Best damn majic trick
| |
Anonymous comments allowed.
36 comments displayed.
#20 to #16
-
cognosceteipsum ONLINE (01/07/2016) [-] At least it's funny unlike 90% of your cringe comps that just have really tame stuff.
#24 to #22
-
cognosceteipsum ONLINE (01/07/2016) [-] Provocation? More like opinion. Checked out the destroy faith thing, I had either seen them before or wasn't phased by them . The necrophilia thing was kinda gross at first but there's a first time for everything
#27 to #24
-
joekerr (01/07/2016) [-] The way you are voiced your opinion was provoking. Another time and I would have loved to do some internet-hissy-fit, but ... dunno ... doesn't appeal to me. Not when you defended 9gag-reposting-and-advertisment, I guess that's disqualified you for being treated as a person one should respect in my eyes.
You have to keep stuff in SFW tame, as there's lots of silly rules that can get you banned. Still leaves the Cringe **** stuff?
That necrophilia thing is fake btw.
You have to keep stuff in SFW tame, as there's lots of silly rules that can get you banned. Still leaves the Cringe **** stuff?
That necrophilia thing is fake btw.
#29 to #27
-
cognosceteipsum ONLINE (01/07/2016) [-] Lol, I'm rather sure a lot of things do that for you considering the low bar of which is set for you to make it in a cringe comp. I don't care where it comes from. It isn't really advertising as much as showing that it came from 9gag.9gag is a site like any other, you can't rally compare fj, 9gag and 4chan because they are so vastly different in usage, interface and community.
I'll check it out just not now. GOTTA go back to sleep.
I'll check it out just not now. GOTTA go back to sleep.
#31 to #29
-
joekerr (01/07/2016) [-] Look, I don't disagree with you calling those cringe-comp.s tame, I don't get what you are trying to prove, besides being some edgelord.
9gag is, very much like FJ, an aggregating website, with the repost machine being turned on and profiting from every other site out there.
The chans are image boards, which FJ kinda is, too, but naturally hardly to compare to 9gag.
They "look" different, but what makes the largest differences are the demographics that actually use them. The worst thing one could do is do advertise for 9gag voluntarily though. If you were interested into the "why", well, you'll quickly find the reddit post that explained the repost-machine back in the day. Then you should look a little deeper on how they create their revenue and stuff. If you then remember the financial troubles of this site, I daresay speaking for leaving *that* watermark in content or even linking to the "source" is quite contra-productive.
Good night.
9gag is, very much like FJ, an aggregating website, with the repost machine being turned on and profiting from every other site out there.
The chans are image boards, which FJ kinda is, too, but naturally hardly to compare to 9gag.
They "look" different, but what makes the largest differences are the demographics that actually use them. The worst thing one could do is do advertise for 9gag voluntarily though. If you were interested into the "why", well, you'll quickly find the reddit post that explained the repost-machine back in the day. Then you should look a little deeper on how they create their revenue and stuff. If you then remember the financial troubles of this site, I daresay speaking for leaving *that* watermark in content or even linking to the "source" is quite contra-productive.
Good night.
#21 to #20
-
joekerr (01/07/2016) [-]
You may take a wild guess why I dropped that stuff a few months ago if you haven't read the reasoning, that'd be cheating.
Also, as much as humor is subjective, the intention of posting cringe compilations was more of the "junk" part in "funnyjunk", but, which is, as stated above, _subjective, I find this piece of content not really funny either.
Also, as much as humor is subjective, the intention of posting cringe compilations was more of the "junk" part in "funnyjunk", but, which is, as stated above, _subjective, I find this piece of content not really funny either.
#23 to #21
-
cognosceteipsum ONLINE (01/07/2016) [-] I've no idea, I always skipped them, but you kept at it for what, 60 comps, that's something. There isn't enough cringe to actually fit in 60 10~ pictures worth of comps. Inflation man.
I always thought junk was the overall ****** stuff with no quality.
I always thought junk was the overall ****** stuff with no quality.
#25 to #23
-
joekerr (01/07/2016) [-] I could easily have continued doing it, even if people would have started behaving. There's just that much autistic degenerates out there. Inflation? Damn, I wish there was one, or else people wouldn't have liked it that much. I'm not really planning on going into the numbers, as I heavily doubt those details interest you, well, except if you'd explicitly ask for them. This is just provocation again, isn't it?
I guess one's approach to this site's name is as subjective as what kind of people would call "funny" or "junk", but even so, I doubt you wouldn't call content with cringe-humour in it junk.
I guess one's approach to this site's name is as subjective as what kind of people would call "funny" or "junk", but even so, I doubt you wouldn't call content with cringe-humour in it junk.
#26 to #25
-
cognosceteipsum ONLINE (01/07/2016) [-] Nope, never was provocation. There are certain things that just reach the front page zone so to speak, meaning they will be front paged no matter what.
Well, for me it's junk because of the quality. I've seen good cringe. A lot of your pics are pushing it.
Well, for me it's junk because of the quality. I've seen good cringe. A lot of your pics are pushing it.
#28 to #26
-
joekerr (01/07/2016) [-] Only content that doesn't reach frontpage is content that sucks hard. Srsly.
I never really got the average number pictures down, but it steadily increased ... first 10 might have had an average of 11-13 and the last 10 like 30.
There's a lots of reasons why some files (it wasn't just images) are "pushing" it. For instance I had varied with the intensity of the shock value, as to reduce the "numbing" effect seeing a lot of that kind of stuff has. Another would be me intentionally putting stuff in there that isn't cringeworthy just to see what the reaction would be some people cringed, other ridiculed and others protested in my choice , that ofc would be pushing it.
I never really claimed of doing a "good" cringe-compilation series, that was never the goal. Only some effort of making it less dull, but, as you should have guessed by now, not something I liked doing. That's why there's 10 other compilation serieses done by a similiar m.o.
I never really got the average number pictures down, but it steadily increased ... first 10 might have had an average of 11-13 and the last 10 like 30.
There's a lots of reasons why some files (it wasn't just images) are "pushing" it. For instance I had varied with the intensity of the shock value, as to reduce the "numbing" effect seeing a lot of that kind of stuff has. Another would be me intentionally putting stuff in there that isn't cringeworthy just to see what the reaction would be some people cringed, other ridiculed and others protested in my choice , that ofc would be pushing it.
I never really claimed of doing a "good" cringe-compilation series, that was never the goal. Only some effort of making it less dull, but, as you should have guessed by now, not something I liked doing. That's why there's 10 other compilation serieses done by a similiar m.o.
#30 to #28
-
cognosceteipsum ONLINE (01/07/2016) [-] I'm on the phon, I won't be able to remember the entire comment while typing my own so I'll wait until I get on comp tomorrow
#33 to #32
-
cognosceteipsum ONLINE (01/07/2016) [-] More like "don't throw bricks in a glass house"
