Upload
Login or register
x

Blame

You Can' t blame all tot Islam tor one little terrorist attack!"
mes all Ch listia tor the Crusades.
all white mane tor slavery and genicide_
all men tor every rape that has ever happened.
all law abiding gun owners tor every school sheeting-
Like " Ema re
Ta 183 .
186 shares
...
+1993
Views: 65650
Favorited: 199
Submitted: 11/16/2015
Share On Facebook
submit to reddit +Favorite Subscribe to ghostblaze

Comments(432):

Leave a comment Refresh Comments Show GIFs
1234>
[ 432 comments ]
Top Rated Controversial Best Lowest Rated Newest
Anonymous comments allowed.
177 comments displayed.
Reply
+331
#19 - yunch (11/16/2015) [-]
How about we don't generalize and look to individual white people, black people, cops, feminists, muslims, christians, skeletons, gun-owners etc?
-9
#352 to #19 - magicalfruitbasket has deleted their comment [-]
Reply
+2
User avatar #367 to #352 - mistercookie (11/17/2015) [-]
Hahaha you care so much about imaginary levels that you delete all your comments and demand an answer for why people did not like your comment? You should delete the last comment as well before it gets flooded with red thumbs
-4
#369 to #367 - magicalfruitbasket has deleted their comment [-]
Reply
+1
#363 to #352 - anon (11/17/2015) [-]
muh levels



don't be a little bitch

inb4 login and say that like a real man
-5
#364 to #363 - magicalfruitbasket has deleted their comment [-]
Reply
+1
User avatar #368 to #364 - quicksilveralicorn (11/17/2015) [-]
You complaining about losing virtual pinkies and that fact no-one got your joke, so dont be a little bitch about it.
Reply
-1
#388 to #368 - anon (11/17/2015) [-]
Why is this?
What did i do?
Can i go back to normal?
Am i stuck getting undeserved red thumbs?

Explain me, just please for god's sake.
What the **** was wrong with it.
Why are you so upset over me deleting comments.
Is it spam?
Why is this?
Why are so many anons here?
Are you a fake account?
Why is the attention on me?
What did i do?
What the **** did i do?
Reply
+1
#391 to #388 - anon (11/17/2015) [-]
Because your joke was a giant pile of **** , someone pasted it , it sounded like you were trying way to hard to be funny, it was the equivalent of that annoying nine year-old that spouts dank memes all day trying to be funny.
Reply
+1
#395 to #391 - anon (11/17/2015) [-]
I don't think that's the reason pal.
Those numbers don't come in red for that sort of joke.
On FJ, if a joke is related, not cancer-themed, you ignore it and walk away.
Never in my life would i have expected this to happen.
I will not apologise.
You have come here with a purpose.
There cannot be so many anonymous users on one post.
Don't you even ******* trick me.
You have either come here with a purpose, or you are all one user.
Pick one faggot.
I'm usually not so quick to make these kind of judgments.
But here, i ******* know it.

Reply
+1
User avatar #397 to #395 - quicksilveralicorn (11/17/2015) [-]
***** , i didn't say apologize you ******* , it was a ****** joke, it was bad, you tried too hard, you'd probably be the kid that shoots up a school because someone didn't laugh at your joke.
Reply
-1
#399 to #397 - anon (11/17/2015) [-]
Since when did i ******* say i was mad about poeple not enjoying it?
This would be the proper response to someone who complains about not getting enough greenies, but i just got 12 ******* RED THUMBS FOR A JOKE.
If you seriously think that this is a normal reaction then you appear to me retarded.
If you like a joke, you thumb.
If you don't, you ignore it.
That is how it has always worked here since i joined.
I'm pretty sure if the same **** happened to you, you'll be whining even harder.
Why the **** am i even talking to you.
You're getting upset over literally nothing.
-3
#370 to #368 - magicalfruitbasket has deleted their comment [-]
Reply
+1
#375 to #370 - anon (11/17/2015) [-]
You got red thumbs because you are a faggot and should kill yourself.
If you expect to come on the internet, make a **** comment that you think is good and get congratulated for it, tough luck, ****** !
We aren't carebears, we will **** on you until you're like us.
You will watch mlp.
You will wear a fedora.
You will use ****** and faggot irl.
You will be stripped of your username.
And only then, you will understand, that you were a fag all along.
Reply
0
#380 to #375 - anon (11/17/2015) [-]
What the actual **** .
0
#377 to #375 - magicalfruitbasket has deleted their comment [-]
Reply
+1
#373 to #370 - anon (11/17/2015) [-]
You gotta circlejerk to the masses bro, and your pussy deleting stunt made sure you get nothing but bandwagon downvotes.
0
#376 to #373 - magicalfruitbasket has deleted their comment [-]
Reply
+1
#381 to #376 - anon (11/17/2015) [-]
Noice, deleting more like a faggot, getting too many red pinkies for your liking?


