Choose one. Being one of these enraged cunts does not require any level of intelligence. Just being able to flame on at everything that barely got a appearance of sexual injustice, without trying to investigate further.
the problem isn't that they don't understand supply and demand, the problem is they insist that their supply and that of the male leage are the exact same and say that the demand should be equal between the two since the supply is the same. Imagine if you will that it's a hot day and you and I are both selling water at the same price however my water is warm and yours is cold. When people rush to buy the water they all rush to your stand because they want cold water and a few go to my stand to avoid the crowd, and instead of trying to figure out a way to cool my water down I sit there shouting that we're both selling water and everyone's going to his stand because they really hate me. that's how they've twisted their logic, they understand supply and demand they just refuse to admit there's a difference in what's supplied and therefore refuse to accept the difference in demand is anything other than a subtle hate of women.
God, her logic and flow of the entire arguement and resolution is a ******* key reason whyI listen. Logic based, factual and it almsot seems like she wants to hear out both sides, and agrees with what is truly right, rather than what is "proposed to be" correct
>be woman
>be prostitute
>raised in ****** environment, no education, no marketeable skills
>last john beat me ugly and children went hungry for a month
>finally get some r & r and turn on tv
>see people complaining about women on a NATIONAL SPORTS TEAM not getting paid enough and how it's a result of sexism
**anonymous used "*roll picture*"** **anonymous rolled image**Women make more money in porn and models. They drastically get paid more than men in multiple fields. But it only counts when it's women not making the same
i have never really gotten the pay gap debate in the first place...its just too general of a thing to argue for. For me it has to be case by case, if for example a women and man in the same profession worked the same hours and did the saem job yet one of them got payed less....then yes there would be a pay gap. But those who argue that the pay gap exists clump together so many proffessions and facotrs that i dont even know where to begin in dissecting the info.
Getting paid to kick a ball around.
might as well disrespect men.
i should get my little cousin to preach to the news that adults get paid to play soccer while kids cant.
So from what I've seen of based mom I agree with what she says overall, but from what I've seen of her she mostly discredits crazy third wave mumbo jumbo. And I'm just wondering, does she cover any subjects that actually are unfair/unreasonable to women. I'm far from informed on the subject so I don't really know whats out there. But in general does she cover actual female oppression in the first world aswell? for what little if any there is
That's precisely the thing. First-world societal oppression is no longer on women, not in any general sense to anyone with a mind to think for themself. The things they complain about are actually perpetrated by such a small number of people, male or female the argument is null when it comes to society as a whole. The larger form of society acknowledges and deals with the actual problems, at this point, third wavers are just reaching for **** to complain about. This is highlighted by the arguments against tools to actually help. The drug-reacting nail polish, any encouragement for women to actually be capable of defending themselves... third wavers can't stand anything that takes away reason for them to complain, it seems. They don't generally want equality, they clearly aim for supremacy and want it without having to do nearly anything. Based Mom debunks their **** , because at this point, the third waver maniacal ********* is counted amongst the legitimate first-world problems that are actually destabilising society.