After holding it all day. .. I bet Peanutbitter has flashbacks seeing this...
Click to expand


What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
#35 - anotheroneonearth ONLINE (04/03/2014) [-]
Comment Picture
#51 to #35 - NatashaReinhart (04/03/2014) [-]
It's okay, I wasn't particularly wanting dinner anyway...
It's okay, I wasn't particularly wanting dinner anyway...
User avatar #36 to #35 - invshika (04/03/2014) [-]
yum, emulsified hot dog
#57 to #35 - mardux (04/03/2014) [-]
After having mexican food for dinner...
#28 - itsnotimportant (04/03/2014) [-]
I bet Peanutbitter has flashbacks seeing this...
#30 to #28 - peanutbitter has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #31 to #28 - peanutbitter (04/03/2014) [-]
woops. that was ****
User avatar #98 to #32 - ninjawildcat (04/03/2014) [-]
Im going to be that guy that points out that out of 205 thumbs you have zero red thumbs sorry if i cause red thumbs, i just wanted to let you know
User avatar #2 - icameheretotroll (04/03/2014) [-]
When you don't fap for a moth
#50 to #2 - areandara has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #69 to #2 - chimpaflimp (04/03/2014) [-]
You misspelled "an hour".
User avatar #16 to #2 - themeerkat (04/03/2014) [-]
I believe you mispelled a day
User avatar #3 to #2 - swordmasterredman (04/03/2014) [-]
why wouldn't I fap for a moth?
#17 to #3 - kallesmange (04/03/2014) [-]
because it's hard to fap for a moth i usualy fap for about half an hour max
#20 to #17 - angryninja (04/03/2014) [-]
Comment Picture
#68 to #17 - anon (04/03/2014) [-]
When you're in boot camp
#26 to #3 - duedum (04/03/2014) [-]
Mane, imagine this on your dick.

