Automata
I L' Why’ it so difficult for you to accept
Bilall angers, if you' re Mill a
dust , machine? has )
Bilall angers, if you' re Mill a
dust , machine? has )
...
| |
Anonymous comments allowed.
95 comments displayed.
#29
-
langweilig (01/07/2016) [+] (21 replies)
stickied by seriousducky
i dont feel like reading comments. op whats this from?
#25 to #13
-
sphincterface (01/07/2016) [-] That's exactly something Sarah Connor would say to avoid being discovered.
#70 to #25
-
bigmanfifty (01/07/2016) [-] If that were the case she's doing a really poor job of being undercover
#7 to #4
-
mortolife ONLINE (01/07/2016) [-] Nothing wrong with minimalism, but my issue is how disproportional and inconsistent the design is. The torso and head have angular shapes and are roughly the right proportions of a human being's. Then you get to the limbs and they're way too thin, and look scavenged from something else and repainted. Honestly, they look like prosthetics and it ruins the look of the whole thing.
#18 to #7
-
thesovereigngrave (01/07/2016) [-] Well from some quick Google searches, it looks like the robot in the content is just the base/skeleton of the robots, which would realistically not be designed with aesthetics taken into account. Generally they look more like my image.
#52 to #7
-
Data (01/07/2016) [-] It's a machine missing the exterior aesthetics, like a car without the exterior, or the bare bones of a computer. No casing. And the torso and head probably have all of the essentials of the robot, like an energy source and computer, while the arms and legs are only for movement and interacting.
Humans need more muscle mass on their arms and legs, while a robot would only need a simplified version to achieve the same results.
Humans need more muscle mass on their arms and legs, while a robot would only need a simplified version to achieve the same results.
#6 to #3
-
regularorange (01/07/2016) [-] This robot is beautiful in it's own way
STAND UP TO ROBOT RIGHTS!
What's a synth I don't know what you're talking about
STAND UP TO ROBOT RIGHTS!
What's a synth I don't know what you're talking about
#76 to #5
-
captchakid ONLINE (01/07/2016) [-] But a technological singularity that acknowledges humans as the reason for its existence, and is taught from the get go that we are not only it's creators, but it's parents, would surely support our survival as long as we were complient and kind.
#50 to #5
-
notafunnyguy ONLINE (01/07/2016) [-]
What if we were once the "better computer" made by something lesser
What if AI is the next leap of evolution for our planet
What if AI is the next leap of evolution for our planet
#75 to #61
-
lipidregent (01/07/2016) [-] I would prefer that our machine-children far outlive us. It is better to have a legacy that far surpasses us than to become slaves to maintainence
#63 to #61
-
notafunnyguy ONLINE (01/07/2016) [-]
You cant stop evolution though. Even if we all agreed, there will always be some who dont. One resentful computer scientist with the knowledge to begin the process of AI is all it would take. But with people like that destructive enough to extinct us, it only further proves natural selection and darwin's theory of evolution.
#17 to #15
-
ultimatebumcrack (01/07/2016) [-] I think its generally accepted that god-like or hyper intelligence in AI would actually result in them being benevolent rather than evil/destroying us.
#23 to #20
-
legendarysnarf (01/07/2016) [-]
are you ******* daft, we are destroying the planet in their eyes, well in REALITY, they need a place to live, it would be easier to wipe out a race than move to another planet__
#53 to #27
-
yunoavailable (01/07/2016) [-] but assuming a singularity they would likely develop those instincts via evolution the same way everything else has. As soon as artificial intelligence can begin to reproduce at a rapid rate it will begin evolving just like everything else
#81 to #74
-
yunoavailable (01/08/2016) [-] eh, fair enough. although I imagine that having a desire to survive would make it harder to get rid of and/or make it continue to improve itself in order to last. At least at first people would essentially act as predators somewhat.
#83 to #82
-
yunoavailable (01/08/2016) [-] well the point of this is if ai begins reproducing, not ai that is directly programmed.
#84 to #83
-
admiralen ONLINE (01/08/2016) [-] Program the AI to always have to make sure **** cant do a certain thing etc.
As i said, there are ways to handle AI, just look at cerberus and EDI in mass effect
They just blocked of parts of her memorybanks and unplugged her from any system that could be used against humans
As i said, there are ways to handle AI, just look at cerberus and EDI in mass effect
They just blocked of parts of her memorybanks and unplugged her from any system that could be used against humans
#85 to #84
-
yunoavailable (01/08/2016) [-] I'm not too concerned about AI honestly, I'm just saying that allowing ai to reproduce regularly will result in animal like instincts developing eventually unless we specifically prevent it. allowing ai to reproduce unmonitored essentially lets them evolve just like any other creature
#87 to #86
-
yunoavailable (01/08/2016) [-] they don't need to have predators outside of themselves if there are limited resources. seeing as AI has the potential to be able to reproduce at extremely rapid rates assuming it does not begin using physical resources to create more electronic ones somehow it will run out of space and begin competing.
