Login or register

x

FunnyJunk Notification

blue shell analogy

crixuz

Favorite Comment

✖ Top Next Comment

blue shell analogy. . N Bll Tit i' lillte -3212 " If white people are so privileged why is there a Black Entertainment Netwerk and no White Entertainment Networ

blue shell analogy. . N Bll Tit i' lillte -3212 " If white people are so privileged why is there a Black Entertainment Netwerk and no White Entertainment Networ

N Bll Tit i' lillte -3212 "
If white people are so privileged
why is there a Black Entertainment
Netwerk and no White
Entertainment Network?"
Men don' t have privilege, there
are wemen‘ s only gyms!"
Why isn' t there a campus centre
for straight/ cis menial?"
SAME REASONS WHY IN MARIO
KART YOU DON' T GET BLUE
SHELLS OR LIGHTNING BOLTS
WHEN YOU' RE ALREADY IN
FIRST PLACE, ASSBAG.
Oh my god, this is the best halting
analogy I have ever seen in my entire
life.

...

+1822

Views:	50877
Favorited:	224
Submitted:	12/13/2015

Share On Facebook

submit to reddit

+Favorite Subscribe to crixuz

Comments(230):

Leave a comment Refresh Comments Show GIFs

[ 230 comments ]

Anonymous comments allowed.

165 comments displayed.

+251

#3 - whitegamedeveloper (12/13/2015) [-]

**whitegamedeveloper used "*roll picture*"****whitegamedeveloper rolled image**
>"When they are in front"

Walk outside and see how many of thee homeless are men just for a start.
Times are changing however, we're seeing mens rights being talked about more and more and feminists are making more enemies as time goes on, it's bad now but they're ****** in the future.

**whitegamedeveloper used "*roll picture*"**
**whitegamedeveloper rolled image**
>"When they are in front"

Walk outside and see how many of thee homeless are men just for a start.
Times are changing however, we're seeing mens rights being talked about more and more and feminists are making more enemies as time goes on, it's bad now but they're ****** in the future.

-55

#6 to #3 - comicironic (12/13/2015) [-]

Increased male homelessness doesn't completely disprove the idea that men generally have it better off than women.

Increased male homelessness doesn't completely disprove the idea that men generally have it better off than women.

+38

#7 to #6 - whitegamedeveloper (12/13/2015) [-]

There are thousands of other factors/areas, some would be college rates, reproductive rights, government resource distribution(women get up to 8 times more money from the government than men in some western countries), suicide rates, unemployment rates etc.

I don't know them all and i don't want to list all the ones i do so here's 4chan on the subject.

[anecdotal evidence]
If you'll excuses me i have to get ready for my job packing shelves because the IT sector in Ireland is demanding more female programmers because the feminists are getting their way (again), so i got the sack because i was the only male intern at my last company with a HR filled with "Equality" loving fem-tards and SJW even though funny enough i was the only one with a masters.

It'll take me a while to get into another programming gig. Gee sure is wonderful being male these days.
[/anecdotal evidence]

There is no way to prove it with which sex has it worse or disprove empirical evidence IMHO.

There are thousands of other factors/areas, some would be college rates, reproductive rights, government resource distribution(women get up to 8 times more money from the government than men in some western countries), suicide rates, unemployment rates etc.

I don't know them all and i don't want to list all the ones i do so here's 4chan on the subject.

[anecdotal evidence]
If you'll excuses me i have to get ready for my job packing shelves because the IT sector in Ireland is demanding more female programmers because the feminists are getting their way (again), so i got the sack because i was the only male intern at my last company with a HR filled with "Equality" loving fem-tards and SJW even though funny enough i was the only one with a masters.

It'll take me a while to get into another programming gig. Gee sure is wonderful being male these days.
[/anecdotal evidence]

There is no way to prove it with which sex has it worse or disprove empirical evidence IMHO.

-41

#9 to #7 - comicironic (12/13/2015) [-]

>women get up to 8 times more money from the government than men in some western countries
Because there's perceived inequality.
If you think people have less, and you want to make them have the same, you give them more.

+36

#10 to #9 - whitegamedeveloper (12/13/2015) [-]

Perceived inequality and reality are two different things in this case.

I like how you avoided 99% of the other things I've said in my comment.

My point still stands, ********** are going to get what's coming to them.

0

#143 to #9 - captaindeath (12/14/2015) [-]

For this topic there are two ways to go about it. You either increase the size of the pie or you divide the share of the pie.

Now i don't have exact figures in front of me. If you have 100,000 and divide it between 10 people each have 10,000. From this we may get an increase to 110,000. This 10,000 won't be shared across all certain people will make more than others so while 1 may only increase by 500 another may increase by 2,500. However in the next year through taxes and welfare you redistribute the funds this person who made 2,500 now goes to only a gain of 1000.

This provides an incentive for the person who made 500 to slack of more as no matter what they do they will still receive 500. Once they start doing this it is likely for them to get lower and lower until they are a significant burden just using resources but providing no benefit to the economy. But now the person who made 2,500 has a disincentive to work as hard as no matter how hard they try they too will also earn only 1,000. From both of these in means that the net per year increase is actually smaller. Instead of a 10% increase you now may only have a 7%. In the long term this would destroy the economy.