Pretty nice, right?
User avatar #11 to #3 - kuntbag (04/03/2014) [-]
*sexy moth noises*
User avatar #15 to #3 - homoexplain (04/03/2014) [-]
cuz ur gay
User avatar #83 to #3 - buttinspecter (04/03/2014) [-]
No fap November. I didn't participate.
#74 to #3 - beatlecat (04/03/2014) [-]
**beatlecat rolled image** cause of this
**beatlecat rolled image** cause of this
User avatar #64 to #3 - marking (04/03/2014) [-]
They can be really mean sometimes. Specially if they forget your anniversary.
User avatar #58 to #3 - niggernazi (04/03/2014) [-]
too clear your views?
User avatar #54 to #3 - terafyde (04/03/2014) [-]
I once accidentally cut my urethra. I've not been able to piss for 3 days.
User avatar #4 to #3 - icameheretotroll (04/03/2014) [-]
No fap november
User avatar #5 to #4 - swordmasterredman (04/03/2014) [-]
I don't see how that would inhibit me from fapping to moths
User avatar #12 - blamie ONLINE (04/03/2014) [-]
Very few people can truly appreciate how much water that is going through that and how much energy it holds.
User avatar #62 to #12 - winners (04/03/2014) [-]
i appreciate how much water is going through that and how much energy it holds
User avatar #47 to #12 - aherorising (04/03/2014) [-]
I bet it's even more than 8.5 gallon per second! :^)
#1 - popcorncolonel (04/02/2014) [-]
Comment Picture
#8 - ibschmitty (04/03/2014) [-]
#60 - mooghens (04/03/2014) [-]
When you haven't fapped all week
When you haven't fapped all week
User avatar #97 to #60 - blamie ONLINE (04/03/2014) [-]
and thats why I try to avoid drum mags.
#24 - dewydonut (04/03/2014) [-]
this is genuinely what it was like when I went to the hospital with constipation and they gave me a really 			*******		 strong laxative
this is genuinely what it was like when I went to the hospital with constipation and they gave me a really ******* strong laxative
User avatar #25 to #24 - dewydonut (04/03/2014) [-]
it was like I was pissing out of my anus
#27 to #25 - tihok (04/03/2014) [-]
Butt with poop?
User avatar #29 to #27 - dewydonut (04/03/2014) [-]
with poop that had been liquidised by the strong laxative, like rusty water, yes
#39 - ninjawildcat (04/03/2014) [-]
If they could angle that water high enough to land in another holding tank of the same elevation with another hole in like this one only facing towards the original tank, could you possibly create an unlimited energy source?
Im sure there is tons of flaws in my logic but its still a cool thought.
Also im assuming there is a way to harness the energy that such a tremendous amount of water probably makes.
User avatar #40 to #39 - ninjawildcat (04/03/2014) [-]
I summon you Sciencexplain in case nobody else sees this.
User avatar #46 to #39 - sciencexplain ONLINE (04/03/2014) [-]
There can't be an infinite energy source like that. We can't destroy or create energy, only transfer it. That kind of thing loses a bit of water every now and then and the energy level in question would decrease ever so slightly. Also, you need to use energy to restore it to do it again, so no.
User avatar #77 to #46 - skeptical (04/03/2014) [-]
what about a sealed system with a siphon and a turbine? that would be drawing out the potential energy in the turbine and surrounding area using gravity particles/waves/ ***************************
User avatar #78 to #77 - sciencexplain ONLINE (04/03/2014) [-]
That's been tried before, I think. Doesn't work that well. Gravity shouldn't be considered as use for a force going outwards, only down.
#79 to #78 - skeptical (04/03/2014) [-]
The higher pressure of the larger amount of water would press the rest down and through the tube, but i've been told that wouldn't work because water remains at the same level. why does it do this?
User avatar #84 to #79 - sciencexplain ONLINE (04/03/2014) [-]
Because the water cannot provide an upward force to raise the level, since the only force of still water is downward gravity. Applying outside force can help it, tough.
User avatar #85 to #84 - skeptical (04/03/2014) [-]
That's weird. you'd think it would continue to take the path up the hose until the volume was equal or it continued to refill.
User avatar #86 to #85 - sciencexplain ONLINE (04/03/2014) [-]
I wouldn't, personally. The acting of water levelling out like that just comes to me. I think about it in the principal of the piping of a toilet and how the pipe goes upwards.
User avatar #88 to #86 - skeptical (04/03/2014) [-]
what about ninjawildcat 's idea? it seems just about crazy enough to potato
User avatar #89 to #88 - sciencexplain ONLINE (04/03/2014) [-]
Naa, I don't really think it's plausible. A good attempt, but not enough to warrant actual testing.
User avatar #90 to #89 - ninjawildcat (04/03/2014) [-]
I hope that someone way to smart for this conversation comes through and goes "Jinkies! That is genius! I think it just might potato!" Afterwards I am given the worlds highest honors for academic achievement and paint skills.
User avatar #91 to #90 - sciencexplain ONLINE (04/03/2014) [-]
I'll get a girlfriend before that happens, bro.
User avatar #92 to #91 - ninjawildcat (04/03/2014) [-]
I feel like you just pretty much said i have no chance of ever being anything in life.
User avatar #93 to #92 - sciencexplain ONLINE (04/03/2014) [-]
Go be what you want. Get all the bitches. I'm just reducing myself to alone status. You'll go far and I'll stay girlfriend-less.
User avatar #94 to #93 - ninjawildcat (04/03/2014) [-]
Not if you give that bitch your mad science knowledge. Bitches love busted unlimited energy source theories.

Tried my hardest to come up with a pun about her being wet but ive got nothing.

good conversation we had here, i learned a lot of stuff that I probably will not retain. Thanks!
User avatar #95 to #94 - sciencexplain ONLINE (04/03/2014) [-]
Your welcome. And she knows everything I know. AND MORE.

We were talking about doing Religious Studies at Uni and the tests and she, being a really polite, kind, beautiful person, just says:

"Just make it up. It's all made up anyways."

Jaws hit the floor. I like the attitude though. Das hawt.
User avatar #96 to #95 - ninjawildcat (04/03/2014) [-]
Christians: 0
Hawt Bitches: 1
#87 to #79 - ninjawildcat (04/03/2014) [-]
Is it crazy enough to potato yet?
-Water maintained same level

