Oh, well... never mind then. See above comment. I was looking at something else before I actually posted that. I kind of forgot about it until I saw something related.
Yea but again, he was the one that lost the plot. I'd do the exact same thing. And personally I'd want to know if a dude suffered from prejaculation, bit of a dealbreaker.
Why would that be a dealbreaker? He could be totally charming in every other way, but you'd dump him because of a medical problem instead of working through it?
40% yes, 40% it depends how good he was in other facets of sex and 20% what's his opinion on meds.
But mainly yes, yea. Think of it like you met this women who was lovely, she made you lunch to take to work (assuming you work) every morning, loved all the shows and music you love, does a lot of nice things for you etc etc.. but she also was completely disgusted by dicks and refused to touch yours. Dealbreaker, right?
It's not the same thing. A guy with premature ejaculation can still please his woman in other ways. It doesn't mean he's allergic to pussy, he just can't last very long. But if he's able to stimulate her in other ways, either before or after, I don't see it totally killing their sex life. A chick who refused to go near my dick isn't even willing to try, so it's not the same thing.
That's where the '40% on how good he was in other facets of sex' comes from. Also I meant in a 'won't blow you or jerk you, but would missonary you in the dark under a blanket' kind of way.
It's not.. the lack of pleasure that's the dealbreaker, because there's always other kinds of pleasure. It's the fact that it completely ruins the atmosphere/passion/etc. You couldn't have a 'heat of the moment' experience with her.