepetru (01/08/2016) [-]
Illiberal Progressives If you have an hour to kill, here is everything you need to know about why the word liberal has such a negative connotation nowadays.
Reply
+4
#79 to #33 - anon (01/07/2016) [-]
Only with I guess some? libertarians and republicans.
And republican is a dirty word for liberals and libertarians.
etc
Reply
0
#140 to #79 - anon (01/08/2016) [-]
Eh, I think it's a dirty word to moderates aswell.
Reply
+9
User avatar #45 to #33 - sketchE (01/07/2016) [-]
yes because it is more easily associated with the extremes
Reply
-6
#75 to #45 - anon (01/07/2016) [-]
b-but it's mostly right wingers who do mass shootings and such
Reply
+6
User avatar #78 to #75 - sketchE (01/07/2016) [-]
according to who?
Reply
-1
#108 to #75 - anon (01/07/2016) [-]
....lol...
Reply
+21
User avatar #19 - gedoushinken (01/07/2016) [-]
It feels like I'm on reverse Tumblr.
Reply
+2
#81 to #19 - anon (01/07/2016) [-]
Not just feels like.
Between this and tumblr I long for reasonable people people with opinions closer to mine becuase I want my own echobox after all this exposure to them .
Reply
+6
User avatar #73 to #19 - bigmanfifty (01/07/2016) [-]
you've just noticed?
Reply
+13
User avatar #39 - tonyxx (01/07/2016) [-]
Can we move on to another circlejerk at some point?
Reply
0
#135 to #39 - gerfox (01/08/2016) [-]
huh, youve been here longer than me, and you still havent realized that there is no such thing as moving on from a circlejerk for FJ
Reply
+1
User avatar #53 to #39 - nickypickle [OP]ONLINE (01/07/2016) [-]
its called sucking on meme dick
Reply
+3
User avatar #42 to #39 - ronyx (01/07/2016) [-]
It's easier to alternate between fok da liberulz or Trump or fok da sandnigurs refuges or the classic fak womin
Choose your flavor
Reply
0
User avatar #69 to #42 - holycrapimacupcake (01/07/2016) [-]
No no, not **** women, **** the ******* morons who think they speak for all women.
Reply
0
#83 to #69 - anon (01/07/2016) [-]
>implying that **** isn't creating actual misogynists
Reply
0
User avatar #123 to #83 - holycrapimacupcake (01/08/2016) [-]
He...he just threw the ******* fishing rod in the water.
Reply
+17
#37 - asotil (01/07/2016) [-]
Reply
+9
User avatar #47 - ponieskilledmyacc (01/07/2016) [-]
>2016
>Still stating the current year to try and make a stupid argument valid
Reply
+28
#14 - rmoran (01/07/2016) [-]
2016
Reply
0
#134 to #14 - gerfox (01/08/2016) [-]
lol, its 1437

allahu akbar *************
Reply
0
#58 to #14 - anon (01/07/2016) [-]
It's 2016
Reply
0
User avatar #70 to #14 - advice ONLINE (01/07/2016) [-]
2001+15
American time stood still after 9/11
Reply
+2
User avatar #41 to #14 - internetexplain (01/07/2016) [-]
1947+69
Reply
+2
#64 to #14 - adhdtookmyaccount (01/07/2016) [-]
It's 2015!!!!

Come on!!!!
Reply
+3
User avatar #63 to #14 - conisnon (01/07/2016) [-]
44.8998886412872966^2
Reply
+4
#114 - totallytito (01/07/2016) [-]
It is the Year 2016,
humanity has progressed further than ever before.
With the invention of the internet having taken less than one hundred years ago,
its society has both prospered and fallen in various areas. Mankind has begun to question more than ever about who to trust, who is right, what is right, and why it is right to do it.

Despite all of this, mankind has achieved incredible feats of space exploration,
medical science, and engineering precise enough to play with the fabric of an atom.
Almost every family has a recreational flying robot in their home, and technology has advanced so quickly that even their own government is unable to catch up.

With such powerful storage devices as lithium polymers and conductors suchas graphene, who knows what bizarre kinds of advances await in the future?

Tune in to next week's episode of"1950's Peek Into the Future", and find out!
Reply
+13
#5 - stoatsmcgoats (01/07/2016) [-]
M E M E M A G I C current
E
M
E
M
A
G
I
C
Year
Reply
+9
User avatar #1 - logicalcommonsense (01/07/2016) [-]
"For gods sake you piece of **** , racist (insert derogatory comment here). It's 2016. Get with the times you uneducated conservative moron. I bet you voted for that racist pig, bankrupt trump. I bet you also believe all mexicans are illegal and all muslims are terrorists. It's 2016, grow the **** up."