Now if instead we leave the 100,000 distributed as it was before some people may only have 6,000 of the total 100,000. However if those top people now have more of their money they are likely to invest it in an attempt to make more money. now the person who earned a 25% return on investment has 40,000 instead of 10,000 they made an extra 7,500. This 7,500 would be invested in other things like shares in companies. If a company has enough money they will try and expand operations. By expanding operations they need to employ more people that can mean the person at the bottom with only 6,000 can now work whereas they couldn't before. This in turn means they will also have more money. Now they are working they may go to an income of 7,500. this is an increase of 1,500 instead of only 1,000. If the top person now knows they will be able to retain some of their funds they will continue trying to make more which will have a flow on effect. At the same time the person at the bottom now sees that they can make more money so they too will also try to work harder to make more money.

By no means am i saying we shouldn't have things like welfare, you most certainly need some element of wealth distribution as some people no matter what can't work. I am just saying that sometimes by trying to make things more fair you are having the opposite effect. Not sure how much sense this makes to you but happy to discuss it.

+1

#186 to #6 - anon (12/14/2015) [-]

your bar is incorrect.

if you wanna make it right it's longer in both the good and bad end.

some men have it better than that women who have it the best.a nd some men have it worse than the women who have it the worst.

the entire bellcurve is bigger for men,.

+1

#172 to #6 - kanadetenshi (12/14/2015) [-]

Give me ONE, just ONE example of how women have it worse than men from a systemic point of view?

-5

#173 to #172 - anon (12/14/2015) [-]

Before I formulate an answer. Are you a boy or a girl?

+3

#182 to #173 - meganinja ONLINE (12/14/2015) [-]

That's extremely irrelevant.

+1

#175 to #173 - kanadetenshi (12/14/2015) [-]

trans

-29

#11 to #6 - comicironic (12/13/2015) [-]

Oh hey, big guy has the balls to thumb me down but not to leave me unblocked for disagreeing with him.
bloodrocutation

-1

#14 to #11 - schneidend ONLINE (12/14/2015) [-]

bloodrocution blocked me for disagreeing with him.

+1

#37 to #3 - anon (12/14/2015) [-]

This is the funniest ****** roll I've ever seen

+1

#197 to #3 - demandred ONLINE (12/14/2015) [-]

Where I'm from, homeless people are druggies without money. And if you're a druggie you've got yourself to blame - at least to some extent. A theory is that women in general prefer other ways to **** themselves up than drugs.
Walk outside and see how many men are selling their own body because they've failed, vs women. Does this mean women should have more rights? it's just as valid..

+1

#206 to #3 - anon (12/14/2015) [-]

GREAT ******* ROLL

+6

#49 to #3 - skebaba (12/14/2015) [-]

That's because even penniless women have an asset men lack: pussy. There are a lot of men who will give a homeless woman home in exchange for sex. Crazy, huh?

+16

#63 - anon (12/14/2015) [-]

Got a blue shell while in first place once, I was unsure what to do with it it went after second place

-1

#187 to #63 - meganinja ONLINE (12/14/2015) [-]

1) You can't get a blue shell in first place. It's coded so that it's a 0 probability. Only method is to get a blue shell and then get into first.

2) If you do just that, and throw the blue shell, it will proceed to bitch slap you in the face.

Don't lie, I've done this **** on every Mario Kart game I've played.

0

#194 to #63 - timmity (12/14/2015) [-]

Mine went after the guy in last place..

+28

#64 to #63 - SuperHyperCrazy (12/14/2015) [-]

Comment Picture

+52

#13 - anon (12/14/2015) [-]

I always thought the purposes of those items was to make it so that even if you ****** up at the beginning of the race (got knocked off a cliff, drove into a sand trap, etc.), it didn't automatically mean you lost. Basically, it was like a second-chance system.

+4

#17 to #13 - xedeid ONLINE (12/14/2015) [-]

I don't know if you have played the more recent mario kart titles, but you get stupid **** like that out the ass the entire game if you're in last place.

+11

#36 to #13 - kurbeh (12/14/2015) [-]

The Blue Shell was first introduced because on the N64 one player getting too far ahead of the others could cause technical issues, so Nintendo gave us the Blue Shell.
Also to make the race more intresting.

Your reason sounds good, but it wasn't the original idea behind it.

+2

#59 to #36 - rollfourexplain (12/14/2015) [-]

Nevermind about that. I think I found the source of that statement.

kotaku.com/5780082/the-maker-of-mario-kart-justifies-the-blue-shell

+1

#60 to #59 - kurbeh (12/14/2015) [-]

I think I heard about it in a "Did you know Gaming?"-Episode, but I don't really remember.
But hey, you found it yourself, nice.

0

#58 to #36 - rollfourexplain (12/14/2015) [-]

Really? That first point is very interesting. Where can I read more? Where did you hear it?

+376

#1 - anon (12/13/2015) [-]

''not saying i believe this to be true....''
I DO.

+30

#21 to #1 - ericzxvc (12/14/2015) [-]

Not surprising this is the top comment on a FJ post. Are there still people trying to argue that racism here is "just a joke"? Or has it been accepted that this site has turned into a cesspool of the worst kinds of people.

+200

#31 to #21 - frenzyhero (12/14/2015) [-]

>Worst kinds of people
But we're mostly white.

+70

#44 to #31 - innocentbabies (12/14/2015) [-]

+33

#51 to #31 - fewjarhead (12/14/2015) [-]

Comment Picture

+2

#198 to #31 - thegreatpepe (12/14/2015) [-]

-5

#156 to #31 - sinconn (12/14/2015) [-]

That doesn't give you the right to label an entire race.

0

#135 to #31 - thrifty has deleted their comment [-]

+14

#103 to #21 - amusingusername (12/14/2015) [-]

It used to be a joke

+11

#104 to #103 - donekilledyou (12/14/2015) [-]

I miss the days when I could laugh at the content instead of having to agree or disagree with it.

