Upload
Login or register
x

Buckle up buckaroo

 
Buckle up buckaroo. Caitlyn Jenner at it again. File: (167 KB, 475x594) C) Anonymous ( Tue) 22: No. 646277492 _ a be Jennifer Lawrence e worth 60 million dollar

Caitlyn Jenner at it again

File: (167 KB, 475x594)
C) Anonymous ( Tue) 22: No. 646277492 _
a be Jennifer Lawrence
e worth 60 million dollars
spend evening on one of my twelve yachts
a take it to my private island
e walk into my mansion
e admire my priceless artwork
a tell my servants to get the caviar ready
a wait by my enormous fireplace
pour glass of 50 year old brandy
a spill some on accident
a who cares, I have twelve more bottles
a sit back and wonder how far I might have gotten if I had been a man
...
+1814
Views: 48478
Favorited: 92
Submitted: 10/16/2015
Share On Facebook
submit to reddit +Favorite Subscribe to noahnicholson

Comments(139):

Leave a comment Refresh Comments Show GIFs
12>
[ 139 comments ]
Top Rated Controversial Best Lowest Rated Newest
Anonymous comments allowed.
117 comments displayed.
Reply
+12
User avatar #19 - evictedone (10/16/2015) [-]
So what did this famous person do stupid this time?
Reply
+9
User avatar #28 to #19 - shinymew (10/16/2015) [-]
www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/jennifer-lawrence-pens-essay-why-831635
Pretty much she found out that her pay and male actor's pay is unfair, and makes an essay about it, saying that women don't negotiate their pay because of gender conditioning, cause they don't want to look like a bitch, while men does and they look manly.
Reply
+77
User avatar #25 to #19 - karlKroenen (10/16/2015) [-]
>Gets payed 3% less than leading actors in American Hustle
>Had 5 minutes screentime
>This is sexism because I got payed less than the males, nothing to do with the acting ability and screen time and countless other variables.
Reply
+1
#98 to #25 - buffygifs (10/17/2015) [-]
It wasn't 2% less as in she made 98% of what the male actors made. Some the back-end compensation is divided among the actors for American Hustle such that the two main actresses got 7% of that amount each and the three main male actors got 9% each. She earned roughly 78% (bumped up from 56%) of what each of the male actors earned. And Lawrence was featured heavily in promotional material. Much more so than Jeremy Renner. (She also had comparable screen time to him.)

To me, the part which shows it is gender related is that the male actors all received th same share and the female actors got the same share even though Amy Adams was billed as a lead and had a much bigger role than Jeremy Renner.
Reply
0
#53 to #25 - buddywuggle (10/17/2015) [-]
How long were the males on? Seriously I have no idea what the **** any of this is.
Reply
+3
User avatar #82 to #53 - fuckingtrolls (10/17/2015) [-]
Well I mean, If they were the leading actors they might have had a little more screen time than 5
Reply
+360
#8 - newprinny (10/16/2015) [-]
>star in film
>freely admit to not negotiating for a higher pay
>freely admit that there was nothing stopping her from doing so except social stigmas she placed on herself
>still somehow men's fault, dood
Reply
+19
User avatar #36 to #8 - toncheky (10/16/2015) [-]
I don't think her point was to support the thought of the pay gap, from what I understood she just pointed out that girls don't negotiate as men do and that's the reason.
Reply
+14
User avatar #85 to #36 - mychaelmoar (10/17/2015) [-]
Which would then be her own fault, rather than the pay gap which she did suppose per the article.



www.elle.com/culture/celebrities/news/a31127/jennifer-lawrence-gender-pay-gap-american-hustle/
Reply
+1
#110 to #85 - thrifty (10/17/2015) [-]
"Lawrence says there's a chance her youth and inexperience were more to blame than gender expectations"

"She reportedly is set to earn $8 million more than Chris Pratt in a new sci-fi drama called Passengers"