(x) post as anonymous
Reply
-1
#382 to #381 - anon (11/17/2015) [-]
Yeah, sorry that i don't want to loose my hard work.
Reply
0
#385 to #382 - anon (11/17/2015) [-]
You think that's hard work?
Then, if you were on a scale of 0-300, you'd probably break it.
Reply
0
#389 to #385 - anon (11/17/2015) [-]
Do you see how i'm literally getting no thumbs down here?
Tell me, where are you from and why have you come here.
Reply
0
#372 to #370 - anon (11/17/2015) [-]
NO ONE CAN ANSWER YOU IF YOU DELETE YOUR ******* COMMENT YOU RETARD.
Reply
0
#353 to #352 - yunch (11/17/2015) [-]
I personally found your joke the funniest out of all the replies.
-6
#354 to #353 - magicalfruitbasket has deleted their comment [-]
Reply
+1
#356 to #354 - yunch (11/17/2015) [-]
**yunch used "*roll picture*"**
**yunch rolled image** Take red thumbs like a man, bro! It's just virtual. Don't sweat it!
-3
#357 to #356 - magicalfruitbasket has deleted their comment [-]
Reply
+1
#358 to #357 - yunch (11/17/2015) [-]
**yunch used "*roll picture*"**
**yunch rolled image** I think you offended skeletons, bro. They're a shaky bunch.
-3
#362 to #358 - magicalfruitbasket has deleted their comment [-]
Reply
+1
#374 to #362 - anon (11/17/2015) [-]
Have you realized that your strange fixation has already given you more crimson fingats than whatever your first post said?
Reply
-1
#379 to #374 - anon (11/17/2015) [-]
Cool what am i supposed to do then.

Are you from 4chan?

I think you're from 4chan.
Reply
0
#401 to #379 - anon (11/17/2015) [-]
Just shut up, bite the pillow and think of England.
Reply
0
#378 to #362 - yunch (11/17/2015) [-]
**yunch used "*roll picture*"**
**yunch rolled image** Run, magicalfruitbasket ! I'll hold them off as long as I can!
Reply
0
#387 to #378 - anon (11/17/2015) [-]
fyi, you sound like a huge ******* faggot.
Reply
-1
#392 to #387 - anon (11/17/2015) [-]
You most definitely have come here with a purpose.
Is this some kind of ******* raid following your butthurt?

Because of you i had to make my profile private so you don't track me down (although you probably will find how to unprivatise it i'm willing to ******* bet.)

I remember mechawolf.
Now this.
You are onto something.
**** . You.
I don't know if you're one doing all this.
I don't know how many of you there are.
And i want you to tell me what the **** are you doing here.

I want to unprivatise my profile but i know i can't do that.
Just tell me what the **** do you want.
Reply
0
#371 to #19 - anon (11/17/2015) [-]
listen here, ******* , are you questioning that every skeleton is dooty by default?
-12
#330 to #19 - magicalfruitbasket has deleted their comment [-]
-4
#342 to #330 - magicalfruitbasket has deleted their comment [-]
-4
#341 to #330 - magicalfruitbasket has deleted their comment [-]
-1
#345 to #330 - magicalfruitbasket has deleted their comment [-]
Reply
+1
#365 to #19 - anon (11/17/2015) [-]
Wise words for a fuccboi.
Don't count on me not spooking you next spooktober though. We're not making any exceptions.
Also please refer to us by the more politically correct term "skeletal americans" .

-Mr. Skeletal

(reposting the joke that got -12 for some ******* reason for someone who might enjoy it)
Reply
+19
#69 to #19 - anon (11/17/2015) [-]
The majority of first world feminists are feminazis. Feminism in the first world is pretty much useless. It is mostly contradictory and one sided. Feminism is really only needed in countries/societies that legitimately oppress women. In most first world cases females have more rights than men, but sacrifice social standing. Rights are more important than social standing though. I'd rather get a slap on the wrist for raping someone and getting catcalled than life in prison for getting accused for rape. Also it's mostly women who make other women feel inferior/oppress women. Black people are their own enemy as well. White problems are mostly due to media bias, same with cops. Muslims have extremist radicals. Christians just have crazy people who are assholes, but you can ignore them and just be chill towards regular christians. Guns is a very debatable topic, but there's no doubt that the media is clearly biased towards gun owners and guns in general.
Reply
+19
#195 to #69 - anon (11/17/2015) [-]
I'd rather say that the media is purely trying to cause as much of an uproar as possible, rather than being biased towards any specific group of people (in this case gun owners). In this case, though, I happen to agree that the extremely open gun policy in the US is a bad thing... Open gun policy mixed with the attitude that "I have the right to both own AND use this gun for whatever I want to in my own home!" is what puts the US at the top of every statistic for gun related deaths. That's just my opinion though, and seeing that a lot of FJers are American, I'm expecting to be red thumbed to hell for it, which is why I'm posting as anonymous
Reply
+4
#220 to #69 - anon (11/17/2015) [-]
No, the majority of feminists you hear about are feminazis. Feminism = equality between genders, which shouldnt be confused with feminazism. You just hear about the feminazis because they cause controversy, regular feminism isnt newsworthy
Reply
+22
#235 to #220 - tanitakavirius ONLINE (11/17/2015) [-]
But FJ needs an enemy!! Could you imagine FJ without feminazis?
Reply
+2
#262 to #235 - anon (11/17/2015) [-]
Reply
+3
#263 to #69 - anon (11/17/2015) [-]
Do you know what 1st world even means? It may surprise you.

1st world - Capitalist society
2nd world - communist society
3rd world - everyone else
Reply
+1
#350 to #69 - anon (11/17/2015) [-]
The majority of feminists who get media/anybody's attention are feminazis... Speaking as somebody who lives in an area where nearly everybody is a rational feminist, but feminazis do exist, I can say that all people ever hear about are the ones who use shock value and have extreme points of view to make themselves heard. Don't use what you see on the Internet as an accurate view of reality.
Reply
+15
#128 to #19 - checkemninja (11/17/2015) [-]
Unfortunately,thats not how human beans work.Generalizing is apart of our survival instincts.And I don't want to be blown up
Reply
+18
#138 to #128 - yugiohkris ONLINE (11/17/2015) [-]
Tell me am I a real human bean?
Tell me am I a real human bean?
Reply
+29
#141 to #138 - checkemninja (11/17/2015) [-]
There can only be one true human bean
Reply
+4
#321 to #138 - emotep (11/17/2015) [-]
Not only. You are also a hero.
Reply
+12
User avatar #77 to #19 - kurbeh (11/17/2015) [-]
You would be surprised, some people actually find that racist at this point.
Reply
+25
#218 to #77 - anon (11/17/2015) [-]
A small minority who should be ignored anyway
Reply
+4
User avatar #337 to #19 - captainprincess ONLINE (11/17/2015) [-]
That's not as gratifying to our prejudicial instincts though
that takes work
:c
Reply
+11
#298 to #19 - skebaba ONLINE (11/17/2015) [-]
Skeletons, eh? I don't believe that they exist... yeah... all ***** ... err conspiracy nut propaganda. Next you are gonna say that Hitler did something wrong.
Reply
+101
#61 - shleker (11/17/2015) [-]
I'm getting tired of this **** .