+1

#140 to #104 - Dincorta (12/14/2015) [-]

Welcome to 2015, the year of opinions and having to have the "right" one to be accepted.

+1

#151 to #140 - lolme (12/14/2015) [-]

That's how society has worked since the beginning.

+1

#152 to #151 - Dincorta (12/14/2015) [-]

It applies to more things now.

+49

#42 to #21 - aerosol ONLINE (12/14/2015) [-]

"Any community that gets its laughs by pretending to be idiots will eventually be flooded by actual idiots who mistakenly believe that they're in good company."
-René "The Dick Meister" Descartes

+7

#150 to #21 - anon (12/14/2015) [-]

If I recall, someone said that /pol/ dumped it's people here after Moot sold out.

+14

#28 to #21 - shaddyz (12/14/2015) [-]

i normaly dont visit the front page anymore for the same reason

+11

#61 to #28 - mpghbombsaway (12/14/2015) [-]

Comment Picture

+5

#46 to #21 - dreygur (12/14/2015) [-]

A lot of the racism is just joking around, but plenty of it is some serious **** as well. I really don't remember the latter being so rampant a few years ago.

+12

#92 to #46 - huntah (12/14/2015) [-]

Yeah, I really didn't care about politics until FJ started /pol/ spouting to an incredible degree like a year ago.

The circlejerk to feel "correct" is strong around here.

+8

#117 to #46 - anon (12/14/2015) [-]

I think funnyjunk has gone seriously downhill in the last 6-12 months and ive been coming here since the green days, however many years ago that was. I come here for the funnies, not to listen to closeted teenagers complaining about imagined problems that only exist on the internet like feminazis.

+4

#147 to #46 - ericzxvc (12/14/2015) [-]

Honestly most of it seems to be not joking, and the problem is with so many real racist people you can't really distinguish it.
Whenever there's a post about a black person everyones comments (or at least the top rated ones) are just unfunny jokes about the guys race, no matter what the content of the post. That's not making funny race jokes, that's just a circlejerk of scummy people getting each other off on how much they hate people who aren't white.
We've become the opposite of Tumblr, they have feminazis, and we have nazis.

-2

#180 to #21 - miilkbone (12/14/2015) [-]

***** this is FJ what do you honestly expect? It's pretty much the last bastion of satire against the cancerous form of logic that tumblr and most of the lefty world has at this moment and we all like it that way.

On that note, if you dislike it you have the very accommodating option of following this black gentleman's advice.

***** this is FJ what do you honestly expect? It's pretty much the last bastion of satire against the cancerous form of logic that tumblr and most of the lefty world has at this moment and we all like it that way.

On that note, if you dislike it you have the very accommodating option of following this black gentleman's advice.

-6

#62 to #21 - alarubra (12/14/2015) [-]

There's a very vocal minority of /pol/tards on this site. They're retards, but they're our retards, and we love them.

-4

#139 to #21 - toosexyforyou (12/14/2015) [-]

Hey there buddy, how's it going? I've a seen a lot of your comments around here lately, big fan of your work. You should probably drink some bleach though.

-1

#148 to #139 - ericzxvc (12/14/2015) [-]

Thanks for proving my point, I don't even need to do anything to prove that you are literal human garbage.

-3

#188 to #21 - drewbridge (12/14/2015) [-]

**** off you ******* ******

+7

#163 to #1 - internetnick (12/14/2015) [-]

Well he probably believes it's a cultural problem with the other races, not actually racial.

That's basically what you believe if you're not stupid.

+81

#20 - jkaizoku (12/14/2015) [-]

so you admit we are ahead of everyone else?

so you admit we are ahead of everyone else?

+9

#22 - zuflux ONLINE (12/14/2015) [-]

The gym I go to, has a card-reader lock to enter the women's wardrobe. The men's wardrobe is just a simple screen in front of one side of the door.

-7

#27 to #22 - thirdjess ONLINE (12/14/2015) [-]

And how many women try to sneak into the mens locker room?

+17

#30 to #27 - zuflux ONLINE (12/14/2015) [-]

There has been a few incidents of women taking peeks, actually. Not caught in the act, but the surveilance tapes show it happening sometimes in the evenings closer to closing time, when few or nobody are working out and most are showering or changing.

+1

#166 to #30 - zerocalibre (12/14/2015) [-]

I think they are less worried about people taking peaks as they are a woman being working out early in the morning or late at night and having a man rape her in the locker room.

Besides, most men don't care nearly as much about those sorts of things while it makes women feel more comfortable/safe. In that case, it's just doing what it takes to keep your customers happy.

-4

#56 to #30 - thirdjess ONLINE (12/14/2015) [-]

Then petition the gym to put a lock on the mens changeroom?

+11

#65 to #56 - anon (12/14/2015) [-]

We shouldn't need to.

Men's security in public should be a standard, just like women's.

Or are feminists not actually for equality, like we already knew?

We shouldn't need to.

Men's security in public should be a standard, just like women's.

Or are feminists not actually for equality, like we already knew?

+1

#76 to #65 - thirdjess ONLINE (12/14/2015) [-]

Do you know why the public is so acutely aware of 'women's security in public'? Because women (and some men) have pitched a fit about it for the last 120 years. If you want something to change, change it. Don't sit in a corner and cry on your laptop because someone else isn't doing it for you.