**** this, everyone stop the internet I want to leave.
Reply
0
#89 to #85 - anon (10/17/2015) [-]
so be difficult and take what you want, or be nice, and take what you get... that's the real reason for a pay gap...?
and i really don't think hollywood is a good example of the pay wage gap, those actors have more experience than her, that kinda lets them negotiate without fear of them looking for someone else cause they want an A list actor, she has been in one blockbuster and is relatively new, it's kinda of a take what you can get and hope they are fair with you.
Reply
0
#95 to #89 - buffygifs (10/17/2015) [-]
By the time of American Hustle, she already had an Oscar and was a key part of two major blockbuster franchises.
Reply
+449
#2 - anon (10/16/2015) [-]
> Man instead of Woman
> Too many men in Hollywood
> Can't find work
> Even less after Hollywood finds unequal and starts hiring mostly woman
> Goes home to shack
> Gets drunk on $3 Wine
> Wonders how far he could have got if he was a woman
Reply
0
#106 to #2 - anon (10/17/2015) [-]
Click to show spoiler
**anonymous used "*roll picture*"**
**anonymous rolled image**Sounds as if Bruce Jenner wrote this.
Reply
-5
#101 to #2 - buffygifs (10/17/2015) [-]
That would make sense if Hollywood wasn't entirely male dominated. But, in fact, it is. iirc, Hollywood movies in the past few years had 70-80% men in leading roles. In 2014, the top 10 highest paid actors were all men. Taylor ******* Lautner made more than the highest paid actress. (I think he was also paid more than Kristen Stewart for the last Twilight movie).
Reply
+6
#61 to #2 - tremuzik (10/17/2015) [-]
same
Reply
+19
#51 to #2 - bloodoffear (10/17/2015) [-]
More like
>Man instead of womyn
>Drama kids in highschool are beat up cause fags
>Take up engineering
>Make six figures
>Live an ok middle class life
>Life sure wouldve sucked as a womyn, amirite?
Reply
+14
#70 to #51 - centifolia (10/17/2015) [-]
>implying you can "just" become an engineer
First off, saying that it is a difficult course is still an underestimation
Second, getting the diploma and passing the board exam does not instantly turn into money. India is one of the best producers of engineers in the world but they are all so bad that India hires foreign engineers to design the safety of their structures.

If you want to be a success in life, you should find what yu are passionate about and improve it.
Young writer who leads 5 artist and currently earning 4 figures doing something I enjoy. And by young, I mean that I am younger than my artists who are all fresh college graduates What have you attained in putting money as your goal?
Reply
0
User avatar #93 to #70 - hoex (10/17/2015) [-]
engineering is probably the safest degree you could pursue. it obviously depends on the major, but if you want a comfortable middle class life without expending a lot of effort, engineering is the way to go.

Reply
0
#103 to #93 - anon (10/17/2015) [-]
And what if you suck at math? Then what?
Reply
0
User avatar #100 to #93 - centifolia (10/17/2015) [-]
Except mastering equations and formulas does not belong in that without expending a lot of effort. If you
India kept on deluding their children that Engineering will lead them to prosperity without giving consideration on the importance of passion.
Result: 75% of their annual engineer graduates are all unemployable. And India produces like 1.5 million graduates every year

Know what you love and and find how you can make money out of it
Reply
0
User avatar #97 to #93 - badgoodass (10/17/2015) [-]
nah IT and certain business majors are the best way to go atm
Reply
0
#74 to #70 - bloodoffear (10/17/2015) [-]
You can't "just" become an actress either. I was just making a joke about Jennifer Laurence with mild sociological undertones anyway I'm a actually a neuro student doing what I love, just me and my massive federal loan
Reply
+4
User avatar #76 to #74 - centifolia (10/17/2015) [-]
Oh, now I feel guilty.
Sorry man, I just can't hold my anger at people who allows money to lead their life. They remind me too much of my family who wanted to stop my career for "jobs that pay".

Now that I am living alone, I am glad to say that I have never felt happier
Reply
+20
#71 to #2 - pedestrianx (10/17/2015) [-]
> Gets drunk on $3 Wine

I don't see the problem here
Reply
+48
#39 to #2 - cabbagemayhem (10/16/2015) [-]
thirdjess
>woe is me, i get more attention than i want
Reply
+1
User avatar #81 to #39 - thirdjess ONLINE (10/17/2015) [-]
?? I'm not sure when I've ever said that.
Reply
0
User avatar #117 to #81 - cabbagemayhem (10/17/2015) [-]
I specifically remember you complaining about catcalls a couple years ago.
Reply
0
User avatar #118 to #117 - thirdjess ONLINE (10/18/2015) [-]
I'm not certain that I've complained about catcalls, more so that I've been the reasoning voice on this website when every member and their dad were crowing "but it's just a compliment!"

