Upload
Login or register
x

Beware of the Trollski

tatt, Russian Embassy. ( at at may
Just imagine UK media headlines if Russian
President called a leading opposition party
threat to national security?
l -Linn
The Labour Party is now threat to our
national security, our economic security and
your family' s security.
499 219
4: 05 PM - San 2015
I David Cameron
...
+259
Views: 13168
Favorited: 4
Submitted: 09/15/2015
Share On Facebook
submit to reddit +Favorite Subscribe to ivroht

Comments(57):

Leave a comment Refresh Comments Show GIFs
Anonymous comments allowed.
57 comments displayed.
User avatar #1 - voltkills (09/15/2015) [-]
but jeremy corbyn totally IS a threat, he wants to get friendly with terrorist groups, he wants out of NATO, wants to get rid of trident, wants to slash military funding. He called the death of osama a "tragedy". His shadow chancellor wants to nationalize pretty much every service he can get his hands on (rail, power, gas, internet). Corbyn is in a fairytale land, despite winning 60% of the party vote, he is definitely not supported by a majority of labour MPs, and i doubt they will allow him to fight the 2020 without someone challenging his leadership.
User avatar #38 to #1 - cuntism (09/15/2015) [-]
Trident is a funds black hole. It's not stopping anyone.

"Shall we attack UK today ?"
"Nah, I mean, not because of the US and NATO forces protecting them, who are obligated to respond in kind..but because of their nuclear subs that aren't even out to sea most of the time"

The trident fleet is outdated

The rest, I don't have an opinion on/don't know enough about, but to give an opinion on face - Out of NATO is retarded, saying it's a shame Osama is dead is understandable from a liberal standpoint (not my own, just..understandable). Military cuts I am totally with, soldiers are cunts in the UK, literally every single one of em I've known have been arseholes. Jokes aside though we don't really need to spend so much on military, we're being forced to by US.

Nationalization is dumb. Part way maybe, but not total. We need tighter controls for sure
#40 to #38 - dakkadakka (09/16/2015) [-]
>24 hour nuclear deterrent
>Not a deterrent
Pick one you dumb **** .
If you think nukes aren't a deterrent you're delusional.
User avatar #54 to #40 - cuntism (09/16/2015) [-]
Also the line about it being a deterrent was a joke, it was sarcasm saying why would anyone be scared of trident when it's not even out to sea most hte time.

You dumb ****
User avatar #53 to #40 - cuntism (09/16/2015) [-]
Yeah because those ******* were really scared when they wasted the twin towers and half of london.
User avatar #45 to #38 - reginleif ONLINE (09/16/2015) [-]
So let me get this straight, because the US is "obligated" to protect the UK, you want to slack on your already piss poor defense?

Limey ***** .
User avatar #56 to #38 - voltkills (09/16/2015) [-]
if UK had no nukes, and russia nuked us, if would be unlikely any country would nuke russia back, becuase of the fear of getting nuked by russia themsleves.
User avatar #57 to #56 - cuntism (09/16/2015) [-]
I go by the "nobody gives a toss about us" school of thought
#44 to #1 - broorb (09/16/2015) [-]
everyone deserves a fair trial
User avatar #2 to #1 - platinumaltaria ONLINE (09/15/2015) [-]
Please read a book. Any book. So long as it isn't Conservative propaganda. It would do you some good.
If you aren't liberal, that's fine, but don't misrepresent someone's platform.
User avatar #3 to #2 - voltkills (09/15/2015) [-]
HE is very clear he wants out of NATO, very very clear.
He is very clear he wants rid of trident.
HE is very clear he is in favor of nationalizing many more services
so eerr, which part am i "misinterpreting"
#31 to #3 - bigmanblue ONLINE (09/15/2015) [-]
as far as nationalizing services go how is that a bad thing?
the post office was national untile the conservatives sold it, prices tripled within a few months
the rail service was national untile the conservatives sold it, prices are now the highest in europe by a huge margin
basically what im getting at is when these services were nationalized, they were MUCH much better
User avatar #4 to #3 - platinumaltaria ONLINE (09/15/2015) [-]
Calling osama's death a tragedy; literally no one is stupid enough to say that, context aside.
And no one is "friendly" with terrorists; that's kind of the point.
User avatar #5 to #4 - voltkills (09/15/2015) [-]
www.telegraph.co.uk/news/politics/Jeremy_Corbyn/11834653/Jeremy-Corbyn-calls-death-of-Osama-bin-Laden-a-tragedy.html

www.channel4.com/news/jeremy-corbyn-i-wanted-hamas-to-be-part-of-the-debate

Do some research, he thinks osama should have been put on trail instead of killed, makes sense, but still, use of the word tragedy is kinda dumb. He also has spoken at the same conferences as many high profile hamas and hezbollah supporters and leaders and has called them friends. Yes the tories take this out of context, but its still very clear he is much more sympathetic to muslim extremist groups than he should be.
User avatar #6 to #5 - platinumaltaria ONLINE (09/15/2015) [-]
Ok; what he's saying is that it was effectively murder to kill someone without trial, which is correct. Now, no one is saying that he shouldn't be killed, but to deny trial is almost inhuman.