+2

#105 to #76 - admiralen ONLINE (12/14/2015) [-]

But sitting in a corner on your laptop crying about it is exactly what women are doing and it seems to be working great for them

+2

#108 to #105 - thirdjess ONLINE (12/14/2015) [-]

Completely untrue. Those women who sit in a corner and cry on their laptop are being labelled extremist, radical, professional victims etc. The women who actually do **** , like write letters to parties in power, hold petitions, protest and so on are the ones that actually change things. For example, our right to abortion. Free birth control for the poor. Our numerous women and children only way-houses.

What has bitching achieved radical feminists? Safe spaces at colleges, which lasted all of four months.

+4

#109 to #108 - admiralen ONLINE (12/14/2015) [-]

I guess thats why the president of the united states actually believed in the statistics of those extremist radical proffessional victims and used their extremely stupid women earn 77 out of mens 100
Yeah no one ever believes them

-3

#110 to #109 - thirdjess ONLINE (12/14/2015) [-]

Oh come on. He doesn't ******* believe them, you idiot. He's pandering to the majority. That's what politicians do, for ***** sake.

+3

#111 to #110 - admiralen ONLINE (12/14/2015) [-]

So the majority believed them?

0

#112 to #111 - thirdjess ONLINE (12/14/2015) [-]

Well when the US majority watches FOX news, and FOX news reports information based on shock value and potential gain rather than whether or not it is factual.. yes. The fact that the ignorant majority believe them does not contradict that they get **** all achieved.

+3

#113 to #112 - admiralen ONLINE (12/14/2015) [-]

But what you just said in fact proves that they get **** achieved
I mean just look at sweden dude
14% of stockholm voted for the feminist party when it came time to choose parliament
That has a LOT to do with the misinformation spread by the extremists

-1

#114 to #113 - thirdjess ONLINE (12/14/2015) [-]

Oh Jesus that's hypocritical. They achieved 5.3%

+3

#116 to #114 - admiralen ONLINE (12/14/2015) [-]

why do you think i said stockholm?
They got 5.3% in the country, 14% in stockholm
The fact that they got a single vote is in itself an absurdity
A party that by default will always focus on only half the peoples prosperity is ******* absurd

-1

#119 to #116 - thirdjess ONLINE (12/14/2015) [-]

It's still misinformation you ****** hypocrite. ******* hate hypocrites, they only want to watch the world burn.

+3

#121 to #119 - admiralen ONLINE (12/14/2015) [-]

What about it?
I said that their misinformation network is doing great, it tricks people everywhere
You said it isnt effective, but they are
Whether you hate me or not i am right

-2

#123 to #121 - thirdjess ONLINE (12/14/2015) [-]

Again, they haven't achieved anything. They 5% achieved something. And that is a red herring. Congrats at being really ****** at logical discussion.

+3

#124 to #123 - admiralen ONLINE (12/14/2015) [-]

You mean the fact that most women believe in the wage gap isnt achieving something?
Are you retarded?

+1

#223 to #112 - factual (12/14/2015) [-]

it's a fact

+1

#224 to #223 - thirdjess ONLINE (12/14/2015) [-]

Are you just responding cause I mentioned you, or are you actually saying something is a fact?

+1

#228 to #224 - factual (12/14/2015) [-]

the first

+1

#229 to #228 - thirdjess ONLINE (12/14/2015) [-]

Okiedokie, have a pleasant day!

+2

#230 to #229 - factual (12/14/2015) [-]

you too <3

+15

#16 - soggytomatoe (12/14/2015) [-]

Comment Picture

+2

#39 - runescapewasgood (12/14/2015) [-]

>when you pick at an analogy instead of actually responding to the argument
lol ok

+12

#67 to #39 - emiyashirou (12/14/2015) [-]

The entire 'argument' was
>Strawman 1
>Strawman 2
>Strawman 3
>Mario analogy

+28

#45 to #39 - WutsAtroll (12/14/2015) [-]

The analogy was the argument

0

#161 to #45 - anon (12/14/2015) [-]

The argument was that the measures mentioned, such as women's gyms, are equal opportunity. Which they compared to the blue shell, which isn't really that bad of an analogy

This isn't hard to understand.

Note that I'm not arguing that the measures are equal opportunity. Only that their argument wasn't just "blue shell lol".

+3

#177 to #161 - kanadetenshi (12/14/2015) [-]

That's not equal opportunity, that's equal outcome. Equal opportunity is having only one gym for both genders to equally use.

+36

#24 - kuchikirukia (12/14/2015) [-]

Analogies serve to illustrate a point, they don't need to fully encompass the subject.

Analogies serve to illustrate a point, they don't need to fully encompass the subject.

0

#202 to #24 - pyromanicturtlez (12/14/2015) [-]

I wouldn't be worried about becoming a minority, I'm just worried when there are "Hate rallies" like in Luton, England where there was a rally of Muslims repeatedly chanting "White people go to hell" "British police go to hell", naturally it's common sense that when someone wants you dead you're a little bit apprehensive about accepting them and their "culture".

www.youtube.com/watch?v=f8WVkbXOHfM (Also I think both parties in this video are ******* terrible I mean she literally goes out of her way to **** all over them)

0

#208 to #202 - rundas (12/14/2015) [-]

Do you know anything about birthrates? Muslim population growth is at least twice that of the native population. If nothing changes, whites WILL be a minority in America and across Western Europe. Are you not concerned that people like that will eventually be the majority in your nation? People like that controlling your future?