The only time I've been the receiving end of a catcall that really spooked me, was when the guys responsible cornered me on a bus and massaged my shoulders and **** . ****** weird. Personal space, pal.

Cause it's not a compliment. And, if I live in a surburb with a population of only 3.5k people, and that kinda space invadery **** happens to me, you can imagine how much worse those in densely populated cities must get it.
Reply
0
User avatar #119 to #118 - cabbagemayhem (10/18/2015) [-]
You said you were catcalled as you walked down the street by drivers while you were dressed professionally. I'm not saying catcalls are compliments, but I'd rather have attention and put up with catcalls than be left alone all the time, and you would too.
Reply
0
User avatar #120 to #119 - thirdjess ONLINE (10/18/2015) [-]
I like being alone, so trust me, that's not true at all.

When I get cat called most of the time, it's walking from the bus stop to where I study or where I work. You'd think it'd be like getting into a taxi from a nightclub or some other sex fuelled venue. These types of catcalls, honestly, don't bother me. They're non-invasive. Yelled at from a car, or the other side of the road. It's annoying, but a fact of life. But the fact that sometimes people follow you, or corner you, and then say 'it's just a compliment!' is not ok.
Reply
0
User avatar #121 to #120 - cabbagemayhem (10/18/2015) [-]
You say you like being alone, but you would change your mind before long. One study shows that even introverts are happier on days that they spend 3-6 hours socializing. Look at any female's profile on FJ. They all have pages of friends and an active comment section. Look at mine. Mine's a bad example. Look at ed'di­o. He's popular and has a picture of a buff guy. Your a feminist -- NoBoDy likes you -- you still have five times as many friends and a more active comment section. I don't think you'd last five minutes without friends.
Reply
0
User avatar #122 to #121 - thirdjess ONLINE (10/18/2015) [-]
I meant romantically. I'm like 65% sure I might be asexual. Just have no interest in dating whatsoever.
Reply
0
User avatar #123 to #122 - cabbagemayhem (10/18/2015) [-]
I don't believe in asexuality, but I do believe in fidelity and waiting for the right person. I'm glad you are whichever it is. What really grinds my gears is that most women give themselves away in college, and it's rare that any make it to 26 without baggage.
Reply
0
User avatar #124 to #123 - thirdjess ONLINE (10/18/2015) [-]
That is just a part of life, hombre. Even I have baggage, it's just not of the romantic sort.
Reply
0
User avatar #125 to #124 - cabbagemayhem (10/18/2015) [-]
The kind of baggage I'm talking about is ex-boyfriends she'll compare you to, someone else's children. Not just that, but the fact that you weren't her first and probably won't be her last, she already has preferences and expectations, and she'll never fall in love like she did the first time again.
Reply
0
User avatar #126 to #125 - thirdjess ONLINE (10/18/2015) [-]
I know the kind of baggage you're referring to

