Upload
Login or register
x

Bitches Be Crazy

Mort
Open Colection Show me another I
Can you make a male baby sitter pay child support?
rm a single mom who to college with my sister. A couple weeks ago. I asked my
neighbor, a nice guy. if he could watch the kids torture hours while I went to class and
my sister wasn' t home, and he agreed. it he babysits and doesnt accept pay. can I
we him for child support because he took on a fatherly take?? sure I can convince
a court that he accepted a fatherly mic, which is how who was child support is
determined in my state..
15 canons an _ 4 days hit to answer
Additional Details
Edit: The real dad died in a car accident almost seven years agta.
It resides we
...
+398
Views: 21494
Favorited: 16
Submitted: 02/09/2014
Share On Facebook
submit to reddit +Favorite Subscribe to numbmind

Comments(118):

Leave a comment Refresh Comments Show GIFs
12>
[ 118 comments ]
Top Rated Controversial Best Lowest Rated Newest
Anonymous comments allowed.
95 comments displayed.
Reply
+111
#6 - scooba ONLINE (02/09/2014) [-]
What a dumb greedy cunt.
What a dumb greedy cunt.
Reply
+72
User avatar #2 - thunderchanter (02/09/2014) [-]
That's just sad
Reply
+4
#12 to #2 - bann ONLINE (02/09/2014) [-]
You know what's funny though? in the US maybe other places idk if you acted like someones spouse for a certain number of years and refereed to one another as husband and wife, then you could be considered legally married without ever actually having a ceremony.

A case I know of happened in Rhode Island where a couple lived together for 7 years and called each other husband and wife. Well later the husband dipped out of the relationship and got married, she even invited his ex "wife" to the wedding and she had a great time.

The next week she sues him for alimony and he faced criminal charges for polygamy ...laws are crazy. I can't find the source, but my law professor told us the story.
Reply
0
#99 to #12 - anon (02/10/2014) [-]
Where i live in canada, you're considered commonlaw marriage after 3 months of living together, which is basically legal marriage just with no certificate, it's kind of making marriage pointless and a waste of money.
Reply
0
User avatar #15 to #12 - thunderchanter (02/09/2014) [-]
I live in the US too and I have never heard about that before. If you could find the source, could you link it? I'd be really interested in that.
Reply
+1
#35 to #15 - gayisnotok (02/09/2014) [-]
Its only in some states. I'm in Illinois and it doesn't apply here.
Reply
+1
User avatar #36 to #35 - thunderchanter (02/09/2014) [-]
Illinois FTW(Not really though cuz it's ******* freezing where I am right now)
Reply
+1
#37 to #36 - gayisnotok (02/09/2014) [-]
Its going to get a lot of worse tomorrow
Reply
0
#118 to #15 - bann ONLINE (02/10/2014) [-]
If you meant the case though, I'm searching for it. If you don't hear back from me I couldn't find it, but I'll talk to the professor.
Reply
0
#117 to #15 - bann ONLINE (02/10/2014) [-]
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Common-law_marriage_in_the_United_States#New_Hampshire

Here yea go! it's only a few states that still do it, but here it is.
Reply
0
User avatar #100 to #15 - avatarvszelda (02/10/2014) [-]
I live in the states and I have heard of it. I think there is a (2?) year wait for us though
Reply
0
#25 to #15 - anon (02/09/2014) [-]
thats because he is full of ****
0
#17 to #15 - stocxt has deleted their comment [-]
Reply
+1
User avatar #19 to #17 - sirfapaton (02/09/2014) [-]
But... he didn't.
Reply
+1
User avatar #20 to #19 - stocxt (02/09/2014) [-]
OOOOHHHHHHHHH FUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK

my bad
Reply
+57
#10 - AnonymousDonor ONLINE (02/09/2014) [-]
yup. this is what you get for doing someone a favor and not demanding payment