And of course you should listen to insurgents; if you don't address their concerns they aren't going to go away. If you don't allow someone to speak, it suggests that you fear what they might say; effectively you let the terrorists win.
User avatar #7 to #6 - voltkills (09/15/2015) [-]
I dont recall but im pretty sure osama was holding an AK when they found him, you would put the lives of US soldiers at risk just to try capture one of the most inhuman pieces of **** ever?
annd no. You think we can make peace, you think we can appease these terrorists? in what world do you live in, becuase it damn sure isnt this one.
User avatar #19 to #7 - elyiia (09/15/2015) [-]
If it were possible, I'd have preferred that Osama was caught, tried and executed. It's not that I think he's innocent, it's that I think that the right to a fair trial is a human right. Obviously it wasn't probable, but it would have been better.
User avatar #20 to #19 - voltkills (09/15/2015) [-]
except he would not have been executed, being an international criminal he would have been tried by the ICC, and the max sentence is life in prison, a prison which would probably be nicer than the house he was living in in pakistan.
User avatar #8 to #7 - platinumaltaria ONLINE (09/15/2015) [-]
It's important, with all atrocities, to remember that the people who committed them were just that; people.
Of course we can appease terrorists, no one is going around killing for no reason. If you don't at least hear their concerns, killing them isn't going to make any difference.
User avatar #9 to #8 - voltkills (09/15/2015) [-]
so you want to give ISIS all of syra and iraq and let millions more die or be displaced? you want to let hamas have the land they want in isreal? you want to let boko-haram have their own sharia state in africa?
User avatar #10 to #9 - platinumaltaria ONLINE (09/15/2015) [-]
No? I want to actually hear what they want, and facilitate as best is possible. I don't see any reason why anyone has to die for the world to be better.
User avatar #11 to #10 - voltkills (09/15/2015) [-]
but i just stated exactly what each group wants..
User avatar #12 to #11 - platinumaltaria ONLINE (09/15/2015) [-]
Then either find a middle ground, or divide the nation's land between the parties.
User avatar #13 to #12 - voltkills (09/15/2015) [-]
there is no middle ground with groups like ISIS.. so divide the land then? any land controlled by ISIS is a blight on the human race as a whole, the land they run is run by a brutal set of laws, non muslims are either oppressed almost of the point of slavery, or killed, muslims must conform to the strictest of sharia law. How on earth can you justify letting millions of innocents suffer just to save the lives of murderes, rapists and criminals?
User avatar #14 to #13 - platinumaltaria ONLINE (09/15/2015) [-]
a) North Korea continues to exist regardless of it's blatant human rights violations.
b) I would argue that anyone is human, regardless of what they are doing. We can't just kill people we don't like, that's what they do.
c) Some other third thing
User avatar #15 to #14 - voltkills (09/15/2015) [-]
north korea has nukes, and is an officially recognized state, and despite all its talk it poses very little threat to international security, ISIS on the other hand, dont only want their islamic state, they want to see the fall of the west (as they themselves have claimed many times) and would no doubt start doing terror attacks on the west.
So what you are saying is, the life of an innocent is equally valuable to that of a murderer and rapist? and we should not protect those innocents, like at all, becuase we might hurt the nice rapist?
User avatar #16 to #15 - platinumaltaria ONLINE (09/15/2015) [-]
North Korea is only recognised because china has everyone's balls in a vice. And they definitely want to destroy america at least.

Everyone's life has equal value, everyone is capable of the same atrocity. It's about circumstance, not just some people being evil.
User avatar #17 to #16 - voltkills (09/15/2015) [-]
I agree, it is about circumstance, but that doesnt make the actions of ISIS any less forgivable, and doesnt mean we should let innocent women and children DIE just to protect members of ISIS, thats insane. What about back here in the UK? should we not arrest rapists, becuase, you know, it was just circumstance that lead them to brutally rape that kid, they arent actually a bad person, so, lets not bother putting them in jail.
User avatar #18 to #17 - platinumaltaria ONLINE (09/15/2015) [-]
We should invest our time into rehab, not just locking them in a box for a bit. Imprisonment, or in the case of isis, death, is clearly not a big enough motivator to stop them. Half the time, people start sounding like terrorists when they try and combat it.
#21 to #18 - ivroht [OP](09/15/2015) [-]
Get a room, you two.
User avatar #22 to #21 - platinumaltaria ONLINE (09/15/2015) [-]
I think he's straight though.
#27 to #22 - ivroht [OP](09/15/2015) [-]
Ok.
#23 to #22 - ivroht [OP](09/15/2015) [-]
Yeah. And you're female.