0

#216 to #208 - pyromanicturtlez (12/14/2015) [-]

Honestly, I'm not worried about becoming a minority as I said as long as it's the colour of our skin or religion that makes us the minority, and not becoming the minority in terms of not wanting all whites dead. I don't give a **** about someone's skin colour or religion as long as it doesn't affect me or those around me. As long as the place I live in allows me to do what I want and not have other views forced on me I'm perfectly fine.

0

#218 to #216 - rundas (12/14/2015) [-]

Only whites care about minority rights. Any nonwhites that do, do so because they live in a white society. Every day nonwhites are taught to hate whites by the media and our government. Do you live in America? The vast majority of Mexican immigrants want the Southwest to become part of Mexico. Most blacks want reparations: they want fine living at our expense. And of course, way too many Muslims want sharia law. A white minority society won't respect your right to be as you are, because all the societies that do are white, and again, the nonwhites that have this libertarian perspective largely come from white-influenced cultures. The fewer whites there are, the less the impact white culture will have. Rule of law, limited government/respect for the Constitution, gun rights, low taxes, etc., are mostly the byproducts of white societies, and similarly have much less support among minorities. As it is, the government is already trying to disarm whites (ever notice that BS narrative they push about whites being violent?), take their money, make it more difficult for them to be employed, firing and suing them for expressing opinions favorable to white interests, and forcing them to live in ****** neighborhoods for "equality."

tl;dr All those ideals you care about will not survive the death of whites. Skin color DOES matter, because support for Western values largely comes from Western peoples. A white minority country will not leave you alone.

0

#204 to #202 - pyromanicturtlez (12/14/2015) [-]

I mean for ***** sake they were protesting the fact that someone connected with a ******* bombing in Sweden was arrested. If you can't follow laws and not kill everyone don't stay in a place where that's the law, go to a place where you can murder each other with no consequences.

-1

#43 to #24 - anon (12/14/2015) [-]

Who's afraid of whites being a minority? I haven't heard many say anything like that.

+11

#47 to #43 - innocentbabies (12/14/2015) [-]

Google "white genocide" it's a popular enough topic on here that I'm surprised you're not familiar with it.

+1

#96 to #24 - Haentar (12/14/2015) [-]

Widespread phrases, however, are pretty easy to misinterpret. Take #blacklivesmatter for an examplee.

+3

#157 to #96 - anon (12/14/2015) [-]

#blacklivesmatter, whether you agree or disagree with the movement, is pretty easy to interpret. only insecure white people have a problem with its phrasing.

if someone were to start a hashtag called "#AIDSlivesmatter," there would be no problem with it. we'd all know what it meant. no one would question it or resort to asking "hey, what about cancer lives? or pneumonia lives?" but somehow, some way, people distort interpretations of phrases when race becomes involved because they feel threatened.

0

#222 to #157 - Haentar (12/14/2015) [-]

Yes sure, but what I'm saying is those phrases are gonna be distorted more often when they're only 3 words in a hashtag, spammed without context. #savegreenfish

+1

#207 to #24 - rundas (12/14/2015) [-]

I'm afraid of whites being a minority because only whites care about minority rights. Can you think of a single nonwhite country that has respected minority rights without it being imposed on them? Mexicans don't. Africans don't. Muslims sure as hell don't. Do you really think affirmative action will end as soon as whites are no longer the majority, with the gibsmedat culture we have? No, whites will be a minority, the Mexican majority will vote for a welfare state that primarily takes away white people's money and gives it to nonwhites, and on top of that whites will be actively discriminated against in the workforce thanks to affirmative action.

No, minorities aren't being treated like second-class citizens: they're being coddled by our government and our media. But whites will be.
But even if minorities were being treated like **** , wouldn't that be a goddamn good reason to make sure we're NOT a minority? I mean I know you like being smug and morally superior, but I kinda prefer people like me having a decent future over smug memes. I have no interest in whites becoming an oppressed minority for "poetic justice." I prefer actual justice.

I'm afraid of whites being a minority because only whites care about minority rights. Can you think of a single nonwhite country that has respected minority rights without it being imposed on them? Mexicans don't. Africans don't. Muslims sure as hell don't. Do you really think affirmative action will end as soon as whites are no longer the majority, with the gibsmedat culture we have? No, whites will be a minority, the Mexican majority will vote for a welfare state that primarily takes away white people's money and gives it to nonwhites, and on top of that whites will be actively discriminated against in the workforce thanks to affirmative action.

No, minorities aren't being treated like second-class citizens: they're being coddled by our government and our media. But whites will be.
But even if minorities were being treated like **** , wouldn't that be a goddamn good reason to make sure we're NOT a minority? I mean I know you like being smug and morally superior, but I kinda prefer people like me having a decent future over smug memes. I have no interest in whites becoming an oppressed minority for "poetic justice." I prefer actual justice.

+9

#41 to #24 - anon (12/14/2015) [-]

That image is some serious ******** . No one wants their culture lessened or marginalized in their own country, no matter what. The idea that you have to imply anything as a result of not wanting to be bred out is just silly.

+6

#50 to #41 - skebaba (12/14/2015) [-]

You do know that cultures change over time, right? Like they always have?

0

#209 to #50 - rundas (12/14/2015) [-]

Yes, and civilizations collapse, countries die. Doesn't mean I want it to happen to mine just because it's "the course of history." Also, tip: never in the course of history has a civilization willingly invited groups that do not share their culture, genes or values to come into their country and breed them out of existence. Every other culture that has died has died fighting. I don't want the West to go gently into the night.

0

#217 to #209 - pyromanicturtlez (12/14/2015) [-]

Here in England refugees helped out a lot during and after WWII the Indian-born immigrants started to become doctors, scientists and many more important hard-working citizens, I'm not trying to justify the current refugees since half of them aren't even trying to work or get a job.