Reply
+30
User avatar #43 - ipartywithpedobear (02/09/2014) [-]
>gets sued for childsupport
>"your honor, as i am apparantly the father figure now, i want to counter sue for full custody since she is an unfit parent"
>win legal battle
>get full custody of a child you have absolutely no relation with.

take that.
Reply
-2
User avatar #73 to #43 - Greevon (02/09/2014) [-]
>dump it in a pool of alligators because, why the **** not?
Reply
+4
User avatar #53 to #43 - youngneil ONLINE (02/09/2014) [-]
If you get full custody of the kid can you then drop him/her off at an orphanage or something?
Reply
+10
User avatar #55 to #53 - ipartywithpedobear (02/09/2014) [-]
idk, you can stop the other parent from seeing them though. youve essentially just legally kidnapped someone
Reply
+5
User avatar #79 to #55 - thelastamerican (02/10/2014) [-]
Then force her to pay child support.
Reply
0
User avatar #108 to #79 - newsuperyoshi (02/10/2014) [-]
I like you.
Reply
0
User avatar #112 to #108 - thelastamerican (02/10/2014) [-]
I like me too. We should hang out some time and talk about how awesome I am.
Reply
+2
#57 to #55 - DemonX (02/09/2014) [-]
You're my new favorite person.
You're my new favorite person.
Reply
+48
#7 - jakoblchaffin (02/09/2014) [-]
Hope she dies in a car accident too.
Reply
0
#13 to #7 - anon (02/09/2014) [-]
It was supposed to be her..... (sobbing) supposed to be her
Reply
+23
#18 - fantastick (02/09/2014) [-]
In what kind of a ****** up place is 'accepting a fatherly role' enough to determine this? That's even more mental than she is.
Reply
+1
#24 to #18 - capricarious (02/09/2014) [-]
Canada.
Yes. ******* .Canada.

This is why America should needs a dictatorship to put those moose humping,syrup drinking, healthcare faggots in their place.
Reply
0
#77 to #24 - anon (02/10/2014) [-]
Or to put those gun-toting, black people shooting, scumbag ultra-capitalists in their place.
See how that didn't make much sense? It's because it followed your model of comment.
Reply
0
#45 to #24 - ronyx (02/09/2014) [-]
inb4 Canadians
inb4 Canadians
Reply
+14
#48 - flufflepuff (02/09/2014) [-]
Comment Picture
Reply
+13
#9 - snakephallus ONLINE (02/09/2014) [-]
Reply
+8
User avatar #63 - respectyourmom (02/09/2014) [-]
someone should seriously call family and children services on this woman, the fact that she has custody of a child, and is this unintelligent, is appalling.
Reply
0
User avatar #78 to #63 - thelastamerican (02/10/2014) [-]
No, because then she'll get a reality TV show. Ever seen Honey Boo Boo?
Reply
0
User avatar #80 to #78 - respectyourmom (02/10/2014) [-]
oh jesus you're right... im surprised casey anthony doesnt have a reality show
Reply
0
User avatar #81 to #80 - thelastamerican (02/10/2014) [-]
Be careful what you call to attention of the public at large. Also, who is Casey Anthony?
Reply
0
User avatar #83 to #82 - thelastamerican (02/10/2014) [-]
I'm going to dislike this aren't I?
Reply
0
User avatar #84 to #83 - respectyourmom (02/10/2014) [-]
probably...
Reply
0
User avatar #90 to #84 - thelastamerican (02/10/2014) [-]
Yep. I see how this would make a lot of people mad. However, based on the evidence in the wiki if I were on a jury I wouldn't have been able to convict of murder. Gross endangerment, child neglect, lying to police, yes. But murder is a pretty high charge for so little evidence. Especially when the prosecution is seeking the death penalty.