Im pretty sure i just used minecraft logic for real life though.. idk im tired
User avatar #55 to #46 - ninjawildcat (04/03/2014) [-]
Ok well we have discovered that it is not an infinite energy source. But it could possibly yield high amounts of energy, right?
User avatar #61 to #55 - sciencexplain ONLINE (04/03/2014) [-]
Put it this way. This gives 100 Joules (Just an example, it's not accurate at all) of energy per minute as it shoots. 1 Joule per minute is lost from excess spray and fuels are used to power with more energy. That costs, say, $20 a minute. After 100 minutes, you've payed $2000 just to keep it going. That's not efficient at all, is it?
User avatar #63 to #61 - ninjawildcat (04/03/2014) [-]
Im not sure we're on the same page. I assume that the water pressure alone is what is shooting that water at such a high rate. I know there would be need for fuel but only minor amounts, much like the small amounts used at the hoover damn.
Then again, I know **** about any of this, im just giving you something to think about.
User avatar #65 to #63 - sciencexplain ONLINE (04/03/2014) [-]
I can see where you're coming from. In a situation like this, I always ask myself:

"They have the world's greatest scientists at their bidding. If it works, wouldn't they be doing it already?"
#67 to #65 - ninjawildcat (04/03/2014) [-]
Im pretty much the same way except you have to remember that even with all these minds thinking, they still cant cover all the bases. There is a microscopic chance that nobody has thought of this and that I might have just discovered the most efficient energy supply ever.

Nah im kidding, im sure this exact thought has been mocked by someone in the past after an idiot like me thought of it.

Thanks for your time btw.
only science related reaction i have
User avatar #76 to #67 - sciencexplain ONLINE (04/03/2014) [-]
No prob. Feel free to rattle my brain any time.
#41 to #39 - painismysaviour (04/03/2014) [-]
Couple problems with using this as an infinite energy source.

Firstly, you have to take into account friction, which probably single-handedly prevents anything like this from ever happening as a 100% efficient system.

Next, you have the losses due to the water that sort of sprays off - not all will be able to be collected and the momentum they possess is lost permanently. This may be negligible on a small scale, but it'll prevent the system from being 100% efficient.

Then, you have the issue of taking the kinetic energy of the water spray and converting all of it to kinetic energy of an outgoing water spout. Some of it, if not most, will be lost within the system itself as it acts on the container around it. That is, some of the momentum of the "collision" will be lost by the water trying to force itself out of its container at the wrong places. Now, I'm not 100% sure how this part works, but I also suspect that the system may give preference to converting the kinetic energy of the water into grav. potential energy by raising the level of the water, then converting some, not all, of that grav. potential energy to the outgoing stream, which by this point is much less powerful that the incoming one.

I may not be 100% right on the third point, but the first two alone show why this can never be a fully efficient system like you described.
User avatar #42 to #41 - ninjawildcat (04/03/2014) [-]
Friction ***** everything.
Lets assume that the water is easily replenished, maybe by rainwater. Also, you wouldnt need to take all of the energy, if it is "infinite energy" then you could just you part of it.

Im not really sure about any of this stuff because I have never been any good with science or anything science related so dont think im arguing with you.
#43 to #42 - painismysaviour (04/03/2014) [-]
Except you aren't dealing with "infinite energy", you're dealing instead with a 100% efficient system. This system, without outside intervention or influence, should have a constant total energy content, but this content is definitely finite. Also, by making the system not closed (not sure if open is the right word) by adding rainwater, you pretty much discount it from being a 100% efficient system since more kinetic energy is being added by the rainwater. And it's cool, we're all here to learn.
User avatar #45 to #43 - ninjawildcat (04/03/2014) [-]
hmm interesting, Thanks for the help.
User avatar #80 - anusraper (04/03/2014) [-]
when i hold my diarhhea in for an hour
#72 - youmotherfather (04/03/2014) [-]
when finally getting a bj after a month
when finally getting a bj after a month
User avatar #52 - Stansnowman (04/03/2014) [-]
me after eating at Taco Bell
User avatar #23 - naruzumono ONLINE (04/03/2014) [-]
Am I the only one who wants to jump in it?
#56 to #23 - anon (04/03/2014) [-]
yes. I prefer not to die.
#100 - spidermanthred has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #82 - thijsofbodom (04/03/2014) [-]
not masturbating for 2 days
#75 - oryx (04/03/2014) [-]
**oryx rolled image**

My face when I held it all day
#73 - anon (04/03/2014) [-]
**anonymous rolled image** I wanna jump inside that thing right ******* now
#66 - goblincocks (04/03/2014) [-]
**goblincocks rolled image** MFW I hold it in all day.
#9 - threeeighteen has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #14 to #9 - nativninja (04/03/2014) [-]
okay... whats out of curiosity there?
Leave a comment
 Friends (0)