ISIS goal is to shock people. They targeted France not because of its involvement in the coalition (only 20 strikes since the begining of the campaign) but because of the huge number of french muslims (~5millions) and of the cultural unrest that already threatens our nation's unity. Their goal is to make white people fear muslims in France, Make France take laws which the muslim population will see as agressive and opressive. They want us to fear muslims so that muslims can fear us in return and join ISIS in their fight. everyone in this story will feel victim, will fell threatened, and will fight for survival.

By spreading the idea that every muslims are responsible for every terrorist attack you are giving ISIS exactly what it wants : a war betwen civilizations. Whereas there could just be civilized world against a bunch of mentally ill terrorist who cant even read their holly book properly.
ISIS wants you to think every muslim is your ennemy so every muslim will become their allies it's so simple to understand, how can you fall for that ?
Reply
-9
#233 to #61 - anon (11/17/2015) [-]
this is very wrong first of all isis attacked france because they simply attack what they can, and they don't want real war between nations because muslims would be wiped out if they tried to fight against everyone else and honestly who would side with them if it escalate as you say? eu+russia+usa vs muslim nations already more than enough if the others stay neutral and it would be just carpet bombing not actual war isis want to hide behind the muslims, muslims could catch the terrorist best themselves in france but they obviously don't try because they rather act like there are no terrorist muslims are more afraid of being called a terrorists or their religion called violent than actually afraid of terrorists in the european countrie
Reply
-3
#322 to #61 - anon (11/17/2015) [-]
I hear this claim again and again, but it's complete nonsense. If Europe goes all skinhead nazi and kill/deport all muslims ISIS wont benefit. Quite on the contrary they pretty much lost then, as they don't have the military power to challenge any larger state or NATO country.
Reply
0
#328 to #61 - emotep (11/17/2015) [-]
The good guys vs all the bad guys.

The size of ISIS isn't scary in itself. The scary part is the implications it carries. If such a large number of people in the area is ready to go all out terrorist suicide bombing what does that tell you about the general population? How many are considering joining? how many just idealize them? So many warped minds don't just exist among a perfectly reasonable population.

It's a nice thought that ISIS is just a couple of 100.000 black sheep, and that they are nothing like their country men, but quite frankly I think that might be wishful thinking, and I think their world view is shared, at least in part, by an even greater number than the organization itself.

I don't think anyone actually tries to justify hatred toward all Muslims. I know quite a few who are exactly like the native danish population and they are great people, and to be honest with these people I can't even for sure tell that they are even religious anyway.

However we can't keep pretending there are no problems with middle eastern immigrants. A few days after the Paris attack, there was an attack on a 15-year old girl, by 3 young men. Which made headlines because she kicked one and punched another and then got back on her bike and fled You want to guess their description? Yep all three of middle eastern ethnicity, and somehow I doubt we will hear in the news that they were all Israelis, if they are caught. Every goddamn time we hear something about an attack in the streets it's always the same... Middle eastern men... again, and again, and again. And I'm willing the next 10 times, will also be middle eastern men. Unless gang related. Then it will might be a biker gang... vs. a middle eastern gang
Reply
+1
User avatar #258 to #61 - antinonymous (11/17/2015) [-]
ISIS' tactics are working to a degree i.e. Australia has just changed it's rules of engagement with terrorist threat from "trying to stop before resorting to violence" to "shoot on sight". This freaks me out because as a Muslim born and raised in Australia, I'm seeing more and more laws passed that in the name of national security is specifically targeting Muslims to the point where I could be shot down in a moment of confusion by a random cop.
Reply
+5
User avatar #86 to #61 - notanotheraccount (11/17/2015) [-]
So what youre saying is that everyone needs to stand together against ISIS? I wish the rest of the world shared this opinion.
Reply
+1
#101 to #86 - theorize (11/17/2015) [-]
There is currently an international coalition of over 40 countries involved in the fight against ISIS, including several Muslim geographical neighbor countries like Jordan. Much of the operations consist of containment-based strategy, and are very active as we speak.
Reply
-1
User avatar #102 to #101 - notanotheraccount (11/17/2015) [-]
Eh, i meant more along the lines of blow them all to **** , not keep them where they are. They will always get out.
Reply
+1
User avatar #243 to #102 - emiyashirou (11/17/2015) [-]
See, the problem is, we can't 'blow them all to ***** , because we don't know where they are. They're in hiding and blended in between civilians.
Reply
+1
#106 to #102 - theorize (11/17/2015) [-]
I understand what you're saying, and in fact most people's gut reaction are word for word the same, but reality is more complicated than that.

Historically, "blowing them all to **** " makes the problem worse, and U.S. operations changed because we even saw it over the course of our initial strategy, and the Pentagon was reluctant to release data because it showed ISIS had been losing many in numbers, but making up for that in responsive recruitment. Locals are able to be convinced that the West is their enemy when ISIS shows the civilian casualties we inevitably face.