On a whole I would say that I don't find Casey Anthony a most unsavory individual, and the case disgusting in the extreme.
Reply
+1
User avatar #91 to #90 - respectyourmom (02/10/2014) [-]
i completely disagree with your opinion, however i dont care enough to argue with you over this. Guilty or not, this is still a tragedy
Reply
0
User avatar #93 to #91 - thelastamerican (02/10/2014) [-]
I agree with you. But I just read the wiki, so I'm sure there is more I've not even looked at. A lack of facts blocks my ability to draw a conclusion here.
Reply
0
User avatar #95 to #93 - respectyourmom (02/10/2014) [-]
just curious.... how is your handle "thelastamerican" and you no nothing about this case... it makes me wonder... are you an american at all? or have you not watched any television in the past 10 years
Reply
0
User avatar #111 to #95 - thelastamerican (02/10/2014) [-]
I avoid sensationalized crimes. They tend to be far too publicly backed. People find themselves mindlessly clinging to one side or another regardless of facts that are presented. In my opinion court cases should not be covered by news to the degree that it is.
Reply
0
User avatar #113 to #111 - respectyourmom (02/10/2014) [-]
while i agree with you, i find it hard to avoid something that is literally plastered all over the country such as a little girl being murdered.
Reply
0
User avatar #115 to #113 - thelastamerican (02/10/2014) [-]
I really don't want this to sound as bad as it's going to, but it's going to sound bad no matter how I try and explain it.

Little girls and boys are murdered every single day in the US. The only reason that the media makes these stories big is because they know that they can get a rise out of their readers. If they thought that they would be able to sell more newspapers if they reported on anything else, they would report on that. What they need is a controversy. Something without a clearly defined right and wrong to stir up their readers. Whenever I'm listening to the radio, or watching TV and something so obviously manipulative comes on I just change the channel, or turn it off.
Reply
+8
User avatar #1 - leonhardt (02/09/2014) [-]
Man, I just ate. C'mon dude.
Reply
+6
#38 - broale (02/09/2014) [-]
Comment Picture
Reply
+15
User avatar #21 - avengerofthenight (02/09/2014) [-]
Everybody saying how this is "why they don't trust women"... This is the ******* Internet, this is a troll and a bad troll that jumps on the "effects of feminists" bandwagon to give some people who have nothing better to do something to complain about. I wouldn't be surprised if after half of posts like this one are men or just in general attention whores who want to cause a ********* . Funny how I see a lot of people on FJ complain about other users of the Internet not checking their sources and blindly believing any news they read, but as soon as it is comfortable for them they are just gonna accept that this was written by a real woman who really wants to get an innocent guy to pay child support for children that are obviously not his own. Really? Aren't the roles in this story a bit too black and white for you?
Woman: Obviously a cunt, trying to take advantage of a man, wants to get money for something evil and might or might not be a terrible mother, considering she is already a terrible person.
Guy: Doesn't even want to be paid to babysit, is described by the woman as a nice guy (sure, because she would post that), and is all over so innocent and lovely and is now tricked by this monster hyenna cunt of death.

I am not saying it is not possible that this is not in fact a true story, but I find it terribly unfair that people use this ******* yahoo post to demonize all women in general.

And now let the red thumbs roll in.
Reply
-1
User avatar #33 to #21 - timmywankenobi (02/09/2014) [-]
You seem to have forgotten Feminism does not equal Women or All Women. Feminism is a Ideology which has become completely corrupted and hypocritical so it is completely reasonable to be critical of it without criticizing women in general.
Reply
0
User avatar #44 to #33 - avengerofthenight (02/09/2014) [-]
How does that have to do anything with what I have said? I said this post was made by a stupid troll and people who already ride on the bandwagon use it to demonize women even further, because: Ah, evil cliché bitches are the doom of men.
Reply
0
User avatar #89 to #44 - timmywankenobi (02/10/2014) [-]
you implied anyone who critizes feminisim is critizing women.
Reply
0
#75 to #44 - anon (02/10/2014) [-]
No, just the doom of polite society.
Reply
0
#85 to #21 - lordraine ONLINE (02/10/2014) [-]
"I refuse to believe this isn't a troll because nobody can be this stupid or cruel."

