Brain-freeze?
| |
Anonymous comments allowed.
126 comments displayed.
#83 to #82
-
aquaekk (10/13/2015) [-] It's not that, it's more like the only word you can use negatively is "autism" or "cancer".
I'm not saying you can't use them, there are appropriate uses, but is your vocabulary really that bad?
Also, I don't judge. If a person likes maggots, loli, scat, whatever the **** , I don't care. As long as that doesn't directly affect me in any way.
I'm not saying you can't use them, there are appropriate uses, but is your vocabulary really that bad?
Also, I don't judge. If a person likes maggots, loli, scat, whatever the **** , I don't care. As long as that doesn't directly affect me in any way.
#89 to #85
-
anon (10/13/2015) [-]
IS YOU WERE ABLE OF MAKE ME
IS YOU WERE ABLE OF MAKE ME
IS YOU WERE ABLE OF MAKE ME
IS YOU WERE ABLE OF MAKE MEIS YOU WERE ABLE OF MAKE ME
IS YOU WERE ABLE OF MAKE ME
IS YOU WERE ABLE OF MAKE ME
IS YOU WERE ABLE OF MAKE MEIS YOU WERE ABLE OF MAKE ME
IS YOU WERE ABLE OF MAKE MEIS YOU WERE ABLE OF MAKE ME
IS YOU WERE ABLE OF MAKE ME
IS YOU WERE ABLE OF MAKE ME
IS YOU WERE ABLE OF MAKE ME
IS YOU WERE ABLE OF MAKE MEIS YOU WERE ABLE OF MAKE ME
IS YOU WERE ABLE OF MAKE ME
IS YOU WERE ABLE OF MAKE MEIS YOU WERE ABLE OF MAKE ME
IS YOU WERE ABLE OF MAKE ME
IS YOU WERE ABLE OF MAKE ME
IS YOU WERE ABLE OF MAKE MEIS YOU WERE ABLE OF MAKE ME
IS YOU WERE ABLE OF MAKE ME
IS YOU WERE ABLE OF MAKE ME
IS YOU WERE ABLE OF MAKE MEIS YOU WERE ABLE OF MAKE ME
IS YOU WERE ABLE OF MAKE MEIS YOU WERE ABLE OF MAKE ME
IS YOU WERE ABLE OF MAKE ME
IS YOU WERE ABLE OF MAKE ME
IS YOU WERE ABLE OF MAKE ME
IS YOU WERE ABLE OF MAKE MEIS YOU WERE ABLE OF MAKE ME
IS YOU WERE ABLE OF MAKE ME
IS YOU WERE ABLE OF MAKE MEIS YOU WERE ABLE OF MAKE ME
#100 to #82
-
drpenguinz (10/13/2015) [-] well i never saw the movie
so...dunno...idc about it?
there is also r34 stuff about characters like lola bunny and i dont know what else...thats also a kids movie but no one complained back then when this site hyped her for a week.
so...dunno...idc about it?
there is also r34 stuff about characters like lola bunny and i dont know what else...thats also a kids movie but no one complained back then when this site hyped her for a week.
#48 to #44
-
platinumaltaria ONLINE (10/13/2015) [-] You can't honestly say that's not hot. Or maybe you can, but then I won't like you.
#49 to #48
-
fatstupidnerds (10/13/2015) [-]
it's just so wrong, and arent they related or something?
#54 to #52
-
fatstupidnerds (10/13/2015) [-]
Related fictional characters.. God does not approve of this
#59 to #54
-
platinumaltaria ONLINE (10/13/2015) [-] a) God isn't here
b) God disapproves of masturbation, so...
b) God disapproves of masturbation, so...
#106 to #68
-
chaosraptor (10/13/2015) [-] well when you look deeper into life youd see alot of stuff seems way too engineered to be natural.... but sure as hell not made by some fairy prince in the sky from a book a mere human wrote
#108 to #106
-
platinumaltaria ONLINE (10/13/2015) [-] Well, in reality it was simply formed by a handful of physical laws governing minute particles beyond our scope of understanding, which I find much more beautiful.
