Bill Nye Bow Tie
| |
Anonymous comments allowed.
57 comments displayed.
#47 to #1
-
shoryuken (01/07/2016) [-] www.rapgrid.com/battles/url/smack-url-presents-math-hoffa-vs-dose-full-battle
they met again in 2014
they met again in 2014
#3 to #1
-
mrwalkerfour (01/06/2016) [-] prepares the deceased they do more than dress them, they also prep the body so its presentable,
such things as preparing the body for cremation, or embalming. transporting the body.
for open coffins they do things such as sewing the lips shut so the mouth doesnt gape open,, they apply makeup to get rid of the weird colours that dead people go while they begin decaying and it also means the peson looks more normal to the bereaved. they apply chemicals to mask the scent of the body, and they do also dress them
such things as preparing the body for cremation, or embalming. transporting the body.
for open coffins they do things such as sewing the lips shut so the mouth doesnt gape open,, they apply makeup to get rid of the weird colours that dead people go while they begin decaying and it also means the peson looks more normal to the bereaved. they apply chemicals to mask the scent of the body, and they do also dress them
#52 to #3
-
abesimpson (01/07/2016) [-] Also the people that own those business are ******* loaded. There's never going to be a shortage of dead people.
#54 to #52
-
mrwalkerfour (01/07/2016) [-] its good business but you have to have the stomach for it. its not always clean work. they have to deal with all kinds of dead, some dont die cleanly unfortunately.
#5 to #3
-
insanefreak (01/06/2016) [-]
Aside doing that, they're also in charge of making bodies look decent. Not all corpses are in a proper state, think of people dying in a crash. They sew it up, cover it with clothes, do as much as possible to let the family look at them the way they're supposed to look like.
#21 to #1
-
JimChillino ONLINE (01/07/2016) [-] FULL VERSION WITH BOTH PARTS
www.youtube.com/watch?v=R6H0i1RAdHk
www.youtube.com/watch?v=R6H0i1RAdHk
#39 to #33
-
twothreefivefive ONLINE (01/07/2016) [-] Credit to CeeJay Louis in the youtube comment section from www.youtube.com/watch?v=R6H0i1RAdHk
Hydrogen is the one in this webm.
HYDROGEN: Good evening. I would like to begin by introducing myself. My name is Hydrogen and I come from a low income neighborhood where life is not very comfortable. I've stolen many things, and have been involved in many altercations, most of which have ended in gunfire. In addition to this, I've had sexual intercourse with a great number of the opposite sex. In contrast, and despite the lack of legitimate evidence, I believe you to have been in a involved in a number of homosexual activities. Activities I, and my companions, look down upon. I am so much stronger than you and, my powers of rhetoric are so much greater than yours, that you can employ an army of some sort to aid in your fight with me; but I would of course prevail because I am stronger than you. I'm sure I needn't remind you of my place of birth where and, as as I explained before, the living conditions are much worse than in your aforementioned city of residence. I would like to stop here for a moment and remind you that I am in fact orating with little, or no, prior preparation, an act commonly referred to as "freestyling." Once again, and I think this bears repeating, I would like to restate my claim that I am, in fact, much stronger and, have endured a larger number of hardships then you. Hardships which have left me with an aggressive behavior and imposing demeanor which I believe frightens you. I know of a woman with whom you have had sexual intercourse. I, too, have had sexual intercourse with said woman and she complained to me of your less then exemplary performance in bed. She went on to explain to me in graphic details the dimensions and particulars of your genitals; and I tell you what she said was not very generous, Sir. In conclusion, I would like to leave you with a brief summary of my argument: you sir are a weak, timid, and untrustworthy homosexual. The city in which you live is not nearly as difficult to live in, nor is it in such a high state of disrepair as mine. I am superior monologist in this debate, and any claim to the contrary will result in physical violence, and perhaps even death.
BOOST: And a good day to you too, Sir. I would like to rebut your previous claims in a improvisational and rhythmic manner. I was given the name "Boost" by my peers. The alleged facts you have uncovered in regards to me are unfounded and without merit. My birthplace is not only vastly inferior to yours, but my neighbors are also much more resilient. In terms to your claim of my sexuality: Sigmund Freud theorized that, in some cases, the Semi-conscious mind manifests repressed desires therefore leading me to believe that you, Sir, are indeed the homosexual. In fact, I once had a romantic rendezvous with your biological mother; in which fellatio was performed forthwith, and without explanation. The encounter lasted several hours and many unspeakable acts were implemented. I paid her for her services and no subsequent contact, neither verbal nor physically, has been made. I brandish a 9 millimeter pistol in which I stole from a man involved in a gang related turf war. I fired the pistol several times and in some cases critically wounded those with whom I was in contest with. I would like to inform the audience that I engage in the sale and consumption of illegal narcotics on a regular basis. Speaking candidly; I am in no form Intimidated, or fearful, of your actions as I have been involved in countless altercations which have ended less than favorably. In summation, your argument denotes a lack of intellectual honestly on your part. It is my contention that this matter would best be solved with fisticuffs. I believe I will be victorious in this regard.
Hydrogen is the one in this webm.