Are you a virgin?
Reply
0
User avatar #128 to #127 - thirdjess ONLINE (10/18/2015) [-]
Ya, because either you're a virgin who wants to marry another virgin. Which is totally fine. Or you're a massive hypocrite. Less fine.
Reply
0
User avatar #130 to #128 - cabbagemayhem (10/18/2015) [-]
There's a legend on the internet that if you stay a virgin until you're thirty, you become a wizard.
Reply
0
User avatar #131 to #130 - thirdjess ONLINE (10/18/2015) [-]
I actually haven't heard that particular one
Reply
0
#132 to #131 - cabbagemayhem (10/18/2015) [-]
Wow, have you been under a rock the last few years?
Reply
0
User avatar #134 to #132 - thirdjess ONLINE (10/18/2015) [-]
Nah, I just don't particularly pay attention to memes.
Reply
0
User avatar #135 to #134 - cabbagemayhem (10/18/2015) [-]
Whatever. Will you go away now?
0
User avatar #136 to #135 - thirdjess ONLINE (10/18/2015) [-]
Hahah sure
Reply
0
User avatar #129 to #128 - cabbagemayhem (10/18/2015) [-]
You must not know the legend on the internet.
Reply
+1
#42 to #39 - nicktheslayer (10/16/2015) [-]
Im gonna favorite and come back to it when i feel bad
Reply
+104
#9 to #2 - innocentbabies (10/16/2015) [-]
In fairness, if you're banking on a career as an actor, you should expect to live in a shack.
Reply
+11
User avatar #17 to #9 - eddio (10/16/2015) [-]
I think most people that see acting as a viable career don't think that far.
Reply
+3
#18 to #17 - migueldecervantes (10/16/2015) [-]
But I'm sure that you understand some people must act. Right?
Reply
+3
User avatar #21 to #18 - eddio (10/16/2015) [-]
I definitely do. The problem is that so many people think that they are the person to be among those select few that do act and become successful, whereas most are left with either broken dreams or as delusional people.
Reply
+2
#22 to #21 - migueldecervantes (10/16/2015) [-]
Oh. Yeah, definitely. It's a shame, but that's how the world operates. We need engineers more so than we need actors.
Reply
0
User avatar #24 to #22 - eddio (10/16/2015) [-]
It's really a big shame, especially when you consider how much an actor earns to pretend to be another person, or a singer earns to make a catchy song, etc, as compared to engineers and scientists who work tirelessly to earn a fraction of what they do.
Reply
+4
#27 to #24 - migueldecervantes (10/16/2015) [-]
I'm sorry, but I need you to clarify something, if you don't mind. Are you expecting scientist, engineers and doctors to make as much as artists and entertainers?

Because if that is so, consider that most funding for science and technology comes from the state or private contracts, while the money artists make comes entirely out of the pocket of the populace. I think it would be disingenuous to claim that people tend to need art and entertainment more so than science. After all, science helps us survive and understand the world better, but what is the point of surviving if life is not worth living. That is, I think, where creativity and aesthetics come in.

Also, since our economic, (almost) free market system (the famous invisible hand) rewards culture so much, I do not think that setting constraints on people's wishes and needs will change anything for the better.
Reply
0
User avatar #31 to #27 - eddio (10/16/2015) [-]
Not what I mean at all. Fundamentally, Engineers and scientists are behind what essentially drives us forward as a species. Agriculture, civil and mechanical engineering, etc. What I mean by what I said is that well known people within the entertainment industry obviously garner more interest, fame and therefore money because of what they do. And why not? They entertain us, they provide us with a much needed laugh or cry after a hard day's work. The shame is that essential industries are often taken for granted and under-appreciated for what they do.

For example, how many people you asked would know about Norman Borlaug, the guy who revolutionized the agricultural industry with GMOs? It'd be nice if more people were aware of what guys like him did, as opposed to praising the acting prowess of a particular actor (Which I'm guilty of, I know more actors than scientists). It just doesn't quite feel right, even if those people didn't work for recognition.
Reply
+3
#55 to #31 - migueldecervantes (10/17/2015) [-]
I would actually disagree with you. Fundamentally, in my opinion, those behind what essentially drives us forward as a species is philosophy, literature and the arts.

Without philosophy, you will never acquire the essential values it takes to even endorse scientific expansion in the first place. Without literature, you will never be able to understand human experience in all its breadth and width, and thus be consigned to a narrowness of existence that would allow for the worst kind of moral and intellectual regressions. Without art... Well, imagine a world without music, beauty and human expression; you need something to survive for; we are to some extent above biology in this sense; we need to find worth in something, and as Nietzsche proposed: it is not science that fills the gap left by religion, but art philosophy and literature.

To put it in concise terms:

"There are two kinds of sufferers in this world: those who suffer from a lack of life and those who suffer from an overabundance of life. I've always found myself in the second category. When you come to think of it, almost all human behavior and activity is not essentially any different from animal behavior. The most advanced technologies and craftsmanship bring us, at best, up to the super-chimpanzee level. Actually, the gap between, say, Plato or Nietzsche and the average human is greater than the gap between that chimpanzee and the average human. The realm of the real spirit, the true artist, the saint, the philosopher, is rarely achieved." -Louis Mackey, University of Austin.
Reply
0
#65 to #55 - daemonicdemeanor ONLINE (10/17/2015) [-]
**daemonicdemeanor used "*roll picture*"**
**daemonicdemeanor rolled image**Hahahaha. Too bad no one will ever agree with that. I do of course, but I was a philosophy major. Anyone I told that I was studying philosophy would laugh and tell me to enjoy working at Mcdonald's. The average person has about as much respect for philosophy as they do for astrology or faith healers. It's ******* ******** , but it's true. Since you brought up Nietzsche, I was reading Thus Spake Zarathustra in the cafeteria at my old school, when someone asked me what I was reading. I showed the cover, and their gut reaction was, "Isn't that the guy Hitler got all his ideas from?"