What ya need? Instructions?
User avatar #26 to #21 - platinumaltaria ONLINE (09/15/2015) [-]
>>#25 I have no idea what that means
User avatar #24 to #21 - platinumaltaria ONLINE (09/15/2015) [-]
>>#22 I'm not though
User avatar #25 to #24 - ivroht [OP](09/15/2015) [-]
Oops! Yeah, that's not gonna work.

Is it going to have to be Marquis of Queensberry Rules, then?
#48 to #5 - noonelikesdan (09/16/2015) [-]
>Telegraph
>Channel 4

******* Conservative propaganda **** lords.
User avatar #55 to #48 - voltkills (09/16/2015) [-]
they where litterally the first links i found, its on pretty much every news site.
User avatar #43 to #1 - recoveryone (09/16/2015) [-]
Afghanistan War, Helmand British Troops Call In 4 x 2000lb Bomb Airstrike I think our British friends across the pond already have a very effective way of dealing with insurgents...
#29 to #1 - borderlineparanoid ONLINE (09/15/2015) [-]
hold the phone.

that ***** wants to get rid of our nukes?!

this mad man must be stopped.
User avatar #30 - sonsofsol ONLINE (09/15/2015) [-]
Because Putin just has popular opposition politician shot or put in jail.
User avatar #33 to #30 - pirateseatcarrots (09/15/2015) [-]
I find funny about who everyone has a way to deal with political opponents the west has defacement Russia has less than likely "natural causes" mid east has no opposition can't oppose if you don't or can't exist North Korea has AA gun. Ah politics one way or another you die
#37 - gowge (09/15/2015) [-]
MFW funnyjunk is filled with right wing Tories
User avatar #28 - robertolee (09/15/2015) [-]
Corbyn definitely has a screw loose, yet he has this huge amount of support but some pretty major MPs in his own party are aware even he is abit crazy.

A lot of people hate the conservatives and I think it is all down to the Thatcher years, these ******* need to get a grip.
#32 to #28 - bigmanblue ONLINE (09/15/2015) [-]
its nopt just thatcher, cameron is ******* a lot of things up too, not to mention lieing out his ass about everything
and how in any way does corbyn have "a screw loose"?
User avatar #34 to #32 - robertolee (09/15/2015) [-]
Cameron is ******* things up? We have a largest economic growth in the EU right now, millions more have jobs, less idiots on benefits, hundreds of thousands now have homes and young people are getting on the property ladder (around 98,000), minimum wage is increasing to £9+ over the next 5 years and is raising the tax threshold to £12,000+.

Cameron has done more for me and my family than ******* labour has ever done.

Corbyn has a screw loose because he's got pretty much unrealistic expectations and I really don't want to live in a welfare state and over powered unions like in the 70's.
#46 to #34 - noonelikesdan (09/16/2015) [-]
No we ******* don't stop eating their ******** propaganda you stupid twat. Cameron doesn't care about you or your family, all he cares about is the money that the big corporations are slipping in his pocket.
User avatar #47 to #46 - robertolee (09/16/2015) [-]
You spew that ******** and you think I'm the one reading propaganda?
#49 to #47 - noonelikesdan (09/16/2015) [-]
******** ? You're funny, If you really cared about the state of this country why is he getting rid of everything that makes the country stable? why is he making cuts to public services? Why is he increasing tax on the poor and lowering it on the rich? why is he giving himself and a majority of the conservative party a pay rise? Why does he want to leave the EU, the only thing that will keep this country from sinking? He refuses to help the homeless and the desperately poor, other than food banks. The Conservatives have never done **** for your family. You family did **** for themselves, the Conservatives never had anyhing to do with that.

INB$ "my family are self employed and have their own buisnesses" That has **** all to do with the Con artists.
User avatar #50 to #49 - robertolee (09/16/2015) [-]
Cuts to public services are required
Tax hasn't been increased on the poor, you're thinking of the bedroom tax, tax has been reduced. The tax bracket was at just over 8000 4 years ago, now its over 10,000 and moving to 12,000 in the next few years, meaning you will have more money in your pocket every single month.
He is lowering inheritance tax which affects every single person and lowering corporation tax which will directly stimulate economic growth and attract investment, creating more jobs in the private sector.
Politicians do not decide their own wages, it is done by a third party group and they are still amongst the lowest paid in Europe.