I'm saying that immigration isn't always a problem, the problem with the recent refugees is that again half of them aren't working and they have no intention of assimilating with the current cultures of the west, they want to bring the middle east to the west, which frankly is just idiotic, bringing the problems and the bloodshed from one place to another doesn't help anyone.

TL;DR Not everyone who's non-white wants your head on a stake

0

#220 to #217 - rundas (12/14/2015) [-]

Funnily enough, all those Indians wanted to become British back when Britishness was still largely an exclusive identity. Nowadays being "British" is just some wishy-washy ******** meaning you support democracy and liberty and everything that sounds good. And consequently, no one wants to become British. People want to move to Britain for the welfare tit, but no one wants to be British. The immigrants coming hate Britain. And why should they show love for Britain when British people won't?

Europeans always want to make their identities and citizenship so inclusive that it loses all meaning. How is it then a surprise that they have trouble securing the loyalty of foreigners, when their own people have no clue who they are?

0

#212 to #209 - skebaba (12/14/2015) [-]

>Implying the refugees are invited by most people

Seriously, though, I have seen more anti-refugee opinions than pro-refugee opinions.

0

#214 to #212 - rundas (12/14/2015) [-]

Not by the people, but by the governments, the EU, the elite. And the #RefugeesWelcome faggots are accomplices to suicide.

+2

#83 to #41 - kuchikirukia (12/14/2015) [-]

Ah, so Americans who are minorities don't get to call this "their own country." It's defined as whites-only?'
And white culture is defined as "power by fiat, including oppressing minorities"? "If you take away our majority you take away our culture!"
Thank you for being the proof of the picture.

0

#210 to #83 - rundas (12/14/2015) [-]

It was whites who founded this country, designed and built its cities, established its institutions, and bled on its battlefields. If you actually look at history, nonwhites have fought against America every step of the way. Indians and blacks supported British overlordship twice, we had to fight Mexicans and Indians to establish our great states in the west, and we fought the Yellow Peril in the Pacific. It doesn't make sense to me that Americans who've lived in the United States and have been citizens since its founding have no more right to their country than the Tsarnaev brothers or a border-crossing druglord.

Every other country gets to defend its majority status. Ask a Japanese person if they would be alright if Japanese became a minority in their own country. Hell, ask a Mexican, or a Nigerian, or a Syrian. All of these peoples recognize that their culture is inherently tied to their people. They know that their culture and their values would not survive the end of their majority. Oh, their culture might live on in some form, like Native American culture does now, in dreamcatchers and peyote, but not in any dignified form.

+1

#149 to #41 - ericzxvc (12/14/2015) [-]

Culture developing into a more balanced representation of its people is not being "bred out". Nobody is being forced to do anything, if you want to marry a white person, go ahead, if you want to marry a black person, go ahead.
To actively tell people not to marry who they want because of their race in order to preserve some kind of "purebredness" is ****** up, it would be ****** up in an Asian or African country if they told you not to breed with white people, and it's ****** up here to say don't breed with non-white people.

+4

#153 to #149 - emiyashirou (12/14/2015) [-]

That's not the point at all. My president has actively advocated literally killing off all white people. Nice development into a balanced representation, huh?

Jacob Zuma sings "Kill the Boer" at ANC Centenery Celebrations in Bloemfontein, South Africa

+1

#155 to #153 - ericzxvc (12/14/2015) [-]

So did you ignore the part where I said "it would be ****** up in an African country if they told you not to breed with white people"? My point is that any control or attempt to influence who people choose to marry and have kids with is a ****** up viewpoint, people should be free to do what they want.

0

#211 to #155 - rundas (12/14/2015) [-]

Imam: We will conquer Europe through Mass Immigration

And therein lies the inherent flaw with the Western liberal paradigm. You can preach to all the world about multiculturalism, and only whites will turn their ear. Every other culture is concerned with its survival, and is fully willing to force out and kill other peoples. Whites refuse to even acknowledge the danger posed by hostile cultures.
The result of multicultural Europe is kinda like the duel between Alexander Hamilton and Aaron Burr. Hamilton believed killing was wrong, and refused to fire his gun. Burr had no such moral qualms, and thus was able to kill him unharmed. Multiculturalism inevitably results in foreign cultural imperialism.

0

#48 to #41 - innocentbabies (12/14/2015) [-]

It's kind of a silly thing to care about, imo. That said, if you do care, how do you plan to stop it? Will you decide that the government should begin enacting eugenic/social darwinist policies to prevent the position of one race from being lessened?

+3

#174 to #24 - kanadetenshi (12/14/2015) [-]

Not in the west no, because for some reason it seems to be the countries where whites are the dominant race where there's the most equal rights, tolerance and support for minorities. In fact compared to how great it is to be a minority in the west every other place is an intense ******** of xenophobia, racism and bigotry.

So yeah minorities are treated as second class citizens in most non-white countries, and that's why some people are afraid of whites becoming a minority.

+9

#35 to #24 - anon (12/14/2015) [-]

Analogies should never serve the placeholder for actual logical reasoning, though.

-6

#66 to #35 - kuchikirukia (12/14/2015) [-]

If the analogy is strong, you have:
A=B. B=C. Therefore, A=C.
Guess what is, "Actual logical reasoning"?

Nobody's logic is even close to perfect. We are all biased. Analogies can illuminate this by using the logic we applied to another situation to the current emotionally colored one.
Analogies can be false and pulled up only because they are colored the same way, but this doesn't mean all analogies are.