The rage was unbearable. First, if an idea is bastardized to do something horrible, it doesn't make it less valid. The uber-mensch was simply an improved man; it is unbelievably sad that an idea as optimistic and wise as improving ourselves is flushed away because of propaganda. Even if Hitler did some terrible things, I absolutely think that his heart was kinda in the right place. Maybe forced eugenics isn't ethical, but voluntary is a pretty swell idea if we don't want idiocracy to become a documentary.

Any ******* time I say anything negative about the government, not about the Democrats/republicans, but the whole system, people ask me what I would do instead. I always tell them to read the republic by Plato. I mean, **** , the Ancient Greeks knew why democracy would fail thousands of years ago, and their most wise person came up with a better system that has yet to even be attempted. People almost always don't take me seriously because they think that someone that old couldn't have had wisdom that would be valid today.

Go to wikipedia and click the first hyperlink on any page, then the first on that page. Almost every page out of the whole damn thing will link back to philosophy within ten clicks. Yet, I'm an idiot because I chose to study it, as most people think.
Reply
+1
#67 to #65 - migueldecervantes (10/17/2015) [-]
I've never had that kind of experience. Just ask the people "Where do you think we would be without philosophy and literature?" People tend to agree with me.
Reply
+1
#63 to #31 - daemonicdemeanor ONLINE (10/17/2015) [-]
**daemonicdemeanor used "*roll picture*"**
**daemonicdemeanor rolled image**Man, I think you are seriously overestimating how bad engineers have it. I dropped out of college But I was philosophy major, so my degree wouldn't have changed much unfortunately. because I'm stupid and went to work in fast food management then manufacturing. I'm just now enrolling in school again to become a mechanical engineer. I don't give a **** if anyone knows my name, I just want to earn more than $35K a year, and engineering is my best bet for my personality. I wanted to be a musician, but that **** is so over-rated. I was in a metal band, and over the span of 6 months, we recorded an album, performed about 100 times and promoted ourselves as much as possible. In the end, we probably made 50k, but that was split between 5 people. Admittedly, we knew going in that metal wasn't exactly the most lucrative genre, but we loved it. With the combination of driving the van, practicing, taking care of equipment, warming up, setting up, performing, packing, unpacking and promoting, I probably worked 60 hours a week every week for that whole time.

Reply
+80
#16 - bonbonboneh (10/16/2015) [-]
Listening to any actor is poor life choice. Their whole job is lying to you convincingly, or another way to look at it they are professionals at playing pretend.
Listening to any actor is poor life choice. Their whole job is lying to you convincingly, or another way to look at it they are professionals at playing pretend.
Reply
+1
User avatar #46 to #16 - slyforawhiteguy (10/17/2015) [-]
well, thanks for changing my perspective on a lot of things.
mostly just porn stars hahah pretend
Reply
+1
#86 to #16 - migueldecervantes (10/17/2015) [-]
There is an extremely important difference between fiction and lie.
Reply
+25
#14 - froggernaught (10/16/2015) [-]
I could live comfortably for the rest of my days with the money she's made off of one movie. She's been in several, and a franchise. Either use your money to help others in your cause or shut the **** up because no ones going to think you've been treated unfairly when you've made more money in a few months then some people make in a decade.
Reply
0
#99 to #14 - anon (10/17/2015) [-]
>Trump's entire campaign
Reply
+14
#75 - internetnick (10/17/2015) [-]
"Spill some on accident."