Not only has my father managed to get a much better job due to new investments in the shipyards, my mother now gets frequent bonuses working in banking but I got my brother on the property ladder with his help to buy scheme.

He also doesn't want to leave the EU so I have no idea where that is coming from, he is just offering the people a choice like a good leader should.

You were probably just brought up in an area that loves UKIP or Labour and doesn't vote otherwise so you automatically have this negative opinion of the conservatives just like your parents, you're probably also in university and quite young, below 22, and love to lick Corbyns sweaty balls.
#52 to #50 - noonelikesdan (09/16/2015) [-]
Cuts to public services are not required at all, that's complete ******** .
Tax has been increased, by 12% and lowered by 12% respectively
Bedroom tax is not necessary, it forces people out of their homes, not just young adults but entire families.
Inheritance tax was never a big issue and lowering corporation tax is absurd, it's not going to make anyone want to invest more than beforehand while it's just letting companies keep more money, which will only end up benefitting said company.

I doubt that the shipyard investment was caused by the tories and your mother works in a bank, using a calculator doesn;t mean that she deserves bonuses at all, especially when all these higher up bankers give themselves bonuses all the time.

He did want to leave the EU, he wanted to bring back the old trade regulations so that we would gain an insignificant number of profit from trade which would then lose us a lot of trade because some countries wouldn't be able to afford it.

Actually I was brought up in a Lib Dem area, almost everyone here works in manual labour and no one around here likes Labour, a few like the Tories, but they're all English or they have this superiority complex and no one likes them. My uncle is a Tory, nobody likes him, he has his own company, nobody likes working for him, he thinks that now the Tories are back in power his company won't go bust, it's pitiful.

I'm 22 finished university, have a stable job and income, I was earning more a couple of years ago than I am now. I also didn't have to worry about my grandparents in their old age back then, or my father who has to stay in hospital every now and then. My cousin who can barely walk now has to try and find work that he can't do.

And I can say the same about you, you're probably 26-28. Brought up in a well off area where most people don;t have to worry about if they can afford their weekly shop. Everyone near you votes Conservative, you went into the property ladder to try and make some big bucks, but it wasn;t all that profitable beforehand, but now the Tories are in it's a "gold mine" when someone can actually afford to buy a property. You also clearly enjoy burying your nose in Cameron's ****** arse waiting to sniff out your next meal.
#51 to #50 - noonelikesdan (09/16/2015) [-]
Cuts to public services are not required at all, that's complete ******** .
Tax has been increased, by 12% and lowered by 12% respectively
Bedroom tax is not necessary, it forces people out of their homes, not just young adults but entire families.
Inheritance tax was never a big issue and lowering corporation tax is absurd, it's not going to make anyone want to invest more than beforehand while it's just letting companies keep more money, which will only end up benefitting said company.

I doubt that the shipyard investment was caused by the tories and your mother works in a bank, using a calculator doesn;t mean that she deserves bonuses at all, especially when all these higher up bankers give themselves bonuses all the time.

He did want to leave the EU, he wanted to bring back the old trade regulations so that we would gain an insignificant number of profit from trade which would then lose us a lot of trade because some countries wouldn't be able to afford it.

Actually I was brought up in a Lib Dem area, almost everyone here works in manual labour and no one around here likes Labour, a few like the Tories, but they're all English or they have this superiority complex and no one likes them. My uncle is a Tory, nobody likes him, he has his own company, nobody likes working for him, he thinks that now the Tories are back in power his company won't go bust, it's pitiful.

I'm 22 finished university, have a stable job and income, I was earning more a couple of years ago than I am now. I also didn't have to worry about my grandparents in their old age back then, or my father who has to stay in hospital every now and then. My cousin who can barely walk now has to try and find work that he can't do.

And I can say the same about you, you're probably 26-28. Brought up in a well off area where most people don;t have to worry about if they can afford their weekly shop. Everyone near you votes Conservative, you went into the property ladder to try and make some big bucks, but it wasn;t all that profitable beforehand, but now the Tories are in it's a "gold mine" when someone can actually afford to buy a property. You also clearly enjoy burying your nose in Cameron's ****** arse waiting to sniff out your next meal.
#39 - youhaveshamedyofam (09/16/2015) [-]
**youhaveshamedyofam used "*roll picture*"**
**youhaveshamedyofam rolled image**
#35 - anon (09/15/2015) [-]
I don't need to.

Your headlines won't list anything, the mafia control your entire country. Everything is corrupt in Russia.
#42 - owmyballs (09/16/2015) [-]
good propaganda m80s
#41 - anon (09/16/2015) [-]
Tv media doesn't even can show non-system opposition on tv and Putin calls them thieves all the time.
#36 - donated (09/15/2015) [-]
That moment when Labour is literally ran by "Tom & Jerry"
 Friends (0)