HYDROGEN: Good evening. I would like to begin by introducing myself. My name is Hydrogen and I come from a low income neighborhood where life is not very comfortable. I've stolen many things, and have been involved in many altercations, most of which have ended in gunfire. In addition to this, I've had sexual intercourse with a great number of the opposite sex. In contrast, and despite the lack of legitimate evidence, I believe you to have been in a involved in a number of homosexual activities. Activities I, and my companions, look down upon. I am so much stronger than you and, my powers of rhetoric are so much greater than yours, that you can employ an army of some sort to aid in your fight with me; but I would of course prevail because I am stronger than you. I'm sure I needn't remind you of my place of birth where and, as as I explained before, the living conditions are much worse than in your aforementioned city of residence. I would like to stop here for a moment and remind you that I am in fact orating with little, or no, prior preparation, an act commonly referred to as "freestyling." Once again, and I think this bears repeating, I would like to restate my claim that I am, in fact, much stronger and, have endured a larger number of hardships then you. Hardships which have left me with an aggressive behavior and imposing demeanor which I believe frightens you. I know of a woman with whom you have had sexual intercourse. I, too, have had sexual intercourse with said woman and she complained to me of your less then exemplary performance in bed. She went on to explain to me in graphic details the dimensions and particulars of your genitals; and I tell you what she said was not very generous, Sir. In conclusion, I would like to leave you with a brief summary of my argument: you sir are a weak, timid, and untrustworthy homosexual. The city in which you live is not nearly as difficult to live in, nor is it in such a high state of disrepair as mine. I am superior monologist in this debate, and any claim to the contrary will result in physical violence, and perhaps even death.
BOOST: And a good day to you too, Sir. I would like to rebut your previous claims in a improvisational and rhythmic manner. I was given the name "Boost" by my peers. The alleged facts you have uncovered in regards to me are unfounded and without merit. My birthplace is not only vastly inferior to yours, but my neighbors are also much more resilient. In terms to your claim of my sexuality: Sigmund Freud theorized that, in some cases, the Semi-conscious mind manifests repressed desires therefore leading me to believe that you, Sir, are indeed the homosexual. In fact, I once had a romantic rendezvous with your biological mother; in which fellatio was performed forthwith, and without explanation. The encounter lasted several hours and many unspeakable acts were implemented. I paid her for her services and no subsequent contact, neither verbal nor physically, has been made. I brandish a 9 millimeter pistol in which I stole from a man involved in a gang related turf war. I fired the pistol several times and in some cases critically wounded those with whom I was in contest with. I would like to inform the audience that I engage in the sale and consumption of illegal narcotics on a regular basis. Speaking candidly; I am in no form Intimidated, or fearful, of your actions as I have been involved in countless altercations which have ended less than favorably. In summation, your argument denotes a lack of intellectual honestly on your part. It is my contention that this matter would best be solved with fisticuffs. I believe I will be victorious in this regard.
#42 to #24
-
anon (01/07/2016) [-]
Actually, doctor who was around in black and white. It was a thing before bill nye's time on air, and likely either of ours on earth. However, the referenced time period here is indeed far off, and quite frankly there's not much to be a fan of in the earliest Dr. Who pieces. They are quite boring.
I don't remember if he wore a bow tie in those though. I just remember it being very slow moving and anticlimactic.
I'm also assuming you already know this, because you said, "Bring Dr Who again." But I figured maybe I'd bring it up anyway since many here weren't aware that it has been around for quite a bit longer than most of us might expect.
TL;DR - It's actually been around for longer than Bill Nye's show, but that's an irrelevant piece of information in this case anyway.
I don't remember if he wore a bow tie in those though. I just remember it being very slow moving and anticlimactic.
I'm also assuming you already know this, because you said, "Bring Dr Who again." But I figured maybe I'd bring it up anyway since many here weren't aware that it has been around for quite a bit longer than most of us might expect.
TL;DR - It's actually been around for longer than Bill Nye's show, but that's an irrelevant piece of information in this case anyway.
#36 to #2
-
theguywhoaskswhy (01/07/2016) [-] Wow... Lotsa people hate Doctor Who.... If only I cared what other people thought of my obsessions.
#27 to #2
-
clownsplosion (01/07/2016) [-] Not that I'd ever dis the Doc, but this was rather forced. It'd be as if you posted a pony with a bow tie on just because a pony wore one once in the show. I also won't red-thumb you. Because you were at least sincerely making a joke
#40 to #27
-
theguywhoaskswhy (01/07/2016) [-] What do you mean "forced"? Like, the only thing that connected the clever, goofy science man and the other clever, goofy science man was the fact that they both wear bow ties?
#6 to #2
-
rockergamer (01/06/2016) [-] didn't think comparing science guy to doctor who would make me cringe this much
#8
-
PenguinsOfMars (01/06/2016) [-] what a ******* lie, that's not an undertaker, this is The Undertaker.
#20 to #8
-
wrestlingcomments (01/07/2016) [-]
Secretly he had him lay down for a very subtle 3-Count.
The undertaker is truly a monster physically, and a mastermind.
The undertaker is truly a monster physically, and a mastermind.
#14
-
fatminion (01/06/2016) [-] *bow-ties
one car, two cars
one apple, two apples
one bow-tie, two bow-ties
you NEVER EVER EVER EVER use apostrophes to denote pluralization. You only use them for contraction or to show posession:
The bow-tie belonging to Bill Nye = Bill Nye's bow tie.
Bill Nye is the one who owns the bow-tie = Bill Nye's the one who owns the bow-tie.
one car, two cars
one apple, two apples
one bow-tie, two bow-ties
you NEVER EVER EVER EVER use apostrophes to denote pluralization. You only use them for contraction or to show posession:
The bow-tie belonging to Bill Nye = Bill Nye's bow tie.
Bill Nye is the one who owns the bow-tie = Bill Nye's the one who owns the bow-tie.
#22
-
anon (01/07/2016) [-]
I've heard this story being retold like 4 different ways, but basically the same punchline. Nye is ************ .
