So what?
He is simply stating something we all should know by now, that the metals strength weakens greatly before it reaches melting temperatures which caused the building too collapse.
1. You have an anime character on your profile picture so your opinion is worth 1/3 of a normal person
2. Not the same conditions simulated.
3. One question. can you guess which building collapsed?
1. And even with 1/3 off a opinion you still fail too somehow bring up something worthwhile too discuss...
2. I would refrain from asking most people this, but are you retarded?`Even if he wasn't ******* melting
beams holding up several tons it should make it ******* clear too people that the building collapsed because a ******* plane went into it and weakened the structural integrity too the building...
3. i don't ******* care, nor should you as i was specifically talking about the world trade canter incident.
1. That's very, subjective.
2. a30 steel isn't structural steel , a50 is. That is like comparing apples to oranges. Plus the temperature was higher by 300 degrees in the simulation. Also, by some logic should the tomahawked building in Belgrade have collapsed as well? Or is just Serbian steel made by God himself?
3. I was presenting is as a similar case in terms of building fire, which was much more intense and lasted for a longer period of time.
A50 is a "Workhorse steel" Structural Steels are rated as:
A20
A30
A35
A40G
A50 has too high a carbon contnet to survive sustained compressive forces. Great tensile strength though.
The point of that video was to show that heating steel even to a point well below melting removes the temper, this means that placing it under load will cause it to bend. The second building you showed has a steel cage design, the load is more distributed and there was less stress on the actual steel. The WTC had steel columns running near the center of mass, dramatically increasing the load on the steel.
It may or may not have been, but it most likely was.
>It was done by Osama Bin Laden, and the Database Meaning of the word al-Qaeda . Both him and his organisation was made by the CIA.
>They blamed him instantly, and the muslims who have done it were found out of be the Database members and as well as their indestructible passports.
>The event gave an excuse to America to go Pax Americana on anyone and anything on this planet weaker than the US.
>It caused the US to increase censoring, monitoring and blocking information on the internet as an excuse to combat "terrorism"
But on the good side it caused the creation of some good memes and jokes.
**pristinepanda used "*roll picture*"** **pristinepanda rolled image** Did he not just prove that jet fuel can't melt steel beams? obviously it's weakened, but it isn't melted (unless my definition for melting is incorrect)
>Jet fuel cannot melt steel beams
>Heat steel to 300 degrees more than jet fuel can burn under ideal circumstances
>Steel still in solid state and not molten
"YALL ARE ******* STUPID FOR THINKING JET FUEL CANNOT MELT STEEL BEAMS, YOU NEED A JOB YOU ******* IDIOTS"
6th time we see this dumbass. Look just do your own research on 9/11 and if you have more than let's say 10 braincells, you will agree that the official story is bull. I don't pretend to know what happened, but it wasn't what was written in the official report.
I get that part as far as the structural weakness from the fire but that doesn't hold up to the entire building pancaking. I can see the part of the building at and above the impact zone falling to the side but a straight down destruction of uncompromised structure is far fetched.