The one in the OP is very much one-dimensional. It fails on pretty much every level except a very, very narrow one. To correct it would have to go like this:
Imagine playing a version of Mario Kart where people played as cliques, and the largest clique got to decide who the Shells went to. Those players granted themselves all the shells, and whenever someone not in their cabal got ahead, they'd use a Red Shell on him to ensure they occupied all the best places. Also imagine that Mushrooms only spawn for people in the back. Now, after occupying all the top places and continuing to hold all the Shells, have the clique in power complain, "Why do all the Mushrooms go to everyone else? That's unfair!"

See, it's not quite as pithy as the original.

0

#68 to #66 - haroldsaxon (12/14/2015) [-]

My logic is perfect

-2

#72 to #68 - kuchikirukia (12/14/2015) [-]

I disagree, therefore I'm wrong.

0

#73 to #72 - haroldsaxon (12/14/2015) [-]

I see that your logic is strong as well

+13

#75 to #24 - tazze (12/14/2015) [-]

I'd be afraid of being a minority in a community where the predominant demographic tends to be aggressive or blame their issues on other people, like mulims or people of african descent, even though japs are known for being racist depending on the place, I wouldn't mind being part of the white minority in Japan

Or in australia, where the majority demographic is spiders

0

#80 to #75 - kuchikirukia (12/14/2015) [-]

You prefer being a majority in a community where the predominant demographic tends to be aggressive and blame their issues on other people.

0

#82 to #80 - tazze (12/14/2015) [-]

the last time that was accurate in north america or europe was back in the 40s and 50s
sure someone blames minorities every now and then but there are no nazis, no KKK, whereas I'd love to see how we'd live if suddenly the black lives matter movement or the same guys in charge of Saudi Arabia were the majority

-3

#84 to #82 - kuchikirukia (12/14/2015) [-]

You're taking issue with the image of people taking issue with real racism to justify yours.

Whites take up arms and point them at Federal officials carrying out a judicial warrant to remove cattle illegally grazing on Federal land? "Freedom fighters standing up for their rights!"
Blacks protest being extra-judicially shot in the street? "THEY'RE AGGRESSIVELY ANTI-WHITE!"

You're taking issue with the image of people taking issue with real racism to justify yours.

Whites take up arms and point them at Federal officials carrying out a judicial warrant to remove cattle illegally grazing on Federal land? "Freedom fighters standing up for their rights!"
Blacks protest being extra-judicially shot in the street? "THEY'RE AGGRESSIVELY ANTI-WHITE!"

+4

#88 to #84 - tazze (12/14/2015) [-]

First of all, in the Bundy Ranch incident the federal officials very likely opted for a more peaceful solution because they didn't want to risk a firefight, and second, Ferguson was pretty much looted till it was left empty by barbaric mobs of "protesters"

These are the peaceful protests black people should be carrying out, absolutely nothing would happen if they were that way.

First of all, in the Bundy Ranch incident the federal officials very likely opted for a more peaceful solution because they didn't want to risk a firefight, and second, Ferguson was pretty much looted till it was left empty by barbaric mobs of "protesters"

These are the peaceful protests black people should be carrying out, absolutely nothing would happen if they were that way.

+1

#97 to #88 - gabemczombie (12/14/2015) [-]

>Absolutely nothing would happen

Well... MLK did get shot.

+6

#100 to #97 - tazze (12/14/2015) [-]

so did JFK, your point?

0

#101 to #100 - gabemczombie (12/14/2015) [-]

Violent people won't care if a protest is peaceful or not.

-2

#90 to #88 - kuchikirukia (12/14/2015) [-]

"Whites aren't racist and aggressive, blacks just need to act exactly as I say to avoid justifying white aggression! Whites, of course, can act differently, because their actions are justified by default."

+5

#91 to #90 - tazze (12/14/2015) [-]

the people at Bundy Ranch are still wrong, and laws must be enforced, but there's a difference between a group of people with guns just standing between Federal officials and cows in the middle of nowhere and a mob of people looting and raiding a whole city for no good reason.

what does anyone lose if they just let the rednecks be for a couple more days while things can be properly talked about? some grass in a field? are they going to risk getting people shot and killed because of some god damn grass?

but maybe, maybe if there are hundreds or thousands of people destroying private property and causing chaos in an urban area and threatening the safety of the citizens, they must be stopped.

+1

#154 to #91 - emiyashirou (12/14/2015) [-]

Don't bother arguing with this guy. He's either retarded or a troll, he does this all the time on every topic.

-5

#93 to #91 - kuchikirukia (12/14/2015) [-]

>laws must be enforced, but there's a difference between a group of people with guns just standing between Federal officials and cows in the middle of nowhere and a mob of people looting and raiding a whole city for no good reason.

Good to know you believe that way. I'll inform Queen Elizabeth that you acknowledge that the American Revolution was an illegal protest and that you hereby agree to abide by Her rule.

+11

#94 to #93 - tazze (12/14/2015) [-]

joke's on you, that doesn't affect me

joke's on you, that doesn't affect me

-4

#95 to #94 - kuchikirukia (12/14/2015) [-]

No wonder you have to take on another country's racism. Yours isn't worth having your own.

0

#89 to #88 - kuchikirukia has deleted their comment [-]

0

#185 to #75 - therealtjthemedic (12/14/2015) [-]

>you blame blacks and muslims for all of america's problems
>and say you don't want to be in a community where people blame their issues on other people

0

#146 to #75 - captaindeath (12/14/2015) [-]

Don't forget the bloody snakes!! Or any of our other animals that are hell bent on killing you!