The reasoning behind containment has a very strong set of arguments, and if you're interested in an elaboration of Containment vs. "Blowing them to **** ", then IQ2 Debates have a detailed display of both ideas.

Containment Is Not Enough: ISIS Must Be Defeated
Reply
+4
#153 to #61 - yunch (11/17/2015) [-]
**yunch used "*roll picture*"**
**yunch rolled image** Thank you. I'm glad you have this mentality, whereas so many have succumbed to fear and spout nothing but childish accusations.
Reply
+13
#163 - saytwaa (11/17/2015) [-]
the whole world is gray, its not black and white. everyone has a certain deal about them. races dont have a hive mind, same goes for political views, religion, and stuff like that. folk really love to generalize everything cause it makes it easy, you dont even have to think about the individual, but its something we ought to start doing. its all so petty, good lord. we are all on this rock together anyways
Reply
-4
#165 to #163 - anon (11/17/2015) [-]
I don't think discussions after the murders of 150+ people is a petty topic, especially with the threat of it happening again.
Reply
+4
User avatar #167 to #165 - saytwaa (11/17/2015) [-]
wasnt saying thats petty, oh lord no. its a very serious thing. but the whole deal where folk can seem to get that each person, no matter where or who they are, has a life and memories and experiences that lead the to where they are. we are all the same one way or the other. even an ol jihadist i am in no way saying they are in the right has his own views and opinions on something. no one has a hive mind is what i guess im saying
Reply
+13
User avatar #18 - jamesisawesome (11/16/2015) [-]
All of those things are stupid, that doesn't make it less stupid to sink to their level.
Reply
0
User avatar #47 to #18 - tittylovin (11/16/2015) [-]
Crusades and slavery in the Western world ended AGES ago. Men hate rapists just as much as any woman, arguably more sometimes. Gun owners LOATHE and utterly despise anyone that brings negative attention to firearms through misuse and irresponsible actions.
Muslims
don't do **** about terrorists. Especially migrant Muslims.
Reply
+8
#112 to #47 - theorize (11/17/2015) [-]
Not in my Name - Muslims against ISIS
That is a popularly restated idea but is in fact a deliberate avoidance of consistently presented counterevidence.

Most attacks almost immediately have Muslim responses for peace.
Also, Muslim countries neighboring Syria are involved in the international coalition against ISIS, notably Jordan, Saudi Arabia, and the United Arab Emirates.
Reply
+7
#118 to #112 - anon (11/17/2015) [-]
Theres a video going viral atm of a muslim news presenter commenting on how we need unity to fight ISIS, because literally their entire aim is to drive us apart.


People are commenting on the video of the muslim man bad-mouthing ISIS, saying that muslim people never speak out against ISIS.
Reply
-1
#120 to #118 - theorize (11/17/2015) [-]
ISIS IS WEAK - What ISIS doesn't want you to hear! Yes, the story is Waleed Aly, a Muslim Australian journalist went deep and hard after ISIS and their propagandizing strategies (very similar to something I personally have been saying for quite some time).

As for the comments close to what you're referring to, evidence is minimal, though I haven't (and don't intend to) monitored the comments of other videos.
Reply
+4
#66 to #47 - atonial (11/17/2015) [-]
Gunsmithing apprentice here, might be called edgy but I'd legit scalp a mass shooter, they're ******* subhuman. They're better at passing gun legislation than politicians.
Reply
+7
User avatar #332 - lateday (11/17/2015) [-]
Can the opposite be said though?

"You can't blame all men for every rape that has ever happened."
"You can't blame all law abiding gun owners for ever school shooting."
"You can't blame all white people for slavery and genocide."
"You can't blame all Christians for the Crusades."

>Blames all of Islam or refugees for one terrorist attack.



I made a similar point on a different post a few days earlier
Reply
+1
#344 to #332 - bwiedieter (11/17/2015) [-]
i see what you´re saying, and it is indeed a good point, but I´d like to point out a big difference between "Blaming X for Y" and "Blaming Islam for a terror attack".

Nearly 100% of men would never approve of raping someone.
Nearly 100% of law abiding gun owners would never approve of school shootings.
Nearly 100% of white people would never approve of slavery or genocide.
Nearly 100% of Christians would never approve of going on a crusade.

Muslims are seemingly far more unsure on whether or not violence and terrorism against civilian targets isn´t often or at least sometimes justified.
There is a palpable correlation between how big a percentage of Muslims a country has and how much approval of terrorist attacks there is on average for that country.

Source, e.g.: www.pewresearch.org/files/old-assets/pdf/muslim-americans.pdf#page=97 (where this screenshot is from)
And that´s a major point why "Blaming Islam on terror attacks.
Reply
0
User avatar #396 to #344 - lateday (11/17/2015) [-]
You say that there is a correlation between approval of terrorism and percentage of Muslims in a country, yet in your own screenshot, out of the non-western nations, Indonesia had the highest percentage of disapproval while also having the biggest Muslim percentage of the world. Might be the exception, but it is a big one. I like you tho. You provided source even if I feel it is a bit weak. You are a good sport.
Reply
+1
#398 to #396 - bwiedieter (11/17/2015) [-]
Yeah, you´re right about Indonesia there. I just tried checking whether is possibly rather a correlation between percentage of Sunni or Shia muslims and approval ratings, but I didn´t find any.
And yeah, a survey of 1000 people from 10 different countries is going to have some huge error margins. For the life of me, I cannot find the one that I originally wanted to link you to, it had a much bigger number of participants, albeit it was focused on the UK alone. According to that study (and I checked, it´s not some Nazi propaganda, it´s the real deal) around 40% of UK Muslims approved of the use of violence against civilians on one way or another.

