10/10 would do.
| |
Anonymous comments allowed.
44 comments displayed.
#5
-
penileburglar (07/11/2015) [-] Frankly, I think they should have been in trouble even if they had successfully taken all the cameras down.
I mean, if you're the police and what you're doing is legal, you should WANT security footage. That alone means they knew they ****** up.
I mean, if you're the police and what you're doing is legal, you should WANT security footage. That alone means they knew they ****** up.
#10 to #8
-
penileburglar (07/11/2015) [-] ...Unless you were joking, you have a fundamental misunderstanding of how a security camera system works.
#31 to #9
-
majordraco (07/12/2015) [-] They took the DVR confiscated also, this was an independent camera system. The found, main DVR was wiped.
#11
-
instalation (07/11/2015) [-] "It was an unavoidable mistake, there was no way we could have known there was actually pot in what we ate."
#30
-
skeletorexplains ONLINE (07/12/2015) [-] I remember seeing this **** on the ******* Drunken peasants.
I was completely ******* disgusted. Especially that ******* bitch cop.
"I was going to kick her in the nub if he she didn't get out"- Bitch Cop talking about a woman who had both her ******* legs amputated that was in the store.
They destroyed video evidence (As much as possible) took the computers and then spent the next few hours playing ******* darts. I really hope these idiots go to jail.
I was completely ******* disgusted. Especially that ******* bitch cop.
"I was going to kick her in the nub if he she didn't get out"- Bitch Cop talking about a woman who had both her ******* legs amputated that was in the store.
They destroyed video evidence (As much as possible) took the computers and then spent the next few hours playing ******* darts. I really hope these idiots go to jail.
#16
-
comicfun (07/12/2015) [-]
Fired, forced to pay for damage to the door, the equipment, items they ate, sent to jail and publicly shamed for what they did.
If it were up to me, that's what I'd do to those police officers,
If it were up to me, that's what I'd do to those police officers,
#42 to #33
-
instalation (07/12/2015) [-] They're police officers. I'd be surprised if they didn't get out scottfree.
#24
-
nimba (07/12/2015) [-] >licensing issue
>immediately escalate
>add element of danger because COPZ
USA USA USA
>immediately escalate
>add element of danger because COPZ
USA USA USA
#18
-
yetisixnineonesix (07/12/2015) [-] **yetisixnineonesix used "*roll picture*"**
**yetisixnineonesix rolled image** Rolling relevant picture dear sweet science I hope
**yetisixnineonesix rolled image** Rolling relevant picture dear sweet science I hope
#20 to #19
-
yetisixnineonesix (07/12/2015) [-] I believe it's from Kiki's Delivery Service, directed by Hayao Miyazaki.
#12
-
GmCity ONLINE (07/11/2015) [-] This is why one of our clients has their cam footage backed up to a remote location automatically.
Even if you go in and trash the server as soon as an error/alarm is triggered it all starts streaming offsite.
Even if you go in and trash the server as soon as an error/alarm is triggered it all starts streaming offsite.
#6 to #2
-
ssjkirby ONLINE (07/11/2015) [-] Yes, but its a lot harder to control.
You have to wait between 30-120 minutes before it kicks in fully. It is really easy to get too high or be high for too long.
When you smoke or vap you get high faster and it doesn't last as long, so it is faster to sober up if you want.
Some people freak out when they get too high, so edibles are bad for them.
You have to wait between 30-120 minutes before it kicks in fully. It is really easy to get too high or be high for too long.
When you smoke or vap you get high faster and it doesn't last as long, so it is faster to sober up if you want.
Some people freak out when they get too high, so edibles are bad for them.
#7 to #6
-
dzeusas (07/11/2015) [-] Edibles should be used when you know that you won't need to be sober that day. If you take it easy, and estimate how potent they will be it's not hard to have a good time.
They do have a much more intense effect and it last much longer so if you have too much it might end up being a bad experience.
One friend once had like twice the amount everyone else had and he just went to sleep for like 8 hours and then woke up with major case of muchies and ate everything he found in the fridge. But he's notorious for eating non-stop anyway so I don't know if that can be blamed on the pot.