OMG see how relatable she is? She's just like us.
Reply
+26
User avatar #1 - psychadelicace (10/16/2015) [-]
Guy has a stellar point
Reply
+3
User avatar #12 to #1 - sarcasticone (10/16/2015) [-]
Nice avatar. I hope there's a season 2. Shalltear is best
Reply
+9
#26 to #12 - paddypancake (10/16/2015) [-]
> Shalltear
> Not Albedo
Reply
+1
User avatar #96 to #26 - nigeltheoutlaw (10/17/2015) [-]
Wis I had the webm of that scene. Her giggling was incredible on the ears.
Reply
+1
User avatar #72 to #26 - sarcasticone (10/17/2015) [-]
Old and expire not immortal and stay young looking forever. Pfft
Albedo is cool if not for the fact that she's insane.
Reply
+1
User avatar #107 to #72 - paddypancake (10/17/2015) [-]
Has there ever been mentioning about her aging?I mean she is a demon after all. Haven't read the novel so maybe you know more than i do. Also no fake breasts. As if her being a yandere is something bad i mean come on what are you a casual?
Reply
+1
User avatar #112 to #107 - sarcasticone (10/17/2015) [-]
****** his undead,straight up unaging.
undead master race. She and Aura had an argument about breastsize saying atleast hers can fill in, while Shalltear will remain the same. No u, casual lord
Reply
0
User avatar #113 to #112 - sarcasticone (10/17/2015) [-]
She*
Reply
+2
User avatar #33 to #12 - zetsuboukamina (10/16/2015) [-]
Read the light novels. They rushed it so much
Reply
0
User avatar #73 to #33 - sarcasticone (10/17/2015) [-]
I've read the ligh novel also. It's quite enjoyable but, watching it animated was also enjoyable.
Reply
+2
User avatar #20 to #1 - dsendz ONLINE (10/16/2015) [-]
Weren't you banned?
Reply
+1
User avatar #90 to #20 - psychadelicace (10/17/2015) [-]
no, i have never been banned before
Reply
0
User avatar #116 to #90 - dsendz ONLINE (10/17/2015) [-]
Huh, my mistake sorry.
Reply
+1
User avatar #57 to #20 - dmkstarstar ONLINE (10/17/2015) [-]
He was? May I ask what he did exactly? He posted cheese pizza didn't he?
Reply
+2
User avatar #58 to #57 - dsendz ONLINE (10/17/2015) [-]
I don't remember that's why I asked.
Reply
+1
User avatar #59 to #58 - dmkstarstar ONLINE (10/17/2015) [-]
Ah I see thanks! I still think it was delectable cheese pizza
Reply
+7
User avatar #6 - lenytunes (10/16/2015) [-]
I bet there are men out there willing to trade their lives with her for that money right now...
Reply
0
#7 to #6 - mistervile (10/16/2015) [-]
are you one of them? Just Curious.
Reply
0
User avatar #10 to #7 - lenytunes (10/16/2015) [-]
Lol no because I love my "men" privileges too much
Reply
+11
#11 to #10 - mistervile (10/16/2015) [-]
**mistervile used "*roll picture*"**
**mistervile rolled image** sweet, good to go!
Reply
+1
User avatar #45 to #11 - vincentvalkerii (10/17/2015) [-]
Perfect roll!
Reply
+1
User avatar #23 to #6 - misterfrog (10/16/2015) [-]
"there are men"

you make it sound like there are a few men who want that, but there are most likely hundreds of millions if not billions of men who'd want that
Reply
+9
User avatar #43 - lonelybaloney (10/16/2015) [-]
Never the same after I saw her butthole.
Reply
+6
#91 - yourboyblue (10/17/2015) [-]
She complains that Christian Bale made more money than she did in the movie. Of course he did. He's been in far more movies, and a lot of them have been very successful. A more experienced actor that has proven how good they are is going to have a more expensive contract.
Reply
0
#115 to #91 - anon (10/17/2015) [-]
He's also in more of the film, there's like one or two scenes that she's in that he's not and there are plenty of scenes that he's in without her. More work = more money, who'd have ******* figured?
Reply
+6
#37 - anon (10/16/2015) [-]
**anonymous used "*roll picture*"**
**anonymous rolled image** She placed blame on herself. I looked up the essay, and she said, "I don’t think I’ve ever worked for a man in charge who spent time contemplating what angle he should use to have his voice heard. I didn’t get mad at Sony. I got mad at myself. I failed as a negotiator because I gave up early.”