Thing is, I provide sources because I want other people to double-check and correct me if I´m wrong - like you just did. I want to know whether I´m wrong, I want others to verify my argument. And a claim without a source may have some validity to it, but it cannot be validated.
Reply
0
#408 to #403 - bwiedieter (11/18/2015) [-]
That might actually have been the one I was looking for, explains why I couldn´t find it. I searched for 40% instead of 1 in 4 because I´m an idiot sometimes
Reply
0
#346 to #344 - bwiedieter (11/17/2015) [-]
dat unfinished last sentence -.-*
Wanted to write: That´s a major point why some people tend to blame Islam as an ideology for terrorism. while correlation doesn´t necessarily mean causation, it hints at it waving it´s arms in front of a blinking sign that says "It´s probably causation!"
Reply
+27
#164 - anon (11/17/2015) [-]
This person is assuming that all people who believe that not all Muslims are the same also believe all those other things. I'm seriously disappointed in you FJ, ISIS is getting exactly the reaction that they want from everybody, to cause chaos. Content spreading ignorance and close mindedness is getting so many thumbs, it's not what we should be doing with our energy.
Reply
-1
#261 to #164 - anon (11/17/2015) [-]
That's not what they're saying at all. Can't you read between the lines? This person is not saying that all people who believe not all Islamic people are the same also believe this other stuff. They're just pointing out that a grand majority of those people will go out of their way to express ONE OR MORE of these ideas. Not all of them. Don't take this post so literally.
Reply
+1
User avatar #252 to #164 - scorcho (11/17/2015) [-]
it's not all of funnyjunk.
just the stormfag circlejerk troupe.
Reply
-3
User avatar #292 to #252 - thumbfortrump (11/17/2015) [-]
Or just some of us who see what a medieval religion islam really is.
Reply
+2
User avatar #301 to #292 - dreygur (11/17/2015) [-]
Sure, the religion itself isn't very modern at all, but that doesn't mean that Muslims can't live normal, modern lives.
Reply
0
User avatar #307 to #301 - thumbfortrump (11/17/2015) [-]
You do realize that most polls show that the majority of the muslim community are against basic, human rights, right?
Reply
0
User avatar #309 to #307 - dreygur (11/17/2015) [-]
I'm aware that they're shallow people, but I blame the people over the religion. Changing religion wouldn't necessarily change their views on basic human rights, because they grew up with inequality and won't let it off easily.

I believe Islam can be taught in a modern manner, like what Christianity has turned into for the most part
Reply
0
User avatar #312 to #309 - thumbfortrump (11/17/2015) [-]
Religion is a huge, huge part of their identity. A lot of the moral values they have come from the religion itself. Only through reformation is it possible for the religion to become modern, but that is a process that takes several hundred years.
Reply
+2
#201 to #164 - kellorkleft ONLINE (11/17/2015) [-]
Damn, you beat me to it.
Reply
+6
#166 - anon (11/17/2015) [-]
Maybe, you little ******** , just because there is a stupid person who has the same views, it doesn't make my opinion wrong.

I don't blame all muslims for the attacks, because a hell of a lot muslims were killed by terrorists. I also don't blame christians for the doings of the westboro baptist church.
I don't blame all christians for the crusades. I don't blame all white people for slavery and genocide, as if brown people never did that **** . I don't blame all men for rape, because there are also women who do this **** , and there are also people who lie about rape. I don't blame gun owners for school shootings (even though I don't like the gun laws, because imo every person who wants to get a gun should at least get a psychological check), I blame the person who did it (and probably the person they got the gun from).
Reply
+12
User avatar #58 - kibbleking (11/17/2015) [-]
ye we get it SJW's are hypocrites.
preaching to the choir
Reply
+32
#98 - theorize (11/17/2015) [-]
This is a deliberate misrepresentation of points made by a conflicting party.

1.) "You can't blame all of Islam for terrorist attacks"
This is true, given it is a composition fallacy, and an accurate representation of a major circulated talking point. It is often denied by some, which historically has lead to demonization of a larger innocent group (whom after every terror attack have representative community groups release statements condemning the attacks, as part of a modern Islam reformation).

2.)">Blames all Christians for Crusades"
Correctly identified as a logical fallacy, but a misrepresentation of the circulated talking point. What this references is when people say "But Christians were violent in the Crusades", and that is meant to demonstrate the fact that Christianity has had a violent past but was reformed for interpretation to only focus on the good parts of the religion, introducing to dissenters that an Islam reformation should be permitted, and the painting of Islam as violent only hinders the progress of a peace reformation.

3.) ">Blames all white people for slavery and genocide"
Correctly identified as illogical, but based on no evidence from any popular talking point from the same party. The only evidence of the talking point is of the anti-SJW party making this claim, and of fringe-extreme-SJW tweets or Facebook posts(occasionally fake for this reason), often having a handful of retweets, many times half of which are mock-related, only made popular by anti-SJW post circulation for ridicule.

4.)">Blames all men for every rape that has ever happened"
Another logical fallacy, but is reframed to a separate fringe group of Feminazism ("neo-Feminism") assuming that both the first statement and this statement are linked to liberal ideology, when in fact, the only group identified with this talking point are the extreme Tumblr users and attention-seeking Twitter accounts. It seems to be strictly limited to social media and has virtually no materialization to the real world aside from the videos of those on street corners likely directly related to Tumblr extremists.