They do have a much more intense effect and it last much longer so if you have too much it might end up being a bad experience.
One friend once had like twice the amount everyone else had and he just went to sleep for like 8 hours and then woke up with major case of muchies and ate everything he found in the fridge. But he's notorious for eating non-stop anyway so I don't know if that can be blamed on the pot.
#34
-
srskate (07/12/2015) [-] Well to start, it has not yet been proven that what the officers ate were edibles. Secondly, the officers have not "gotten away" with anything. There is currently an ongoing investigation into, first and foremost, if they actually did anything wrong. And this is coming from a site called "the cannabist," which you would assume to be biased the other way.
www.thecannabist.co/2015/06/12/videos-pot-raid-santa-ana-california/36032/
www.thecannabist.co/2015/06/12/videos-pot-raid-santa-ana-california/36032/
#35 to #34
-
discobleach ONLINE (07/12/2015) [-] riddle me this, what do you think is sold as edible in a cannabis clinic? it wouldn't be edibles, perchance, would it??
>if they did anything wrong
taking down security cameras doesn't qualify? neither does showing contempt for disabled people? please.
>if they did anything wrong
taking down security cameras doesn't qualify? neither does showing contempt for disabled people? please.
#37 to #35
-
srskate (07/12/2015) [-] So you are a hundred percent sure that what they ate in that video not only came from the store, but are edibles. They aren't snacks the officers had anyway?
and are you sure that removing surveillance cameras is illegal?
I have a large amount of doubt as of right now, so I'm glad we have a legal process to prove to me within reasonable doubt what happened.
and are you sure that removing surveillance cameras is illegal?
I have a large amount of doubt as of right now, so I'm glad we have a legal process to prove to me within reasonable doubt what happened.
#38 to #37
-
discobleach ONLINE (07/12/2015) [-] judging from their behavior, and stuff they said like 'what flavor?' followed by laughter, it's not objectively proven that it was edibles but it's pretty damn obvious.
destroying security cameras is property damage, and it's not something they needed to do to carry out their investigation; they were obviously trying to cover their tracks. there was no information they could get by means of taking down security cameras since the footage is stored elsewhere.
proving they did something criminal may be hard, but it's undeniable that it was morally reprehensible. no prison for them maybe, but they should be relieved of their duties immediately. as a cop, a person the community is supposed to look up to, you don't take jabs at the disabled. you just don't.
destroying security cameras is property damage, and it's not something they needed to do to carry out their investigation; they were obviously trying to cover their tracks. there was no information they could get by means of taking down security cameras since the footage is stored elsewhere.
proving they did something criminal may be hard, but it's undeniable that it was morally reprehensible. no prison for them maybe, but they should be relieved of their duties immediately. as a cop, a person the community is supposed to look up to, you don't take jabs at the disabled. you just don't.
#39 to #38
-
srskate (07/12/2015) [-] Well, they've already been relieved of their duties. They've been put on administrative leave while the investigation occurs, therefore not allowing them to keep up their corruption if they did in fact eat the edibles, but not forcing them out of a job if the evidence turns out to be insufficient. As for the cameras, I don't think police are usually charged with property damage while doing a raid, but I guess it could be proven that taking down the cameras was unnecessary to the raid and a case could be made from there. Ultimately though, it comes down to the lawyers and the experts to decide, and this post is just spreading unsubstantiated claims.
Sidenote: I don't actually get why a raid was needed in the first place. There are other ways to close down a business.
Sidenote: I don't actually get why a raid was needed in the first place. There are other ways to close down a business.
#40 to #39
-
discobleach ONLINE (07/12/2015) [-] i don't get why a raid was necessary either, but in that respect i will actually give them the benefit of the doubt.
#27
-
fuckingtrolls (07/12/2015) [-] 
The forgot to add the part where they threatened to kick a disabled person's "handicapped ass"
#17 to #13
-
refundable (07/12/2015) [-]
Damn that mantis is about to suffocate. I love killing the crew while the ship stays intact. Much better rewards.