Boy, have I got some bad news for you when you leave college.
Reply
+2
#59 to #27 - saetonchapelle (02/09/2014) [-]
Nothing about this even revolves around feminism...
Reply
+5
#46 to #27 - bbdabrick (02/09/2014) [-]
How is this about feminism?
Reply
0
User avatar #96 to #46 - unlithe (02/10/2014) [-]
a woman being psychotic is now classified as feminism
Reply
0
#106 to #96 - bbdabrick (02/10/2014) [-]
well i guess on this site thats true
Reply
+28
User avatar #8 - mrnpc (02/09/2014) [-]
This. This right here is why I don't trust women. Also false rape allegations.
Reply
0
#60 to #8 - anon (02/09/2014) [-]
Because, you know... all women are the same, right?
Reply
0
#64 to #60 - anon (02/09/2014) [-]
Are you suggesting that in an extremely large group of people you will find differences between each person?

What an enlightening piece of information and you have truly contributed something of value to the discussion by stating it.
Reply
+2
#29 to #8 - mca (02/09/2014) [-]
haha using false rape allegations as an excuse not to trust women
Reply
0
#51 to #29 - anon (02/09/2014) [-]
Considering the fact that you can't account for unreported rape, because, hey, IT'S UNREPORTED, these charts are ******** . They THINK that only 1 in 10 rapes are reported, but that is based off of literally no evidence whatsoever. It's completely made up, like most of the crap you hear feminists spewing out all over the place.
Reply
+1
#54 to #51 - mca (02/09/2014) [-]
Okay yea that's a more than valid point. The diagram is most likely exaggerated to its highest degree but i just don't like the "men get false accusations lots too" thing. Yes it happens, and when it does it's inexcusable, but when used as a counter to the women and rape thing the fear of being falsely accused simply doesn't match up to the fear of rape itself for women (even though that fear is often exaggerated also). i apologise greatly for posting a [very] ****** diagram
Reply
0
#58 to #54 - anon (02/09/2014) [-]
Okay, let me make this perfectly clear: rape is amongst the rarest crimes perpetrated, and by FAR the most commonly falsified. A man is, by SEVERAL orders of magnitude, more likely to help a woman than harm her in any way. There is no reason whatsoever for women to actively fear being raped by men in much the same way you and I do not constantly fear being struck by lightning when we go outside for a walk. It CAN happen, and it is a terrible thing, but... come on.

Society has placed rape on a pedestal as the worst thing anybody can do to anybody, which is just insane. There are far, far worse tortures that can be enacted. On top of that, again, it's extremely rare for a true rape to occur (I say true because the constant redefining of what a rape is has made the line very blurry indeed). As if that wasn't bad enough, there are all kinds of stupid special rules for rape cases that blow it even further out of proportion, while making it so we can't/don't punish false accusers.
Reply
+1
#62 to #58 - mca (02/09/2014) [-]
You sound like you're being very dismissive to rape in general man. UN came out with statistics however and for England and Wales the number of reported rapes per 100,000 each of the last two years has been in the high 60's which is not small enough a number to wave off like you're doing. It's an utterly morbid act that literally tears a piece of the victim out and leaves a gaping **** off hole (sorry for the dramatics) and the fact that people over exaggerate the statistics to "prove points" or simply wave the statistics away pisses me off man. I agree wholeheartedly with the punishment of false accusers and i can't really convey my anger over stories of actual proven false accusations.
Reply
0
#65 to #62 - anon (02/09/2014) [-]
You know, not very long ago the Australian Prime Minister went on television and publicly announced that 1 in 3 women will be beaten or raped in her lifetime.

They came to that number by counting every single woman who said "yes" in the survey to any question involving ANY kind of violence as somebody who was beaten/raped. In other words, people who said yes to being pushed at some point? Raped. Slapped? Beaten.

