Anime is Japan's revenge

Flag

cheshirecatless

(See more...)

random

Favorite Comment

✖ Top Next Comment

(Enlarge)

Anime is Japan's revenge. . JAP ill LICENSES The Jap- l' lva TIRED CF SEEING THIS STUPID DEBATE SO LLTG GET ONE THING STRAIGHT. SURE, THERE WERE A CF PERFECTLY

Tags: ww2 | War | jap | Anime | internet Argumen | Japan | usa

JAP
ill LICENSES
The Jap-
l' lva TIRED CF SEEING THIS STUPID DEBATE SO LLTG GET ONE THING STRAIGHT.
SURE, THERE WERE A ******* CF PERFECTLY LEGIT REASCEND FOR DROPPING THE BOMB. SURE, WE KNEW THE PSYCHOTIC JAPS WHO
HAD BEEN FIGHTING TO THE LAST MAN FOR THE WHOLE ******* WAR WOULD NEVER SURRENDER AFTER A MERE DEMONSTRATION
WHICH IS WHY WE HAD TO BOMB NAGASAKI AFTER )
SURE, THE AIRDROPPED MINING CAMPAIGN HAD SHUT DOWN 95% CF ALL SHIPPING TRAFFIC TO THE HOME ISLANDS IN JUST A
FEW MONTHS, COMPLETELY CUTTING OFF JAPAN FROM FOOD SUPPLIES, AND WAITING FOR JAPAN TO STARVE OUT WOULD" -IE COST
HUNDREDS CF MILLIONS MORE CIVILIAN LIVES THEN THE BOMBINGS.
SURE, DROPPING THE BOMB TOLD THE RUSSIANS (WHO HAD JUST DECLARED WAR ON JAPAN AND WERE ) THAT THEY
WEREN’ T GOING TO GET THEIR FILTHY ******* MITTS ON JAPAN IN THEIR POSTWAR ; AAB, WHICH IS WHY JAPAN
WAS REBUILT AND BECAME A PROSPEROUS COUNTRY, INSTEAD CF LANGUISHING AS A ROTTEN, ? UPT HELLHOLE RULED BY
TYRANNICAL MONSTERS LIKE ALL THE STATES THE SOVIET UNION GAINED CONTROL OVER.
BUT YOU KNOW WHAT?
NONE CF THAT ******* MATTERS.
ALL THAT ASIDE, THE TRUTH, THE REAL, HONEST, BRUTAL TRUTH, ' THAT BY If? 46, WE DIDN' T GIVE A SINGLE ROTTEN **** WHAT
HAPPEN ED TO THOSE LITTLE BASTARDS.
BY THAT TIME WE KNEW ABOUT THE BRATAN DEATH MARCH. WE KNEW ALL ABOUT THE POEG WHO WERE THEN
DUMPED INTO TRENCHES. WE KNEW ALL ABOUT THE ) IN THE PHILIPPINES WHERE WOMEN WERE LITERALLY RAPED TO
DEATH. WED SEEN THE ; CF OUR SOLDIERS HAVING THEIR HEADS CHOPPED OFF BY SMIRKING LITTLE CUNT COWARDS WITH
CHEAP "KATANAS," SO PROUD CF BEING BIG BAD WARRIORS FOR THE EMPEROR.
WED SEEN AND OFERED THE LENGTH AND BREADTH CF THE CRU ALTY INFLICTED BY THE AVERAGE JAPAN ESE SOLDIER, WHO WAS A
BULLY, A RAPIST AND A MISERABLE LITTLE **** WITH ABSOLUTELY NO RESPECT FOR HUMAN LIFE.
SO WHEN WE FINALLY REACHED MAINLAND JAPAN, BELIEVE ME WHEN I SAY WE JUST DIDN' T GIVE A **** ABOUT HOW HUMANE
THE BC) hhim; WERE, THEY MADE OUR VICTORY EASIER, AND THAT' S ALL WE ******* CARED ABOUT,
AND THE JAPS, TO THIS DAY, HAVE THE ******* GALL TO BITCH AND WHINE ABOUT HOW THOSE MEAN CID AMERICANS NUKED
THEM, BUT THEY REFUSE TO TAKE RESPONSIBILITY FOR THE WANTON MURDER, RAPE AND CRUELTY INFLICTED BY THEIR OWN
GOVERNMENT.
YOU REAP WHAT YOU SOW, AND IN 1945, THE JAPS REAPED HELLFIRE.
DEAL WITH I

...