Basically, what I took away from it is that she said men don't make more than her because they're men and she's a woman; men make more than her because she was trying too hard to be nice and didn't negotiate hard enough, she didn't want to be perceived as a bitch.

I really don't see the big deal when the chick's blaming herself.
Reply
0
User avatar #83 to #37 - admiralen ONLINE (10/17/2015) [-]
Blaming herself for what?
Not asking for more money than the leads with WAY more screentime?
Reply
+2
User avatar #56 to #37 - malinko (10/17/2015) [-]
"When the Sony hack happened and I found out how much less I was being paid than the lucky people with dicks"

because the doesn't imply that she thinks if she was a man she would be "luckier" with getting paid more.
Frankly, she was paid less because she had less screen time, was competing with bigger stars that have been in the game longer, and she gave up quick. yes she said she "blamed herself" but then went on in the same essay that she gave up quick because women are socially conditioned by the patriarchy i suppose to back down and not "seem like a bitch" which linked her own failings back to men. so yeah, she was blaming men.
Reply
+3
#38 to #37 - kcits (10/16/2015) [-]
Sorry, didn't mean to post as anon; I stand by it.
Reply
0
User avatar #80 to #38 - Shiny ONLINE (10/17/2015) [-]
You make a good point, but assertiveness in women is often seen as uncooperative and belligerent when men have the opposite expectations.

Unless they're ugly, of course.
Reply
0
#64 - tbeaz (10/17/2015) [-]
You guys realize this **** is just the reversal of the tumblr femanazi stuff right?

Men have problems and get taken advantage of. Women have problems and get taken of advantage of. Deal with it, go make your community a better place.
Reply
0
User avatar #77 to #64 - poutinesalad (10/17/2015) [-]
Yeah except 90% of the feminists side is fed by falsified statistics, **** that is the very definition of first world problems, or things that aren't even problems.

Women get treated better than men. Fact. Thats why there was such a big backlash to these opportunistic cunts trying to cash in on their victim card.
Reply
+7
#79 to #77 - tbeaz (10/17/2015) [-]
This is exactly what I mean. Women do get treated better than men. Men also get treated better than women. It's not like it's a black and white dichotomy. You'll find a lot more men in ****** manual labour jobs, but women getting allowed into jobs where they physically should not be allowed in some cases like parts of the military. You'll find a lot more women who are forced into sex work, but men get payed worse for it. Society is varied, to say men have it worse or that women have it worse is just wrong.

What you're doing is just trying to cash in your own victim card. Also you just brought up them using falcified statistics using a random statistic. Also all kinds of **** brought up here could be classified as first world problems or not really problems.
Reply
-1
User avatar #137 to #79 - poutinesalad (10/18/2015) [-]
thumbing me down is not one way that men get treated better in. Name one you **** . You cant. I will wreck you with everything you have to say.
Reply
-1
User avatar #108 to #79 - poutinesalad (10/17/2015) [-]
No. Women get treated better than men everywhere. Name one thing men get treated better than women at. There are countless ways for women who are being abused can seek help. What ways do men have? Name a crackhead I guaruntee you he's sucked dick for drugs. Women just use sex to get what they want more readily. It's a defense mechanism for them. What help do men in essentially their situation have?

The answer is there might as well not be one because mens shelters (which are really shelters for everyone) are so overloaded that they cant handle the load. There are 3-1 womens shelters to homeless shelters where I live.

Women are more easily hired than men because of the false statistics about workplace diversity. Women don't nearly come to the same amount of ridicule men get daily, be it from mistakes or just for plain existing. Women get **** handed to them on a silver platter simply for existing from men who work their ass off to do so. Argue that men doing so is sexist, then why the **** don't women do the same for men equally? Because women expect it from men. Women have a school system that caters to them from kindergarten through college. Boys get treated like broken girls and falsly fed ritalin to keep them focused on the school system that doesn't teach them the way they need to be. So if women are doing better in school why aren't they in the majority of high paying jobs? Well, thats mainly due to womens ideal job. Women want to care and nurture. This is an admirable job. Unfortunately those jobs are paid through taxpayer money. They drain the economy and dont generate any revenue. The ones that do join the jobs that generate revenue just aren't willing to work as hard. **** , I've worked with tons of womens in the trades, retail, warehousing, you name it. Women do not work as hard, as long, or as efficiently as men. This is due to differences between the sexes at a fundemental level.

