Why so edgy? Calm down.. and for the record it's actually a .png. ' **** eating wank'
Also (for thematthew and anyone else wondering) the reason you see white when you click is because it has a transparent background. So it takes whatever color its being posted on as the background.
I mean, I remember he was a pretty controlling and jealous guy. He was so much of an asshole that his girlfriend actually fell in love with a talking bee.
You are now aware of your own awareness. and the weight of your jaw. and your tongue. and your nose peeking at the corner of your vision. and your breathing and that you're a masochist, since you keep opening these spoilers.
**froglordy used "*roll picture*"** **froglordy rolled image** I already do this all the time, however it's trying to get others to take the red pill that's difficult.
I honestly don't know. I liked the first one, haven't watched the second. Dreamworks has quite a few gems in between the cracks. I would say this and Flushed Away are two of them. Though, with all of HTTYD's spin off materials, you could say it's their money printer. Not to say the original material is lessened by it.
Basically, Jeffrey Katzenberg was the chairman of Walt Disney Studios. He quit after he was refused a promotion. He took over Dreamworks Animation. And supposedly stole the idea of Antz from Pixar after a conversation with John Lasseter.
But both movies have been critically acclaimed, and the differences outway the similarities, such as how antz revolves around how ants interact with other insects (such as termites) and a bug's life deals with many different bugs and well, their lives.
I liked both at different times, but I've gone back to A Bug's Life more often. Studios compete like this all the time today, guess this is just another example of it.
so i rewatched it yesterday night, and it is a lot funnier than I remember, but i think what puts me off is it's animation style. Not saying A Bug's Life's animation is amazing, but I think Antz hits that valley between cartoon and realistic that either is really good or really bad. And for them it's bad.
yea the animation and art style are really stuck in uncanny valley, especially the bees. But i think the humor wins out over the weirdness of the art style
dreamworks know how to create human characters.
hence why pixar typically doesnt like having humans in their movies, and if they do, theyre only there for a short time. (and then there is wall-e, which doesnt even need humans to have proper dimensions, so everyone just looks like a pink baymax.)
i mean have you seen toy story's humans? they look ugly as fuq.
Her backstory is once she became president of the home owners association she reinvested her large sums of money into building affordable suburban housing at the cost of clear cutting and bulldozing large quantities of forest WITHOUT permission from the EPA.
The EPA gave her a specific amount of land to use but with the help of absurdly exaggerated photoshop 10 acres of land ended up being 10,000 acres of land and she gleefully laughed as every last trees was cut down
I know this because this got explained in the really ****** video games. Her goal is to destroy all nature and pave it into an industrial sized utopia that fits her specific criteria.
That's really sad to be honest. My college gets comedians every now and then, and they don't care about getting the ones who aren't PC. I'd say for some it might be budgets and things like that.
That's really disappointing. Colleges should be places of open-mindedness and free exchange of ideas. Instead they're money pits full of overly-sensitive closed-minded people who are just there because of some vague promise of future employment.