5.) ">Blames all law abiding gun owners for every school shooting"
Correctly identifying a non sequitur, but is in itself a non sequitur to the proposals made by their political counterparts used for any form of gun control. Any further discussion falls under open questions over gun control politics, which is outside of my forte.
Reply
0
User avatar #331 to #98 - lateday (11/17/2015) [-]
You are correct. But I believe you read too much into it. I just see it to mean "You can't blame a community for the actions of some" and tackling various points that had been talked online for the past months. It makes you ponder, it is in no way meant to be a 1:1 analogy.
Reply
0
#343 to #331 - theorize (11/17/2015) [-]
Open interpretation and pondering is not my job
Reply
-1
#305 to #98 - anon (11/17/2015) [-]
I can hear the force of your furious, dirty self-sex from here.
It's painfully obvious that you're trying as hard as possible to write like a lawyer, and while your vocabulary is good, your efforts are more than a little wasted.
Try to remember that you're on a site full of mouth-breathing social rejects who aspire to 4chan.
Reply
+3
#348 to #305 - theorize (11/17/2015) [-]
1.) "I can hear the force of your furious, dirty self-sex from here."
The claim that I am masturbating furiously, although currently true, was not true at the time of your comment. The claim you could hear it is unsubstantiated, and likely false.

2.) "trying to write like a lawyer"
While a mildly decent estimation of the language presented in the original comment, it is misleading. Although it is written in a formal format, it is not specific to lawyers, which is known for higher concentration of clauses and citations very often under persuasive format.

3.) "your efforts are more than a little wasted"
This is false, given that my efforts towards "furious, dirty self-sex" are immensely gratifying.
Reply
0
#360 to #348 - anon (11/17/2015) [-]
I couldn't help but notice that you didn't argue my point about 4chan.
Reply
0
#366 to #360 - theorize (11/17/2015) [-]
1) "you didn't argue my point about 4chan"
True. I accepted the suggestion you made to "remember" that. Although, to address it: At best it could only be noted that "full of" is an exaggeration, yet, aside from the foul framing, it is well substantiated by Funnyjunk's immigration history. There have been several events that led 4chan goers to migrate to Funnyjunk, most notably after Gamergate.
Reply
+1
#175 to #98 - migueldecervantes (11/17/2015) [-]
Good work, my friend.
Reply
+2
#114 to #98 - nerdking (11/17/2015) [-]
**nerdking used "*roll picture*"**
**nerdking rolled image**That was so very refreshing to read. Thank you, kind sir.
Reply
+3
User avatar #137 to #98 - garymotherfingoak (11/17/2015) [-]
you're doing good work, son.
Reply
+5
User avatar #323 - Das (11/17/2015) [-]
You forgot blames all cops for bad shoots.


One bad apple spoils the whole bunch. Sad as it is.
Reply
+8
User avatar #20 - beatmasterz (11/16/2015) [-]
Who does that?
Reply
+13
User avatar #21 to #20 - itssakamoto (11/16/2015) [-]
Twitfags with their heshtags and sjws.
Reply
0
User avatar #22 to #21 - beatmasterz (11/16/2015) [-]
who cares about them
Reply
+4
User avatar #23 to #22 - itssakamoto (11/16/2015) [-]
Ignoring the problem doesn't make it disappear
Reply
-4
User avatar #24 to #23 - beatmasterz (11/16/2015) [-]
I don't see a problem?
Reply
-2
User avatar #27 to #24 - itssakamoto (11/16/2015) [-]
The not all Muslims comes from idiots who hunt down whites and call them all slave-owners and **** .
Reply
-1
User avatar #29 to #27 - beatmasterz (11/16/2015) [-]
Now look who's generalising. Such irony.
Reply
-2
User avatar #30 to #29 - itssakamoto (11/16/2015) [-]
I don't see your point but go on.
Reply
0
User avatar #31 to #30 - beatmasterz (11/16/2015) [-]
But how is it a problem? What problem do they pose? Retards are gonna retard. Why do you care?
Reply
-1
User avatar #32 to #31 - itssakamoto (11/16/2015) [-]
Problem: seeing them in your streets attacking people verbally and sometimes physically
Reply
0
User avatar #33 to #32 - beatmasterz (11/16/2015) [-]
So you are saying there are SJWs on twitter decriminalising muslims and these people also attack white people on the streets?
Reply
-1
User avatar #34 to #33 - itssakamoto (11/16/2015) [-]
You haven't noticed? Attacking (verbally almost all times unless you get too close) by day, tweeting about it by night.
Reply
-1
User avatar #36 to #34 - beatmasterz (11/16/2015) [-]
No, I haven't. Are you talking about cyberbullying? Is anyone doing that to you? If so you can either choose to not care and let them exercise their right to free speech or report them to the authorities. I fail to see the problem.
Reply
-1
User avatar #37 to #36 - itssakamoto (11/16/2015) [-]
>irl
>cyber
Does not compute
Reply
-1
User avatar #38 to #37 - beatmasterz (11/16/2015) [-]
Are you being bullied?
Reply
-1
User avatar #39 to #38 - itssakamoto (11/16/2015) [-]
don't derail, son.
Reply
-1
User avatar #40 to #39 - beatmasterz (11/16/2015) [-]
I don't ******* get what you are trying to say. Formulate your ******* argument.
Reply
+1
User avatar #41 to #40 - itssakamoto (11/16/2015) [-]
You, first. I'm talking about how twitfags are the ones doing what is shown in the post and you're talking about cyberbullying. Don't derail, son.
Reply
-2
User avatar #42 to #41 - beatmasterz (11/16/2015) [-]
>All twitfags generalise white people

Nice irony there faggot.