#109 to #108
-
chaosraptor (10/13/2015) [-] well when you think of evolution...some things kinda dont seem right
like living things are effectively machines made of meat, and we've proven we can swap parts and keep running like machines
evolution says that time and environment changes species to have traits older species dont have... well how did licking things over millions of years suddenly grant mammals saliva the power to become antibacterial and a blood coagulent....
or some frogs have the power to squirt slightly acidic blood from their eyes or break the bones in their feet and poke them out of the skin to use as claws
some creatures can change gender at will..... or deep ocean fish went blind and grew lightbulbs on their heads
alot of things that seem engineered
like living things are effectively machines made of meat, and we've proven we can swap parts and keep running like machines
evolution says that time and environment changes species to have traits older species dont have... well how did licking things over millions of years suddenly grant mammals saliva the power to become antibacterial and a blood coagulent....
or some frogs have the power to squirt slightly acidic blood from their eyes or break the bones in their feet and poke them out of the skin to use as claws
some creatures can change gender at will..... or deep ocean fish went blind and grew lightbulbs on their heads
alot of things that seem engineered
#110 to #109
-
platinumaltaria ONLINE (10/13/2015) [-] You seem to have been misinformed, the antibacterial properties are either a) an accident of chemistry or b) selected for as individuals with the trait survived better than those without.
Yup, it's called selection. Nature doesn't do weird things unless they work.
Deep ocean fish aren't all blind, and the light is to lure things. Those that make light work better than those that don't. As I recall, the phosphorescence comes from consuming glowing bacteria and slowly gaining the trait, like mitochondria (THE POWERHOUSE OF THE CELL)
Yup, it's called selection. Nature doesn't do weird things unless they work.
Deep ocean fish aren't all blind, and the light is to lure things. Those that make light work better than those that don't. As I recall, the phosphorescence comes from consuming glowing bacteria and slowly gaining the trait, like mitochondria (THE POWERHOUSE OF THE CELL)
#111 to #110
-
chaosraptor (10/13/2015) [-] yes but what would cause a fish to suddenly sprout a lightbulb out of its head on a stalk.... or every modern mammal each had the particular mutation to make saliva antibacterial
#112 to #111
-
platinumaltaria ONLINE (10/13/2015) [-] Well a long while back deep sea fishies developed bioluminescence. That was likely used for being able to lure in prey. One particular fish had a little patch on it's head, and the longer it was the better it could lure in prey. So bigger lures were preferred and now they have huge ones.
All mammals have the mutation from one common ancestor.
All mammals have the mutation from one common ancestor.
#113 to #112
-
chaosraptor (10/13/2015) [-] so cats, dogs. giraffes and humans all have the same ancestor?
#114 to #113
-
platinumaltaria ONLINE (10/13/2015) [-] Yes... that is kind of the point of evolution.
#115 to #114
-
chaosraptor (10/13/2015) [-] and even though other species that havent used some of their old traits in a while eventually lost that trait out of disuse..... mankind that hasnt consistantly licked their injuries for a very long time still retains it?
#116 to #115
-
platinumaltaria ONLINE (10/13/2015) [-] No species ever lose a trait unless it is directly harmful or made obsolete (ie: a creature with the ability to see in colour losing its eyes)
#117 to #116
-
chaosraptor (10/13/2015) [-] what about the species of birds that stayed on the ground long enough to become flightless birds with useless wings
#118 to #66
-
platinumaltaria ONLINE (10/13/2015) [-] Evidently their wings were a disadvantage, they're unnecessary weight you have to feed.
#119 to #118
-
chaosraptor (10/13/2015) [-] so again they got comfy on the ground and eventually lost the use of their wings, they atrophied and that became a steady trait
humans havent needed to lick things in a damn long time since they discovered early herbal remedies with plants, but our saliva still carries the properties
like the appendix, that organ used to be bigger but over time became more vestigial
humans havent needed to lick things in a damn long time since they discovered early herbal remedies with plants, but our saliva still carries the properties
like the appendix, that organ used to be bigger but over time became more vestigial
#120 to #119
-
platinumaltaria ONLINE (10/13/2015) [-] Well it's only been about 3000 odd years with medicine, which isn't long enough. But as I said, it needs to be a disadvantage before it is removed.
Our appendix is in fact harmful, and since it has become useless now that we don't eat raw plant fibre, we can safely live without it. People are being born without them all the time.
Our appendix is in fact harmful, and since it has become useless now that we don't eat raw plant fibre, we can safely live without it. People are being born without them all the time.
#121 to #120
-
chaosraptor (10/13/2015) [-] i think mammals including early humans knew about what plants to eat when sick/injured well before a mere 3000 years ago
#122 to #121
-
platinumaltaria ONLINE (10/13/2015) [-] Then you would be wrong, medicine is a pretty hard concept to even grasp.
#123 to #122
-
chaosraptor (10/13/2015) [-] right so humans only figured out eating certain plants when they're sick around 1000BC
sorry to burst your bubble but ancient egyptians had apothecaries mixing herbal remedies up to 4000BC and even before then, humans understood certain plants had certain health properties
sorry to burst your bubble but ancient egyptians had apothecaries mixing herbal remedies up to 4000BC and even before then, humans understood certain plants had certain health properties
#124 to #123
-
platinumaltaria ONLINE (10/13/2015) [-] And they lived till 60, not past 100. We're talking severe changes.