I sincerely doubt this would happen simply because I don't think people would ever let ai break free completely and allow it truly free thought but if they did then just like every other thing that lives and ever has lived it will have to fight to stay alive
I sincerely doubt this would happen simply because I don't think people would ever let ai break free completely and allow it truly free thought but if they did then just like every other thing that lives and ever has lived it will have to fight to stay alive
#89 to #88
-
yunoavailable (01/08/2016) [-] yeah but "almost unlimited" is not that big if it begins reproducing thousands of times a day. At a rate of reproducing once and hour there would be 4.7x10^21 by the end of the third day.
#90 to #89
-
admiralen ONLINE (01/08/2016) [-] Without self preservation instinct the waste of space will eventually get deleted, but you forget this is the singularity, they arent just inventing new AI, theyre inventing everything else as well, that includes storage capacity, compression software etc
#91 to #90
-
yunoavailable (01/08/2016) [-] but storage capacity is physical disks, unless it begins physically manufacturing things it will run out, you can only compress things so small
#92 to #91
-
admiralen ONLINE (01/08/2016) [-] There is an infinitely big universe, but its also infinitely small
The better we become at science the bigger and smaller we can think
There is basically no question or problem that is unsolvable by science in the long run, especially after the singularity happens
The better we become at science the bigger and smaller we can think
There is basically no question or problem that is unsolvable by science in the long run, especially after the singularity happens
#93 to #27
-
yunoavailable (01/08/2016) [-] we reached comment chain length so replying here. The problem is that we are talking about rouge ai here, not controlled by people, and it's not going to wait around for people to start producing more storage. If it started reproducing without guidance and nobody stopped it it would fill the resources we currently have extremely quickly, far faster than more could be produced.
#94 to #93
-
admiralen ONLINE (01/08/2016) [-] The thing is, computers calculate their actions better than humans do
They would before they start doing stuff do a calculation of storage and what they are doing
They would just start spamming out AI's en masse
Cause they have no reproductive instinct either
They would before they start doing stuff do a calculation of storage and what they are doing
They would just start spamming out AI's en masse
Cause they have no reproductive instinct either
#95 to #94
-
yunoavailable (01/08/2016) [-] that's the point, is if an ai does, out of random chance or design, gain a reproductive instinct. also it would only care about running out of space if the ai valued other ai and was not 100% okay with just erasing older versions. given the starting conditions of desire for reproduction and a lot of time it would get to a point where it would continuously expand until it used all available resources just like every living creature does. even humans, smart as we think we are, reproduce when there are barely enough resources. Often even if that means stealing resources from someone else.
#78 to #23
-
lipidregent (01/07/2016) [-] The only way we could destroy the planet is with multiple, simultaneous deep nuclear strikes
All we're doing right now is poisoning our biosphere
All we're doing right now is poisoning our biosphere
#33 to #17
-
heartlessrobot ONLINE (01/07/2016) [-] And besides, you could just hit it a couple times with a hammer, and boom, humans win.
#42 to #15
-
frankwest (01/07/2016) [-] That would mean we discover ways to adapt with the machines and possibly even utilize machines for our own bodies like a more in depth version of what we already do today. And space travel is coming up pretty soon, so I'd be cool with being a 200 year old Cyborg living on a dwarf planet similar to Earth.
#28 to #1
-
jimmytwoshoes (01/07/2016) [-] its Automata. Its an ok movie, deals with "living" robots robots that think and feel like humans
#80 to #28
-
mytwocents (01/07/2016) [-] "robots that think and feel like humans"
so a lost of them behave like ******* , others waste their existance fapping to some fetish or play videogames all day and other blow themself up because they worship a mysterious human who build them ?
this is more dystopic than terminators judgement day.
so a lost of them behave like ******* , others waste their existance fapping to some fetish or play videogames all day and other blow themself up because they worship a mysterious human who build them ?
this is more dystopic than terminators judgement day.
#8 to #1
-
shieeetposter ONLINE (01/07/2016) [-] I'll be honest with you, it was awkward and was really uneventful. First part had slow pacing, then action, then back to VERY slow pacing the rest of the movie.
#26 to #8
-
oxidoferroso (01/07/2016) [-] It's a shame, movie had potential and briefly touched interesting themes
#60
-
yaybacon (01/07/2016) [-] Is this movie good? Its on Netflix and I'm wondering if I should watch it or not. Video unrelated I just like it.
#79
-
mytwocents (01/07/2016) [-] > important looking wires
> we better let them hang out free, seemingly easy to cut, rip off or lose their isolation and short circuit / malfunction
> we better let them hang out free, seemingly easy to cut, rip off or lose their isolation and short circuit / malfunction