The hilarious part is, by skewing the statistics in precisely the same fashion, 2 out of 3 men would be counted, but not a peep came up about that.

I dismiss rape in general because the numbers we are provided by the authorities are inflated beyond imagining. It just does not happen that often. They want you to think it does because they profit from that delusion.

Again, it is terrible when it happens. I'm not suggesting that it isn't. I'm telling you that it is extremely rare and there are more important things to focus on.
Reply
0
#70 to #65 - mca (02/09/2014) [-]
Not really sure i see where the profit comes from in the manipulation of rape statistics but the statistics i'm quoting are reported rapes [can't clarify what number are proven+falsely accused so my argument here is very sloppy] that are in cases literally multiples of 60 greater than the same years' murder rates per 100,000. I'm not saying "shTU UP RPAIST SIMATHISER" or calling you a ********** but i just don't see adjusting those statistics aiding the UN in a justifiable way, would be another case if those stats came from a mental, what you guys call "femi-nazi", board.
Reply
0
#72 to #70 - anon (02/09/2014) [-]
I'm going to show you what you're doing right now. You have said twice now, that it is the number of REPORTED rapes. By throwing that statistic around, you and many others will mistakenly believe that the 60k rapes are all rapes, when they aren't. They are just reports. Of that 60k, some are going to end in convictions, some will be falsified, others lack sufficient evidence. We don't know what the proportions are for each, but we can state with confidence that substantially less than the announced 60k were actual rapes.

What happens is, feminist lobby groups will charge in screaming, "60k rapes happened and we were only able to convict X number! Rape culture! Misogyny!" People like you quoting that 60k figure feed the lie because people won't think far enough to realize that people lie about these things. Lobbyists get the support of the people, governments change policies to shut up the lobbyists and look good, lots of money is passed around, and innocent men wind up in jail.
Reply
-1
#40 to #29 - economic (02/09/2014) [-]
If women went to jail for crying rape about 1% of the "Rapists" in your little chart would be gone and those false rape black men down there would make up 90% of the chart if men had equal rights groups.

Also, most first world "rape" these days(for the most part) is a women who ****** an ugly guy and regrets it the next morning. So **** your little feminist ******** .
Reply
-1
User avatar #41 to #40 - economic (02/09/2014) [-]
%1
99%*

My bad
Reply
+1
#47 to #41 - mca (02/09/2014) [-]
No not really, if you apply error propagations encountered in the collection of those statistics you'd maybe see about +3 or 4 little black men. Yea women do deserve far worse penalties than they recieve now (which are next to non-existent) for false accusations but that chart is a pretty accurate representation of the number of actual rapists against those falsely accused. Simmer down son I see were you're coming from.
Reply
-1
User avatar #49 to #47 - economic (02/09/2014) [-]
Not really, just more feminist man hate. They're really do need to **** off and die.
In Europe all they can do is blame men for everything while demanding jobs because they've a vag.

Feminism is a joke.
Reply
-1
User avatar #50 to #49 - economic (02/09/2014) [-]
They*
**** it, I'm off to bed.
Reply
+3
User avatar #11 to #8 - megatrollinator (02/09/2014) [-]
This bitch does not deserve her Children. Their Father deserves to live, not her.
Reply
+3
User avatar #39 to #8 - chevah (02/09/2014) [-]
not all women are the same though.
Reply
0
User avatar #116 to #39 - mrnpc (02/10/2014) [-]
I know that. The problem is telling which ones will do **** like this.