+361

Views:	17571
Favorited:	88
Submitted:	11/09/2015

Share On Facebook

+Favorite Subscribe to cheshirecatless

Comments(89):

Leave a comment Refresh Comments Show GIFs

1 2 >

[ 89 comments ]

Anonymous comments allowed.

67 comments displayed.

+72

#4 - spookyghostparty (11/09/2015) [-]

It's also worth considering that the actual demonstration of the potential danger of nuclear weapons may have had a sobering effect on the cold war. The US and USSR came close to nuking each other a number of times but in the end cooler heads always prevailed. I'm just speculating here, but it's possible that one of the reasons that these incidents ended without anyone pushing the button was that world leaders had a tangible example of the consequences of using these weapons.

#68 to #4 - burningchimera (11/10/2015) [-]

Reasons why i don't consider the cold war a war

#70 to #68 - innocentbabies (11/10/2015) [-]

Nobody does, it was a cold war.

+98

#3 - mortolife (11/09/2015) [-]

Not taking part in any debate, but I do want to say, that second to last line is ******* epic, gave me chills reading it. "You reap what you sow, and in 1945, the japs reaped hellfire." Damn that's awesome.

+19

#45 to #3 - anon (11/10/2015) [-]

read it in this bastards voice

+33

#5 to #3 - skumbaner (11/09/2015) [-]

fukin based quote

+22

#10 - anon (11/10/2015) [-]

I've never met a Japanese person that didn't think that dropping the bombs was a good thing. Hell, in the museum at Hiroshima the guides even say that although what happened was an atrocity, it was the lesser of evils.They're fully aware of how ****** they were and how much better things are because of those bombs being dropped.

Nuclear power is an awsome thing. A dime-a-dozen ******** of a country went in, and out of nuclear fire one of the most prosperous countries in the world emerged.

#72 to #10 - anon (11/10/2015) [-]

Well, then. This post kinda makes the one I just posted (#69) redundant. Wish I had seen it earlier, but at the very least I can corroborate that your story is indeed true.

#30 to #10 - Ruspanic (11/10/2015) [-]

I find that a little strange, considering that the Japanese government and many mainstream right-wingers in Japan still deny some of the war crimes and atrocities the Imperial Japanese committed (in stark contrast to the Germans, who have acknowledged and thoroughly apologized for everything the Nazis did).

#35 to #30 - zomaru (11/10/2015) [-]

It's like the Armenian Genocide, They have the mindset of "If we admit we were wrong, then that means our fathers were wrong," so everything that happened is deemed OK by the government.

Kinda like a child who wont admit they took the last cookie when they can just keep denying it thinking the questions will eventually stop.

#17 to #10 - hapasan (11/10/2015) [-]

I'm half Japanese, and I agree. Honestly I feel I don't have a say on whether or not it was a good idea. I wasn't there; and there are a lot of different factors that go into it. I can say that was history, and the best thing we can do is look to the future.
What I can say though that bothers me are racist people like the one who wrote that post above. Not for any of the facts they wrote, but mainly for the way they treat the Japanese.

#25 - Tyranitar (11/10/2015) [-]

The way I learned about it, we pretty much had 3 options:

Carpet-bombing. This would've caused many more casualties
Invasion. This would pretty much become an even bloodier D-Day, with thousands of deaths on both sides
A-Bomb. One swift, deadly blow. No loss of life to us, and still brutal enough to stop the enemy, who until then showed no sign of stopping, even in the face of certain death.

+11

#34 to #25 - shameonapony ONLINE (11/10/2015) [-]

Two swift, deadly blows*

+62

#2 - anon (11/09/2015) [-]

Now a similiar problem can be seen in the Middle East. These peaceful muslims *cough* terrorists *cough* commit rape, torture, kill, mutilate, etc. to all non-believers of their faith and even to those of the same faith and all in the name of jihad. There are mass graves, public executions, and etc. that are the result of this 'religion of peace'. It is my deepest hope that we will soon grow weary and sick of the disgusting garbage in the Middle East and as a result perform the miracle of changing sand to radioactive glass in an instant.

-4

#52 to #2 - knightmoiden (11/10/2015) [-]

For what it's worth, Japan went back and said sorry years later for the crimes of there great grandfathers to China and The Philippines. How long would it take most of the Middle East to look back and apologize to us and their own? Never because of who is doing the crime would be dead and disassociated with those who remain.