There is literally no way that women have it worse. You want to talk about sexual harassment? I cant think of a single time that i've gone to the bar that a woman I don't have any interest in has groped me. Men get it too, the only difference is that we're considered assholes for not finding a woman attractive. We have to stay silent because thats just the hand we were dealt.

So **** off, you have no idea what you're talking about.
Reply
-1
User avatar #109 to #108 - internetexplain (10/17/2015) [-]
at least in terms of Sexual harassment you can play a universal victim card : " I feel offended as a Pious Christian "
Reply
0
User avatar #138 to #109 - poutinesalad (10/18/2015) [-]
No I cant because men do not get a sexual harassment card. We're obviously asking for it. At least how society sees it anyway
Reply
+2
User avatar #66 to #64 - noahnicholson [OP](10/17/2015) [-]
you realise it's a satircal post right?
Reply
0
#68 to #66 - tbeaz (10/17/2015) [-]
But a lot of the posts, and a large amount of this communities response often is not.

It's like those posts we like to make fun of on tumblr with the OP saying something stupid and blatantly satirical and then the commentators calling men the devil and doing that #killallmen ********
Reply
+2
#4 to #3 - oxidoferroso (10/16/2015) [-]
So random
Reply
+1
#40 - lutra (10/16/2015) [-]
"on accident"
Reply
+1
#35 - anon (10/16/2015) [-]
Don't their managers/agents negotiate for their pay in films?
Reply
+1
#5 - anon (10/16/2015) [-]
Hi! I'm Accident and I'm so wet right now!
Reply
-1
#87 - arolexion (10/17/2015) [-]
Lol this slut is worth 60million. I'd rather remain priceless. Free Humans shouldn't have price tags. So then this mean this bitch is just a really expensive sex slave?
Reply
-1
User avatar #88 to #87 - vegeta (10/17/2015) [-]
money is legal tender for debts.
the definition of tender is a note to be accepted in place of a debt.
so united states money is debt for the use of debt.
just by having it you are in debt to the federal reserve, whom is in debt to the the Vatican, (don't tell Daddy Day Francis). .
Reply
-1
User avatar #105 - thetaxman (10/17/2015) [-]
This website is full of manchildren lmao
Reply
0
#111 to #105 - anon (10/17/2015) [-]
I assume, given the definition of full, that you include yourself in that estimation?
Reply
0
User avatar #114 to #111 - thetaxman (10/17/2015) [-]
You could have made that sentence in at least 100000 easier ways with less words and here you are jerking off to your thesaurus
Reply
0
#104 - indeedaleedoo (10/17/2015) [-]
>Be Jennifer Lawrence >Lost popularity >Bitching about 'fat' being a bad word not making realz wimin wet anymore >Ranting about pizza and hating exercise behind personal health coach's back not making neckbeards jizz anymore >Emma watson does conference about wage gap >Tumblr bitches go to conference about sexism and wage gap >'Omg no pay attention to me' >Try to jump on it >Look insincere as **** because - like OCD - have no idea wtf im talking about pls internets love me again
>Be Jennifer Lawrence
>Lost popularity
>Bitching about 'fat' being a bad word not making realz wimin wet anymore
>Ranting about pizza and hating exercise behind personal health coach's back not making neckbeards jizz anymore
>Emma watson does conference about wage gap
>Tumblr bitches go to conference about sexism and wage gap
>'Omg no pay attention to me'
>Try to jump on it
>Look insincere as **** because - like OCD - have no idea wtf im talking about pls internets love me again
Reply
0
User avatar #102 - Kamesakke (10/17/2015) [-]
Celebrity worth =/= how much money they have. A celebrity's worth is how much it costs to hire her. A good portion of that goes into the Agency that represents her, who then pays an allowance. Most of the agency spending goes into wardrobe for any appearances, services for the actress/actor they represent, Health insurance (They tend to insure their talent quite nicely. Their talent = their income), legal fees (no doubt ******* expensive.), licenses, etc. In short, Jennifer Lawrence may be WORTH 60 million, but she probably has more like within the hundreds of thousands. A lot, yes, but not 60 million.
12>
[ 139 comments ]
Leave a comment
<
>
 Friends (0)