Reply
+5
#28 to #8 - habanaro (02/09/2014) [-]
That makes me sad. I don't distrust all men because a small, small number are rapists or do abandon families. There's good women out there that do deserve trust, just like you deserve to meet them.
That makes me sad. I don't distrust all men because a small, small number are rapists or do abandon families. There's good women out there that do deserve trust, just like you deserve to meet them.
Reply
0
User avatar #31 to #28 - bodox (02/09/2014) [-]
he deserves to meet them? for all you know he could be one of those rapey, abandony guys
Reply
+1
User avatar #32 to #31 - habanaro (02/09/2014) [-]
True. I'd like to assume innocent until proven guilty, however.
Reply
0
#52 to #32 - anon (02/09/2014) [-]
Don't be a man in college then, because you'll get none of that treatment.
Reply
0
User avatar #69 to #52 - habanaro (02/09/2014) [-]
Considering I'm a woman in college and that's my attitude, then yes you will.
Reply
0
#74 to #69 - anon (02/10/2014) [-]
You, personally, can treat men like equals all you want. The faculty will not. Watch what happens to any male student accused of rape. Watch how fast he gets kicked out of school. Watch how much harassment he receives due to an accusation. Watch really closely to the ones who are proven innocent. Watch as they are not allowed back in the school, are not reimbursed for lost tuition, are continuously harassed.

But don't worry. It couldn't possibly happen to any of your male friends, right? Right? Those are the "good" men, and no woman would ever do something like lie about that kind of thing, right?
Reply
0
User avatar #76 to #74 - habanaro (02/10/2014) [-]
Obviously some women do that just like some men actually commit rapes. If my unviersity has had this happen they've kept it quiet in a small school (630 students) that absolutely thrive on gossip. I've seen both sides of this. In highschool there were girls who cried rape and actually were ignored-- it was brought up to the principle and they were told they were overreacting. I wasn't there so I can't say if they were telling the truth or not, but no students were kicked out of my school.
Another example was last summer when I worked at a coal mine where a woman called rape on a man, he was fired, and later it was found out she lied. She was fired, sued, they paid out the man who was fired and gave him his job back.

but justice doesn't exist, right? There can't possibly be decent human beings out there, right?
Reply
0
#86 to #76 - anon (02/10/2014) [-]
I can't comment much on anecdotes where I am missing most of the information, but I can say the man should not have been fired before being convicted. That is exactly the kind of "guilty before proven innocent" attitude I am talking about.

Fortunately (or unfortunately, depending on your outlook), there have been so many women crying the rape wolf for so many decades that society is starting to be very skeptical indeed. Policy has not kept pace, and many men have and are being punished needlessly. We'll see how far the pendulum swings back the other way.
Reply
0
#92 to #86 - habanaro (02/10/2014) [-]
The reason he was fired was because there had to be an immediate response, but yes it should have gone to court rather than to union.
I agree that policy has been skewed. The problem now is generalization. If all women cry false rape, then not only is it implied that all women are liars, but that anyone who has actually been raped won't be believed because of it. The despicable people who make **** up like that are only ******* it up for everybody. Men get blamed, women don't get taken seriously any more. Policy may not have caught up, but attitudes have. If I was ever raped I don't know if I'd be able to fight it because I wouldn't want everyone calling me a life destroying liar and ruining any shred of credibility I have/need for life I hope that this wouldn't be the case . At the same time, I hate the idea that dumb bitches can just make **** up and ruin lives. That's why things like the innocence project need more support.
tldr; bitches that cry rape **** **** up for everybody and should be culled. seriously, anyone that conniving doesn't deserve to be a part of society
Reply
+4
#67 - limb (02/09/2014) [-]
99 problems
99 problems
Reply
+4
User avatar #66 - thismustbeseen (02/09/2014) [-]
Burn her in fire.
Reply
+3
User avatar #97 - letting (02/10/2014) [-]
You can say that this a troll all you want, in fact it probably is, but that doesn't discredit the fact that there are women out there who think that this would be a great idea. And you can bet your ass I'm not going to be the friendly neighbor that gets sued for child support for babysitting somebody else's kids.

Don't trust women, simple.
Reply
0
#68 - anon (02/09/2014) [-]
These are the people that make me sad.
Reply
+3
#56 - orrihaa (02/09/2014) [-]
Jesus, some people!
Jesus, some people!
12>
[ 118 comments ]
Leave a comment
<
>
 Friends (0)