Reply
-1
User avatar #45 to #42 - itssakamoto (11/16/2015) [-]
did I ever say "all" twitfags?
Be careful next time. Wanna go on?
-2
User avatar #46 to #45 - beatmasterz (11/16/2015) [-]
Nope, but you didn't say some twitfags either. What's your point here? Are you complaining about stupid people being stupid? Yes some people on twitter say stupid things. WHY DO YOU CARE? Do you care about some guy in some country crashing his bike because he ran it into a tree? Does that upset you too?

Jesus christ.
Reply
-1
User avatar #43 to #42 - itssakamoto (11/16/2015) [-]
You keep using that word without knowing its meaning. Nice.

Protip: irony would be if I was generalising all white people and scolding you for doing that ;)
-1
User avatar #44 to #43 - beatmasterz (11/16/2015) [-]
You're generalising all twitter users. What you're describing is hypocrisy.
Reply
0
User avatar #244 to #32 - welliguessitsaname (11/17/2015) [-]
Source?
Reply
0
User avatar #329 to #244 - itssakamoto (11/17/2015) [-]
Source: your ******* eyes if you live in an area that has sjws.
Reply
0
User avatar #402 to #329 - welliguessitsaname (11/17/2015) [-]
I live in New York, one of the most liberal states in the US. Still no.
Reply
-2
User avatar #25 to #24 - itssakamoto (11/16/2015) [-]
Problem is retards rioting about ******** left and right?
Reply
0
User avatar #26 to #25 - beatmasterz (11/16/2015) [-]
You think retards complaing about dumb **** on twitter is rioting? Again, who cares?
Reply
-1
User avatar #28 to #26 - itssakamoto (11/16/2015) [-]
Again, those who don't ignore the problem do care.
Reply
+3
#246 - trollmobile (11/17/2015) [-]
i don't blame all of islam for terrorist attacks
i don't blame all christians for the crusades
i don't blame all men for rape
i don't blame law abiding gun owners for school shootings.


this is null and void.
Reply
-1
User avatar #259 to #246 - serrikari (11/17/2015) [-]
"i don't blame all of islam for terrorist attacks"

Then this argument doesn't pertain to you, now does it?

But you still blame all white people for slavery and genocide? Either you forgot that part or you failed to troll.
Reply
0
User avatar #280 to #259 - trollmobile (11/17/2015) [-]
also, the argument implies that those whom say "don't blame all of islam for terrorist attacks", say the other things.
which we don't.
it's called a strawman.
when you claim someone holding an opinion, hold other contradicting opinions, when they don't.
Reply
0
User avatar #281 to #280 - serrikari (11/17/2015) [-]
Makes sense.

To me, this whole thing just points out the irony in a lot of people. A lot of those opinions are typically from some pretty ignorant people. I get what you're saying though.
Reply
0
User avatar #278 to #259 - trollmobile (11/17/2015) [-]
i forgot it, i do none of the things in the content.
Reply
0
User avatar #279 to #278 - serrikari (11/17/2015) [-]
You must not be having a trolly day then.
Reply
0
#351 to #246 - bwiedieter (11/17/2015) [-]
I´m so gonna save that pic.
Reply
+1
User avatar #282 to #246 - sketchE ONLINE (11/17/2015) [-]
fallacy fallacy
Reply
+1
User avatar #334 to #282 - lateday (11/17/2015) [-]
You need more thumbs
Reply
+1
User avatar #286 to #246 - heartlessrobot (11/17/2015) [-]
If you don't do any of that, then he wasn't talking to you.
Reply
+3
#162 - lolibear (11/17/2015) [-]
I don't get how your strawman of liberals justifies the original statement.
Reply
+6
User avatar #219 - muxammle (11/17/2015) [-]
As a Muslim, reading all those comments that are defending the rest of the Muslim population is heart warming. I did not come to FJ since the France incident because i knew i would see a bunch of idiots bashing Islam. And sincerely, it hurts me when i see those comments. It doesnt mean that you cant do it. Its your choice to do it (freedom of speech?). But after seeing the comments I can say that there is really some hope in this world.

We can only beat ISIS or these other radical bastards if we joined hands. Not by name calling each other.
Reply
-2
User avatar #227 to #219 - lotengo (11/17/2015) [-]
I sincerely hope you die in the next terror attack.
Reply
0
User avatar #228 to #227 - muxammle (11/17/2015) [-]
Thank you for the kinds words.
Reply
-1
User avatar #229 to #228 - therealfell (11/17/2015) [-]
edgy little 12 year olds ftw, right?
Reply
-1
#234 to #229 - muxammle (11/17/2015) [-]
lol yeah.
Reply
-1
#277 to #227 - anon (11/17/2015) [-]
Stop being such an edgy faglord.

And I am pretty sure you're not the one to say who is inhumane and who is not, your country killed millions and millions of people years ago, nazi retard.
Reply
0
User avatar #338 to #277 - lotengo (11/17/2015) [-]
I'm not a german
Reply
-2
User avatar #260 to #227 - serrikari (11/17/2015) [-]
Je hebt papa kwesties.
Reply
-2
#236 to #227 - digitalmasterx (11/17/2015) [-]
wat is je kanker probleem a zemmer?
Reply
-1
User avatar #237 to #236 - lotengo (11/17/2015) [-]
Islam
Reply
-2
#238 to #237 - digitalmasterx (11/17/2015) [-]
heb je wel de comments zitten lezen? ze willen juist dat de mensheid een vijand van moslims wordt zodat die moslims dan weer isis gaan steunen kutkop.

isis is niet islamitisch, het is een ******* mantel. open je ogen.
Reply
0
User avatar #239 to #238 - lotengo (11/17/2015) [-]
Je ziet een moslim die zegt dat isis niet lief is en je gaat meteen weer d'awwwww religie van de vrede.