Liberal response ^^^
Reply
+4
#82 to #1 - anon (01/07/2016) [-]
"You ******* beta cuck sweden yes the jews did it good goy"

right-wing response ^^^^
Reply
+19
User avatar #20 - haroldsaxon (01/07/2016) [-]
You're all hypocrites. "It's current year" is not very different from "get with the times", or "in this day and age". We all know the meaning behind it is a focus on progression. Focusing on trivial things and repeating stuff like apes makes you just as bad, if not worse, than the people you mock.


While bringing up time as an argument is stupid, it's mostly brought up to empathize a point, nothing more.
Reply
+3
User avatar #26 to #20 - madb (01/07/2016) [-]
i have used this site for almost a year now and i usualy allways look trough almost the entire first page of the coment section if i find a picture interesting. i have litarely never seen anyone here say "get with the times"

Reply
+2
User avatar #30 to #26 - haroldsaxon (01/07/2016) [-]
Nor have I. However, it is a well known term most people don't complain about. My complaint is how people chose to ignore every argument and focus on trivial things, how both sides repeat buzzword after buzzword, refusing to acknowledge own mistakes or others valid points.

My point was not that you were hypocrites for mocking one word, while using an alteration yourselves, but rather the bashing of moot points.
Reply
+1
#67 to #30 - lujan (01/07/2016) [-]
"Get with the times" is used in movies and stuff as a parody phrase. They are mocking the idea that time can change morality or integrity. Like in Jay and Silent Bob Strike Back, George Carlin says he's going to give any truck driver a blowjob to give him a ride, and Jay says he's not gay so he won't do that and he's not willing to stoop to that level to hitch a ride, and then George Carlin replies something along the lines of, "Gay, straight, it's all the same. Get with the times. It's the new millennium." (The movie came out in 2001 I think). Using the year as a reason to do or not do something makes no sense.
Reply
+4
#22 to #20 - anon (01/07/2016) [-]
How are we hypocrites? People dislike "Its the current year" for the same reason they dislike "get with the times" and "it is how it is".

Its a buzzword of arguments.
Reply
+2
User avatar #28 to #22 - haroldsaxon (01/07/2016) [-]
It's not even an argument.
Reply
+1
#74 to #28 - anon (01/07/2016) [-]
that's the point, people use it like it is
Reply
+5
User avatar #25 to #20 - TheHutchie (01/07/2016) [-]
I'm not American, so to me, words like "liberal" are just buzzwords to the same effect, but I'll throw in my thoughts anyway.

To me, the notion of a certain thing being encouraged simply due to what era of history we're sitting in is ridiculous. I think that when people use these expressions, they should instead be emphasising how ways of thinking should be left behind in time rather than how new ones should be encouraged now. There's no such thing as progress without comparison to the past, otherwise what would we be progressing from?
Reply
+1
User avatar #27 to #25 - haroldsaxon (01/07/2016) [-]
That is the implications of the "current year" saying. Though it is silly, it does exactly what you wished for, emphasizing that old ways of thinking should be left behind.
Reply
0
User avatar #29 to #27 - TheHutchie (01/07/2016) [-]
I don't believe it does, sir, unless the person saying it actually makes a real comparison. It shouldn't be made about the numbers 2016 and 1926, for example - it should be directly said that women can vote now and they couldn't then.
Reply
+1
User avatar #31 to #29 - haroldsaxon (01/07/2016) [-]
As I've stated, numerous times, "current year" is no more then emphasis, something you add after pointing out something you perceived as wrong which was common before, but not now. Like women voting. An example could be: "Party [x] wants to remove women's right to vote. C'mon people it's [current year]." While I dislike the way this is worded, all the implications are there, and ignoring those would just be silly and a huge step back. I imagine using terms like these is mostly to rail people up with you, likely through media, but I digress.

If you'd say "modern art is good because it's modern", or "I don't like this because it was better before", then I'd agree that would be problematic.


Just for clarity. My personal problem, and reason for posting, is that people avoid the actual points in arguments, and focus on something else. Both* sides does this. I don't mind the satire of "current year", though I might have implied it with bad wording, the problem is when people dismiss a possibly legit argument just because of those words. Humor is ok, but the use in "serious" discussion is not.

If we were brave enough to admit our own faults, and others strengths, then we could improve much faster.