#125 to #124
-
chaosraptor (10/13/2015) [-] *facepalm*
and back then the early herbal medicines made them live longer than they would have otherwise then
mankinds had medicines for well over 6000 years, just improving the quality and capabilities of them over time, and thus extended our lives as a result
and back then the early herbal medicines made them live longer than they would have otherwise then
mankinds had medicines for well over 6000 years, just improving the quality and capabilities of them over time, and thus extended our lives as a result
#126 to #125
-
platinumaltaria ONLINE (10/13/2015) [-] For someone who doesn't get common ancestry you do seem to have an abundant knowledge of human history.
#127 to #126
-
chaosraptor (10/13/2015) [-] i know common ancestry BUT theres a funny thing caled divergence... aka species go off on totally different biological paths and develop different attributes
mankind is far enough removed from the ancient ancestor to be completely different yet still retain a bodily function that hasnt been used properly in ages
mankind is far enough removed from the ancient ancestor to be completely different yet still retain a bodily function that hasnt been used properly in ages
#61 to #59
-
fatstupidnerds (10/13/2015) [-]
first of all. God is everywhere. second, she is not masturbating. you can't masturbate with your sisters face dude..
#62 to #61
-
platinumaltaria ONLINE (10/13/2015) [-] a) There is no such thing as god, calm down
b) I'm saying this "god" character may not be the best standard of morality.
b) I'm saying this "god" character may not be the best standard of morality.
#67 to #63
-
chaosraptor (10/13/2015) [-] "hey lets drown the world and everyone in it except this one boatload of people and animals i cherrypicked to repopulate the earth"
yeah that genocide is so moral
yeah that genocide is so moral
#70 to #67
-
platinumaltaria ONLINE (10/13/2015) [-] I read boatload as battletoad. What has the world come to.
#104 to #70
-
chaosraptor (10/13/2015) [-] means youre a dedicated gamer that you think of game titles off the bat like that
#107 to #105
-
chaosraptor (10/13/2015) [-] been a while since i played sega dude
i do still somethings think of pc game titles
i do still somethings think of pc game titles
#9 to #7
-
iforgetwhattosay (10/12/2015) [-] r34 of a cartoon based off of humans is the most autistic thing you've ever seen?
keep up the good work, there may be hope for you yet.
keep up the good work, there may be hope for you yet.
#13 to #11
-
asotil (10/13/2015) [-] Here friend, take a full game based on keeping Korra trapped in your basement as a Sex Slave that requires you to break her mind with Blood Bending first
You need to login to view this link
You need to login to view this link
#58 to #47
-
vegasstoner ONLINE (10/13/2015) [-]
hmmmmm....want to download....don't want virus...anyone got a cost/benefit analysis for me???
#56 to #47
-
assassindash ONLINE (10/13/2015) [-] The fact you don't have a reply nor single thumb to your name makes me suspicious enough to not click that link....
#19 to #17
-
spiritfoxsilver (10/13/2015) [-] Blonde, hair, blue eyes, lives in an areas already covered in snow, Russian maybe?
#22 to #19
-
sptnfouroneseven ONLINE (10/13/2015) [-] Isn't the story of Frozen Danish or something?
#129 to #38
-
thepizzadevourer (10/14/2015) [-] I suppose there's SO MANY lewd pictures of these two, I had no idea
#46 to #30
-
thechosentroll (10/13/2015) [-] "Uuuuuuhm......... Elsha?"
"It's stuck again, isn't it?"
"Yesh."
"*sigh* Hand me the hair drier."
"It's stuck again, isn't it?"
"Yesh."
"*sigh* Hand me the hair drier."
#43
-
anon (10/13/2015) [-] Can you make a girl orgasm just by doing oral? But what about those black dudes and their big black dicks? Can you really satisfy a girl as small as your tongue?
im just a child, please have mercy
im just a child, please have mercy
#84 to #43
-
icedmantwo (10/13/2015) [-] Easy enough to get a girl off with any dick size, depends on a lot more than simple in and out thrusting. If you take the time to stimulate her clit before and/or during the **** , and figure the angles of thrusting that stimulate her the most you can get a girl off easily. Of course not all girls can actually orgasm.
#16
-
mastercolossus (10/13/2015) [-]
i have ****** naked in the snow and survived. i might give it a shot with elsa if she were real.
#101
-
remzroller (10/13/2015) [-] **remzroller used "*roll picture*"**
**remzroller rolled image**anyone have any more games like witch trainer
**remzroller rolled image**anyone have any more games like witch trainer