#37 to #2 - anon (11/10/2015) [-]

Yeah, because the destabilisation of the middle east has absolutely nothing to do with America meddling for the last 60 years.

#61 to #37 - anon (11/10/2015) [-]

If you give a man a weapon and he kills someone with it, who is responsible for the death?
The middle east wasn't some prosperous peaceful community before america's meddling. It was a crazy horrific ******** before, and now it's a fully armed crazy horrific ******** .
The answer to the question is both parties are responsible.

#40 to #37 - lathyrusvii (11/10/2015) [-]

Prolly not.

+19

#9 - jeanmariegrangon (11/10/2015) [-]

By that logic, nuking the middle east would be a justifiable thing.

#42 to #9 - asotil (11/10/2015) [-]

#48 to #42 - anon (11/10/2015) [-]

Yeah...it wouldn't stop burning for a while.

inb4 "We need that oil". Oil is holding back technological progress, like a crutch holds back a cripples recovery.

#62 to #42 - reaperriley ONLINE (11/10/2015) [-]

Oil is right, but the reality is that the US is protecting its allies' oil more so than theirs. US produces a lot of oil each year. Its one of their top three exports, only beaten out by computer parts and machinery parts.

#11 to #9 - banteringcat ONLINE (11/10/2015) [-]

It isn't?

#12 to #9 - clonedcommando (11/10/2015) [-]

It's not?

#13 to #9 - hourlyb (11/10/2015) [-]

Ehh, different situation.
Al-Qaeda/ISIS isn't a state sponsored agency, so unless they take control of a nation, nuking a entire nation isn't an optimal solution.

#60 to #13 - actionmastermegatr (11/10/2015) [-]

Well ISIL is getting support from the Turkish government, since Erdogan doesn't want the Syrian kurds to form their own state.

#27 to #9 - donfailed (11/10/2015) [-]

There's a LOT more issues surrounding the middle east that keep it from getting glassed. First off, how things are now the second a nuke goes in the air the entire planet ***** its pants. Whoever threw it is about to have a very, very bad day. They'll have almost as bad a time as the guys on the receiving end, if only for the political ********* coming in. Second, the world's a lot more sensitive and connected than it was back then. Even if there's only a couple innocent groups in an entire mob of *********** , they could set back a bombing attempt harder than a Draw 4 if people whined enough. Third, the middle east is actually a pretty damn important place. There's oil out the wazoo and religious, along with possibly scientific, hotspots. Blasting it to dust would be like that time some government in Europe detonated a massive collection of Nazi artifacts: You may not like them, but **** man that was a lot of history.

TLDR ****** ******* backed up by legislation and constipation

+16

#14 - hapasan (11/10/2015) [-]

Geez, nobody talks about the Japanese-Americans that fought for America. They had to petition just to be able to fight for America. Calling Japanese "Japs" is a disservice to them. They didn't care about race; they were Americans, plain and simple.
It's funny because most of the people that use the term "Japs" are fat internet nerds.

#55 to #14 - lennylorenzo (11/10/2015) [-]

I say Japs because its shorter

#33 to #14 - Ruspanic (11/10/2015) [-]

I think he called them "Japs" because that's what Americans and American war propaganda called them at the time. He was essentially channeling the 1945 American mindset.

#65 to #14 - sphincterface (11/10/2015) [-]

No dude, you don't understand.

The Japs were the Imperial Japanese, the monsters that gleefully raped murdered and tortured innocent people, POW's and just about everybody they came across. They were an an entire of nation of war criminals, committing atrocities that would even disgust the Nazis.

The Japanese-Americans who fought for the US were true Americans and true heroes, they weren't the Japs. The Japs were the monsters that got bombed the **** out of.

#83 to #65 - hapasan (11/10/2015) [-]

No I do understand that.
I meant that when people talk as the Japanese race as a whole, they usually mention the atrocities by the Japanese Army against the Allies, and a lot less do I hear about the Japanese that fought for America.

#19 to #14 - skelebones ONLINE (11/10/2015) [-]

thats a simple answer. there are americans that fight for their adopted country out of patriotism and happen to be japanese at the same time.
and then there are ****** slanty eyed jap imperial ***** that rape women and children and take part in the batan death march.

kinda like how theres an upstanding american citizen that happens to be black and theres a ****** .

-9

#21 to #19 - hapasan (11/10/2015) [-]

" ****** slanty eyed jap imperial ***** that rape women and children and take part in the batan death march"
Good lord, you need help.