Weer lekker PvdA stemmen tot de volgende terreuraanslag, en 2 dagen later weer goedpraters.
Flikker toch op, of we wegkijken of nie maakt niet uit, ISIS zal blijven aanvallen. Mocro jeugd zal crimineel blijven, Somaliers houden werkeloosheidspercentage van 70%


Reply
-2
#240 to #239 - digitalmasterx (11/17/2015) [-]
ja, en mannen lossen het op ipv klagen over een probleem.

voor alles is er een reden, voor alles een oplossing.

als je alleen haat gaat lopen zaaien veranderd er ook niks.
Reply
-1
User avatar #241 to #240 - lotengo (11/17/2015) [-]
Ik heb je oplossing, muur om Europa, bommen op die dobbelsteen van haat en pedofilie
Reply
+1
User avatar #245 to #219 - tankeruber (11/17/2015) [-]
Most muslims aren't terrorists, but most terrorists happen to be muslim. Fix your **** .
Reply
0
User avatar #394 to #245 - muxammle (11/17/2015) [-]
It's not my **** to fix mate. I can't control isis. They do what they please. They kill Muslims too. Their main goal is to create chaos and let the world fight each other for their goal.

Sometimes Muslims do crazy **** . That doesn't mean I should be held responsible for that act. Even if they say they are doing it for the religion.
Reply
0
User avatar #416 to #394 - tankeruber (11/18/2015) [-]
The last time any other religion had such massive surges of violence attributed to the religion under which the combatants fought, it was christianity with the crusades, the first of which were responses to the saracens (muslim) wars of conquest. You could argue the Reformation and wars between catholics and protestant countries could be the last time, but those were mainly to gain territory, and obviously you would rather ally with people of the same church, which might have looked liked internal holy wars, similliar to what the muslims are having now. However, we didn't have anywhere to run away to during the reformation, we built our **** back up and are now the best places to live. Muslims or people living in muslim areas, despite not being "real muslims", the classic no true scotsman fallacy that "moderate" muslims like to say about ISIS or ISIL or the Taliban or Boko Haram or any other terrorist organization fighting under Islam, haven't done this step. There isn't any other way to put this, if we took a million muslims/people who live in muslim countries, the chance that one of them is a terrorist is higher than if we took a million of any other follower of any other religion or any other group of people living in any other place.
Obviously every muslim shouldn't be held accountable for what some do, the fact that we still have refugee camps shows that we don't hold you accountable. As a gun owner I get held responsible for every shooting that happens, I know how this feels. Unlike muslims, however, there's so much research and proof that there is a correlation between having a lot of guns and having low crime and violence in a specific area, for example the fact that two of the most notoriously anti-gun states, California and New York, have the highest crime rates compared to mostly pro-gun states right next to them that have substantially lower crime. Same goes for Europe, Estonia, Finland and other pro-gun countries have lower crime than their neighbours. There's no such correlation between muslims and violence, however, and some would even claim there's correlation between muslims and violence in a way that suggests the more muslims there are, the more violent the area.
Reply
+1
#355 to #219 - bwiedieter (11/17/2015) [-]
I sincerely hope that France invokes Article V of the NATO treaty and the world finally begins to REALLY do something in a concerted effort instead ofjust airstrike pinpricks like there are now.
We need NATO boots on the ground. And I´m saying that despite the fact that there is a good chance two of them might be mine. Innocent people will keep dying if the NATO and the "alliance of the willing" don´t get their **** together and really start to do something.
Reply
+3
User avatar #248 to #219 - trollmobile (11/17/2015) [-]
don't pay lotengo any mind, he's a white supremacist retard.
there's a lot of hate out there, but i will try to help spread facts among the emotional rage.
Reply
+3
#267 - llpanic (11/17/2015) [-]
Doesn't want people to generalize about issues.... by generalizing with like 4 types o people atributing it all to muslims
Reply
0
User avatar #333 to #267 - lateday (11/17/2015) [-]
I think he is just covering all 4 points of view since all 4 appeal to slightly different people.
Reply
+3
#119 - tobistrigoivii (11/17/2015) [-]
**tobistrigoivii used "*roll picture*"**
**tobistrigoivii rolled image***roll picture* >Blames all Nazis for
Reply
0
User avatar #123 to #119 - randacc (11/17/2015) [-]
nice
Reply
+2
#257 - anon (11/17/2015) [-]
Who the **** blames all gun owners for school shootings?

We blame the people who committed the crime.

What the problem is that society has to adapt to that 1% of people who **** everything up for everyone else. Hence why some people don't want everyone to have guns because then itll make it much ******* harder for the criminals to get their hands on guns.
Reply
+1
#293 to #257 - Lookinatstuff (11/17/2015) [-]
There certainly are people that blame gun owners for school shootings, because there are people that use a school shooting to call for the taking away of all citizens' guns.
Reply
+2
#57 - anothergun (11/17/2015) [-]
Saying that all muslims blames others for all sorts of things, are also blaming all of them for blaming others...
Reply
+2
User avatar #288 - Awesomecarrot (11/17/2015) [-]
Even if this was true, which it flat-out isn't, it still proves a point:

It's ******* idiotic to blame an entire group of people for the action that a few committed.

I'm getting really tired of Funnyjunk's ****** attitudes these days.
Reply
+1
User avatar #325 to #288 - manofbacontits (11/17/2015) [-]
we don't love you either but we're stuck all the same
Reply
+1
#390 - Sunset (11/17/2015) [-]
>CIA funds Al Quesadilla, Hezbollah, Muslim Brotherhood, Taliban, etc etc in the 80s, 90s, and 00s
>it backfires
>CIA trains ISIS today
>it backfires

na son, it's the CIA
1234>
[ 432 comments ]
Leave a comment
<
>
 Friends (0)