**** like this is exactly why I'm always polite to the elderly. I can imagine them thinking "This snot nosed little ******* acting like a right cocksicunt. **** it, I've only 6 months to live, I'll twat him."
Imagine if someone made two theme accounts of those two and one started commenting something and the other would reply with a joke.
do you thing it would be worth the thumbs?
#1 rule they teach in art school - at least the ones I have been in contact with.
"Less is more"
The more you can show with the simpler the image, the better your work is. Of course it's not always applicable, many great things are all about complexity. But it's true for a lot of cases.
Of course. But I mainly worked on designs, particularly ads, posters, commercials overall - and that rule is true there more often than not.
What I personally believe is that great works are great regardless of what rules they did or did not follow. I usually make very detailed works, so there's that. Unquestioningly believing into what they teach you is understandable when you're studying math - but not art.
Art has its rules. I didn't say it didn't have rules. It's just more complicated than that.
I think that less is more in a general way. It's a thing about balance. You want as much depth and richness as possible while avoiding needless length and complexity.
For instance, in narrative you want as few events as possible in one sense (as in: you don't want to clog/bury your story in irrelevant details/events), but in another sense you truly want to be as detailed as possible when it comes to pertaining to your point.
In terse manner, I would say a general aesthetic rule to bear in mind for creative people is: concise unity.
You're overthinking the subject. It's art. You can say anything you want in any way you want. Some great writers are some major trash-talkers, with overly-extended descriptions of nature - and still no one questions their greatness.
There really is no rules to pure, free art. It doesn't even have to reach to people. If it's a form of expression, it's art. To some art is a foam piece of **** put on an exhibition srsly, that happened and to others it's the ceiling in Sistine Chapel. But even the Michelangelo himself hated painting that ceiling, because to him painting is an inferior for of art. It's that elastic of a topic.
To some one thing is great art, to others is awful - but it still counts as art, because art is subjective in its very nature.
Rules apply only when you want to have practical uses for it, and even then it's mostly a matter of how much you think will get through before someone decides it's too much. Rules are made by people you're working for, but when you're working for yourself, just because you want to, there's no limits to art, none at all.
This. His delivery totally sold it. He started out making it sound like he had a genuine infatuation, and at that point in the story, he probably did. Then, he changed to a more surprised tone, and then a humorous, "I can laugh at it know" kind of mood. The genius in this is that he expressed the emotions throughout in a way that would make us relate to the experience if we were to go through something similar.