#24 to #21 - skelebones ONLINE (11/10/2015) [-]

its ok kid. you can put your blinders on and plug your ears and go "lalalala" and pretend the world will be ok. you go right ahead.

#85 to #24 - hapasan (11/10/2015) [-]

Oh no, I didn't mean that it wasn't true. I agree, all the stuff they did was true. I just meant that there was a lot of venom in the comment towards the Japanese. You just sound really angry.

#87 to #85 - skelebones ONLINE (11/10/2015) [-]

hardly. i was just making a point with my statement.

-4

#20 to #19 - anon (11/10/2015) [-]

I'm just curious: Are you white?

#22 to #20 - skelebones ONLINE (11/10/2015) [-]

no im mexican

#46 - Onemanretardpack (11/10/2015) [-]

Also, everyone conveniently glosses over the leaflets we dropped over Hiroshima and Nagasaki that basically said you should get the **** out of dodge because we're about to drop the mother of all bombs on you

-2

#74 to #46 - theluppijackal (11/10/2015) [-]

There's actually no evidence we did such a thing

#6 - gazra (11/09/2015) [-]

The Soviets had been working in co-ordination with the allies since 1943 to invade Japan or more specifically Manchuria after peace with Germany. The principle aim was for the Soviets to deal with the Japanese army in China where the majority of Japanese troops had been for the war and in a combined effort with the Atomic bombings (which the soviets had almost full knowledge of). As for that last point, just no, are you (assuming you're American, which it sounds like) responsible for all the actions of your government, the civilian casualties in Iraq and Afghanistan, or Vietnam for that matter, are civilians in New York responsible for the actions of troops at My Lai, no that would be ridiculous. Don't get me wrong I think the bombings were justified but this argument is utter ******** .

#59 - superanonymouspers (11/10/2015) [-]

For anyone interested:

"was it wrong to drop the atom bomb on japan?"

-1

#79 to #59 - theluppijackal (11/10/2015) [-]

For a guy who claims to critique bad history, he does some bad history himself.

He says we would've needed to invade Japan. This is completely unknowable. History is full of surprises and viable alternatives to trying out our new toy were certainly on the table. We now know quite a bit about the Japanese peace plans. Many of them were mostly interested in avoiding being accused of war crimes.

Halfway through, he talks about how some of the generals still wanted to pursue the defense option. This is true, but misleading. SOME wanted to pursue it. Others were very much considering the option of surrender. In fact, much of the evidence suggests there were current ongoing debates from the higher ups on the CONDITIONS of surrender.

Then again makes the unknowable claims that it saved more lives. No, all around it was a poor video. It asserts the exact same thing we have for 50 years about the nuking. It's nothing new.

#80 to #79 - superanonymouspers (11/10/2015) [-]

Damn you and your solid logic and facts.

Why do they have to make sense.

#81 to #80 - theluppijackal (11/10/2015) [-]

W-Woah. It didn't end in a 50 comment long internet argument. I'm impressed. Good day to you sir. May a squadron of vaginas visit you by days end.

#82 to #81 - superanonymouspers (11/10/2015) [-]

If only that could actually happen. all my problems would melt away.

good day to you as well sir.

#86 to #81 - hapasan (11/10/2015) [-]

>May a squadron of vaginas visit you by days end
It doesn't usually happen, but I keep hoping that one day, it happens for everyone that deserves it.

#28 - slyblade (11/10/2015) [-]

I may be wrong but from what I was aware, Japan tried to surrender, or more accurately tried to setup negotiations but were stonewalled by the Russians, which led to a split in power (I think I forget who was who) the Emperor wanting peace but the Government pursuing a continuation of war.

Either way one basically forced the other out of the picture in order to try and continue the war. The first Bomb changed the minds of the people and freed whoever wanted peace to speak, the second was unnecessary but sped up the process of those who still didn't want peace changing their minds.

#36 to #28 - kapitanokliosov ONLINE (11/10/2015) [-]

It was the emperor that was pushing for peace but the generals wanted to keep on fighting. Fairly sure they were a couple of weeks away from surrendering as well.

#50 to #28 - zafara (11/10/2015) [-]

The emperor also wanted to stop and surrender, but he was considered a near god and was supposed to be above that sort of thing. The actual war was run by his generals.

The emperor's role was like the Warhammer 40K Emperor; everyone looks up to him, but he can't actually control what was happening at the time, and his 'loyal' generals and soldiers were 'doing his will (assuming you follow that interpretation).'