0

#79 to #75 - kuchikirukia has deleted their comment [-]

+10

#125 to #24 - anon (12/14/2015) [-]

I'm not American, but let me speak as though I was for a moment.

The way that the SJWs are attempting to aid the Blacks, is by putting white people down. By giving the Blacks advantages over whites, instead of simply changing things so that where whites are advantaged over blacks, blacks are equal.

There is no "white history month." Sure, most of America's history is white, but that's because so are its founding people, the English who came over and settled there.

As stated in OP, there's no "White Entertainment Network". We don't have entertainment dedicated to us. In fact, the SJWs demand that people change established white comic book characters into blacks.

Meanwhile, the Blacks are getting entire channels dedicated to them.

The SJWs are TRYING to make whites second-class citizens.

Also nice block, faggot. - bewailedbadger

+8

#179 - spanishninja ONLINE (12/14/2015) [-]

+2

#190 to #179 - elcreepo ONLINE (12/14/2015) [-]

Comment Picture

+15

#4 - psychadelicace (12/13/2015) [-]

And if you hit me with a blue shell consider our friendship and your life to be over

+4

#5 to #4 - verycoolcat (12/13/2015) [-]

I would do it... and I'd gloat while I was doing it with maniacal laughter.

0

#106 to #5 - prozack (12/14/2015) [-]

That's because verycoolcat is ruthless and spares no victims... I've heard the tales

+6

#171 - spookyexplain ONLINE (12/14/2015) [-]

>be in first place
>get blue shell
>throw blue shell
>get hit by blue shell

>be in first place
>get blue shell
>throw blue shell
>get hit by blue shell

0

#192 to #171 - elcreepo ONLINE (12/14/2015) [-]

How Bush plays mario kart

0

#215 to #171 - suicidalfish ONLINE (12/14/2015) [-]

If I remeber right it goes around the whole track then hits you or at least it did on the DS version.

+14

#53 - platinumaltaria ONLINE (12/14/2015) [-]

It's kind of interesting; all of SJW rhetoric depends on the idea that whites are in fact inherently superior, making them the largest group of racists alive.

0

#201 to #53 - wowxreally (12/14/2015) [-]

Best comment ever!

Best comment ever!

+1

#169 to #53 - anon (12/14/2015) [-]

Not really
It's based on white men being in positions of power due to tradition, who help other white men get power.
Not that current white men are superior to anyone.

+1

#170 to #169 - platinumaltaria ONLINE (12/14/2015) [-]

Whites were typically in positions of power... in countries where white people were the majority. I doubt china had the evil cis-white patriarchy installed. Men where in power... for some of history some of the time. Women at many times in history had a lot of power, going so far as to control whole empires.

+4

#69 to #53 - hwaraam (12/14/2015) [-]

... **** me, that's one of the best arguments against their retardness I heard.

+4

#71 to #69 - platinumaltaria ONLINE (12/14/2015) [-]

Well that's the point isn't it: If you claim that women need safe spaces you must think that they're weak.

+5

#87 - einsampibroch ONLINE (12/14/2015) [-]

Comment Picture

+4

#18 - xedeid ONLINE (12/14/2015) [-]

I got a blue shell in 2nd once and then advanced to first without using it.
Then, I used it to see what would happen.
Exactly what you would think.

0

#19 to #18 - ulash (12/14/2015) [-]

i still wish they would allow you to throw them backwards like in super circuit

+1

#23 to #18 - thesinful ONLINE (12/14/2015) [-]

Crash Team Racing once someone got the lightning orb (basically blue shell of the game) when I was in first and used it. Turns out that because I'd lapped them, the orb had to go through the extra lap first.

+1

#77 to #18 - needsauceadmisblan (12/14/2015) [-]

flew around the track once and then hit you.
i have gotten the blue shell in first place on mario cart ds so i cant take that statment as true.

0

#78 to #77 - xedeid ONLINE (12/14/2015) [-]

I was playing the gamecube one, it just instantly hit me and the person behind got caught in the explosion, I ended up in like 5th place.

+1

#81 to #78 - needsauceadmisblan (12/14/2015) [-]

mario ds
i get them once in a while and i just keep them until someone passes me or like 20-5 seconds before i pass finish and get first. its weird man.

+3

#57 - genocidalhamster (12/14/2015) [-]

Comment Picture

+4

#40 - CAPSEDDIE (12/14/2015) [-]

>Implying skill actually determines the winner of Mario-kart rather than lucky items

>Implying skill actually determines the winner of Mario-kart rather than lucky items

0

#107 to #40 - xxitzchubbsxx (12/14/2015) [-]

If you actually think that then you probably aren't very good at Mario Kart.

+2

#191 - tyrson (12/14/2015) [-]

I always thought CMT (Country Music Television) was the white equivalent of BET.
Or am I missing something?

I always thought CMT (Country Music Television) was the white equivalent of BET.
Or am I missing something?

0

#193 to #191 - elcreepo ONLINE (12/14/2015) [-]

BET has shows about black people doing black people things and making black people jokes

CMT just has white people music

If anything networks like lifetime have white people doing white people things and making white people jokes

+2

#142 - fwp (12/14/2015) [-]

Well,as far as the Black entertainment Television thing goes

Well,as far as the Black entertainment Television thing goes

+1

#200 - fyaq (12/14/2015) [-]

If you believe in privilege, you have to admit you are a lesser species. Its only fair.

[ 230 comments ]

Leave a comment

Top Content in 24 Hours

<

>

Friends (0)