* There aren't two black and white sides. It's more like 50 shades of grey.
Reply
0
User avatar #32 to #31 - TheHutchie (01/07/2016) [-]
I see where you're coming from, and of course you're right. I still think that if I were to argue the same points, I'd probably avoid saying "it's 2016!" all out. Much better to argue that improving our society should be done on its own merits and to just forget that the time we live in is even a factor, when applicable anyway.
Reply
+1
#76 - daniboyi (01/07/2016) [-]
Honestly.
From all the things I hear about American politics, it sounds to me like the american government is pure **** no matter what way you look at it.

Of course this is only said as an outsider. So my opinion is worth **** .
Reply
0
User avatar #124 to #76 - mrjweezy (01/08/2016) [-]
well its an outside veiw of things.
something we americunts dont have.
still accurate.....but trump will change that.
Reply
0
#139 to #124 - anon (01/08/2016) [-]
That's with the circus cunt included, don't flatter yourself.
Reply
0
User avatar #131 to #76 - strangesir (01/08/2016) [-]
As an American, I can confirm that our government is ****** , and none of our candidates are really good. We are going to go to **** whether a Democrat or a Republican take office, because both are just looking to shape the U.S. how they want it to be, rather than what would make it better. Except maybe Ben Carson. Maybe.
Reply
+1
User avatar #80 to #76 - garykn (01/07/2016) [-]
Congratulations, you have a complete grasp of what our government is like. If the Dems are in charge, it's **** . If the Repubs are in charge, it's **** .
Reply
0
#85 to #80 - jouten (01/07/2016) [-]
Vote for a third party?
Reply
0
User avatar #133 to #85 - strangesir (01/08/2016) [-]
Independents/Third parties generally are not popular or voted for, probably because "they ain't a Democrut or a Republicun"
Reply
0
User avatar #127 to #85 - fukkentyranitar (01/08/2016) [-]
The american government doesn't like change.
Reply
0
User avatar #93 to #85 - garykn (01/07/2016) [-]
The Problems with First Past the Post Voting Explained I think this video does a good job of explaining why the American Two-Party system makes it nearly impossible for third parties to win.
Reply
0
User avatar #97 to #93 - jouten (01/07/2016) [-]
Is that really how it works in America? In germany you need at least 50% of the people's votes to reign, so it makes it basically impossible for a single party to rule, so they need to form coalitions to govern.
One time that even went to the poit were Schröder thought he could still covern although he didn't get the majority of votes, because he didn't believe Merkel and Liberals would be able to coaliate.
Reply
0
User avatar #103 to #97 - garykn (01/07/2016) [-]
Well in the States, we really only have the two parties. Sure there are other smaller parties, but they're mostly just jokes that don't have any representation in our government anyways. If you're a liberal, you're a democrat. If you're a conservative, you're a republican.
Reply
0
User avatar #110 to #103 - jouten (01/07/2016) [-]
So there's no way coalitions can form in the US? Like if liberals got 18%, Democrats 37% and Republicans 45%, the Liberals and Democrats can't make a coalition and form the rightful 55% vote government?
Reply
0
User avatar #113 to #110 - garykn (01/07/2016) [-]
The liberals are the democrats. It's not that you have liberals, conservatives, republicans, and democrats. If you lean liberal on the political scale then you are a democrat. If you lean conservative on the political scale then you are a republican. There's no need for democrats to form a coalition with liberals because all of the liberals (<--Not a political party) are already democrats (<--A political party).
Reply
+1
#84 to #76 - anon (01/07/2016) [-]
Congress bois
Reply
+1
User avatar #89 to #76 - masdercheef (01/07/2016) [-]
Nah, yeah, your opinion's pretty accurate.
Reply
+2
#90 to #76 - anon (01/07/2016) [-]
Yep, you got it. It's just a mess of **** slinging and nothing getting done.

The few people that genuinely care about government work and doing what they believe in either stop at the local level, get pushed out of official government positions altogether, or get corrupted by the money, power, and/or favor system.
Reply
+3
User avatar #34 - kameken (01/07/2016) [-]
C U R R E N T Y E A R
U
R
R
E
N
T

Y
E
A
R
Reply
+1
User avatar #38 - cheastnut ONLINE (01/07/2016) [-]
they've said it here> www.facebook.com/video.php?v=10153819747946800
Reply
+1
User avatar #17 - improbable (01/07/2016) [-]
i say "in this day and age"

it sounds obvious but more natural because i think it has been said a long time before saying the current year
Reply
0
User avatar #8 - demonbreadofnorth ONLINE (01/07/2016) [-]
T H E C U R R E N T Y E A R
H
E

C
U
R
R
E
N
T

Y
E
A
R
12>
[ 143 comments ]
Leave a comment
<
>
 Friends (0)