#58 to #28 - superanonymouspers (11/10/2015) [-]

"was it wrong to drop the atom bomb on japan?"

#23 - anon (11/10/2015) [-]

if you're gonna bomb civilians do it, just don't act all high and mighty about it like you're doing the world a favour.

#39 - anon (11/10/2015) [-]

When you awake a sleeping giant.

You're probably gonna get crushed.

#56 to #39 - lennylorenzo (11/10/2015) [-]

Don't poke the bear

-4

#44 to #39 - sugoi (11/10/2015) [-]

Well you Americans are getting pretty fat so you're not wrong.

#53 - nightmarexnxnxnxnx ONLINE (11/10/2015) [-]

Funny how that ¨Revenge¨ turned to be more diverse and innovative than most of hollywood and other tv show production.

#1 - anon (11/09/2015) [-]

my reasoning for the nuking was always "they were an imperial nation, every single person who lived in the country at the time, no matter what their job was, was somehow connected to the military" and there for this was not terrorism, but this, this just gave me a justice boner.

#47 - anon (11/10/2015) [-]

Well m8, war is war. Ain't no good or bad people in it, just winners and losers. Maybe you're forgetting about Eisenhower's german genocide, or how brutal americans were to the same japs they fought. Skull taking, ear necklaces, that sort of thing. And to be honest, 1940's americans didn't give two ***** about chinks either.
I'm not defending the japs. Both the nuking and the acts they did count as war crimes. But you certainly shouldn't try and go all full american hero on it. Remember, from their perspective, Pearl Harbor was justified. From the ************ perspective, 9/11 was justified.
In war you make choices. You just have to accept and deal with their consequences.

#29 - Maroon ONLINE (11/10/2015) [-]

>hundred's of millions of extra civilian casualties from starvation
>Japan's population today: ~124 mil(2013 census)

#77 - theluppijackal (11/10/2015) [-]

Nope.
It was wrong.
It was a war crime. Period. Dot. End.
It was a war crime.

>It saved lives!
Unknowable. We don't know what history would've wrote if we HADN'T nuked them. Even still, utilitarianism in war where the ends justifies the means leads to fraught, evil, and immoral decisions such as war crimes. Such as this one.

#89 to #77 - cheshirecatless [OP](11/11/2015) [-]

The Japanese hadn't signed anything with other nations to make any actions in war by or against them a crime. There was no violation of international law by or against the Japanese, in WW2 there was no such thing.

#90 to #89 - theluppijackal (11/11/2015) [-]

>In ww2 there was no such thing

The secretary himself admitted if they lost they'd be war criminals

"If we'd lost the war, we'd all have been prosecuted as war criminals." And I think he's right. He, and I'd say I, were behaving as war criminals. LeMay recognized that what he was doing would be thought immoral if his side had lost. But what makes it immoral if you lose and not immoral if you win?

avalon.law.yale.edu/20th_century/hague04.asp

lawofwar.org/hague_rules_of_air_warfare.htm
>2) Such bombardment is legitimate only when directed exclusively at the following objectives: military forces; military works; military establishments or depots; factories constituting important and well-known centres engaged in the manufacture of arms, ammunition, or distinctively military supplies; lines of communication or transportation used for military purposes.

>3) The bombardment of cities, towns, villages, dwellings, or buildings not in the immediate neighborhood of the operations of land forces is prohibited. In cases where the objectives specified in paragraph 2 are so situated, that they cannot be bombarded without the indiscriminate bombardment of the civilian population, the aircraft must abstain from bombardment.

Also, as for the war crimes the japanese comitted, look up the raping of nanking.

#66 - moosaysthecal (11/10/2015) [-]

my grandfather was a bataan deathmarch survivor, was also on the hellships and everything, i agree with this

#64 - blackoutonetwotwo ONLINE (11/10/2015) [-]

As a mestizo (Chink) from the Philippines

my ******* anti-Japanese sentiment is intensifying as of now.

but I like Overlord, Monster Musume and some anime hentai **** too

#84 to #64 - anon (11/10/2015) [-]

>my ******* anti-Japanese sentiment is intensifying as of now.
That kind of mindset is retarded. "I hate all Japanese now because of what they did in the war." You might as well hate Whites for being slave drivers and killing and raping Natives. You might as well hate Blacks for killing and raping in America. Doesn't that sound just as ridiculous?
History is history, times have changed for the better.

>But I like Hentai
More like your autism is intensifying